Jurnal Vol.2 No.2.pdf

1 Comprehension

2 Developing Vocabulary Materials Based on Picture Media for Autistic

Students of SMP Negeri 3 Lamongan

3 Analysis of Code Switching in English Speaking Class A Case Study of English Education

Department of Islamic University of Lamongan in Academic Year 2015/2016

4 An Analysis of Character to Reveal The Theme in A Novel Bound Written By Okky

Madasari

5 Developing Speaking Materials Based On Traditional Javanese Games For The

Students Of Senior High School In Indonesia

6 A Morphological Study On English Compound Words Found In Globeasia Magazine

On May 2015 Edition

7 A Study of Language Variation Used by The Fishermen in TPI Brondong

Lamongan

8 Penggunaan Media Kartu Bergambar untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar

Siswa Pada Materi Jenis-Jenis Usaha dan Kegiatan Ekonomi di Indonesia Mata Pelajaran IPS

9 Peningkatan Kemampuan Mengidentifikasi Unsur Cerita Melalui

Pendekatan Whole Language Siswa Kelas V SDN Kramat II Lamongan

10 Designing Reading Assessment: Perceptive, Selective, Interactive, and

Extensive Reading

11 English For Specific Purposes At Non-English Department Students To

Encounter The Asean Community Era

Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan

UNIVERSITAS ISLAM LAMONGAN

JURNAL PENDIDIKAN DAN PEMBELAJARAN

REFORMA

FAKULTAS KEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN Vol 2, No 2, November 2016

DEWAN REDAKSI

Penanggung Jawab

: Rektor Universitas Islam Lamongan

Ketua Penyunting

: Madekhan, MSi

Wakil Ketua Penyunting

: Mohamad Nurman, SPd. MPd.

Penyunting Pelaksana

: Dian Lutfiyanti, SPd. MPd.

Husen, S.Ag. MPd. Drs. Syarif Hidayatullah Diah Astuty, MPd. Ryrin Fatmawati, MPd. Tiara Retno H., MPd.

Penyunting Ahli

: Drs. Tsalis Fahmi, MM.

R. Chusnu Yuli S. MPd, Fathurrahman, MM Hariyanto, SPd. M.IP M. Faizal Mubarok, MPd.

Abdullah Farih, M.Pd

PENERBIT KANTOR

Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Islam Lamongan

Gedung A Universitas Islam Lamongan Jl. Veteran No. 53 A Lamongan Telp. (0322)324706/ 317116.

Email: [email protected]

Mengutip ringkasan dan pernyataan atau mencetak ulang gambar atau tabel dari

jurnal ini harus mendapatkan ijin langsung dari penulis. Jurnal ini diedarkan sebagai tukaran untuk perguruan tinggi, lembaga penelitian dan perpustakaan di

dalam negeri.

DAFTAR ISI

1 Comprehension

Reciprocal Teaching Teachnique to Improve the Students‟ Reading

Developing Vocabulary Materials Based on Picture Media for Autistic

14 Students of SMP Negeri 3 Lamongan

Analysis of Code Switching in English Speaking Classa Case Study of

23 English Education Department of Islamic University of Lamongan in Academic Year 2015/2016

An Analysis of Character to Reveal the Theme in A Novel Bound

31 Written by Okky Madasari

Developing Speaking Materials Based on Traditional Javanese Games

38 for The Students of Senior High School in Indonesia

46 Globeasia Magazine on May 2015 Edition

A Morphological Study on English Compound Words Found in

51 Brondong Lamongan

A Study of Language Variation Used by The Fishermen in TPI

Penggunaan Media Kartu Bergambar untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar

58 Siswa Pada Materi Jenis-Jenis Usaha dan Kegiatan Ekonomi di Indonesia Mata Pelajaran IPS

Peningkatan Kemampuan

70 MelaluiPendekatan Whole Language Siswa Kelas VSDN Kramat II Kecamatan Lamongan

Designing Reading Assessment: Perceptive, Selective, Interactive, and

85 Extensive Reading

English For Specific Purposes at Non-English Department Students to

92 Encounter the Asean Community Era

Reciprocal Teaching Teachnique to Improve the Students’ Reading Comprehension FITA FARIDAH

Email address: [email protected]

Abstract :

This present study is conducted in order to improve the Students’ Reading Comprehension through Reciprocal Teaching Technique. There are four strategies that make up reciprocal teaching (predict, question, clarify, and summarize). The writer focuses on descriptive text to help students’ reading comprehension In this research, the writer uses an action design which is call classroom action research. The action research involved some steps called as cycles. The cycle process in this research study referred to the model of action research proposed by Kemmis and McTaggart Burns (2010:9). Each cycle has four stages: planning, implementing, observing, and reflecting. The researcher was done into two cycles. The result of the study indicates the students were active during the implementation of the strategy in the Cycle II probably because of several reasons. In second cycle, the students were more manageable and active than before. They did these techniques faster and faster. Besides, the improvement was not only in the teaching learning process but also the scores in the reading task. Based on each component of reading comprehension’s scores, the writer concluded that they were able to find the appropriate main idea, vocabulary better than before.

Introduction

among most readers in a community (called the common ground). At more global

levels, the reader needs to identify the extremely important, it gives the big

structure, plot, contribution to students to perform their

genre,

rhetorical

prespective of different characters, communication skill better. In their daily

narrator, theme, story point, and life, students are always related to the

sometimes the attitude of the author. By written or printed words, for instance: text

reaching good reading comprehension, books,

the students can catch the information announcements, letters, even advertise-

magazines,

newspapers,

given by the writer well. In junior high ment. According to McNamara (2007:3-4)

school, reading skill has a big role the states deep comprehension of the

students learn reading the majority of the sentences requires the construction of

material is reading passage. In the final referents of nouns, a discourse focus,

national examination, the students are presuppositions, and plausible inferences.

given text in order to answer the The reader needs to distinguish given

questions. In the classroom, the teacher versus new information in the text and

must create the situation that can implicitly acknowledge what is shared

encourage

students‟ reading students‟ reading

in the classroom. Those problems are Understanding

barrier for students to improve their constructed from print is essential if

reading skill. Thus, based on reality, the teachers

teacher needs a new strategy of learning comprehension of their students (Tovani,

reading text activity in order to students 2000:17). It means that students learn

become active, enjoy and comprehend through catching

about the main point of reading text. growing

the information,

Based on the reasons above, remembering

English teachers should have several knowledge, and getting the new

their

background

methods and techniques, so the students knowledge from the passage they have

achieve the goal of learning. The writerr read. Comprehension is more than a

using one of techniques to improve matter of reading the words. It needs to

students‟ reading comprehension. The involve the reader in actively making

technique is named reciprocal teaching, decisions, solving problems, and using

which has been developed by Annemarie background knowledge in an attempt to

Pallinscar and Ann Brown in 1984. make sense of the passage. Based on

Acording to Oczkus (2011:11) there are reason above, reading comprehension is

four strategies that make up reciprocal the process of making meaning from text.

teaching (predict, question, clarify, and The goal is an overall understanding of

summarize). The steps consist of four what is described in the text rather than to

steps as followed:

obtain meaning from isolated words or

a. Prediction

sentences. Whereas, teaching reading When predicting, students comprehension is not easy. The problems

The use language of prediction such as: appeared during the teacher is reading the

(I predict......, I think......, I’ll bet......) text, the students just listen and repeat the

The use clues from the text to help form teacher‟s reading but they do not

predictions and evidence from the text understand what is convey in the reading

illustrations to support text that is read by teacher. In this

and/or

predictions.

condition, teacher do es not build students‟ (I predict......because......) background knowledge what the reading

The use prior knowledge about the text initially. After finishing read of the

topic or from experience to help make text, the teacher asks the student to

logical predictions.

translate the text, only a few students (I predict ......because ......) doing the task. In addition, while

Check predictions after reading to see if translating the text, only a few students

they make sense.

come to the teacher‟s desk and ask the

Metacognition

difficult word, but not for other. They Tell steps to predicting. would rather talk with their friends than

(When I predict I......)

finish their task. In this case, students and Tell how predicting helps them teacher

understand what they have read.

Metacognition

Tell steps to clarifying. When questioning, the students

b. Questioning

(When I clarify I...)

The use the language of questioning Tell how clarifying helps them with question words such as (who, what,

understand what they have read

when, where, why, or how)

Ask logical “wonders” before reading

d. Summarization

based on clues from the text. (I When summarizing, students wonder...)

The use the language of summarizing. Ask literal and higher level thinking

(This part is about..., The most important questions after reading.

ideas in this text are...)

Metacognition Reread to summarize main events or Tell steps to questioning (When I

important ideas from the text. question I...)

Include only main events or important Tell how questioning helps them

ideas.

understand what they have read. Tell main events or important ideas in order.

The use some vocabulary from the text. When clarifying, students

c. Clarification

Metacognition

The use the language of clarifying. Tell steps to summarizing. (I didn’t get.....(confusion), so I......strategy

(When I summarize I...) used to repair comprehension).

Tell how summarizing helps them Identify words that are difficult to

understand what they have read. pronounce or understand.

teaching technique The use a variety of strategies to

Reciprocal

becomes an instructional procedure understand the words, including

designed to enhance students‟ reading finding “chunks” they know, sounding

comprehension of a text. In other words, out the words, using syllables, and

the teacher is an instructor for the process, rereading.

explaining and drawing a conclusion about the text together with the students.

Tell how they clarified a difficult

The writer focuses on descriptive text to

help students‟ reading comprehension. Identify sentences, pages, or ideas that

word.

According to Anderson and Anderson need clarifying.

(1998:26), “Descriptive text describes The use a variety of strategies to

particular person, place, or t hings.” It understand the parts, such as

means that it is designed specifically rereading, reading on, or talking to

about a person, a place, or things. someone to figure out the parts of the

Based on the reasons and the text that confused them.

findings of some previous studies about Identify confusions (words, parts, or

the benefit of using cartoon film as a ideas) and the strategies that they used

teaching media, the researcher observed to repair comprehension.

the application of using cartoon film by the application of using cartoon film by

second is the reciprocal teaching Taman. This research was proposed to

technique to improve students‟ reading study the following problem:

comprehension in terms of descriptive

text. The last is the result of the students‟ implemented

1. How is reciprocal

technique

learning reading comprehension at the seventh grade of

comprehension at the seventh grade (C SMP N 1 Sugio?

class) of SMP Negeri 1 Sugio. The research

design that would be suitable to apply in contribute to students‟ improvement in

this research is Classroom Action reading comprehension at the seventh

Research (CAR). According to Kemmis grade of SMP N 1 Sugio?

and Mc Taggart (1998) this action research was conducted through the following

Furthermore, the writer uses procedure: (1) preliminary study to know classroom action to develop in this

the real problem face the students, (2) research. It is necessary to carry out a

implementing, (4) study in which the problem has to be

planning,

observation, (5) reflection. In this research, clearly specified, an action plan has to be

the writer planned to conduct two cycles described and carried out, and finally an

of classroom action research. evaluation can completed clearly in the

Based on the research design classroom. According to Ary (2010:512)

above, there are four steps in each cycle: states that action research is about taking

observing, and action based on research and researching

planning,

acting,

reflecting. After, the writer and the the action taken. It can be used to enhance

students accomplish cycle I, and then everyday work practices, to resolve

there might be found a new problem. specific problems, and to develop special

They have to continue the next cycle with projects and programs. One of the aims of

the same phase of the first cycle. Here are classroom action research is improve the

the descriptions in every phase. teaching practice and in the long run. So in this study the writer can use a strategy

Preliminary study

which can solve the problems that happen Before planning the action, the to improve reading comprehension in the

writer conducted a preliminary study to classroom.

identify and analyze the problem that should be solved. The writer interviewed

Method

English teacher at seventh grade with 10 questions. They are the general condition

This study is conducted at SMP in English class especially in reading class, Negeri 1 Sugio around April until May

the difficulty faced by students in reading 2016. The school is located at Jalan Raya

ability, and the strategy used by the Sugio, Kecamatan Sugio Lamongan. The

teacher to solve students‟ difficulties in first, The subject of the study is the

reading ability.

seventh grade (F class) students of SMP seventh grade (F class) students of SMP

Planning phase

technique, the first step is dividing the In this phase, the writer make

students into five groups. In each group designing lesson plan, preparing the

consist of five or six people. Then, the model of reciprocal technique, and

writer giving a descriptive text for each determining criteria of success. The

member of the group. The teacher guide organized planning formed into lesson

the students to do the four steps of plan based on the research used syllabus

reciprocal technique.

at that school and designs the project or The first step (prediction), the activity that she has been planned for

writer built their background knowledge students by preparing lesson plan and

and their prediction about the reading applying lesson at the seventh grade (C

text‟s title. She started by asked students class) at SMP Negeri 1 Sugio. The lesson

whether they had known or ever heard planning

about text. “What is your prediction of the procedures, media, and resources in every

text ?”. After that, second step cycle.

(questioning), the writer gave opportunity The next step is preparing the

students to ask some words about their model of reciprocal technique. The writer

difficult. The third step (clarifying), the using descriptive text to improve reading

about students‟ comprehension in this technique. There

writer

clarify

comprehension of the text. After are steps that is prediction, question,

comprehending and understanding about clarification and summarization.

the text, the last step (summary) the writer The criteria of the action success,

and the students made a summary of the when there are 75% numbers of students

text orally. In reciprocal teaching could achieve some improvement scores

technique, the writer allowed the students from the reading task 1 until the reading

to look up the dictionary. Then, the writer task 2 in cycle two and/or they could pass

asks the students finished the exercise. the score of the minimum criterion score

To complete the research, the writer (KKM). The KKM that must fulfill

conducted observations during and after considering reading subject is 75 (seventy-

the learning process. The activities were as five). If the criterion of the action success

follows:

1. Observing the situation during the the classroom action research would be

reached, it means that the next action of

learning process when the students stopped, but if the criteria has not met the

discuss and it was record by using field criteria of success, the alternative action

note.

would be done in the next cycle.

2. Conducting the reading task for the The second phase, the writer to

students.

carry out based on arranged the action. It

3. Analyzing the result of the students starts the process of learning the issue

reading task score.

being researched. In this phase the writer

4. Comparing the result of the tests on the conduct learning teaching process and

students‟ improvement after the implementing the technique. In the students‟ improvement after the implementing the technique. In the

teaching technique. “Do you know or ever In collecting the data, the writer

reciprocal teaching used two techniques. The first data were a

heard

about

technique?”, “What is reciprocal teaching numerical data. The data were taken from

technique?”. Since nobody knew about the students‟ score of reading task in the

reciprocal teaching technique, then she last session of the technique. The second

gave short explanation of reciprocal data were a verbal data, the data were

teaching technique. The explanation taken students‟ participation during the

of reciprocal implementation of Reciprocal Teaching

concluded

definition

teaching technique, the purpose of Technique. The data were obtained from

technique and the interview and field note.

reciprocal teaching

descriptive text to each student. In this phase is carried out after the writer

In cycle 1, the writer gave have finished the action, then realize and

instruction to the students to make five find about the problem appeared when

groups. Later, the writer implemented the the plan has been implemented. In this

step of reciprocal teaching technique. case, if there still might have found

Then, the writer gave a descriptive text for problems and the criteria that decided has

each member of the group. The writer not reached yet. It means reciprocal

guided the students to do the four steps of teaching technique cannot increase the

reciprocal technique. The first step students‟

(prediction), the writer built their Consequently, the writer has to prepared

reading

comprehension.

knowledge and their and arranged for the next cycle

background

prediction about the reading text‟s title. She started by asked students whether

Result and Discussion

they had known or ever heard about text.

“What is your prediction of the text ?”.

Finding from Cycle 1

After that, second step (questioning), the In this cycle the writer used two

researcher gave opportunity students to desc riptive text entitled “the white

ask some words about their difficult. The house”, and “my pets”. The writer chose

third step (clarifying), the writer clarified descriptive text to make students easier in

about students‟ comprehension of the text. making summary of text. The writer took

After comprehending and understanding

a part as teacher. The first phenomenon about the text, the last step (summary) the was appearing in the teaching and

writer and the students made a summary learning process was the writer start the

of the text orally. In reciprocal teaching class. She began the conversation by

technique, the writer allowed the students greeting the students. Then the writer

to look up the dictionary. Then, the writer continued her class activity by checking

asks the students finished the exercise. students‟ attendance, telling what material

whether the she will be taught and sharing the

To

know

implementation of teaching reading purpose of the lesson. She started the

comprehension by using reciprocal lesson by asked students whether they

teaching technique in cycle 1 was success teaching technique in cycle 1 was success

motivated to solve their difficulty in aspects, the first is evaluation of the

comprehension of the text. As the writer teaching-learning process and the second

notes in her preliminary study, only some is evaluation of students‟ reading

students comprehend the tasks given by comprehension as the result of the

teacher. But at this time the students teaching and learning activity.

comprehend about text by using reciprocal teaching technique.

Evaluation on the Teaching-Learning Process in Cycle 1

Evaluation of Students’ Reading Task 1

In the first stage , the students were The writer gave twenty multiple enthusiastic when the writer started the

choice questions in the reading task 1. In lesson. But the writer felt little

this meeting all of the students listened disappointed because the students still

when they give guide by answering all of noisy. The writer needed more attention,

the questions of task. They also did the because initially some of them did not

task in individual work. want to sit in a group with other friends.

Based on the result of the reading So the writer was hard to emerge

task 1 and field notes which were students‟ motivation to attention of the

obtained by researcher, it can be lesson. The writer divided student become

concluded that many students joined the five groups. The students response about

class enthusiastically. Some the students the implementation reciprocal teaching

can finish this reading task in the first technique. When the writer asked about

cycle. It was to know understanding of the text, they can predict of the text. They

text in students‟ comprehension skill. asked the meaning of difficult words, so

The writer then recorded and the writer helped them to find the

analyzed the result. There were only 11 meaning of words. The researcher helped

students (38% of 7F students) who passed the students clarify to comprehend of text.

the minimum passing criterion score and Finally the writer and the students can

18 students (62% of 7F students) got make summary of the text.

scoreless of 75. The first cycle cannot be Second, the writer found one of the

called success since only 11 students who students still confused with the technique.

passed the minimum criterion score. To make sure that students have comprehended the text, the writer

Reflection on Cycle 1

assigned students to done exercises of the Based on the descriptions of

text. Each group looked compact do the evaluation on the teaching-learning

exercise from the writer. They can finished process and evaluation of students‟ some exercises that given by the writer.

reading test in cycle 1 above, the writer The writer concluded that she had

a conclusion that the to be more selective because the students

make

of reading must gave clear explanation of the

implementation

comprehension by using reciprocal material using

reciprocal teaching reciprocal teaching

the students can be answered, and it conduct cycle 2.

turned for the writer asked about text to the students, the question was “what is

Finding from Cycle 2

the main idea of the text?”, and “How is Since 75% of students had not

the characteristic about the person or reached the minimum passing score yet in

thing?”

During the process of reading, the the first cycle, therefor the writer decided

writer also clarified their question. The to revise her teaching strategy. After

writer gave an opportunity the student to reviewing the previous lesson at the

beginning, the writer started to divide the answer and gave their idea related to the classroom into five groups that the form

text. The writer also allowed the students was as same as with the previous meeting.

to look up the dictionary if they found difficult word. The last, the writer and the

The writer made sure every student could students summarized together the text in

sit well. Then, the writer put the flipchart the first paragraph. This activity was

on the whiteboard. All of the students were curious about the flipchart. The

continued for the next paragraph. After words put in the flipchart as sequence in

understanding the whole text, they reciprocal teaching technique, first

answered some questions related to the prediction, question, clarification, and

text. Then, the writer also invited the students to summarize it together. The

summarization. After that, the writer writer gave a reward for the active

began to explain reading descriptive text students. The last, the writer gave the

through reciprocal teaching technique systematically. After giving the reading

score for the group that did the exercise. text handout to the students, the writer

presented the four steps of reciprocal

Evaluation

teaching technique to read a text. The In this meeting the writer writer appointed the prediction word in

introduced and explained about reciprocal the flipchart on the white board firstly.

teaching technique and gave descriptive Then, the writer let the students predict

text to comprehend of the text easilly. about the title. The writer asked deal with

In the first stage, the classroom students‟ prediction about the title. The

atmosphere in learning process can be question was for insta nce, “what is your

seen the students were more curious and prediction about title?” After predicting

silent. They sit well on their own chair. In about the title, the writer wrote all their

addition, the writer brought a flipchart. prediction on the whiteboard, and then

This condition was easy for the writer to the writer asked the students read the first

explain and give the correction feedback paragraph. Later, the writer appointed the

to the students. In the process of next step, question. Directly, the writer

reciprocal teaching technique, when the offered to the students, the writer asked,

writer let students predict and ask “do you have any question about first

questions, many students raised their paragraph?” In this section, students were questions, many students raised their paragraph?” In this section, students were

task in individual work. In the second stage, the writer

Based on the result of the reading satisfied because the students focused and

task 2 and field notes which were followed the writer instruction. There

obtained by the writer, it can be concluded were no students walked to another table

that many students joined the class and talked with their friends in a group

cooperatively. Some the students can when the writer was explaining the

finish this reading task 2 in the second lesson. The writer also made a cycle. It was give students to trust that

competition among other groups in that they can develop their skill in reading activity in order to they had a spirit to be

through reciprocal the first to ask the question, and gave their

comprehension

teaching technique.

idea, predicted, and looked up their The writer then recorded and dictionary quickly, and gave detailed

analyzed the result. There were 25 opinion about the text. Students were

students (86% of 7F students) who passed active at the classroom. Moreover, they

the minimum criterion score and 4 did

students (14% of 7F students) get score collaboratively and correctly.

the exercises

in

a group

less of 75. It means that all of students The writer concluded that she must

passed the minimum criterion score. checked students‟ works by walking to

Therefore, the second cycle had reached their table and giving the comments. The

the criteria of success.

writer also gave attention students to listen the writers‟ explanation so they can

Reflection on Cycle 2

be understood about the material of this From descriptions of evaluation on lesson. As the writer notes in her study in

teaching-learning process and cycle 1 only some students comprehend

the

studen ts‟ speaking the tasks given by teacher. But at this time

evaluation

of

performance in cycle 2 above, the writer all of students comprehend about text by

a conclusion that the using reciprocal teaching technique.

makes

implementation of teaching reading comprehension by using reciprocal

Evaluation of Studen ts’ Reading Task 2

teaching technique in cycle 2 was success. To evaluate students‟ reading

Thus, the next cycle was not necessary to comprehension, the writer asked students

be implemented. The researcher decided to done reading task 2 in second cycle. It

to stop her research in this cycle 2. was so different like usual, when the writer gave the reading task 2 in second

Discussion

cycle, the students were enthusiastically. In writer‟s opinion, in this the first The writer also gave twenty multiple

cycle left some problems behind. They choice questions in the reading task 2. In

were some components of reading this meeting all of the students listened

main idea, and when they give guide by answering all of

comprehension,

vocabulary. Besides that, the students vocabulary. Besides that, the students

students build their own understanding preparation before delivering their

needed

more

and reading process, the students get questions to their friends. In other words,

more experience and confidence help they always wrote them down before

other students in their group to decode stating them. Beside, the students should

and understand what is being read.

be reminded the kinds of questions types Finally, they share their understanding in reading comprehension. In second

and thinking with the group. In this stage, cycle, the students were more manageable

the students‟ thoughts are shaped through and active than before. They did these

group discussion.

techniques faster and faster. Besides, the improvement was not only in the teaching

The Result of Interview

learning process but also the scores in the The first category discussed about reading task. Based on each component of

the general condition in English class reading c omprehension‟s scores, the

especially in reading class. The teacher writer concluded that they were able to

said that every student has a different find the appropriate

main idea,

attitude when learning English. Most of vocabulary

students who did not like English class Considering that all problems were

because they gained low competence in resolved, the researcher conducted the

English, and still faced obstacle in reading task 1 and 2 to be compared with

following the English lesson. Moreover, the pre reading task.

the teacher stated that most of them were Therefore, the writer concluded

hardly to pass the Minimum Mastery that reciprocal teaching technique is one

Criterion- Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal of the effective techniques which is able to

(KKM). (See item numbers 1, 2 and 3 of improve

Second category discussed about explained reciprocal teaching strategy and

Oczkus

the students‟ difficulties in reading ability. explain how it helps readers understand

The teacher told that reading skill was text. It means that reciprocal teaching

difficult faced by students in learning requires students to work in groups,

English. The teacher mentioned the discussing the material (reading passage)

difficulties for some students in reading through some steps of strategies.

skill because students are confused on The researcher have observed the

finding ideas of text, comprehension of first, students in a group learn with the

text, and less vocabulary. Consequently, members of their group by sharing,

they are lazy to do the task of reading and discussing, and peer tutoring. The second,

lack of their score in passing the Minimum they internalize this knowledge. In

Mastery Criterion- Kriteria Ketuntasan reciprocal teaching, students learn the

Minimal (KKM). (See item numbers 4 and four main strategies throug h the teacher‟s

5 of interview)

modeling and working in cooperative The third category is related to the groups, and they think of the four main

teacher‟s strategy in teaching reading strategies they have learned. The third, the

previously to solve the students‟ previously to solve the students‟

confused. In cycle 2, all of group can read and open dictionary in teaching

predict of the text easly. They also active reading. Teacher used story telling. Up to

in learning process. So,the results of now; the teacher had been looking for an

students in the second cycle better of the alternative way to teach reading and to

results of students in the first cycle. engage students actively in teaching

The second step is Question, learning process. At last, the writer

teacher gave instruction each group to ask proposed to implement reciprocal

about contents of the text. The students technique; it might be able to improve

must find the difficult words after they students‟ reading ability. (See item

read the text and then write it in paper numbers 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 of interview)

given by the teacher. The teacher also asked the students to open dictionary.

Implementation of Reciprcal Teaching

Then, the students may discuss to other

Technique in the Classroom

member of their own group. After they In the first meeting, the teacher

wrote the words that were difficult and asked if students still remember the

finding meaning, group representatives lessons of the descriptive text given by

should come forward and write the their English teacher. To increase their

vocabulary on the white board. In fact, in knowledge of the descriptive text, the

cycle 1 no one came forward to write. So, teacher gives them an example of

the teacher made them come forward descriptive text entitled “The White based on the attendance list. But, in the House” in cycle 1 and “My Mother” in cycle 2 several representatives of groups

cycle 2. Afterwards, the teachers with the voluntary to come forward to write students together discussing about the

vocabulary they found. They were no contents of the story.

longer feel shy as at the first cycle. For the next activity, the teacher

The third step is Clarify. In this introduced reciprocal teaching techniques

step, teacher gave opportunities students to students. Teachers make introduced

to asking paragraph to know students‟ four step consisting of predicting,

comprehension. In cycle 1, students feel questioning, clarifying, summarizing and

shy to asked about paragraph. Then, explain one by one. Then, the teacher

teacher explained the paragraph to make dividing the students into five groups. In

students‟ comprehend. In cycle 2, students each group, consist of five or six people.

can classify about text and they asked Then, teachers gave a paper of descriptive

teacher to clarifying about text. It means text for each member of the group.

that students already knew how to clarify The first activity was Predict. The

of the text.

teacher asked all of students to read the The last step of reciprocal text by two or three times by themselves.

technique is Summarization. In this step, Afterward, teacher asked students to

students read the text once again and then predict of the text. In cycle 1, one of group

make a summary with their own can predict of the text, they explain about

language. In cycle 1, there were still some language. In cycle 1, there were still some

criteria of success. It is different with the

2, all students were able to summarize first cycle, the average score was fairly well. Then, students also able done

satisfying, it was 80,17. There were 25 exercises given by teacher.

students or about 86% were able to reach the criteria of success, and 4 or about 14%

The Discussion of Students’ Achievment

students who did not achieve the criteria The improvement of the students‟ of success. Related to the students' reading task in Cycle 2, it can be

achievement in the implementation of concluded that satisfying in the students'

reciprocal teaching technique can be illustrated in the following:

comprehending of the text given in this

The improvement of the students’ cycle, and also students have a good achievement in the implementation of

understanding of the questions in the

Reciprocal Technique technique

reading task. The implementation of reciprocal teaching technique obviously could help the students in reading comprehension achievement.

Conclusion and Suggestion Conclusion

The implementation of Reciprocal Teaching Technique at seventh grade (C class) of SMP Negeri 1 Sugio Lamongan in academic year 2015/2016 can be conclud-ed that reciprocal teaching

technique can improve students‟ reading Based on the result of students‟

comprehen-sion. It can be proved from final composition in cycle 1, it indicated

the following fact. First, reciprocal that students had not reached the criteria

teaching technique stimulated students to of success yet. It can be proved by the

be active readers because of having their average score was only 71,72. There were

own strategy to comprehend the texts. only 11 students or about 38% were able

Second, the students could predict what to reach the criteria of success and 18 or

questions that probably occurred in the about 62% students had not reached the

task after reading. Third, reciprocal criteria of success. Based on the student's

teaching technique is more interesting reading task, mostly students could not

and effective to improve students‟ answer questions given by the teacher.

reading comprehen-sion where the That‟s because the students still do not

students read the texts and translated understand the whole story and could

them.

not comprehend the question well. The results of students‟ reading Meanwhile, based on the result of

task in the first cycle indicates that the students‟ final composition in Cycle 2, it task in the first cycle indicates that the students‟ final composition in Cycle 2, it

the reading text given well. It can be proved by the

average score was only 71,72. There were only 38% students were able to reached

BIBLIOGRAPHY

the criteria of success, and 62% students Anderson, Mark and Anderson, Kathy.

had not reached the criteria of success. 1998. Text Type in English III. Sydney:

But in the second cycle, the average score Macmillan Education.

reading task of students increased Arikunto, Suharsimi, Suharjo, dan significantly. The average score was Supardi. 2010. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. fairly satisfying, it was 80,17. There were Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

86% students were able to reach the Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen. C. K.

criteria of success, and 14% students who 2010. Introduction to Research in

did not achieve the criteria of success. It Education. Eighth Edition. Wadsworth: means that target of class score average

Cengage Learning.

was fulfilled. Burns, Anne. 2010. Doing Research in Based the result of field notes, it English Language Teaching: A Guide

showed that the class condition during forPractitioners . New York: Routledge

teaching learning process creates the Tailor and Francis Group.

positive atmosphere in the classroom, Maleong, Lexy J. 2007. Metode Penelitian

and also makes students creative in

Bandung: Remaja finding the ideas. Moreover, Reciprocal

Kualitatif .

Rosdakarya

Teaching Technique would be alternative McNamara, Danielle S. 2006. Reading

strategy in teaching reading.

Comprehension

StrategiesTheories,

Interventions,and

Technologies. New

Recommendation

York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. After the researcher carried out the

Oczkus, Lory D. 2010. Reciprocal Teaching research, the writer concludes that

at WorkPowerful Strategies and Lessons Reciprocal Teaching Technique could

for Improving Reading Comprehension . improve students‟ reading comprehen- Newark, DE: International Reading sion. Regarding to the subject of the CAR,

Association

the writer recommendation the teacher Oczkus, Lory D. 2006. Reciprocal Teaching

should use various techniques in the Strategies at Work: Improving Reading

classroom. It can motivate their students

Newark, DE: and they will not get boring. Especially

Comprehension .

International Reading Association implement the Reciprocal Teaching

I Read It, but I Don’t Technique as an alternative strategy in

Tovani, Chris. 2000.

Get It: Comprehension Strategies for teaching reading.

Adolescent Readers. Smoky Hill High For the other writer, the writer

School, Aurora, Colorado.Stenhouse suggest that by reading this skripsi, they

Publishers Portland, Maine. are expected to be able to conduct or

analyze research

relate

to

any

Developing Vocabulary Materials Based on Picture Media for Autistic Studentsof SMP Negeri 3 Lamongan AYU VELLAYATI SOVELLA

Email address: [email protected]

Abstract :

The objective of this research is to develop vocabulary materials based on picture media for autistic students of SMP Negeri 3 Lamongan. The main purpose of this study is to help the English teachers to create fun and easy learning process in teaching English by applying picture media as vocabularylearning to the autistic students. This study was a Research and Development (R&D) study. Subject of this study was autistic students of SMP Negeri 3 Lamongan. This study adapted the R&D model proposed by Hyland. The steps of this study were conducting needs analysis, developing materials, getting expert validation, revising, doing try-out, revising again and writing the final draft of the vocabulary materials based on picture media for autistic student. The researcher used three instruments to obtain the data: interview, questionnaires and observation checklist. The obtained data will be classified based on the instrument used. To show the results, the researcher explained them in quantitative and qualitative approach. The result of the needs analysis showed that the autistic students needed vocabulary materials which contained many attractive pictures, varied activities and alluring colors. The product of this study is vocabulary materials entitled “Picture Vocabulary Mastery for Autistic Student” which is suitable with autistic students’ needs.

Keywords: Vocabulary, Autistic student, Picture Media

Introduction

vocabulary is one of the most crucial ones in language learning without which

A study of a language includes the communication is not possible. From the four skills, namely listening, speaking,

definition, above, it can be concluded that reading and writing. It is impossible that

vocabulary is the total numbers of words one master of them without mastering

and without vocabulary nothing can be vocabulary. In order to support the

conveyed.

mastery of English skills as mentioned In communication, all students need above, it is essential to learn vocabulary. It

vocabulary which can support them to becomes a central part in English learning.

produce and use meaningful sentences Mansourzadeh (2014:48) says that learning

because vocabulary provide organ of

a second/foreign language needs some sentence. That‟s way vocabulary is skills and components to be mastered.

important to be mastered. Actually, there Among those skills and components,

are student classes who experience are student classes who experience

That is LKS (Lembar Kerja Siswa) as their in learning English especially mastery

subject matter. They don‟t apply other vocabulary, for example is autistic

media or books which kick vocabulary student.

ability of autistic students. The attention Autistic student has major problem. That

of teachers for autistic students is very is communicating in language with the

low. The English teachers treat alike their result that limits vocabulary acquisition.

students‟ conditions without seeing According to Timmons, Breitenbach and

autistic students‟ conditions. With the Maclsaac

a result those English teachers‟ materials developmental disability that affects the

can‟t make autistic students to reach KKM normal functioning of the brain.

(Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal). Autistic Therefore, individuals with autism often

students find difficulties to follow and have difficulty with communication skills,

study English in class. If they are social skills, and reasoning. National

managed to buy new book about Institute of Mental Health NIMH (2010:1)

increasing vocabulary ability as their defines many children with autism have

supporting study. In fact, no books are some degree of intellectual disability.

relevant with their needs as autistic When tested, some areas of ability may be

student and vocabulary materials in their normal, while others especially cognitive

school.

(thinking) and language abilities may be In short, autistic students need some relatively weak. So, language teaching

teaching media that can help them to learn program for autistic students is different

the English easier, to make the learning with common students. It is because the

process more interesting for autistic development of various aspects should be

students. By using media, teacher can related to the abilities and needs of the

make teaching learning process run well, autistic students, one of them is in the way

either can get the goal of teaching also to teach them.

make learning process effective and Based on survey in SMPN 3

efficient. It is better to have visual aids or Lamongan, there are 2 autistic students

supports as teaching media for autistic who study in that school. In this case,

students. Hayes et al (2010:664) define that there are autistic students who study at

visual supports are those things people general school. Automatically, many facts