Understanding Leadership in Non-profit Organization: A Case Study of WALHI.

IINDERSTANDINC Lf,,AI}ERTIEIP IN NON.PROFIT

ORGANIZATION:
A CASE STIIITY OT WALTII

T!6ir
Thesis is

slbnitted

Unddgndde Deg@

6 a pdrial tnf runt
in Manag.mnt

ofthe

rcqttendtfu

an


D.pdttue,tt F@krofE@honics

AI,FAJRI AI,W$
03 152 053

MANAGEMENT DEPARTI!8M
T'ACTJLTY OF DCONOMTCS

ANDAI,AS IJNIVT,RSITY
PADANC

a)

lalpatlll Lalir

llulittinlAir2l 09

1935

Ndra Oare lua: Alwis dar In*dy B.nar

c) r.liullas: tkononi d)J!rustu Vdxtcmcn
ll Tmqsd Lulus: l 5 Juli 2003
3) Prediket LulN: Smeal Menuasku |)IPK]r.l9
ll l.,nM Sn l:,1 lahrn 5 rlrh.
k),^lharOra gTu:Jl. Sejri Dalm Nl, l5 B Ruliuimg,
Uidc6r.ndiiA lfldcFh I if Noi-proft O(mialnrr:
A Car srudyoawAl lll
Alfi ri ,4lpis. Tlrcsis SrNnier: DR l,uckv Aminrrto M S€.Sc
b)

'r[osn

rr:-

by:

h.s dldc \4h,n r+ulir corponrionr or ptrblic s(ror orgiiiztions h dic
ch on hadcah4, irrhc mtr F)fir olga,t"liorr ri6 bo$ sarcc.ven
r.1$ rncs. o4otili.is plA a" ii,podr pd h soioly and the e.onomr a sell. li is arlmd ihrt
€=.Ehip ln NPOS is diferem fro a profir o.gantiri.i due ro rhc ditltrcnccs mong rhe*

-iiialions. fte resemch queslion olrhislhesisislhereforer "what rre 6e readenhlprola. rcldcArrip
1:rr md iead.Nhip siyre rhar leadfls s wAl-llr adof" 1lr obiecrivc orrr,is rcsqret' is ro hrvc rn
.:rEi ding ol leadeBhip !ylc, lorde^hip rulc rnd leadsship lkin trrd dommmd! Il.dom'd il
; \Lllr Tlir ftrmh is I d*cipiive rcserfh rr,! d.\.nh.\;divdua( i,, rtldr! Jx)iirilD s bchavior
.edcship

{sc.(h

i r(

y compring the iact ihn cctrrJd *irh rhc disry rlrd etarul ro rhe
tr*d r.r ..LrccrinS rhc rrimaw dah ot rhis re*amh m inrdie*s ud
lved *erc rtu
l€dcd in rhc orssn;llioi had s high rclalionship
'n domimrt leadeGhif stales $rr strt,p.ni,,g d
aod mrdJlc ( loq {ask bchrvlor. Thcf
lrtrons lilh exren'l .orniluenci.s. md reaD
3ar rhcir domintr( sltils w.r. commtnnaiion ski|, iEiag.ncnr sli i d n,oriv n! and

:!r.si


Thesis 1€l.n

- n(d
!1\'or

Mdhodr (rEr

r.ln,

d

n

dip€rbnoko di deptr sidin8

dnn

dinyxhknr trh6 ladx


rbg!:l:

sdxitri.rl rrn!ui

kL
Iri sl

. -1r\l.lah M.nJrllark.F,ktrlris'lrnndsnis,^idslx\,l,ltl
Pc,
l l,ulL.rrni\eriL \nJriir
'!J

CIIA}TER

1

INTRODIJCTION

U tlol,l.n


B.cLsrcund

Toda, mmy successffn bad€rs cm be foud in the business world. Bill
Meg Whilrna4

WalM Brfiel md Inew KmPtzd G jut

a

ftw €xdpl6

ilnduls kbo hau. b.m tLisl ) rucce.sEl in then Rsp4uve o€danoG
- rt bNin€ss mdd 4 a whole. WlDl l€addhlp chffa.rdistica ad strl€s
blls in

sMessfin olgeiatiotu posess

le!d6 hd

for a long line


did nol begin

b.hshjD

utl

have nad

ad

rbd demine hov well

*t

@

n€

irb! is a


ri.g

eFedvm6s.

rd

behavios, souces of powd
a

lsder cm

10

rest4h

Eseeheu have bied b

dd


4p€cts ol lhe

innDen@ his or h€r foUowes

seclor

md the

broad

non

ed

hsve

that

e


oryeialionsl foms

prcfir salor. Tn€ prcfil

conpmy rhar sdves for pmnt

lbd

sto.,

Res@ch aboul

over lime. Tne f@us of the

dkiqrished into 1ntr

s'tor, the public

iE


h.come

obifttiv€s for the orsmizalior.

Ogmization

td

lley

the twediel! c€ntury md ditrercnt alprcaches

- ddmine he le.de6ti!

tle

how did

bm bsed or speulation,

vfyins popul ity

g,n r rnirs, abililies,

ed

llHiniation md h6

m inrrq in div'd6.ls ft. prblic sato' corsiqb or

oMed by ln€

sovmdt &d 6nded

by laks. Iinally,

or8tuizLions moReD deciakd wiLh harins a $cial mision.

lb. ovimmenL sistins

elder

ly p@ple or leedins lhe homeless

Iibds
t

in Ldson md SlorhmE (2008) dgues dBr one tundmental

tween a profit

do.s

dd

the

orgbialion dd

s

NPO is ihe rcquirenent for

mmbd. Mey naases tlEt have Doved Eon a prcfit

inlo a leadins position wiihin m NPO nave

rb MbeE qhel ryirs

fed

sreat oppositio!

to adoF his or hd ladeanip s_yle. Tlis

r

Lte

chmtrnqLic or NPOS md aigD6

LlEr

iD wilhin tnis orernialional fom is a im-vay pGess.

The

by Jo4.or ib

Issor

iq

i taue E d hrd
..tr?-o&tl omb6

le5d

d s o,hmus ()00E who e.pha

eDral

!y nrling

decisions at netings, throusb debat€

&d

eye of tne opedtions. At lne sme tjne the meDbes N atreded by th€
--,I
r-d heoffis ed a€livilies llat N ililialed hy ihe bmae6. Egrj ed
(2002) al$ nention that ther is a lds€ diflerence between pDfir
b
..tF,r@ dd non prott oreeianion in Es ds 10 ihc'r peBonally

-*isti6

or teadsship

skil.

DeFnjne fion thse difeMces, theE is thu a r€Mn ro b€lieve that

H6hip

wuld look diffcrent

dep€ndjng on wbat tlTe of

l&sbjp resNh b6 nsde wfthi!
AEizaoG

orsmizatjoN 0{POt h6 b€d
part itr s@i€ty md the

Ite d8ue

b

dai of

Er'oft

a

s

brcushl

folMd

prc6r orgdiztion due

orsoizalion.

A

b

is. Mosl

resulr corpondons o. lublio s6to.

in the buin$s world. Howver, the

-Fo6t
trt a iopoi{l

orsmiatior it

sce

re*Nh

even

on leadeshi! in the

6ougl rbes olsuiations

€onony 6 wllslates that leadeship in NPOS
1h€

dilfeMt pEonditiotu

queslior that one

h d'fdent

rhar exisl

6 d dh is l]1en hor

i!

a

!o be e

CHAI'TER VI
CONCI-IJSION. CONTRIBUIION AND FURTSER RESEARCH

Re@her
prc6t orgeiztion
question

*6;

hav€ provided

l@k

m u.derst

like, lhich

nding for

ho{

the leadmhip in no.

this thesis The Esedh

R$ lhe pu+o$ if

how does lhe leade6hip in successlul N?Os look like,

dd

whal

d!ale€nt leade^hip styles, rolcs and skill cd be found? The intetiews rcsearhe.

h6

nade with thd dircclor ex-uriv€s al eighr diftercnt omces ol WALHI have hclped

€saEher to unded;nd the *ay $e lqdes

e

wo.king lowads deir cmplovees at

WALHI. Thc conclusion hs bee. dirided inlo Nd frain parts, the fiftconcludesm
undeBlanding aboul rhe leadcrship al

w

LHl. and the o$cr pan discDss* thal

implications Esdcher findings could hale lor NPOS in
chapter

6.1

it will p€*nt d the cdntribulion 6 vell

IstteBhip

in

d

gendl rn$eendofthe

SiYinC suggcaion for tu'1her

WALIII

Th€ lode6hip styles usd 3t VALHI wos delemine,l bv a 161 creared bv

Heey & Blochtd (1981) Thc
orsaniarion had

a

hisn

domin{t leadeship
lhe

Fb

styles

l€d6 om opinion

rhoueht lhal n

rcsults lhar Eceived wee that all

oship behavior ed middle

10

b*

lsde6

i'

the

rask behavio. Tneir

wec suppoding ed coaching This wts ako in line wnh
d p€Gpdlite oflhen

w6 imporht lo empo*ei

om hadc6hip, where

tho emploles

4

well

tlrc

14d6

s inflnenc' d

'14

REFNRNNCES

i$Sadeq, Ilaan A & Khou'f, Cnre C, 2006, L$de.ship slyles in rIe
Prledinirn |fgescale indu{ri.l enlerprises. Ihc loumiL of Management
DevciDpnr.nt. avaiLbLe rr:

unoddr.b.d'd I 4

lrli

&sid

8&rT 18.

elrlJ

64099&ROT=309&Vl Jame=POD
Blanchard. KeD. 1003.

Lcidenhip Er..ncnce, 3%ilble

htn:r.ro!uest.0ri.con/podweb?did-1,131 966

I

1

at:

1&sid ?&Fnt 3&clientld=6

,1099&RQT:309&\!$aE!OD

Cl!*son. llmes G., 2001. Le'cl Thre LedoBhip, C.ning Bclo* the Sn.fice,
Sec.nd Edition, NewJereti Prentice Hall.
Cldrcrbuck, Dalid & Sheild Hn!, 2002, Lerdenhip Comn{nicalion
Repo.t. Joumal oi Communicarion \ianagemenr

Dyn-

Blry & Hurson, Hary, Le,dership in Nonp.olit Or8,niztions,
br&lbeebeorst q!!rrl!!r!l9!i-b1QE

alailable all

53onaC&orintse-liontcover&do=Dfl ckc+PctedF+l 1990J.+%E2%30%9C
Msnasjnq+the+non.oit+or€an jzat jor%L2%80%9D.+Ham(Colliis+Prblish
e6&lr&hl=id&sie OU!,1B6ti!qqt qLtlS0bxTkitre&ro-vq22Mmeine+t
lro

Egn.

fiL I

Orcr izariun%22&\outuF

h..k .n3ri.n1 r&. {r

llPPPT

Cd.lli

R. & Susd llern , 2002, Leadenbip ln Tb€ ND.rh Anericnn
Envirodentrl Sector: V.lu6, L€deBhip Style & CoDlexi of
Enviromcnr,l LudcB rn'l Their O.grnizaiion. The Acrdemy ol
Ma.agcmcnt Journal.

. & Do..ld L. Laurie, 1997, Tb€ Work oI
arsiness Review on LedeNhip.

H€ilaL. Ro.nld

Lsde6hip, Hdard

h(p:/id.wikipedir.orqlwiki/Wahana Lin0kunlan HiJup Ind.nelir

hnpt/sv.*€lhi.or.id/nlkmi/nrofi I wlh/
h(p //lr,rw Rrlhi dr id/tlqkrfri/cabaid walhi/

hn.r/w.cns.*.hi.or.idhekami/pror salhi end