PENGARUH PARTISIPASI ANGGARAN TERHADAP KINERJA LEGISLATIF KABUPATEN/KOTA DENGAN OTONOMI DAERAH DAN KOMITMEN ORGANISASI SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERATING - Unika Repository
LAMPIRAN A KUESIONER Perpustakaan Unika
Perpustakaan Unika
KUESIONER PENELITIAN
Sehubungan dengan penelitian saya yang berjudul “Pengaruh Partisipasi
Anggaran terhadap Kinerja Legislatif Kabupaten atau Kota dengan Otonomi Daerah
dan Komitmen Organisasi sebagai Variabel Moderating (Studi Empiris pada DPRD II
Kabupaten Semarang, Kabupaten Kendal, dan Kota Salatiga)”, maka saya memohon
kesediaan Bapak / Ibu untuk mengisi kuesioner berikut ini. Atas kesediaan waktu yang
diberikan oleh Bapak / Ibu saya mengucapkan terimakasih.IDENTITAS RESPONDEN:
Nama : Jenis Kelamin : P / L Partai : Jabatan : Petunjuk Pengisian Kuesioner :
Mohon memberikan tanda silang (X) pada pada salah satu kolom (STS/TS/N/S/SS)
sesuai dengan jawaban yang Bapak / Ibu pilih.Keterangan : STS : Sangat Tidak Setuju TS : Sangat Setuju N : Netral S : Setuju SS : Sangat Setuju
Perpustakaan Unika PARTISIPASI PENYUSUNAN ANGGARAN (Milani 1975 dalam Asriningati 2006)
Pertanyaan berikut ini dapat digunakan untuk mendeskripsikan peranan yang
Anda pegang dalam merancang anggaran untuk pemerintahan Kabupaten/Kota
Bapak/Ibu/Saudara. Mohon dijawab dengan melingkari nomor dari 1 sampai dengan 5
pada skala untuk masing-masing pertanyaan berikut: a) Keterlibatan saya dalam penyusunan anggaran.1
2
3
4
5 Tidak satu anggaran pun Semua anggaran b) Alasan pimpinan rapat panitia anggaran ketika meerevisi anggaran yang saya buat.
1
2
3
4
5 Sangat tidak logis Sangat logis
c) Frekuensi saya dalam memberikan pendapat atau usulan dalam rapat panitia anggaran.
1
2
3
4
5 Tidak pernah Sangat sering d) Pengaruh yang saya miliki atas hasil akhir anggaran.
1
2
3
4
5 Tidak ada pengaruh Sangat berpengaruh e) Kontribusi saya terhadap penyusunan anggaran.
Perpustakaan Unika
1
2
3
4
5 Sangat tidak penting Sangat penting
f) Frekuensi pimpinan rapat panitia anggaran meminta pendapat atau usulan saya ketika penyusunan anggaran.
1
2
3
4
5 Tidak pernah Sangat sering
Perpustakaan Unika
I. KOMITMEN PADA PARTAI POLITIK (Mowday 1979, dalam Asriningati 2006)
Pernyataan berikut ini akan menggambarkan persepsi terhadap organisasi partai
politik yang Bapak/Ibu/Saudara anut. Pilihan jawaban berupa skala 1 sampai dengan 5
yang menunjukkan ’sangat tidak setuju’ sampai dengan ’sangat setuju’NO KETERANGAN STS TS N S SS
1. Saya berkeinginan memberikan segala upaya yang ada untuk membantu organisasi partai politik saya untuk menjadi sukses.
2. Saya membanggakan partai politik saya kepada teman-teman saya sebagai suatu organisasi partai politik yang paling baik.
3. Saya akan menerima hampir setiap jenis penugasan pekerjaan agar tetap bisa menjadi kader organisasi parpol saya.
4. Saya menemukan bahwa sistem nilai (values) saya sama dengan sistem nilai (values) organsasi partai politik tempat saya bernaung.
5. Saya bangga mengatakan kepada orang lain bahwa saya kader pada organisasi partai politik tempat saya bernaung saat ini.
6. Organisasi partai politik saya memberikan peluang yang terbaik bagi saya untuk meningkatkan kinerja organisasi partai politik.
7. Saya merasa pilihan saya untuk bergabung menjadi kader pada
Perpustakaan Unika organisasi partai politik ini paling tepat dibandingkan organisasi partai politik lain yang sudah saya pertimbangkan sebelumnya.
8. Kepedulian saya terhadap masa depan organisasi partai politik tempat saya bernaung saat ini sangat besar.
9. Bagi saya organisasi partai politik ini adalah yang terbaik dari semua kemungkinan organisasi partai politik yang ada.
II. PRINSIP DAN KENDALA OTONOMI DAERAH (Governance and Decentralization Survey)
Pernyataan berikut ini merupakan persepsi bapak / ibu mengenai prinsip otonomi daerah yang berlaku dan kendala apa saja yang terjadi dalam rangka pelaksanaan otonomi daerah di daerah kabupaten / kota tempat bapk / ibu bekerja.
PRINSIP OTONOMI DAERAH
NO KETERANGAN STS TS N S SS
1.Otonomi membuat saya memiliki wewenang yang lebih luas kepada daerah mengelola urusan Kabupaten / Kota tempat daerah saya bekerja.
2. Otonomi daerah berarti membuat saya bisa merumuskan kebijakan dan program yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan daerah saya.
Perpustakaan Unika 3.
Menurut saya otonomi daerah berarti menggali sumber dana daerah sebesar-besarnya melalui pajak dan retribusi.
4. Otonomi daerah membuat saya bisa memperjuangkan kepentingan warga / penduduk asli dalam pemerintahan dan pembangunan.
5. Otonomi daerah memberikan kesempatan bagi saya untuk mengalokasikan anggaran pembangunan secara otonom.
6. Menurut saya otonomi daerah berarti memperkuat identitas daerah.
7. Otonomi daerah menurut saya berarti menggunakan seluruh sumber daya yang ada di Kabupaten / Kota tempat saya bekerja untuk kepentingan daerah sendiri
8. Otonomi daerah membuat saya mampu untuk meningkatkan kualitas pelayanan masyarakat.
9. Otonomi daerah semakin memberdayakan saya sebagai anggota legislatif untuk lebih aspiratif.
Perpustakaan Unika KENDALA OTONOMI DAERAH
NO KETERANGAN STS TS N S SS
1.Keterbatasan dana merupakan kendala dalam pelaksanaan otonomi daerah saya.
2. Ketidak jelasan aturan merupakan kendala dalam pelaksanaan otonomi daerah saya.
3. Keterbatasan sumber daya alam merupakan kendala dalam pelaksanaan otonomi daerah saya.
4. Keterbatasan sumber daya ekonomi merupakan kendala dalam pelaksanaan otonomi daerah saya.
5. Keterbatasan sumber daya manusia merupakan kendala dalam pelaksanaan otonomi daerah saya.
6. Ketidakpastian politik termasuk euforia politik merupakan kendala dalam pelaksanaan politik daerah saya.
7. Tuntutan masyarakat yang berlebihan terhadap pemerintah merupakan kendala dalam pelaksanaan otonomi daerah saya.
8. Keterbatasan prasarana merupakan kendala dalam pelaksanaan otonomi daerah saya.
9. Semangat kedaerahan yang berlebihan merupakan kendala
Perpustakaan Unika dalam pelaksanaan otonomi dearah saya.
10. Konflik dengan daerah lain merupakan kendala dalm pelaksanaan otonomi daerah saya.
11. Jumlah pegawai tidak sesuai dengan kebutuhan peekerjaan merupakan kendala dalam pelaksanaan otonomi daerah saya.
LAMPIRAN B Statistik Deskriptif Perpustakaan Unika
Perpustakaan Unika Crosstabs Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent Jenis Kelamin * Daerah 75 100.0% .0%
75 100.0%
Jenis Kelamin * Daerah Crosstabulation
Count Daerah
Kabupaten Kabupaten Kota Kendal Semarang Kota Salatiga Semarang Total
Jenis Kelamin L
16
15
16
17
64 P
1
1
3
6
11 Total
17
16
19
23
75 Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent Partai * Daerah 75 100.0% .0% 75 100.0%
Partai * Daerah Crosstabulation
1
1
3
1
2
2
3
8
3
2
2
8
1
17
16
19
23
75 Golkar PAN PD PDIP PIS PKB PKPI PKS PPP
Partai Total
Kabupaten Kendal
Kabupaten Semarang Kota Salatiga
Kota Semarang
Daerah Total
1
8
Count
2
1
3
5
5
14
2
2
1
2
7
1
2
4
7
4
4
7
4
19
1
1
4
2
Perpustakaan Unika
Perpustakaan Unika Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent Jabatan * Daerah 75 100.0% .0%
75 100.0%
Jabatan * Daerah Crosstabulation
Count Daerah
Kabupaten Kabupaten Kota Kendal Semarang Kota Salatiga Semarang Total
Jabatan Anggota
14
13
15
19
61 Ketua
1
1
1
1
4 Wakil Ketua
2
2
3
3
10 Total
17
16
19
23
75
LAMPIRAN C
VALIDITAS Perpustakaan Unika
Perpustakaan Unika Correlations PPA1
Correlations
Partisipasi ppa1 ppa2 ppa3 ppa4 paa5 ppa6 Anggaran ppa1 Pearson Correlation 1 .041 .420** .573** .637** .497** .803** Sig. (2-tailed).726 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 ppa2 Pearson Correlation .041 1 .082 .060 .018 .101 .075 Sig. (2-tailed)
.726 .486 .608 .877 .388 .524 N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 ppa3 Pearson Correlation .420** .082 1 .570** .463** .537** .753** Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .486 .000 .000 .000 .000
N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 ppa4 Pearson Correlation
.573** .060 .570**
1 .580** .510** .820** Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .608 .000 .000 .000 .000N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 paa5 Pearson Correlation .637** .018 .463** .580** 1 .517** .813** Sig. (2-tailed)
.000 .877 .000 .000 .000 .000 N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 ppa6 Pearson Correlation .497** .101 .537** .510** .517** 1 .761** Sig. (2-tailed)
.000 .388 .000 .000 .000 .000 N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 Partisipasi Anggaran Pearson Correlation .803** .075 .753** .820** .813** .761**
1 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .524 .000 .000 .000 .000 N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Correlations PPA2
Perpustakaan Unika
Correlations
ppa1 ppa3 ppa4 ppa5 ppa6 toappabaru ppa1 Pearson Correlation1 .420** .573** .637** .497** .774** Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N
75
75
75
75
75
75 ppa3 Pearson Correlation .420** 1 .570** .463** .537** .713** Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
N
75
75
75
75
75
75 ppa4 Pearson Correlation .573** .570** 1 .580** .510** .786** Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N
75
75
75
75
75
75 ppa5 Pearson Correlation .637** .463** .580** 1 .517** .791** Sig. (2-tailed)
.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N
75
75
75
75
75
75 ppa6 Pearson Correlation .497** .537** .510** .517** 1 .716** Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
N
75
75
75
75
75
75 toappabaru Pearson Correlation .774** .713** .786** .791** .716**
1 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N
75
75
75
75
75
75 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Correlations Komitmen
Perpustakaan Unika
Correlations
Komit1 Komit2 Komit3 Komit4 Komit5 Komit6 Komit7 Komit8 Komit9 Tot.Komitmen Komit1 Pearson Correlation 1 .373** .076 .306** .074 .186 .007 .105 .169 .464** Sig. (2-tailed) .001 .515 .008 .526 .110 .951 .372 .147 .000
N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 Komit2 Pearson Correlation .373** 1 .214 .084 .280* -.081 -.026 .188 .258* .508** Sig. (2-tailed) .001 .066 .475 .015 .492 .822 .107 .025 .000 N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 Komit3 Pearson Correlation .076 .214 1 -.030 .112 .003 -.021 .040 .135 .309** Sig. (2-tailed) .515 .066 .796 .339 .979 .858 .734 .248 .007
N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 Komit4 Pearson Correlation .306** .084 -.030 1 .099 .018 .184 -.015 .072 .342** Sig. (2-tailed) .008 .475 .796 .397 .879 .114 .897 .542 .003 N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 Komit5 Pearson Correlation .074 .280* .112 .099 1 .150 .162 .214 .123 .527** Sig. (2-tailed)
.526 .015 .339 .397 .198 .164 .065 .293 .000 N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 Komit6 Pearson Correlation .186 -.081 .003 .018 .150 1 .284* .137 .076 .433** Sig. (2-tailed) .110 .492 .979 .879 .198 .014 .242 .516 .000 N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 Komit7 Pearson Correlation .007 -.026 -.021 .184 .162 .284* 1 .403** .310** .559** Sig. (2-tailed) .951 .822 .858 .114 .164 .014 .000 .007 .000 N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 Komit8 Pearson Correlation .105 .188 .040 -.015 .214 .137 .403** 1 .419** .603** Sig. (2-tailed)
.372 .107 .734 .897 .065 .242 .000 .000 .000 N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 Komit9 Pearson Correlation .169 .258* .135 .072 .123 .076 .310** .419** 1 .613** Sig. (2-tailed) .147 .025 .248 .542 .293 .516 .007 .000 .000 N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 Tot.Komitmen Pearson Correlation .464** .508** .309** .342** .527** .433** .559** .603** .613**
1 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .007 .003 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
- .
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Correlations Prinsip Otonomi Daerah
Perpustakaan Unika
Correlations
Prinsip1 Prinsip2 Prinsip3 Prinsip4 Prinsip5 Prinsip6 Prinsip7 Prinsip8 Prinsip9 Tot.Prinsip Prinsip1 Pearson Correlation 1 .532** .387** .116 .372** .249* .323** .201 .451** .563** Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .001 .322 .001 .031 .005 .084 .000 .000
N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 Prinsip2 Pearson Correlation .532** 1 .555** .443** .450** .423** .477** .350** .419** .739** Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .002 .000 .000
N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 Prinsip3 Pearson Correlation .387** .555** 1 .479** .580** .487** .482** .550** .612** .808** Sig. (2-tailed) .001 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 Prinsip4 Pearson Correlation .116 .443** .479** 1 .501** .471** .553** .307** .306** .686** Sig. (2-tailed) .322 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .007 .008 .000 N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 Prinsip5 Pearson Correlation .372** .450** .580** .501** 1 .667** .621** .252* .532** .784** Sig. (2-tailed) .001 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .029 .000 .000 N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 Prinsip6 Pearson Correlation .249* .423** .487** .471** .667** 1 .562** .241* .419** .715** Sig. (2-tailed) .031 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .037 .000 .000 N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 Prinsip7 Pearson Correlation .323** .477** .482** .553** .621** .562** 1 .304** .461** .750** Sig. (2-tailed) .005 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .008 .000 .000
N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 Prinsip8 Pearson Correlation
.201 .350** .550** .307** .252* .241* .304**
1 .506** .576** Sig. (2-tailed) .084 .002 .000 .007 .029 .037 .008 .000 .000N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 Prinsip9 Pearson Correlation .451** .419** .612** .306** .532** .419** .461** .506** 1 .719** Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .008 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 Tot.Prinsip Pearson Correlation .563** .739** .808** .686** .784** .715** .750** .576** .719**
1 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
- .
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Correlations Kendala Otonomi Daerah
Correlations
1 .749** -.068 .544** .146 .431** .583** .611** .599** .481** .506** .701** .000 .564 .000 .213 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 75 75 75 7575
75 75 75 75 75 75 .000 .980 .000 .160 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 75 .749** 1 -.003 .657** .164 .607** .507** .658** .596** .599** .610** .785** 75 75 75 7575
75 75 75 75 75 75 .564 .980 .434 .104 .148 .515 .876 .456 .802 .579 .026 75 -.068 -.003 1 .092 .189 .169 -.076 -.018 -.087 .029 .065 .257*75 75 75 75
75
75 75 75 75 75 75 .000 .000 .434 .071 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 75 .544** .657** .092 1 .210 .560** .508** .665** .643** .552** .478** .773** 75 75 75 7575
75 75 75 75 75 75 .213 .160 .104 .071 .131 .037 .101 .049 .183 .050 .000 75 .146 .164 .189 .210 1 .176 .241* .191 .228* .155 .227 .456** 75 75 75 7575
75 75 75 75 75 75 75 .431** .607** .169 .560** .176 1 .526** .488** .543** .664** .610** .765** .000 .000 .148 .000 .131 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 75 75 75 7575
75 75 75 75 75 75 .000 .000 .515 .000 .037 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 75 .583** .507** -.076 .508** .241* .526** 1 .597** .658** .592** .600** .742** 75 75 75 7575
75 75 75 75 75 75 .000 .000 .876 .000 .101 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 75 .611** .658** -.018 .665** .191 .488** .597** 1 .736** .499** .463** .758** 75 75 75 7575
75 75 75 75 75 75 75 .599** .596** -.087 .643** .228* .543** .658** .736** .000 .000 .456 .000 .049 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 1 .532** .565** .772** 75 75 75 7575
75 75 75 75 75 75 .000 .000 .802 .000 .183 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 75.481** .599** .029 .552** .155 .664** .592** .499** .532**
1 .490** .730** 75 75 75 7575
75 75 75 75 75 75 .000 .000 .579 .000 .050 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 75 .506** .610** .065 .478** .227 .610** .600** .463** .565** .490** 1 .728**75 75 75 75
75
75 75 75 75 75 75 75 .701** .785** .257* .773** .456** .765** .742** .758** .772** .730** .728** 1 .000 .000 .026 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 75 75 75 7575
75 75 75 75 75 75 Sig. (2-tailed) 75 Pearson Correlation N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Kendala1 Kendala2 Kendala3 Kendala4 Kendala5 Kendala6 Kendala7 Kendala8 Kendala9 Kendala10 Kendala11 Tot.Kendala Kendala1 Kendala2 Kendala3 Kendala4 Kendala5 Kendala6 Kendala7 Kendala8 Kendala9 Kendala10 Kendala11 Tot.Kendala Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). **. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). *.Perpustakaan Unika
Perpustakaan Unika LAMPIRAN D RELIABILITAS
Perpustakaan Unika Reliability PPA Case Processing Summary
N % Cases Valid 75 100.0
a
Excluded .0
Total 75 100.0 a.
Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
.849
5 Item Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N ppa1
3.69 .788
75 ppa3 3.68 .720
75 ppa4 3.76 .732
75 paa5 3.84 .736
75 ppa6 3.77 .649
75 Item-Total Statistics Scale Corrected Cronbach's
Scale Mean if Variance if Item-Total Alpha if Item Item Deleted Item Deleted Correlation Deleted ppa1
15.05 5.213 .663 .818 ppa3 15.07 5.631 .606 .831 ppa4 14.99 5.311 .703 .806 paa5 14.91 5.329 .691 .809 ppa6 14.97 5.810 .636 .825
Scale Statistics
Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items 18.75 8.219 2.867
5
Reliability Komitmen Case Processing Summary
75 4.05 .590
Mean Std. Deviation N
75 Komit1 Komit2 Komit3 Komit4 Komit5 Komit6 Komit7 Komit8 Komit9
75 3.93 .644
75 4.01 .604
75 4.17 .601
75 4.07 .644
75 4.12 .614
75 4.32 .470
75 4.19 .456
4.07 .414
75 100.0 .0 75 100.0
Item Statistics
9 Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
.602
Reliability Statistics
a.
N % Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
Total Cases
a
Valid Excluded
Perpustakaan Unika
Item-Total Statistics
75 100.0 .0 75 100.0
9 Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
.869
Reliability Statistics
a.
N % Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
Total Cases
a
Valid Excluded
Reliability Prinsip Otonomi Daerah Case Processing Summary
32.87 5.414 .318 .571 32.88 5.053 .300 .570 32.75 5.705 .131 .608 32.61 5.619 .161 .602 32.81 4.965 .313 .567 32.87 5.225 .190 .604 32.76 4.888 .357 .554 32.92 4.750 .412 .538 33.00 4.649 .409 .537
9 Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items
36.93 6.198 2.490
Scale Statistics
Alpha if Item Deleted
Correlation Cronbach's
Item Deleted Corrected Item-Total
Scale Variance if
Scale Mean if Item Deleted
Komit1 Komit2 Komit3 Komit4 Komit5 Komit6 Komit7 Komit8 Komit9
Perpustakaan Unika
Perpustakaan Unika Item Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N Prinsip1
3.76 .786
75 Prinsip2 3.87 .827
75 Prinsip3 3.84 .806
75 Prinsip4 3.71 .997
75 Prinsip5 3.79 .793
75 Prinsip6 3.75 .790
75 Prinsip7 3.84 .698
75 Prinsip8 3.83 .760
75 Prinsip9 3.92 .632
75 Item-Total Statistics Scale Corrected Cronbach's
Scale Mean if Variance if Item-Total Alpha if Item Item Deleted Item Deleted Correlation Deleted
Prinsip1 30.53 21.117 .440 .870
Prinsip2 30.43 19.491 .648 .851
Prinsip3 30.45 19.062 .739 .842
Prinsip4 30.59 19.084 .555 .863
Prinsip5 30.51 19.334 .709 .845 Prinsip6 30.55 19.900 .623 .853 Prinsip7
30.45 20.170 .678 .850 Prinsip8
30.47 21.117 .461 .868 Prinsip9
30.37 20.778 .649 .853
Scale Statistics
Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items 34.29 24.913 4.991
9 Reliability Kendala Otonomi Daerah
Case Processing Summary
N % Cases Valid 75 100.0
a
Excluded .0
Total 75 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics
.851
11 Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
Item Statistics 4.17 .554
75 4.04 .667 75 3.39 1.089 75 3.89 .689 75 3.52 1.044 75 4.00 .735 75 3.88 .734 75 4.00 .678 75 4.03 .677 75 3.91 .720 75 3.96 .603
75 Kendala1 Kendala2 Kendala3 Kendala4 Kendala5 Kendala6 Kendala7 Kendala8 Kendala9 Kendala10 Kendala11 Mean Std. Deviation N
Item-Total Statistics 38.61 24.375 .642 .834 38.75 23.084 .729 .825 39.40 26.405 .054 .892 38.89 23.015 .712 .826 39.27 24.225 .280 .868 38.79 22.765 .697 .826 38.91 22.951 .669 .828 38.79 23.197 .695 .827 38.76 23.104 .712 .826 38.88 23.134 .656 .829 38.83 23.902 .667 .831 Kendala1
Kendala2 Kendala3 Kendala4 Kendala5 Kendala6 Kendala7 Kendala8 Kendala9 Kendala10 Kendala11
Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if
Item Deleted
Corrected
Item-Total
Correlation
Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted
Scale Statistics
42.79 28.197 5.310
11 Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items
Perpustakaan Unika
LAMPIRAN E REGRESI LOGISTIK Perpustakaan Unika
Perpustakaan Unika Logistic Regression PPA terhadap Kinerja Case Processing Summary a
Unweighted Cases N Percent Selected Cases Included in Analysis 75 100.0
Missing Cases .0
Total 75 100.0 Unselected Cases
.0 Total 75 100.0 a.
If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value Internal Value Tidak terpilih Terpilih
1 Block 0: Beginning Block
a,b,c Iteration History
Coefficients
- 2 Log Iteration likelihood Constant Step
1 89.006 -.880
2 88.943 -.944 3 88.943 -.944 a.
Constant is included in the model.
b.
Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 88.943 c. Estimation terminated at iteration number 3 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
- .944 .257 13.487 1 .000 .389
Block 1: Method = Enter Iteration History a,b,c,d
d.
Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 88.943 c.
b.
Coefficients Method: Enter a. Constant is included in the model.
1
5 Step
4
3
2
1
Iteration
85.965 -3.262 .635 85.407 -4.591 .958 85.394 -4.844 1.021 85.394 -4.851 1.022 85.394 -4.851 1.022
Step 0 Score df Sig.
Variables pa Overall Statistics
3.044 1 .081 3.044 1 .081
Variables not in the Equation
Constant Step 0 B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)
Variables in the Equation
The cut value is .500 b.
a.
Correct Predicted Constant is included in the model.
Kinerja Percentage
Step 0 Tidak terpilih Terpilih
Kinerja Overall Percentage
72.0 Observed Tidak terpilih Terpilih
54 100.0 21 .0
Classification Table
a,bPerpustakaan Unika
- 2 Log likelihood Constant pa
- 2 Log likelihood
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Total
2
3
4
5
6
7 Step
1 Observed Expected Kinerja = Tidak terpilih
Observed Expected Kinerja = Terpilih
Classification Table
a5
53
1
98.1 21 .0
70.7 Observed Tidak terpilih Terpilih
Kinerja Overall Percentage
Step 1 Tidak terpilih Terpilih
Kinerja Percentage
Correct Predicted
The cut value is .500 a.
1
13 3 2.785 2 2.215
3.549 1 .060 3.549 1 .060 3.549 1 .060
Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
Step Block Model
Step 1 Chi-square df Sig.
Model Summary
85.394
a
.046 .067 Step
1
Cox & Snell R Square
Nagelkerke R Square
a.
18 9 8.267 4 4.733
Hosmer and Lemeshow Test
6.861 5 .231 Step
1 Chi-square df Sig.
Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test
8 8.125 1 .875
9 4 4.852 2 1.148
6 8 6.107 1.893 8 13 11.591
3 4.409
16 9 12.273 9 5.727
Perpustakaan Unika
Variables in the Equation
1.022 .611 2.796 1 .095 2.780 .839 9.2131 a
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper 95.0% C.I.for EXP(B) Variable(s) entered on step 1: pa.
- 4.851 2.390 4.119 1 .042 .008 pa Constant Step
a.
Correlation Matrix
1.000 -.994
Step
1 Constant pa
Perpustakaan Unika
- .994 1.000 Constant pa
Perpustakaan Unika Logistic Regression Moderasi Komitmen Case Processing Summary a
Unweighted Cases N Percent Selected Cases Included in Analysis 75 100.0
Missing Cases .0
Total 75 100.0 Unselected Cases
.0 Total 75 100.0 a.
If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value Internal Value Tidak terpilih Terpilih
1 Block 0: Beginning Block
a,b,c Iteration History
Coefficients
- 2 Log Iteration likelihood Constant Step
1 89.006 -.880
2 88.943 -.944 3 88.943 -.944 a.
Constant is included in the model.
b.
Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 88.943 c. Estimation terminated at iteration number 3 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
Perpustakaan Unika a,b
Classification Table
Predicted Kinerja
Percentage Observed Tidak terpilih Terpilih Correct
Step 0 Kinerja Tidak terpilih 54 100.0 Terpilih 21 .0
Overall Percentage 72.0 a.
Constant is included in the model.
b.
The cut value is .500
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Step 0 Constant
- .944 .257 13.487 1 .000 .389
Variables not in the Equation Score df Sig.
Step Variables pa 3.044 1 .081 ko .028
1 .867 paxko 1.637 1 .201
Overall Statistics 7.613 3 .055
Block 1: Method = Enter
- 2 Log likelihood Constant pa ko paxko
1
Step Block Model
Step 1 Chi-square df Sig.
Model Summary
75.252
a
.167 .240 Step
Cox & Snell R Square
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Nagelkerke R Square
Estimation terminated at iteration number 7 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
a.
Hosmer and Lemeshow Test
5.772 7 .567 Step
1 Chi-square df Sig.
13.691 3 .003 13.691 3 .003 13.691 3 .003
d.
Perpustakaan Unika
4
Iteration History a,b,c,d
80.979 -43.420 11.630 9.645 -2.635 77.067 -98.336 26.248 22.357 -6.027 75.486 -162.282 42.897 37.278 -9.915 75.256 -195.678 51.443 45.019 -11.897 75.252 -200.431 52.652 46.118 -12.177 75.252 -200.504 52.671 46.134 -12.181 75.252 -200.504 52.671 46.134 -12.181
Iteration
1
2
3
5
Estimation terminated at iteration number 7 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
6
7 Step
1
Coefficients Method: Enter a. Constant is included in the model.
b.
Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 88.943 c.
- 2 Log likelihood
Perpustakaan Unika Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test
Kinerja = Tidak terpilih Kinerja = Terpilih Observed Expected Observed Expected Total
Step
1 8 7.985 .015
8
1
2 7 6.427 .573
7
3 6 6.644 2 1.356
8
4 6 6.726 3 2.274
9
5 7 5.138 1.862
7
6 6 6.494 3 2.506
9
7 5 4.846 2 2.154
7
8 4 5.787 6 4.213
10
9 5 3.953 5 6.047
10
a Classification Table
Predicted Kinerja
Percentage Observed Tidak terpilih Terpilih Correct
Step 1 Kinerja Tidak terpilih
49
5
90.7 Terpilih
17
4
19.0 Overall Percentage 70.7 a. The cut value is .500
Variables in the Equation
95.0% C.I.for EXP(B) B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower UpperStep pa 52.671 22.334 5.562 1 .018
7E+022 7312.245
8E+041 a
1 ko 46.134 20.207 5.212 1 .022
1E+020 684.692
2E+037 paxko -12.181 5.224 5.437 1 .020 .0000051 .000 .143 Constant -200.504 86.436 5.381 1 .020 .000 a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pa, ko, paxko.
Correlation Matrix
Constant pa ko paxko Step Constant
1.000 -.998 -.999 .997
1 pa -.998 1.000 .998 -.999 ko -.999 .998 1.000 -.998 paxko
.997 -.999 -.998 1.000
Perpustakaan Unika Logistic Regression Moderasi Otonomi Daerah Case Processing Summary a
Unweighted Cases N Percent Selected Cases Included in Analysis 75 100.0
Missing Cases .0
Total 75 100.0 Unselected Cases
.0 Total 75 100.0 a.
If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value Internal Value Tidak terpilih Terpilih
1 Block 0: Beginning Block
a,b,c Iteration History
Coefficients
- 2 Log Iteration likelihood Constant Step
1 89.006 -.880 2 88.943 -.944
3 88.943 -.944 a. Constant is included in the model.
b.
Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 88.943 c. Estimation terminated at iteration number 3 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
- .944 .257 13.487 1 .000 .389
Block 1: Method = Enter Iteration History a,b,c,d
d.
Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 88.943 c.
b.
Coefficients Method: Enter a. Constant is included in the model.
1
5 Step
4
3
2
1
Iteration
83.962 -3.543 .691 -2.357 .388 83.137 -5.190 1.082 -4.736 .939 83.109 -5.589 1.179 -5.489 1.120 83.109 -5.607 1.183 -5.526 1.129 83.109 -5.607 1.183 -5.526 1.129
Step Score df Sig.
Variables Overall Statistics
3.044 1 .081 1.887 1 .170 1.985 1 .159 5.151 3 .161 pa otonom paxotonom
Variables not in the Equation
Constant Step 0 B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)
Variables in the Equation
The cut value is .500 b.
a.
Correct Predicted Constant is included in the model.
Kinerja Percentage
Step 0 Tidak terpilih Terpilih
Kinerja Overall Percentage
72.0 Observed Tidak terpilih Terpilih
54 100.0 21 .0
Classification Table
a,bPerpustakaan Unika