Pengaruh Tingkat Pemahaman Manajemen Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3) Manajer Konstruksi Terhadap Keberhasilan Pelaksanaan suatu Proyek Dilihat dari Sisi Peningkatan Kinerja Waktu dan Biaya Pelaksanaan Proyek di PT. Waskita Karya (Persero) Medan

  148

MAGISTER ILMU MANAJEMEN SEKOLAH PASCA SARJANA UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA

  

KUESIONER

Kuesioner ini digunakan untuk melengkapi data penelitian yang berjudul :

  

PENGARUH TINGKAT PEMAHAMAN MANAJEMEN KESELAMATAN DAN

KESEHATAN KERJA (K3) MANAJER KONSTRUKSI TERHADAP

KEBERHASILAN PELAKSANAAN SUATU PROYEK DILIHAT

DARI SISI PENINGKATAN KINERJA WAKTU DAN BIAYA

PELAKSANAAN PROYEK DI PT. WASKITA KARYA

  

(PERSERO) MEDAN

Responden yang terhormat,

Saya mohon kesediaan Bapak/Ibu untuk meluangkan waktu sejenak guna mengisi angket

ini. Saya berharap Bapak/Ibu menjawab dengan leluasa, sesuai dengan apa yang

Bapak/Ibu rasakan, lakukan dan alami, bukan apa yang seharusnya/yang ideal.

Penelitian ini bersifat ilmiah, independen dan tidak ada hubungannya dengan reputasi

Bapak/Ibu di PT. Waskita Karya (Persero) Medan dan sesuai dengan kode etik penelitian,

saya menjamin kerahasiaan semua data. Kesediaan Bapak/Ibu mengisi angket ini adalah bantuan yang tak ternilai bagi Saya.

Demikian Saya sampaikan, atas perhatian, waktu dan bantuan yang telah Bapak/Ibu

berikan, peneliti mengucapkan terima kasih.

   Peneliti

SARIATY SEBAYANG

NIM. 087019126/IM

  Universitas Sumatera Utara

  149 Lampiran 1 : Kuesioner Penelitian

  

KUESIONER

PENGARUH TINGKAT PEMAHAMAN MANAJEMEN KESELAMATAN DAN

KESEHATAN KERJA (K3) MANAJER KONSTRUKSI TERHADAP

KEBERHASILAN PELAKSANAAN SUATU PROYEK DILIHAT

  

DARI SISI PENINGKATAN KINERJA WAKTU DAN BIAYA

PELAKSANAAN PROYEK DI PT. WASKITA KARYA

(PERSERO) MEDAN

  Petunjuk Pengisian:

1. Mohon angket ini diisi oleh Bapak/Ibu untuk menjawab seluruh pertanyaan yang ada.

  2. Berilah tanda silang (X) atau contreng ( √) pada jawaban yang tersedia, dan pilihlah sesuai dengan keadaan yang sebenarnya.

  Identitas Responden

1. Jenis Kelamin : Laki-laki/Perempuan *)

  2. Usia : .................................................Tahun 3. Pendidikan Terakhir : ..........................................................

  4 Masa Kerja : ..........................................................

  Keterangan :

• ) = Coret yang tidak perlu

  Universitas Sumatera Utara

  150 HIPOTESIS 1:

  

A. Pemahaman Manajemen Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja Manajer

Konstruksi (X)

  

1. Bagaimana menurut Bapak/Ibu penjelasan yang telah dilakukan oleh perusahaan

berhubungan dengan keamanan dalam bekerja? a. Sangat jelas sekali

  b. Sangat jelas

  c. Jelas

  d. Kurang jelas

  e. Tidak jelas sekali

Berikan penjelasan Bapak/Ibu......................................................................................

.......................................................................................................................................

.......................................................................................................................................

  

2. Bagaimana menurut Bapak/Ibu ketersediaan rambu bahaya dalam lingkungan

pekerjaan di proyek untuk menghindari terjadinya kecelakaan kerja? a. Sangat tersedia sekali

  b. Sangat tersedia

  c. Tersedia

  d. Kurang tersedia

  e. Tidak tersedia sekali

Berikan penjelasan Bapak/Ibu......................................................................................

.......................................................................................................................................

.......................................................................................................................................

  

3. Bagaimana menurut Bapak/Ibu kewajiban penggunaan alat pelindung bagi seluruh

pekerja proyek pada saat berada di lokasi proyek? a. Sangat wajib sekali

  b. Sangat wajib

  c. Wajib

  d. Kurang wajib

  e. Tidak wajib sekali

Berikan penjelasan Bapak/Ibu......................................................................................

.......................................................................................................................................

......................................................................................................................................

  B. Keberhasilan Proyek (Y)

  

1. Bagaimana menurut Bapak/Ibu kesesuaian antara biaya yang digunakan untuk

menyelesaikan suatu proyek dengan biaya yang dianggarkan? a. Sangat sesuai sekali

  b. Sangat sesuai Universitas Sumatera Utara

  151 c. Sesuai

  d. Kurang sesuai

  e. Tidak sesuai sekali

Berikan penjelasan Bapak/Ibu......................................................................................

.......................................................................................................................................

......................................................................................................................................

  

2. Bagaimana menurut Bapak/Ibu kesesuaian antara waktu yang digunakan dalam

penyelesaian proyek dengan waktu yang direncanakan? a. Sangat sesuai sekali

  b. Sangat sesuai

  c. Sesuai

  d. Kurang sesuai

  e. Tidak sesuai sekali

Berikan penjelasan Bapak/Ibu......................................................................................

......................................................................................................................................

......................................................................................................................................

  

3. Bagaimana menurut Bapak/Ibu kesesuaian antara mutu pekerjaan yang diselesaikan

dengan mutu yang diinginkan owner? a. Sangat sesuai sekali

  b. Sangat sesuai

  c. Sesuai

  d. Kurang sesuai

  e. Tidak sesuai sekali

Berikan penjelasan Bapak/Ibu......................................................................................

......................................................................................................................................

......................................................................................................................................

  HIPOTESIS 2:

  A. Pendidikan (X1)

  

1. Bagaimana menurut Bapak/Ibu kemampuan Manajer Konstruksi dalam penguasaan

teori yang berkaitan dengan pekerjaannya? a. Sangat mampu sekali

  b. Sangat mampu

  c. Mampu

  d. Kurang mampu

  e. Tidak mampu sekali Berikan penjelasan Bapak/Ibu....................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................

  Universitas Sumatera Utara

  152

  

2. Bagaimana menurut Bapak/Ibu kemampuan Manajer Konstruksi dalam membuat

keputusan yang berkaitan dengan pekerjaannya? a. Sangat mampu sekali

  b. Sangat mampu

  c. Mampu

  d. Kurang mampu

  e. Tidak mampu sekali

Berikan penjelasan Bapak/Ibu......................................................................................

.......................................................................................................................................

......................................................................................................................................

B Masa Kerja (X2)

  

1. Bagaimana menurut Bapak/Ibu pengaruh rentang waktu kerja terhadap hasil

pekerjaan Manajer Konstruksi? a. Sangat berpengaruh sekali

  b. Sangat berpengaruh

  c. Berpengaruh

  d. Kurang berpengaruh

  e. Tidak berpengaruh sekali

Berikan penjelasan Bapak/Ibu......................................................................................

.......................................................................................................................................

......................................................................................................................................

  

2. Bagaimana menurut Bapak/Ibu hubungan antara peningkatan keahlian Manajer

Konstruksi dengan masa kerja seorang manajer? a. Sangat berhubungan sekali

  b. Sangat berhubungan

  c. Berhubungan

  d. Kurang berhubungan

  e. Tidak berhubungan sekali

Berikan penjelasan Bapak/Ibu......................................................................................

.......................................................................................................................................

......................................................................................................................................

C Pemahaman Manajer Konstruksi (Y)

  

1. Bagaimana menurut Bapak/Ibu kompetensi akademis yang dimiliki Manajer

Konstruksi? a. Sangat baik sekali

  b. Sangat baik

  c. Baik

  d. Kurang baik Universitas Sumatera Utara

  153 e. Tidak baik sekali

Berikan penjelasan Bapak/Ibu.....................................................................................

......................................................................................................................................

......................................................................................................................................

  

2. Bagaimana menurut Bapak/Ibu pengalaman yang dimiliki Manajer Konstruksi dalam

menyelesaikan suatu proyek? a. Sangat berpengalaman sekali

  b. Sangat berpengalaman

  c. Berpengalaman

  d. Kurang berpengalaman

  e. Tidak berpengalaman sekali

Berikan penjelasan Bapak/Ibu.....................................................................................

......................................................................................................................................

......................................................................................................................................

  

3. Bagaimana menurut Bapak/Ibu kemampuan Manajer Konstruksi dalam beradaptasi

dengan lingkungan sosial ekonomi suatu proyek? a. Sangat mampu sekali

  b. Sangat mampu

  c. Mampu

  d. Kurang mampu

  e. Tidak mampu sekali

Berikan penjelasan Bapak/Ibu....................................................................................

.....................................................................................................................................

.....................................................................................................................................

  HIPOTESIS 3:

  A. Waktu (X1)

  

1. Bagaimana menurut Bapak/Ibu pelaksanaan jadwal pekerjaan proyek yang dilakukan

Manajer Konstruksi? a. Sangat terlaksana sekali

  b. Sangat terlaksana

  c. Terlaksana

  d. Kurang terlaksana

  e. Tidak terlaksana sekali

Berikan penjelasan Bapak/Ibu.....................................................................................

......................................................................................................................................

.....................................................................................................................................

  Universitas Sumatera Utara

  154

  

2. Bagaimana menurut Bapak/Ibu pelaksanaan laporan kemajuan proyek yang

dilakukan Manajer Konstruksi? a. Sangat terlaksana sekali

  b. Sangat terlaksana

  c. Terlaksana

  d. Kurang terlaksana

  e. Tidak terlaksana sekali

Berikan penjelasan Bapak/Ibu......................................................................................

......................................................................................................................................

  

......................................................................................................................................

  B. Biaya (X2)

  1. Bagaimana menurut Bapak/Ibu ketepatan estimasi biaya suatu proyek?

  a. Sangat tepat sekali

  b. Sangat tepat

  c. Tepat

  d. Kurang tepat

  e. Tidak tepat sekali

Berikan penjelasan Bapak/Ibu......................................................................................

......................................................................................................................................

......................................................................................................................................

  

2. Bagaimana menurut Bapak/Ibu ketepatan penganggaran yang digunakan pada suatu

proyek? a. Sangat tepat sekali

  b. Sangat tepat

  c. Tepat

  d. Kurang tepat

  e. Tidak tepat sekali

Berikan penjelasan Bapak/Ibu.....................................................................................

.....................................................................................................................................

.....................................................................................................................................

  

3. Bagaimana menurut Bapak/Ibu pengendalian biaya yang dilakukan pada suatu

proyek? a. Sangat terkendali sekali

  b. Sangat terkendali

  c. Terkendali

  d. Kurang terkendali

  e. Tidak terkendali sekali

Berikan penjelasan Bapak/Ibu......................................................................................

  Universitas Sumatera Utara

  155

......................................................................................................................................

......................................................................................................................................

  C. Kinerja (Y)

  

1. Bagaimana menurut Bapak/Ibu kemampuan Manajer Konstruksi dalam

menyelesaikan suatu proyek? a. Sangat mampu sekali

  b. Sangat mampu

  c. Mampu

  d. Kurang mampu

  e. Tidak mampu sekali

Berikan penjelasan Bapak/Ibu......................................................................................

......................................................................................................................................

.....................................................................................................................................

  

2. Bagaimana menurut Bapak/Ibu pengetahuan yang dimiliki Manajer Konstruksi

berkaitan dengan pekerjaannya? a. Sangat baik sekali

  b. Sangat baik

  c. Baik

  d. Kurang baik

  e. Tidak baik sekali

Berikan penjelasan Bapak/Ibu.....................................................................................

.....................................................................................................................................

.....................................................................................................................................

  

3. Bagaimana menurut Bapak/Ibu motivasi Manajer Konstruksi dalam menyelesaikan

suatu proyek? a. Sangat termotivasi sekali

  b. Sangat termotivasi

  c. Termotivasi

  d. Kurang termotivasi

  e. Tidak termotivasi sekali

Berikan penjelasan Bapak/Ibu......................................................................................

......................................................................................................................................

......................................................................................................................................

  Universitas Sumatera Utara

  

LAMPIRAN SPSS

Lampiran 2: Karakteristik Responden

Jenis_Kelamin

  Percent Cumulative Percent Valid

  Percent Cumulative Percent Valid S1

  31

  72.1

  72.1

  72.1 S2

  12

  27.9 27.9 100.0 Total 43 100.0 100.0

  

Masa_Kerja

Frequency Percent Valid

  < 5 Tahun

  2.3 2.3 100.0 Total 43 100.0 100.0

  7

  16.3

  16.3

  16.3 5 - 10 Tahun

  19

  44.2

  44.2

  60.5 > 10 Tahun

  17

  

Pendidikan

Frequency Percent Valid

  1

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

  2

  Percent Valid Laki-laki

  41

  95.3

  95.3

  95.3 Perempuan

  2

  4.7 4.7 100.0 Total 43 100.0 100.0

  

Usia

Frequency Percent Valid

  Percent Cumulative Percent Valid < 30 Tahun

  4.6

  97.7 > 50 Tahun

  4.6

  4.6 30 - 40 Tahun

  22

  51.2

  51.2

  55.8 41 - 50 Tahun

  18

  41.9

  41.9

  39.5 39.5 100.0 Total 43 100.0 100.0

  Lampiran 3: Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas HIPOTESIS 1:

  

A. Variabel Pemahaman Manajemen Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja

Manajer Konstruksi Case Processing Summary

  N % Cases Valid 30 100.0

  Excluded(a) .0

  Total 30 100.0 a Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics

  Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  .630

  3 Item-Total Statistics Scale Corrected Cronbach's

  Scale Mean if Variance if Item-Total Alpha if Item Item Deleted Item Deleted Correlation Deleted

  PMK3MK1 8.10 4.093 .411 .573

  PMK3MK2 7.90 3.679 .503 .435

  PMK3MK3 7.80 4.579 .410 .572

B. Variabel Keberhasilan Proyek Case Processing Summary

  N % Cases Valid 30 100.0

  Excluded(a) .0

  Total 30 100.0 a Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics

  Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  .654

  3

  Item-Total Statistics

  Scale Corrected Cronbach's Scale Mean if Variance if Item-Total Alpha if Item

  Item Deleted Item Deleted Correlation Deleted KP1

  8.03 4.516 .330 .723 KP2

  7.90 4.024 .469 .553 KP3

  8.20 2.993 .620 .315

  HIPOTESIS 2:

  A. Variabel Pendidikan Case Processing Summary

  N % Cases Valid 30 100.0

  Excluded(a) .0

  Total 30 100.0 a Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics

  Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  .785

  2 Item-Total Statistics Scale Corrected Cronbach's

  Scale Mean if Variance if Item-Total Alpha if Item Item Deleted Item Deleted Correlation Deleted

  Pendidikan1 4.23 1.495 .652 .706

  Pendidikan2 4.20 1.131 .679 .793

  B. Variabel Masa Kerja Case Processing Summary

  N % Cases Valid 30 100.0

  Excluded(a) .0

  Total 30 100.0 a Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics

  Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  .641

  2 Item-Total Statistics Scale Corrected Cronbach's

  Scale Mean if Variance if Item-Total Alpha if Item Item Deleted Item Deleted Correlation Deleted

  Masa_Kerja1 3.77 2.185 .584 .686

  Masa_Kerja2 4.10 1.886 .484 .510

   Variabel Pemahaman Manajer Konstruksi C. Case Processing Summary

  N % Cases Valid 30 100.0

  Excluded(a) .0

  Total 30 100.0 a Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics

  Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  .809

  3 Item-Total Statistics Scale Corrected Cronbach's

  Scale Mean if Variance if Item-Total Alpha if Item Item Deleted Item Deleted Correlation Deleted

  PMK1 7.07 6.616 .639 .757

  PMK2 7.30 6.424 .597 .803

  PMK3 6.97 6.033 .743 .649

  HIPOTESIS 3:

  A. Variabel Waktu Case Processing Summary

  N % Cases Valid 30 100.0

  Excluded(a) .0

  Total 30 100.0 a Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics

  Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  .842

  2 Item-Total Statistics Scale Corrected Cronbach's

  Scale Mean if Variance if Item-Total Alpha if Item Item Deleted Item Deleted Correlation Deleted

  Waktu1 5.73 19.789 .716 .801 Waktu2 6.87 17.513 .830 .763

  B. Variabel Biaya Case Processing Summary

  N % Cases Valid 30 100.0

  Excluded(a) .0

  Total 30 100.0 a Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics

  Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  .674

  3 Item-Total Statistics Scale Corrected Cronbach's

  Scale Mean if Variance if Item-Total Alpha if Item Item Deleted Item Deleted Correlation Deleted

  Biaya1 7.70 5.528 .580 .443

  Biaya2 7.30 6.355 .575 .463

  Biaya3 7.07 8.064 .327 .764

C. Variabel Kinerja Case Processing Summary

  N % Cases Valid 30 100.0

  Excluded(a) .0

  Total 30 100.0 a Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics

  Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  .662

  3 Item-Total Statistics Scale Corrected Cronbach's

  Scale Mean if Variance if Item-Total Alpha if Item Item Deleted Item Deleted Correlation Deleted

  Kinerja1 8.27 3.857 .456 .590

  Kinerja2 8.00 3.517 .493 .542

  Kinerja3 7.93 4.271 .481 .565

  Lampiran 4: Deskriptif Variabel HIPOTESIS 1:

a. Variabel Pemahaman Manajemen Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja Manajer Konstruksi PMK3MK1

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid

  2

  1

  2.3

  2.3

  2.3

  3

  7

  16.3

  16.3

  18.6

  4

  26

  60.5

  60.5

  79.1

  5

  9

  20.9 20.9 100.0 Total 43 100.0 100.0

PMK3MK2

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid P ercent Percent

  Valid

  3

  5

  11.6

  11.6

  11.6

  4

  23

  53.5

  53.5

  65.1

  5

  15

  34.9 34.9 100.0 Total 43 100.0 100.0

PMK3MK3

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid

  2

  2

  4.7

  4.7

  4.7

  3

  4

  9.3

  9.3

  14.0

  4

  25

  58.1

  58.1

  72.1

  5

  12

  27.9 27.9 100.0 Total 43 100.0 100.0

b. Variabel Keberhasilan Proyek KP1

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid

  2

  1

  2.3

  2.3

  2.3

  3

  8

  18.6

  18.6

  20.9

  4

  25

  58.1

  58.1

  79.1

  5

  9

  20.9 20.9 100.0 Total 43 100.0 100.0

  KP2

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid

  2

  3

  7.0

  7.0

  7.0

  3

  4

  9.3

  9.3

  16.3

  4

  32

  74.4

  74.4

  90.7

  5

  4

  9.3 9.3 100.0 Total 43 100.0 100.0

  KP3

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid

  2

  1

  2.3

  2.3

  2.3

  3

  9

  20.9

  20.9

  23.3

  4

  27

  62.8

  62.8

  86.0

  5

  6

  14.0 14.0 100.0 Total 43 100.0 100.0

  HIPOTESIS 2: Pendidikan a. Pe ndi dika n1

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid P ercent Percent

  Valid

  3

  7

  16.3

  16.3

  16.3

  4

  16

  37.2

  37.2

  53.5

  5

  20

  46.5 46.5 100.0 Total 43 100.0 100.0

  Pendidikan2

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid

  2

  1

  2.3

  2.3

  2.3

  3

  6

  14.0

  14.0

  16.3

  4

  21

  48.8

  48.8

  65.1

  5

  15

  34.9 34.9 100.0 Total 43 100.0 100.0

  b. Masa Kerja Masa_Kerja1

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid

  2

  1

  2.3

  2.3

  2.3

  3

  6

  14.0

  14.0

  16.3

  4

  26

  60.5

  60.5

  76.7

  5

  10

  23.3 23.3 100.0 Total 43 100.0 100.0

  Ma sa_Kerja2

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid P ercent Percent

  Valid

  3

  5

  11.6

  11.6

  11.6

  4

  24

  55.8

  55.8

  67.4

  5

  14

  32.6 32.6 100.0 Total 43 100.0 100.0

  c. Pemahaman Manajer Konstruksi PMK1

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid

  2

  4

  9.3

  9.3

  9.3

  3

  13

  30.2

  30.2

  39.5

  4

  16

  37.2

  37.2

  76.7

  5

  10

  23.3 23.3 100.0 Total 43 100.0 100.0

  PMK2

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid

  2

  3

  7.0

  7.0

  7.0

  3

  21

  48.8

  48.8

  55.8

  4

  14

  32.6

  32.6

  88.4

  5

  5

  11.6 11.6 100.0 Total 43 100.0 100.0

  PMK3

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid

  2

  3

  7.0

  7.0

  7.0

  3

  11

  25.6

  25.6

  32.6

  4

  17

  39.5

  39.5

  72.1

  5

  12

  27.9 27.9 100.0 Total 43 100.0 100.0

  HIPOTESIS 3:

a. Waktu Waktu1

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid

  2

  2

  4.7

  4.7

  4.7

  3

  9

  20.9

  20.9

  25.6

  4

  12

  27.9

  27.9

  53.5

  5

  20

  46.5 46.5 100.0 Total 43 100.0 100.0

  Waktu2

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid

  2

  2

  4.7

  4.7

  4.7

  3

  8

  18.6

  18.6

  23.3

  4

  13

  30.2

  30.2

  53.5

  5

  20

  46.5 46.5 100.0 Total 43 100.0 100.0

   Biaya b. Biaya1

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid

  2

  4

  9.3

  9.3

  9.3

  3

  7

  16.3

  16.3

  25.6

  4

  17

  39.5

  39.5

  65.1

  5

  15

  34.9 34.9 100.0 Total 43 100.0 100.0

  Biaya2

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid

  2

  3

  7.0

  7.0

  7.0

  3

  9

  20.9

  20.9

  27.9

  4

  17

  39.5

  39.5

  67.4

  5

  14

  32.6 32.6 100.0 Total 43 100.0 100.0

  Biaya3

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid

  2

  2

  4.7

  4.7

  4.7

  3

  6

  14.0

  14.0

  18.6

  4

  16

  37.2

  37.2

  55.8

  5

  19

  44.2 44.2 100.0 Total 43 100.0 100.0

c. Kinerja Kinerja1

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid

  2

  4

  9.3

  9.3

  9.3

  3

  7

  16.3

  16.3

  25.6

  4

  18

  41.9

  41.9

  67.4

  5

  14

  32.6 32.6 100.0 Total 43 100.0 100.0

  Kinerja2

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid

  2

  2

  4.7

  4.7

  4.7

  3

  5

  11.6

  11.6

  16.3

  4

  16

  37.2

  37.2

  53.5

  5

  20

  46.5 46.5 100.0 Total 43 100.0 100.0

  Kinerja3

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid

  2

  4

  9.3

  9.3

  9.3

  3

  5

  11.6

  11.6

  20.9

  4

  13

  30.2

  30.2

  51.2

  5

  21

  48.8 48.8 100.0 Total 43 100.0 100.0

  Lampiran 5: Pengujian Regresi Hipótesis HIPOTESIS 1: De scri ptive Statistics

  R Square Std. Error of the Estimate

  Dependent Variable: Keberhasilan_Proyek b.

  Model Summary b

  .707

  a

  .500 .488 .860 Model

  1 R R Square Adjusted

  Predictors: (Constant), PMK3MK a. Dependent Vari able: Keberhasilan_Proyek b.

  Variables Removed Method All requested variables entered.

  Coeffi cients a

  3.573 1.278 2.795 .008 .661 .103 .707 6.408 .000

  (Const ant) PMK3MK

  Model

  1 B St d. E rror Unstandardized

  Coeffic ients Beta

  St andardiz ed Coeffic ients t Sig.

  a.

  1 Variables Entered

  11.72 1.202

  43

  43 12.33 1.286

  43 Keberhasilan_P royek PMK3MK

  Mean St d. Deviat ion N

  Correlations

  1.000 .707 .707 1.000

  . .000 .000 .

  43

  . Enter Model

  43

  43 Keberhasilan_Proyek PMK3MK Keberhasilan_Proyek PMK3MK Keberhasilan_Proyek PMK3MK

  Pearson Correlation Sig. (1-tailed) N

  Keberhasil an_Proyek PMK3MK

  Variables Entered/Removed b

  PMK3MK

  a

  Dependent Variable: Keberhasilan_P roy ek a.

  Normal P-P Plot of Regression Standardized Residual Dependent Variable: Keberhasilan_Proyek _{0.8 1.0} rob P _0.6 um

  C ed _0.4 xpect E _{0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0} Observed Cum Prob

  HIPOTESIS 2: Descriptive Statistics

  Mean Std. Deviation N PMK

  11.12 2.195

  43 Pendidikan 8.47 1.162

  43 Masa_Kerja 8.26 1.115

  43 Correl ations PMK Pendidikan Masa_Kerja

  Pearson Correlation PMK 1.000 .669 .785

  Pendidikan .669 1.000 .568

  Masa_Kerja .785 .568 1.000 Sig. (1-tailed) PMK

  . .000 .000 Pendidikan

  .000 . .000 Masa_Kerja .000 .000 . N PMK

  43

  43

  43 Pendidikan

  43

  43

  43 Masa_Kerja

  43

  43

  43

  Variables Entered/Removed b

  a

  VIF Collinearity Statistics

  Standardized Coefficients t Sig. Tolerance

  Coefficients Beta

  1 B Std. Error Unstandardized

  Model

  1.179 .211 .598 5.599 .000 .678 1.476 (Constant) Pendidikan Masa_Kerja

  3.881 1.614 2.404 .021 .622 .202 .329 3.080 .004 .678 1.476

  

Coefficients

a

  Predic tors: (Constant), Mas a_K erja, Pendidikan a. Dependent Variable: PMK b.

  1 Sum of Squares df Mean S quare F Sig.

  Model

  42 Regres sion Residual Total

  62.688 40 1.567 202.419

  139.730 2 69.865 44.579 .000

  Masa_ Kerja, Pendidika n

  

ANOV A

b

  Predictors: (Constant), Masa_Kerja, Pendidikan a. Dependent Variable: PMK b.

  R Square Std. Error of the Estimate

  1 R R Square Adjusted

  .690 .675 1.252 Model

  a

  .831

  Model Summary b

  Dependent Variable: PMK b.

  a.

  Variables Removed Method All requested variables entered.

  1 Variables Entered

  . Enter Model

  a

  Dependent Variable: PMK a.

  Normal P-P Plot of Regression Standardized Residual _{0.8 1.0} Dependent Variable: PMK rob P _0.6 um

  C ed _0.4 xpect E _{0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0} Observed Cum Prob

  Scatterplot ₂ Dependent Variable: PMK ed et ¹ el

  D ed dual iz esi R tudent

• _-1 S ress) on (P _-2 egressi R _{-3 -3 -2 -1}
_{1 2} Regression Standardized Predicted Value

  

Histogram

_{10 12} Dependent Variable: PMK ₆

8 Frequency

  _{2 4 Mean = 1.01E-15 -3 -2 -1 1 2} Std. Dev. = 0.976 _{N = 43} Regression Standardized Residual HIPOTESIS 3: Descriptive Statistics

  Mean Std. Deviation N Kinerja

  12.42 1.789

  43 Waktu 8.35 1.494

  43 Biaya 12.19 2.119

  43 Correl ations Kinerja W aktu Biaya

  Pearson Correlation Kinerja 1.000 .603 .544

  W aktu .603 1.000 .295

  Biaya .544 .295 1.000 Sig. (1-tailed) Kinerja

  . .000 .000 W aktu

  .000 . .027 Biaya .000 .027 . N Kinerja

  43

  43

  43 W aktu

  43

  43

  43 Biaya

  43

  43

  43

  b Va riables Entere d/Re moved

  Variables Variables Model Entered Removed Method

  1 Biaya,

  a

  . Enter W aktu a.

  All reques ted variables ent ered.

  b.

  Dependent Variable: K inerja

  b Model Summary

  Adjusted Std. Error of Model R R Square R Square the Estimate

  a

  1 .715 .511 .486 1.282 a.

  Predictors: (Constant), Biaya, Waktu b. Dependent Variable: Kinerja

  b

ANOV A

  Sum of Model Squares df Mean S quare F Sig.

  a

  1 Regres sion 68.680 2 34.340 20.880 .000 Residual

  65.785 40 1.645 Total

  134.465

  42 a. Predic tors: (Constant), Biay a, W akt u b. Dependent Variable: Kinerja

  a

Coefficients

  Unstandardized Standardized Coefficients Coefficients Collinearity Statistics

  Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. Tolerance

  VIF 1 (Constant) 3.442 1.408 2.444 .019 W aktu

  .581 .139 .485 4.188 .000 .913 1.095 Biaya

  .339 .098 .401 3.467 .001 .913 1.095 a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja

  Normal P-P Plot of Regression Standardized Residual _{0.8 1.0} Dependent Variable: Kinerja rob P _0.6 um

  C ed _0.4 xpect E _{0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0} Observed Cum Prob

  Scatterplot Dependent Variable: Kinerja

  4 ed

  3 et el D

  2 ed dual iz

  1 esi R tudent S ress) on (P

• 1
• 2

  egressi R

• 3
• 2 -1

  1 Regression Standardized Predicted Value

  4 ^{3 2 -2 1 -1 -3} Regression Standardized Residual ^{15 12 9 6 3} Frequency _{Mean = 1.39E-16} Std. Dev. = 0.976 _{N = 43}

  

Dependent Variable: Kinerja

Histogram