Appendix 1 Draft of the Pre Test
p
p
E
54
Appendix 1
Draft of the Pre Test
“The Writing Ability of Eleventh Grade Students of Man 2 Kudus in the
Academic Year 2012/2013 Taught by Using Web Log Media”
1. The students are asked to choose one topic to make a text in the genre
of Hortatory Exposition Text.
The example of topics of writing tests:
1. Smoking is good
2. Smoking is bad
3. Using mobile phone while driving should be banned
4. Using mobile phone while driving is okay
5. Home schooling is a good way of learning
6. Home schooling is bad for teenagers
7. Learning English in class is fun
8. Learning English outside of class is fun
2. Students are asked to arrange text using form below. (40 minutes)
Thesis
Argument 1
Argument 2
Argument 3
Recommendation
55
Appendix 2
Pre Test Score
No
Name
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
AU
AU
AAA
AN
AAT
AH
AM
AWA
ANH
AFM
AA
DI
DI
DNF
DN
FI
FNA
FI
FDA
FAW
FIS
IR
II
JN
LM
LS
LM
NLN
NFU
NIA
RTL
RH
SA
SL
SSN
SA
UK
UJN
VLU
YA
C
O
5
4
4
3
3
4
3
3
5
3
4
3
5
4
3
4
4
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
4
4
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
3
4
4
2
4
4
3
V
4
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
4
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
3
3
4
4
3
4
2
4
4
4
L
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
4
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
M Total
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
4
3
3
4
3
4
3
4
4
2
4
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
19
16
18
16
15
17
18
16
19
17
18
15
18
18
15
19
18
17
18
14
16
18
19
18
17
17
17
17
19
19
16
15
18
17
19
18
13
18
17
17
Score (total x 4)
76
64
72
64
60
68
72
64
76
68
72
60
72
72
60
76
72
68
72
56
64
72
76
72
68
68
68
68
76
76
64
60
72
68
76
72
52
72
68
68
56
Appendix 3
The Calculation of Mean and Standard Deviation of Pre Test of the Writing
Ability of the Eleventh Grade Students of MAN 2 Kudus in Academic Year
2012/2013 before being Taught by Using Web Log Media
a.
b.
c.
d.
The maximum score
The minimum score
Range
Number of Classes
e. Interval
: 76
: 52
: 76-52 = 24
: 1 + 3.3 log 40 = 6.28
= 7 (rounded up)
: 24/7 = 3.43
=4
Frequency Distribution Table
Score
f
x
fx
x'
x'2
fx'
f(x'2)
50-53
1
51.5
51.5
-5
5
25
25
54-57
1
55.5
55.5
-4
4
16
16
58-61
4
59.5
238
-3
12
9
36
62-65
5
63.5
317.5
-2
10
4
20
66-69
10
67.5
675
-1
10
1
10
70-73
12
71.5
858
0
0
0
0
74-77
7
75.5
528.5
1
7
1
7
∑
40
444.5
2724
-14
-34
56
114
a. Mean
x’
b. Standard Deviation
=
=
∑𝑓𝑚
𝑁
2724
40
= 68.1
SD
∑𝑓𝑥 2
= 𝑖√
𝑁
−[
∑𝑓𝑥 2
𝑁
]
= 40√2.85 − 0.7225
= 40 𝑥 1.4586
= 5.8
57
Appendix 4
Draft of the Post Test
“The Writing Ability of Eleventh Grade Students of Man 2 Kudus in the
Academic Year 2012/2013 Taught by Using Web Log Media”
1. The students are asked to choose one topic to make a text in the genre
of Hortatory Exposition Text.
The example of topics of writing tests:
1. Laptop computer should be allowed in class
2. Laptop computer should be banned in class
3. Mobile phone should be banned in class
4. Mobile phone should be banned in class
5. Bilingual class should be supported
6. Bilingual class should be revised
7. Internet connection distracts teaching learning process
8. Internet connection should be used in teaching learning process
2. Students are asked to arrange text using form below. (40 minutes)
Thesis
Argument 1
Argument 2
Argument 3
Recommendation
58
Appendix 5
Post Test Scores
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Name
AU
AU
AAA
AN
AAT
AH
AM
AWA
ANH
AFM
AA
DI
DI
DNF
DN
FI
FNA
FI
FDA
FAW
FIS
IR
II
JN
LM
LS
LM
NLN
NFU
NIA
RTL
RH
SA
SL
SSN
SA
UK
UJN
VLU
YA
C
4
5
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
5
4
4
4
4
3
4
5
5
4
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
4
3
4
4
4
5
4
4
5
4
4
O
4
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
5
5
3
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
5
3
4
3
4
5
3
4
4
4
4
4
3
V
3
4
4
4
3
4
3
4
3
3
4
3
3
4
3
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
4
4
L
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
M Total
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
19
22
20
20
18
20
19
20
19
19
21
19
19
19
17
19
20
22
21
19
21
20
17
18
19
19
19
21
19
19
17
17
20
18
20
19
19
20
19
19
Score (total x
4)
76
88
80
80
72
80
76
80
76
76
84
76
76
76
68
76
80
88
84
76
84
80
68
72
76
76
76
84
76
76
68
68
80
72
80
76
76
80
76
76
59
Appendix 6
The Calculation of Mean and Standard Deviation of Posttest of the Writing
Ability of the Eleventh Grade Students of MAN 2 Kudus in Academic Year
2012/2013 after being Taught by Using Web Log Media
a.
b.
c.
f.
The maximum score
The minimum score
Range
Number of Classes
d. Interval
: 88
: 68
: 88 - 68 = 20
: 1 + 3.3 log 40 = 6.28
= 6 (rounded down)
: 20/6 = 3.33
=4
Frequency Distribution Table
Score
f
x
fx
x'
x'2
fx'
f(x'2)
66-69
4
67.5
270
2
8
4
16
70-73
3
71.5
214.5
1
3
1
3
74-77
17
75.5
1283.5
0
0
0
0
78-81
10
79.5
795
-1
10
1
10
82-85
4
83.5
334
-2
-8
4
16
86-89
2
87.5
175
-3
-6
9
18
∑
40
465
3072
-3
-13
19
63
b. Standard Deviation
a. Mean
x’
=
=
∑𝑓𝑚
𝑁
3072
40
= 76.8
SD
∑𝑓𝑥 2
= 𝑖√
𝑁
−[
∑𝑓𝑥 2
𝑁
]
= 4√1.575 − 0.105625
= 4 𝑥 1.212178
= 4.8
60
Appendix 7
The Calculation of T-Test of the Writing Ability of the Eleventh Grade
Students of MAN 2 Kudus in Academic Year 2012/2013 before and after
being Taught by Using Web Log Media
Student
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Pretest
76
64
72
64
60
68
72
64
76
68
72
60
72
72
60
76
72
68
72
56
64
72
76
72
68
68
68
68
Posttest
76
88
80
80
72
80
76
80
76
76
84
76
76
76
68
76
80
88
84
76
84
80
68
72
76
76
76
84
D
D2
0
24
8
16
12
12
4
16
0
8
12
16
4
4
8
0
8
20
12
20
20
8
-8
0
8
8
8
16
0
576
64
256
144
144
16
256
0
64
144
256
16
16
64
0
64
400
144
400
400
64
64
0
64
64
64
256
61
Student
Number
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Total
a. T-test
𝑡=
76
76
64
60
72
68
76
72
52
72
68
68
2744
Posttest
̅
𝐷
∑𝐷
𝑁
𝑡=
2
2 − (∑𝐷)
∑𝐷
√
𝑁
𝑁(𝑁 − 1)
D
76
76
68
68
80
72
80
78
76
80
76
76
3090
𝑡=
(∑𝐷)2
−
√
𝑁
𝑁(𝑁 − 1)
∑𝐷2
Pretest
𝑡=
𝑡=
D2
0
0
4
8
8
4
4
6
24
8
8
8
346
8.65
119716
√4980 − 40
1600 − 40
8.65
1987.1
1.273782051
√
8.65
1.128619533
𝑡 = 7.67
0
0
16
64
64
16
16
36
576
64
64
64
4980
62
Appendix 8
Two-tailed t-Table
df
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
0.10
2.9200
2.3534
2.1318
2.0150
1.9432
1.8946
1.8595
1.8331
1.8125
1.7959
1.7823
1.7709
1.7613
1.7531
1.7459
1.7396
1.7341
1.7291
1.7247
1.7207
1.7171
1.7139
1.7109
1.7081
1.7056
1.7033
1.7011
1.6991
1.6973
1.6955
1.6939
1.6924
1.6909
1.6896
1.6883
1.6871
1.6860
1.6849
1.6839
0.05
4.3027
3.1824
2.7765
2.5706
2.4469
2.3646
2.3060
2.2622
2.2281
2.2010
2.1788
2.1604
2.1448
2.1315
2.1199
2.1098
2.1009
2.0930
2.0860
2.0796
2.0739
2.0687
2.0639
2.0595
2.0555
2.0518
2.0484
2.0452
2.0423
2.0395
2.0369
2.0345
2.0322
2.0301
2.0281
2.0262
2.0244
2.0227
2.0211
0.025
6.2054
4.1765
3.4954
3.1634
2.9687
2.8412
2.7515
2.6850
2.6338
2.5931
2.5600
2.5326
2.5096
2.4899
2.4729
2.4581
2.4450
2.4334
2.4231
2.4138
2.4055
2.3979
2.3910
2.3846
2.3788
2.3734
2.3685
2.3638
2.3596
2.3556
2.3518
2.3483
2.3451
2.3420
2.3391
2.3363
2.3337
2.3313
2.3289
0.01
9.9250
5.8408
4.6041
4.0321
3.7074
3.4995
3.3554
3.2498
3.1693
3.1058
3.0545
3.0123
2.9768
2.9467
2.9208
2.8982
2.8784
2.8609
2.8453
2.8314
2.8188
2.8073
2.7970
2.7874
2.7787
2.7707
2.7633
2.7564
2.7500
2.7440
2.7385
2.7333
2.7284
2.7238
2.7195
2.7154
2.7116
2.7079
2.7045
63
Appendix 9
LESSON PLAN 1
Name of School
: MAN 2 Kudus
Subject
: English
Grade / Semester
: XI/Even
Time
: 2 x 45 minutes
Material
: Written monologue text in the form of hortatory
exposition
Cycle
: Writing
Standard of Competence
: 12. Writing
To express meaning in short functional text and
monologue in Narrative, spoof, and Hortatory
Exposition in the context of daily life.
Basic of Competence
: 12. 2 Writing
To express meaning and rhetorical steps in essay
using variety of written languages accurately,
fluently, understandably in the context of daily life
and in the text form of narrative, spoof, and
hortatory exposition.
I. Indicators
-
To identify the meaning of the text
-
To identify the social function of the text
-
To identify the generic structure of the text
-
To identify the language features of the text
-
To create a hortatory exposition text
II. Learning Objectives
On the end of teaching student can:
-
Identify the meaning of the text
-
Identify the social function of the text
64
-
Identify the generic structure of the text
-
Identify the language features of the text
-
Create a hortatory exposition text
III. Material of teaching
Hortatory exposition text
IV. Learning Method
Teaching-learning cycle
Discussion
V. Procedures of Teaching
1. Pre-teaching
-
Greeting and Praying
-
Checking attendance list
2. Whilst-teaching
a. Building Knowledge of Field (BKOF)
-
The teacher asks some questions related to the topic.
-
The teacher brainstorms students with what they are going to
learn
b. Modeling of the Text (MOT)
-
The teacher open the Web Blog page and explains about
Hortatory exposition text
-
The teacher presents an example of hortatory exposition text
-
The teacher explains the social function, generic structure, and
language features of hortatory exposition
c. Joint Construction of the Text (JCOT)
-
The teacher presents an analytical exposition text and a
hortatory exposition text
-
The students identify the difference of the texts
-
The students write the answers on a worksheet provided by
teacher as an offline Web Log activity to introduce the media
-
The teacher discusses the text
65
d. Independent Construction of the Text (ICOT)
-
The teacher presents several topics
-
The teacher asks the students to choose a topic provided
-
The students make 5 sentences consist of thesis, arguments and
recommendation
-
The students write the text on a worksheet provided
individually
3. Post activity
-
The teacher facilitates students to make conclusion about what have
they learn today
VI. Media & Sources of Learning:
VII.
a. Media
: - Web Log
b. Source
: - Text book
-
Internet
-
Text Book
Evaluation
a. Technique
: Written test
b. Instrument
: Essay
66
LESSON PLAN 2
Name of School
: MAN 2 Kudus
Subject
: English
Grade / Semester
: XI/Even
Time
: 2 x 45 minutes
Material
: Written Monologue Text in the Form of Hortatory
Exposition
Cycle
: Writing
Standard of Competence
: 12. Writing
To express meaning in short functional text and
monologue in Narrative, spoof, and Hortatory
Exposition in the context of daily life.
Basic of Competence
: 12. 2 Writing
To express meaning and rhetorical steps in essay
using variety of written languages accurately,
fluently, understandably in the context of daily life
and in the text form of narrative, spoof, and
hortatory exposition.
I. Indicators
-
To identify the meaning of the text
-
To identify the social function of the text
-
To identify the generic structure of the text
-
To identify the language features of the text
-
To create an hortatory exposition text
II. Learning Objectives
On the end of teaching student can:
-
Identify the meaning of the text
-
Identify the social function of the text
-
To identify the generic structure of the text
67
-
Identify the language features of the text
-
Create a hortatory exposition text
III. Material of teaching
Hortatory exposition text
IV. Learning Method
Teaching-Learning Cycle
V. Procedures of Teaching
1. Pre-teaching
-
Greeting and Praying
-
Checking attendance list
-
Informing what students are going to learn and do
2. Whilst-teaching
a. Building Knowledge of Field (BKOF)
-
The teacher reviews material on the last meeting
-
The teacher brainstorms students with what they are going to
learn
-
The teacher teaches about conjunction
b. Modeling of the Text (MOT)
-
The teacher and students access a text of hortatory exposition
in the class Web Log
-
The students read carefully the text
-
The students pay attention to the conjunction
-
The teacher facilitates students to analyze the social function,
generic structure, and language features of the text
c. Joint Construction of the Text (JCOT)
-
The teacher asks every group to access assigned hortatory
exposition text for each group on the class Web Log
-
Every group of student should fill the missing conjunction
68
-
Every group of students should type down the analyzing result
on the comment form provided below the text assigned
-
The teacher discusses the result of analyzing.
d. Independent Construction of the Text (ICOT)
-
The teacher asks the students to open a page on the class Web
Log a topic provided
-
The students choose a certain topic based on the picture posted
on the Blog
-
The students make a simple hortatory exposition text with
conjunction
-
The students upload the text to their group Web Log
-
The students are permitted to comment each other
-
The teacher discusses the writings
3. Post activity
-
The teacher facilitate students to make conclusion about what
have they learn today.
VI. Media & Sources of Learning:
c. Media
: - Web Log
d. Source
: - Text book
-
Internet
-
Text Book
VII. Evaluation
c. Technique
: Written test
d. Instrument
: Essay
69
LESSON PLAN 3
Name of School
: MAN 2 Kudus
Subject
: English
Grade / Semester
: XI/Even
Time
: 2 x 45 minutes
Material
: Written monologue text in the form of hortatory
exposition
Cycle
: Writing
Standard of Competence
: 12. Writing
To express meaning in short functional text and
monologue in Narrative, spoof, and Hortatory
Exposition in the context of daily life.
Basic of Competence
: 12. 2 Writing
To express meaning and rhetorical steps in essay
using variety of written languages accurately,
fluently, understandably in the context of daily life
and in the text form of narrative, spoof, and
hortatory exposition.
I. Indicators
-
To identify the meaning of the text
-
To identify the social function of the text
-
To identify the generic structure of the text
-
To identify the language features of the text
-
To create an hortatory exposition text
II. Learning Objectives
On the end of teaching student can:
-
Identify the meaning of the text
-
Identify the social function of the text
-
To identify the generic structure of the text
70
-
Identify the language features of the text
-
Create a hortatory exposition text
III. Material of teaching
Hortatory exposition text
IV. Learning Method
Teaching-learning cycle
V. Procedures of Teaching
1. Pre-teaching
-
Greeting and Praying
-
Checking attendance list
-
Informing what students are going to learn and do
2. Whilst-teaching
a. Building Knowledge of Field (BKOF)
-
The teacher reviews the last meeting material
-
The teacher brainstorms students with what they are going to learn
-
The teacher reviews about present tense
b. Modeling of the Text (MOT)
-
The teacher present a hortatory exposition text from the class Web
Log
-
The teacher discuss the text
c. Joint Construction of the Text (JCOT)
-
The students open the class Web Log
-
Every group of student should analyze the social function, generic
structure and language features of the assigned text
-
Every group of students should type down the analyzing result on
the comment form provided below the text assigned
-
The teacher discusses the result of analyzing.
-
The teacher checks the answer
71
d. Independent Construction of the Text (ICOT)
-
The student create a hortatory exposition text with emphasis on the
tenses
-
The students upload and comment each other’s
-
The students revise the text they made
-
The students upload the revised text to the Web Log
3. Post activity
-
The teacher facilitate students to make conclusion about what have
they learn today
-
The teacher give an assignment to give a comment on the individual
text created of each student
VI. Media & Sources of Learning:
e. Media
: - Web Log
f. Source
: - Text book
-
Internet
VII. Evaluation
a. Technique
: Written test
b. Form
: Written question
72
LESSON PLAN 4
Name of School
: MAN 2 Kudus
Subject
: English
Grade / Semester
: XI/Even
Time
: 2 x 45 minutes
Material
: Written Monologue Text in the Form of Hortatory
Exposition
Cycle
: Writing
Standard of Competence
: 12. Writing
To express meaning in short functional text and
monologue in Narrative, spoof, and Hortatory
Exposition in the context of daily life.
Basic of Competence
: 12. 2 Writing
To express meaning and rhetorical steps in essay
using variety of written languages accurately,
fluently, understandably in the context of daily life
and in the text form of narrative, spoof, and
hortatory exposition.
I. Indicators
-
To identify the meaning of the text
-
To identify the social function of the text
-
To identify the generic structure of the text
-
To identify the language features of the text
-
To create an hortatory exposition text
II. Learning Objectives
On the end of teaching student can:
-
Identify the meaning of the text
-
Identify the social function of the text
-
To identify the generic structure of the text
-
Identify the language features of the text
73
-
Create a hortatory exposition text
III. Material of teaching
Hortatory exposition text
IV. Learning Method
Teaching-Learning Cycle
V. Procedures of Teaching
1. Pre-teaching
-
Greeting and Praying
-
Checking attendance list
-
Informing what students are going to learn and do
2. Whilst-teaching
a. Building Knowledge of Field (BKOF)
-
The teacher reviews the last meeting material
-
The teacher asks some questions related to the topic
-
Sharing experience based on the topic
-
The teacher discuss cohesion and cohesive
b. Modeling of the Text (MOT)
-
The teacher displays a series of jumbled sentences from some
coherent hortatory exposition texts
-
The teacher explains how to construct a hortatory exposition
text
c. Joint Construction of the Text (JCOT)
-
The students are asked to open an assigned post on the class
Web Log
-
The students read the text carefully and grasp the meaning
-
The students rearrange the sentences into a coherent
paragraphs of hortatory exposition text
-
The teacher discusses the text
d. Independent Construction of the Text (ICOT)
74
-
The teacher ask students to choose the topic they like about
school from the class Web Log
-
The students are asked to write a hortatory exposition text
based on the topic they choose
-
The students upload the writing then comment each other’s
-
The students edit the text based on the input
-
The teacher discuss the text
3. Post activity
-
The teacher facilitates students to make conclusion about what
have they learn today.
VI. Media & Sources of Learning:
a. Media
: - Web Log
b. Source
: - Text book
-
Internet
VII. Evaluation
a. Technique
: Written test
b. Form
: Essay
75
Appendix 10
The Students’ Worksheets from Web Log
1st Meeting
a. Group Work
76
Taken from: http://classblogspace.wordpress.com/2013/01/26/moredust-bins/
b. Individual work
Please make 5 sentences that are organized as hortatory exposition on the
worksheet provided!
77
2nd Meeting
a. Group Work
Taken from: http://classblogspace.wordpress.com/2013/01/27/tv-adsshould-be-supported/
78
b. Individual Work
Please make and upload a simple hortatory exposition text and do not
forget to add conjunctions, then comment your friends’ texts!
3rd Meeting
a. Group Work
Taken from: http://classblogspace.wordpress.com/2013/01/28/consumewater-to-have-beauty/
79
b. Individual Work
Please make a simple hortatory exposition text and upload it to the Blog
then please comment your friends’ texts especially the tenses they use!
4th Meeting
a. Group Work
Taken from: http://classblogspace.wordpress.com/2013/02/02/vegetarian-diet/
b. Individual Work
Please choose one text you made from previous lesson then improve it
to be a complex construction text and comments your friends work!
80
Appendix 11
The Example of Blog Activities
1. Group Work
Link: http://classblogspace.wordpress.com/2013/01/27/tv-ads-shouldbe-supported/
81
2.
Individual Writing
a. The post
Link:
http://students001.wordpress.com/2013/02/02/waste-disposal-in-the-
right-place
b.
The Peer Comment
82
c. The Edited Post
Link:
http://students001.wordpress.com/2013/02/02/waste-disposal-in-
the-right-place-edit/
83
Appendix 12
The Criteria for Scoring Written Work
Aspect of
writing
Content
Organization
Vocabulary
Language use
Score
Level
Criteria
5
Excellent to Very
Good
4
Good to Average
3
Fair to Poor
2
Very Poor
5
Excellent to Very Ideas stated coherently and cohesively
Good
4
Good to Average
3
Fair to Poor
2
Very Poor
5
Excellent to Very Mostly use appropriate word/idiom to
support meaning
Good
4
Good to Average
Little use of inappropriate word/idiom
but meaning not obscured.
3
Fair to Poor
Frequent
use
word/idiom
2
Very Poor
Shows no knowledge of English
vocabulary
5
Excellent to Very Effective complex constructions
Good
Shows knowledge of the subject
Some knowledge of subject
Limited knowledge of subject
Does not show knowledge of subject
Loosely organized but main ideas stand
out
Ideas confused or disconnected
Does not communicate
of
inappropriate
84
Aspect of
writing
Mechanics
Score
Level
Criteria
Effective but simple constructions
4
Good to Average
3
Fair to Poor
Major problems in simple/complex
constructions
2
Very Poor
Virtually no mastery of sentence
construction rules
5
Excellent to Very Demonstrates mastery of conventions
Good
4
Good to Average
Occasional errors
punctuation
3
Fair to Poor
Frequent errors of spelling punctuation,
or capitalization
2
Very Poor
Dominated by errors of spelling,
punctuation,
capitalization,
or
paragraphing
The max score = Score x 4
= 25 x 4
= 100
of
spelling,
or
85
Appendix 13
Example of Scoring the Student Pre Test and Post Test Work
a. Pre Test
Content:
4
Organization
:
3
Vocabulary:
3
Language
use:
4
Mechanics:
3
Score
68
86
b. Post Test
Content:
5
Organization
:
5
Vocabulary:
4
Language
use:
4
Mechanics:
4
Score
88
87
Appendix 14
The Schedule of Research Activity
Pretest
: 26th January 2013 (Saturday, 2x45 minutes 7th-8th period)
Treatment 1
: 28th January 2013 (Monday, 2x45 minutes 2nd-3rd period)
Treatment 2
: 2nd February 2013 (Saturday, 2x45 Minutes 7th-8th period)
Treatment 3
: 4th February 2013 (Monday, 2x45 minutes 2nd-3rd period)
Treatment 4
: 9th February 2013 (Saturday, 2x45 minutes 7th-8th period)
Posttest
: 11th February 2013(Monday, 2x45 minutes 2nd-3rd period)
88
Appendix 15
The Student List of XI Language 1 Class of MAN 2 Kudus in the Academic
Year 2012/2013
Number
Name
Number
Name
1
Afna Ulfiana
26
Lailis Sa'diyah
2
Afni Ulfiani
27
Lu'luil Maknun
3
Agus Abdullah Afif
28
Nadea Lathifah N
4
Ainun Ni'mah
29
Nila Fitrotul Ula
5
Ais Ananata Tama
30
Nurul Imam A
6
Azizzatin Habibah
31
Reni Tri Lestari
7
Alfiyah Masturoh
32
Rosalia Haryanti
8
Annisa Wahyu A
33
Sahilatul Ardina
9
Aqmarina Nur H
34
Sarah Lusiani
10
Aulia Fitrotul M
35
Shaffa Shaffinah N
11
Awaludin Akmal
36
Sunia Ardiyanti
12
Dedi Irawan
37
Ummi Khoiroh
13
Dewi Istiyani
38
Uzlifatil Jannah N
14
Dina Nurul Fajri
39
Vivi Laila Ulva
15
Durrotun Nafi'ah
40
Yaya Anifah
16
Farah Irsalina
17
Fasha Nabilah A
18
Felayana Isfar
19
Ferry Dwi Agustina
20
Fitri Ayu Wulandari
21
Fitriyani Indah Sari
22
Ima Rokhmawati
23
Inka Indriani
24
Jamilatun Nahdliyah
25
Laili Maghfiroh
89
YAYASAN PEMBINA UNIVERSITAS MURIA KUDUS
UNIVERSITAS MURIA KUDUS
Kampus UMK Gondangmanis Bae Kudus PO. Box 53 Phone/Fax.0291-438229
STATEMENT
Name
: Abdul Fattah
NIM
: 200832295
study program
: English Education
skripsi title
: The Writing Ability of Eleventh Grade Students of MAN 2
Kudus in the Academic Year 2012/2013 Taught by Using
Web Log Media
state that this skripsi is indeed the scientific work of mine, not that of others. I only
make some certain quotations from others’ as references I need to support for my
skripsi.
I am fully responsible for this statement.
Kudus, March 14th 2013
The Writer
Abdul Fattah
90
YAYASAN PEMBINA UNIVERSITAS MURIA KUDUS
UNIVERSITAS MURIA KUDUS
Kampus UMK Gondangmanis Bae Kudus PO. Box 53 Phone/Fax.0291-438229
PERNYATAAN
Yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini, saya:
nama
: Abdul Fattah
NIM
: 2008 – 32 – 295
program studi
: Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
judul skripsi
: The Writing Ability of Eleventh Grade Students of MAN 2
Kudus in the Academic Year 2012/2013 Taught by Using
Web Log Media
menyatakan bahwa skripsi ini berjudul “The Writing Ability of Eleventh Grade
Students of MAN 2 Kudus in the Academic Year 2012/2013 Taught by Using Web
Log” ini benar-benar hasil karya sendiri, bukan jiplakan dari karya tulis orang lain,
baik sebagian atau seluruhnya. Pendapat atau temuan orang lain yang terdapat
dalam skripsi ini dikutip atau dirujuk berdasarkan kode etik ilmiah.
Apabila ternyata pernyataan ini terbukti tidak benar, maka sepenuhnya menjadi
tanggung jawab saya sendiri selaku penulis skripsi.
Kudus, 14 Maret 2013
Penulis
Abdul Fattah
91
CURRICULUM VITAE
The writer, Abdul Fattah, is the first child of his parents, his father is Karno
and his mother is Miasri. He was born on April 26, 1991 in Jepara.
He attended kindergarten for two years and continued to elementary school in
SDN 2 Ngabul, Tahunan Jepara as his first formal education, he graduated from
this elementary school in 2002 and then continued to MTsN Bawu in Pecangaan
Jepara. After three years studied there, then he continued to SMAN 1 Jepara, he
graduated in 2008.
After finished his study in SMA N 1 Jepara, he entered Muria Kudus
University and decided to study in English Education Department because he is
interested in English Education.
YAYASAN PEMBINA UNIVERSITAS MURIA KUDUS
UNIVERSITAS MURIA KUDUS
Kampus UMK Gondangmanis Bae Kudus PO. Box 53 Phone/Fax.0291-438229
KETERANGAN SELESAI Bll\lBIN(iAN
Yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini:
'
Nama
,
:Dr. H.A..Hilal Madjdi, M.Pd
.,
NIS
:0610713020001020
Jabatan
:Pembimbing I
Nama
:Mutohhar, S.Pd, M.Pd
NIS
:0610701000001204
Jabatan
:Pembimbing II
Menerangkan bahwa
nama
: Abdul Fattah
NThr1/Semester
: 2008-32-295/X
Program studi
:Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
telah menyelesaikan skripsi dengan judul:
The Writing Ability of Eleventh Grade Students of
Academic Year 2012/2013 Taught by Using Web Log.
MAt~
2 Kudus in the
Demikian surat keterangan ini dibuat sebagai syarat untuk permohonan ujian
terakhir.
Kudus, 14 Maret 2013
Pembimbing II
Pembimbing I
Dr.1LB~!1:d
"
NIS. 0610713020001020
.YAYASAN PEMBINA UNIVERSITAS MURIA KUDUS
UNIVERSITAS MURIA .KUDUS
KEGU~AN
FAKULTAS
DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN
Kampus UMK Gondangmanis Bae Kudus PO Box 53 ti' 0291-438229
PENETAPAN PEMBIMBING SKRIPSI
-----r------------------------------------- ---------------------Nomor: 555/FKIP.UMK/PBJ:·SEMESTER GASAUX/2011.
!
Dengan hormat, kami memberikan tugas kepada:
~r.
1. Nama Dosen
H.A. Hilal Madjdi, M.Pd
NIP/NIS
0610713020001020
Jabtn/PgkGol~
Lektor Kepala I Pembina Utama Muda I IV c
I
2. Nama Dosen
:
Mutohhar, S.Pd, M.Pd
NIP/NIS
0610701000001204
Jabatan/Pangkat/Golongan
Asisten Ahli I Penata Muda Tk. I I III b
Untuk berturut-turut menjadi Pembimbing I dan II Skripsi yang akan ditulis oleh mahasiswa :
Nama
ABDUL FATTAH
NIM/Semester
2008 - 32- 295 I VII
Jumlah SKS Diperoleh I IPK
124 I 3,67
Program Studi
PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS
Tema/Judul
THE WRITING ABILITY OF ELEVENTH GRADE OF
SMA 1 KUDUS IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 201112012
TAUGHT BY USING WEBBLOGGING
Sehubungan dengan hal tersebut, mohon usulan terscbut dapat disetujui.
Kudus, 26 Oktober 20 11.
Ka.Progdi PBI,
~ •
FORMULIR 86
YAY ASAN PEMBINA UNIVERSITAS MURIA KUDUS
UNIVERSITAS MURIA KUDUS
F AKULTAS KEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN
Kampus Gondangmanis Bae Kudus PO. Box 53 Telp/Fax.0291-438229
LEMBAR KONSULTASI PENULISAN SKRIPSI
Nama
NIM/Semester
P rogram Studi
Pembimbmg
A'o~v,\
tl'H~
:. ·;voo-·.::·1;2·-:·rv;
..l·\){ ............................................
:
.............................................
: ....o~·w:r
p; i \~r1'.t:l·JN................................
· ~\itlr· · s· _ ·vJ ;~
· p~.ts
.. f.~ ..........................
· t. ·M~w
· ·¥eo~:-Q.;ilt
· fis-·
2 . .................. }.......................................................... .
·-.
Hari
Tanggal
No.
tr~
Materi Konsultasi
Pembibing
~
p
E
54
Appendix 1
Draft of the Pre Test
“The Writing Ability of Eleventh Grade Students of Man 2 Kudus in the
Academic Year 2012/2013 Taught by Using Web Log Media”
1. The students are asked to choose one topic to make a text in the genre
of Hortatory Exposition Text.
The example of topics of writing tests:
1. Smoking is good
2. Smoking is bad
3. Using mobile phone while driving should be banned
4. Using mobile phone while driving is okay
5. Home schooling is a good way of learning
6. Home schooling is bad for teenagers
7. Learning English in class is fun
8. Learning English outside of class is fun
2. Students are asked to arrange text using form below. (40 minutes)
Thesis
Argument 1
Argument 2
Argument 3
Recommendation
55
Appendix 2
Pre Test Score
No
Name
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
AU
AU
AAA
AN
AAT
AH
AM
AWA
ANH
AFM
AA
DI
DI
DNF
DN
FI
FNA
FI
FDA
FAW
FIS
IR
II
JN
LM
LS
LM
NLN
NFU
NIA
RTL
RH
SA
SL
SSN
SA
UK
UJN
VLU
YA
C
O
5
4
4
3
3
4
3
3
5
3
4
3
5
4
3
4
4
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
4
4
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
3
4
4
2
4
4
3
V
4
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
4
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
3
3
4
4
3
4
2
4
4
4
L
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
4
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
M Total
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
4
3
3
4
3
4
3
4
4
2
4
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
19
16
18
16
15
17
18
16
19
17
18
15
18
18
15
19
18
17
18
14
16
18
19
18
17
17
17
17
19
19
16
15
18
17
19
18
13
18
17
17
Score (total x 4)
76
64
72
64
60
68
72
64
76
68
72
60
72
72
60
76
72
68
72
56
64
72
76
72
68
68
68
68
76
76
64
60
72
68
76
72
52
72
68
68
56
Appendix 3
The Calculation of Mean and Standard Deviation of Pre Test of the Writing
Ability of the Eleventh Grade Students of MAN 2 Kudus in Academic Year
2012/2013 before being Taught by Using Web Log Media
a.
b.
c.
d.
The maximum score
The minimum score
Range
Number of Classes
e. Interval
: 76
: 52
: 76-52 = 24
: 1 + 3.3 log 40 = 6.28
= 7 (rounded up)
: 24/7 = 3.43
=4
Frequency Distribution Table
Score
f
x
fx
x'
x'2
fx'
f(x'2)
50-53
1
51.5
51.5
-5
5
25
25
54-57
1
55.5
55.5
-4
4
16
16
58-61
4
59.5
238
-3
12
9
36
62-65
5
63.5
317.5
-2
10
4
20
66-69
10
67.5
675
-1
10
1
10
70-73
12
71.5
858
0
0
0
0
74-77
7
75.5
528.5
1
7
1
7
∑
40
444.5
2724
-14
-34
56
114
a. Mean
x’
b. Standard Deviation
=
=
∑𝑓𝑚
𝑁
2724
40
= 68.1
SD
∑𝑓𝑥 2
= 𝑖√
𝑁
−[
∑𝑓𝑥 2
𝑁
]
= 40√2.85 − 0.7225
= 40 𝑥 1.4586
= 5.8
57
Appendix 4
Draft of the Post Test
“The Writing Ability of Eleventh Grade Students of Man 2 Kudus in the
Academic Year 2012/2013 Taught by Using Web Log Media”
1. The students are asked to choose one topic to make a text in the genre
of Hortatory Exposition Text.
The example of topics of writing tests:
1. Laptop computer should be allowed in class
2. Laptop computer should be banned in class
3. Mobile phone should be banned in class
4. Mobile phone should be banned in class
5. Bilingual class should be supported
6. Bilingual class should be revised
7. Internet connection distracts teaching learning process
8. Internet connection should be used in teaching learning process
2. Students are asked to arrange text using form below. (40 minutes)
Thesis
Argument 1
Argument 2
Argument 3
Recommendation
58
Appendix 5
Post Test Scores
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Name
AU
AU
AAA
AN
AAT
AH
AM
AWA
ANH
AFM
AA
DI
DI
DNF
DN
FI
FNA
FI
FDA
FAW
FIS
IR
II
JN
LM
LS
LM
NLN
NFU
NIA
RTL
RH
SA
SL
SSN
SA
UK
UJN
VLU
YA
C
4
5
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
5
4
4
4
4
3
4
5
5
4
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
4
3
4
4
4
5
4
4
5
4
4
O
4
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
5
5
3
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
5
3
4
3
4
5
3
4
4
4
4
4
3
V
3
4
4
4
3
4
3
4
3
3
4
3
3
4
3
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
4
4
L
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
M Total
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
19
22
20
20
18
20
19
20
19
19
21
19
19
19
17
19
20
22
21
19
21
20
17
18
19
19
19
21
19
19
17
17
20
18
20
19
19
20
19
19
Score (total x
4)
76
88
80
80
72
80
76
80
76
76
84
76
76
76
68
76
80
88
84
76
84
80
68
72
76
76
76
84
76
76
68
68
80
72
80
76
76
80
76
76
59
Appendix 6
The Calculation of Mean and Standard Deviation of Posttest of the Writing
Ability of the Eleventh Grade Students of MAN 2 Kudus in Academic Year
2012/2013 after being Taught by Using Web Log Media
a.
b.
c.
f.
The maximum score
The minimum score
Range
Number of Classes
d. Interval
: 88
: 68
: 88 - 68 = 20
: 1 + 3.3 log 40 = 6.28
= 6 (rounded down)
: 20/6 = 3.33
=4
Frequency Distribution Table
Score
f
x
fx
x'
x'2
fx'
f(x'2)
66-69
4
67.5
270
2
8
4
16
70-73
3
71.5
214.5
1
3
1
3
74-77
17
75.5
1283.5
0
0
0
0
78-81
10
79.5
795
-1
10
1
10
82-85
4
83.5
334
-2
-8
4
16
86-89
2
87.5
175
-3
-6
9
18
∑
40
465
3072
-3
-13
19
63
b. Standard Deviation
a. Mean
x’
=
=
∑𝑓𝑚
𝑁
3072
40
= 76.8
SD
∑𝑓𝑥 2
= 𝑖√
𝑁
−[
∑𝑓𝑥 2
𝑁
]
= 4√1.575 − 0.105625
= 4 𝑥 1.212178
= 4.8
60
Appendix 7
The Calculation of T-Test of the Writing Ability of the Eleventh Grade
Students of MAN 2 Kudus in Academic Year 2012/2013 before and after
being Taught by Using Web Log Media
Student
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Pretest
76
64
72
64
60
68
72
64
76
68
72
60
72
72
60
76
72
68
72
56
64
72
76
72
68
68
68
68
Posttest
76
88
80
80
72
80
76
80
76
76
84
76
76
76
68
76
80
88
84
76
84
80
68
72
76
76
76
84
D
D2
0
24
8
16
12
12
4
16
0
8
12
16
4
4
8
0
8
20
12
20
20
8
-8
0
8
8
8
16
0
576
64
256
144
144
16
256
0
64
144
256
16
16
64
0
64
400
144
400
400
64
64
0
64
64
64
256
61
Student
Number
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Total
a. T-test
𝑡=
76
76
64
60
72
68
76
72
52
72
68
68
2744
Posttest
̅
𝐷
∑𝐷
𝑁
𝑡=
2
2 − (∑𝐷)
∑𝐷
√
𝑁
𝑁(𝑁 − 1)
D
76
76
68
68
80
72
80
78
76
80
76
76
3090
𝑡=
(∑𝐷)2
−
√
𝑁
𝑁(𝑁 − 1)
∑𝐷2
Pretest
𝑡=
𝑡=
D2
0
0
4
8
8
4
4
6
24
8
8
8
346
8.65
119716
√4980 − 40
1600 − 40
8.65
1987.1
1.273782051
√
8.65
1.128619533
𝑡 = 7.67
0
0
16
64
64
16
16
36
576
64
64
64
4980
62
Appendix 8
Two-tailed t-Table
df
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
0.10
2.9200
2.3534
2.1318
2.0150
1.9432
1.8946
1.8595
1.8331
1.8125
1.7959
1.7823
1.7709
1.7613
1.7531
1.7459
1.7396
1.7341
1.7291
1.7247
1.7207
1.7171
1.7139
1.7109
1.7081
1.7056
1.7033
1.7011
1.6991
1.6973
1.6955
1.6939
1.6924
1.6909
1.6896
1.6883
1.6871
1.6860
1.6849
1.6839
0.05
4.3027
3.1824
2.7765
2.5706
2.4469
2.3646
2.3060
2.2622
2.2281
2.2010
2.1788
2.1604
2.1448
2.1315
2.1199
2.1098
2.1009
2.0930
2.0860
2.0796
2.0739
2.0687
2.0639
2.0595
2.0555
2.0518
2.0484
2.0452
2.0423
2.0395
2.0369
2.0345
2.0322
2.0301
2.0281
2.0262
2.0244
2.0227
2.0211
0.025
6.2054
4.1765
3.4954
3.1634
2.9687
2.8412
2.7515
2.6850
2.6338
2.5931
2.5600
2.5326
2.5096
2.4899
2.4729
2.4581
2.4450
2.4334
2.4231
2.4138
2.4055
2.3979
2.3910
2.3846
2.3788
2.3734
2.3685
2.3638
2.3596
2.3556
2.3518
2.3483
2.3451
2.3420
2.3391
2.3363
2.3337
2.3313
2.3289
0.01
9.9250
5.8408
4.6041
4.0321
3.7074
3.4995
3.3554
3.2498
3.1693
3.1058
3.0545
3.0123
2.9768
2.9467
2.9208
2.8982
2.8784
2.8609
2.8453
2.8314
2.8188
2.8073
2.7970
2.7874
2.7787
2.7707
2.7633
2.7564
2.7500
2.7440
2.7385
2.7333
2.7284
2.7238
2.7195
2.7154
2.7116
2.7079
2.7045
63
Appendix 9
LESSON PLAN 1
Name of School
: MAN 2 Kudus
Subject
: English
Grade / Semester
: XI/Even
Time
: 2 x 45 minutes
Material
: Written monologue text in the form of hortatory
exposition
Cycle
: Writing
Standard of Competence
: 12. Writing
To express meaning in short functional text and
monologue in Narrative, spoof, and Hortatory
Exposition in the context of daily life.
Basic of Competence
: 12. 2 Writing
To express meaning and rhetorical steps in essay
using variety of written languages accurately,
fluently, understandably in the context of daily life
and in the text form of narrative, spoof, and
hortatory exposition.
I. Indicators
-
To identify the meaning of the text
-
To identify the social function of the text
-
To identify the generic structure of the text
-
To identify the language features of the text
-
To create a hortatory exposition text
II. Learning Objectives
On the end of teaching student can:
-
Identify the meaning of the text
-
Identify the social function of the text
64
-
Identify the generic structure of the text
-
Identify the language features of the text
-
Create a hortatory exposition text
III. Material of teaching
Hortatory exposition text
IV. Learning Method
Teaching-learning cycle
Discussion
V. Procedures of Teaching
1. Pre-teaching
-
Greeting and Praying
-
Checking attendance list
2. Whilst-teaching
a. Building Knowledge of Field (BKOF)
-
The teacher asks some questions related to the topic.
-
The teacher brainstorms students with what they are going to
learn
b. Modeling of the Text (MOT)
-
The teacher open the Web Blog page and explains about
Hortatory exposition text
-
The teacher presents an example of hortatory exposition text
-
The teacher explains the social function, generic structure, and
language features of hortatory exposition
c. Joint Construction of the Text (JCOT)
-
The teacher presents an analytical exposition text and a
hortatory exposition text
-
The students identify the difference of the texts
-
The students write the answers on a worksheet provided by
teacher as an offline Web Log activity to introduce the media
-
The teacher discusses the text
65
d. Independent Construction of the Text (ICOT)
-
The teacher presents several topics
-
The teacher asks the students to choose a topic provided
-
The students make 5 sentences consist of thesis, arguments and
recommendation
-
The students write the text on a worksheet provided
individually
3. Post activity
-
The teacher facilitates students to make conclusion about what have
they learn today
VI. Media & Sources of Learning:
VII.
a. Media
: - Web Log
b. Source
: - Text book
-
Internet
-
Text Book
Evaluation
a. Technique
: Written test
b. Instrument
: Essay
66
LESSON PLAN 2
Name of School
: MAN 2 Kudus
Subject
: English
Grade / Semester
: XI/Even
Time
: 2 x 45 minutes
Material
: Written Monologue Text in the Form of Hortatory
Exposition
Cycle
: Writing
Standard of Competence
: 12. Writing
To express meaning in short functional text and
monologue in Narrative, spoof, and Hortatory
Exposition in the context of daily life.
Basic of Competence
: 12. 2 Writing
To express meaning and rhetorical steps in essay
using variety of written languages accurately,
fluently, understandably in the context of daily life
and in the text form of narrative, spoof, and
hortatory exposition.
I. Indicators
-
To identify the meaning of the text
-
To identify the social function of the text
-
To identify the generic structure of the text
-
To identify the language features of the text
-
To create an hortatory exposition text
II. Learning Objectives
On the end of teaching student can:
-
Identify the meaning of the text
-
Identify the social function of the text
-
To identify the generic structure of the text
67
-
Identify the language features of the text
-
Create a hortatory exposition text
III. Material of teaching
Hortatory exposition text
IV. Learning Method
Teaching-Learning Cycle
V. Procedures of Teaching
1. Pre-teaching
-
Greeting and Praying
-
Checking attendance list
-
Informing what students are going to learn and do
2. Whilst-teaching
a. Building Knowledge of Field (BKOF)
-
The teacher reviews material on the last meeting
-
The teacher brainstorms students with what they are going to
learn
-
The teacher teaches about conjunction
b. Modeling of the Text (MOT)
-
The teacher and students access a text of hortatory exposition
in the class Web Log
-
The students read carefully the text
-
The students pay attention to the conjunction
-
The teacher facilitates students to analyze the social function,
generic structure, and language features of the text
c. Joint Construction of the Text (JCOT)
-
The teacher asks every group to access assigned hortatory
exposition text for each group on the class Web Log
-
Every group of student should fill the missing conjunction
68
-
Every group of students should type down the analyzing result
on the comment form provided below the text assigned
-
The teacher discusses the result of analyzing.
d. Independent Construction of the Text (ICOT)
-
The teacher asks the students to open a page on the class Web
Log a topic provided
-
The students choose a certain topic based on the picture posted
on the Blog
-
The students make a simple hortatory exposition text with
conjunction
-
The students upload the text to their group Web Log
-
The students are permitted to comment each other
-
The teacher discusses the writings
3. Post activity
-
The teacher facilitate students to make conclusion about what
have they learn today.
VI. Media & Sources of Learning:
c. Media
: - Web Log
d. Source
: - Text book
-
Internet
-
Text Book
VII. Evaluation
c. Technique
: Written test
d. Instrument
: Essay
69
LESSON PLAN 3
Name of School
: MAN 2 Kudus
Subject
: English
Grade / Semester
: XI/Even
Time
: 2 x 45 minutes
Material
: Written monologue text in the form of hortatory
exposition
Cycle
: Writing
Standard of Competence
: 12. Writing
To express meaning in short functional text and
monologue in Narrative, spoof, and Hortatory
Exposition in the context of daily life.
Basic of Competence
: 12. 2 Writing
To express meaning and rhetorical steps in essay
using variety of written languages accurately,
fluently, understandably in the context of daily life
and in the text form of narrative, spoof, and
hortatory exposition.
I. Indicators
-
To identify the meaning of the text
-
To identify the social function of the text
-
To identify the generic structure of the text
-
To identify the language features of the text
-
To create an hortatory exposition text
II. Learning Objectives
On the end of teaching student can:
-
Identify the meaning of the text
-
Identify the social function of the text
-
To identify the generic structure of the text
70
-
Identify the language features of the text
-
Create a hortatory exposition text
III. Material of teaching
Hortatory exposition text
IV. Learning Method
Teaching-learning cycle
V. Procedures of Teaching
1. Pre-teaching
-
Greeting and Praying
-
Checking attendance list
-
Informing what students are going to learn and do
2. Whilst-teaching
a. Building Knowledge of Field (BKOF)
-
The teacher reviews the last meeting material
-
The teacher brainstorms students with what they are going to learn
-
The teacher reviews about present tense
b. Modeling of the Text (MOT)
-
The teacher present a hortatory exposition text from the class Web
Log
-
The teacher discuss the text
c. Joint Construction of the Text (JCOT)
-
The students open the class Web Log
-
Every group of student should analyze the social function, generic
structure and language features of the assigned text
-
Every group of students should type down the analyzing result on
the comment form provided below the text assigned
-
The teacher discusses the result of analyzing.
-
The teacher checks the answer
71
d. Independent Construction of the Text (ICOT)
-
The student create a hortatory exposition text with emphasis on the
tenses
-
The students upload and comment each other’s
-
The students revise the text they made
-
The students upload the revised text to the Web Log
3. Post activity
-
The teacher facilitate students to make conclusion about what have
they learn today
-
The teacher give an assignment to give a comment on the individual
text created of each student
VI. Media & Sources of Learning:
e. Media
: - Web Log
f. Source
: - Text book
-
Internet
VII. Evaluation
a. Technique
: Written test
b. Form
: Written question
72
LESSON PLAN 4
Name of School
: MAN 2 Kudus
Subject
: English
Grade / Semester
: XI/Even
Time
: 2 x 45 minutes
Material
: Written Monologue Text in the Form of Hortatory
Exposition
Cycle
: Writing
Standard of Competence
: 12. Writing
To express meaning in short functional text and
monologue in Narrative, spoof, and Hortatory
Exposition in the context of daily life.
Basic of Competence
: 12. 2 Writing
To express meaning and rhetorical steps in essay
using variety of written languages accurately,
fluently, understandably in the context of daily life
and in the text form of narrative, spoof, and
hortatory exposition.
I. Indicators
-
To identify the meaning of the text
-
To identify the social function of the text
-
To identify the generic structure of the text
-
To identify the language features of the text
-
To create an hortatory exposition text
II. Learning Objectives
On the end of teaching student can:
-
Identify the meaning of the text
-
Identify the social function of the text
-
To identify the generic structure of the text
-
Identify the language features of the text
73
-
Create a hortatory exposition text
III. Material of teaching
Hortatory exposition text
IV. Learning Method
Teaching-Learning Cycle
V. Procedures of Teaching
1. Pre-teaching
-
Greeting and Praying
-
Checking attendance list
-
Informing what students are going to learn and do
2. Whilst-teaching
a. Building Knowledge of Field (BKOF)
-
The teacher reviews the last meeting material
-
The teacher asks some questions related to the topic
-
Sharing experience based on the topic
-
The teacher discuss cohesion and cohesive
b. Modeling of the Text (MOT)
-
The teacher displays a series of jumbled sentences from some
coherent hortatory exposition texts
-
The teacher explains how to construct a hortatory exposition
text
c. Joint Construction of the Text (JCOT)
-
The students are asked to open an assigned post on the class
Web Log
-
The students read the text carefully and grasp the meaning
-
The students rearrange the sentences into a coherent
paragraphs of hortatory exposition text
-
The teacher discusses the text
d. Independent Construction of the Text (ICOT)
74
-
The teacher ask students to choose the topic they like about
school from the class Web Log
-
The students are asked to write a hortatory exposition text
based on the topic they choose
-
The students upload the writing then comment each other’s
-
The students edit the text based on the input
-
The teacher discuss the text
3. Post activity
-
The teacher facilitates students to make conclusion about what
have they learn today.
VI. Media & Sources of Learning:
a. Media
: - Web Log
b. Source
: - Text book
-
Internet
VII. Evaluation
a. Technique
: Written test
b. Form
: Essay
75
Appendix 10
The Students’ Worksheets from Web Log
1st Meeting
a. Group Work
76
Taken from: http://classblogspace.wordpress.com/2013/01/26/moredust-bins/
b. Individual work
Please make 5 sentences that are organized as hortatory exposition on the
worksheet provided!
77
2nd Meeting
a. Group Work
Taken from: http://classblogspace.wordpress.com/2013/01/27/tv-adsshould-be-supported/
78
b. Individual Work
Please make and upload a simple hortatory exposition text and do not
forget to add conjunctions, then comment your friends’ texts!
3rd Meeting
a. Group Work
Taken from: http://classblogspace.wordpress.com/2013/01/28/consumewater-to-have-beauty/
79
b. Individual Work
Please make a simple hortatory exposition text and upload it to the Blog
then please comment your friends’ texts especially the tenses they use!
4th Meeting
a. Group Work
Taken from: http://classblogspace.wordpress.com/2013/02/02/vegetarian-diet/
b. Individual Work
Please choose one text you made from previous lesson then improve it
to be a complex construction text and comments your friends work!
80
Appendix 11
The Example of Blog Activities
1. Group Work
Link: http://classblogspace.wordpress.com/2013/01/27/tv-ads-shouldbe-supported/
81
2.
Individual Writing
a. The post
Link:
http://students001.wordpress.com/2013/02/02/waste-disposal-in-the-
right-place
b.
The Peer Comment
82
c. The Edited Post
Link:
http://students001.wordpress.com/2013/02/02/waste-disposal-in-
the-right-place-edit/
83
Appendix 12
The Criteria for Scoring Written Work
Aspect of
writing
Content
Organization
Vocabulary
Language use
Score
Level
Criteria
5
Excellent to Very
Good
4
Good to Average
3
Fair to Poor
2
Very Poor
5
Excellent to Very Ideas stated coherently and cohesively
Good
4
Good to Average
3
Fair to Poor
2
Very Poor
5
Excellent to Very Mostly use appropriate word/idiom to
support meaning
Good
4
Good to Average
Little use of inappropriate word/idiom
but meaning not obscured.
3
Fair to Poor
Frequent
use
word/idiom
2
Very Poor
Shows no knowledge of English
vocabulary
5
Excellent to Very Effective complex constructions
Good
Shows knowledge of the subject
Some knowledge of subject
Limited knowledge of subject
Does not show knowledge of subject
Loosely organized but main ideas stand
out
Ideas confused or disconnected
Does not communicate
of
inappropriate
84
Aspect of
writing
Mechanics
Score
Level
Criteria
Effective but simple constructions
4
Good to Average
3
Fair to Poor
Major problems in simple/complex
constructions
2
Very Poor
Virtually no mastery of sentence
construction rules
5
Excellent to Very Demonstrates mastery of conventions
Good
4
Good to Average
Occasional errors
punctuation
3
Fair to Poor
Frequent errors of spelling punctuation,
or capitalization
2
Very Poor
Dominated by errors of spelling,
punctuation,
capitalization,
or
paragraphing
The max score = Score x 4
= 25 x 4
= 100
of
spelling,
or
85
Appendix 13
Example of Scoring the Student Pre Test and Post Test Work
a. Pre Test
Content:
4
Organization
:
3
Vocabulary:
3
Language
use:
4
Mechanics:
3
Score
68
86
b. Post Test
Content:
5
Organization
:
5
Vocabulary:
4
Language
use:
4
Mechanics:
4
Score
88
87
Appendix 14
The Schedule of Research Activity
Pretest
: 26th January 2013 (Saturday, 2x45 minutes 7th-8th period)
Treatment 1
: 28th January 2013 (Monday, 2x45 minutes 2nd-3rd period)
Treatment 2
: 2nd February 2013 (Saturday, 2x45 Minutes 7th-8th period)
Treatment 3
: 4th February 2013 (Monday, 2x45 minutes 2nd-3rd period)
Treatment 4
: 9th February 2013 (Saturday, 2x45 minutes 7th-8th period)
Posttest
: 11th February 2013(Monday, 2x45 minutes 2nd-3rd period)
88
Appendix 15
The Student List of XI Language 1 Class of MAN 2 Kudus in the Academic
Year 2012/2013
Number
Name
Number
Name
1
Afna Ulfiana
26
Lailis Sa'diyah
2
Afni Ulfiani
27
Lu'luil Maknun
3
Agus Abdullah Afif
28
Nadea Lathifah N
4
Ainun Ni'mah
29
Nila Fitrotul Ula
5
Ais Ananata Tama
30
Nurul Imam A
6
Azizzatin Habibah
31
Reni Tri Lestari
7
Alfiyah Masturoh
32
Rosalia Haryanti
8
Annisa Wahyu A
33
Sahilatul Ardina
9
Aqmarina Nur H
34
Sarah Lusiani
10
Aulia Fitrotul M
35
Shaffa Shaffinah N
11
Awaludin Akmal
36
Sunia Ardiyanti
12
Dedi Irawan
37
Ummi Khoiroh
13
Dewi Istiyani
38
Uzlifatil Jannah N
14
Dina Nurul Fajri
39
Vivi Laila Ulva
15
Durrotun Nafi'ah
40
Yaya Anifah
16
Farah Irsalina
17
Fasha Nabilah A
18
Felayana Isfar
19
Ferry Dwi Agustina
20
Fitri Ayu Wulandari
21
Fitriyani Indah Sari
22
Ima Rokhmawati
23
Inka Indriani
24
Jamilatun Nahdliyah
25
Laili Maghfiroh
89
YAYASAN PEMBINA UNIVERSITAS MURIA KUDUS
UNIVERSITAS MURIA KUDUS
Kampus UMK Gondangmanis Bae Kudus PO. Box 53 Phone/Fax.0291-438229
STATEMENT
Name
: Abdul Fattah
NIM
: 200832295
study program
: English Education
skripsi title
: The Writing Ability of Eleventh Grade Students of MAN 2
Kudus in the Academic Year 2012/2013 Taught by Using
Web Log Media
state that this skripsi is indeed the scientific work of mine, not that of others. I only
make some certain quotations from others’ as references I need to support for my
skripsi.
I am fully responsible for this statement.
Kudus, March 14th 2013
The Writer
Abdul Fattah
90
YAYASAN PEMBINA UNIVERSITAS MURIA KUDUS
UNIVERSITAS MURIA KUDUS
Kampus UMK Gondangmanis Bae Kudus PO. Box 53 Phone/Fax.0291-438229
PERNYATAAN
Yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini, saya:
nama
: Abdul Fattah
NIM
: 2008 – 32 – 295
program studi
: Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
judul skripsi
: The Writing Ability of Eleventh Grade Students of MAN 2
Kudus in the Academic Year 2012/2013 Taught by Using
Web Log Media
menyatakan bahwa skripsi ini berjudul “The Writing Ability of Eleventh Grade
Students of MAN 2 Kudus in the Academic Year 2012/2013 Taught by Using Web
Log” ini benar-benar hasil karya sendiri, bukan jiplakan dari karya tulis orang lain,
baik sebagian atau seluruhnya. Pendapat atau temuan orang lain yang terdapat
dalam skripsi ini dikutip atau dirujuk berdasarkan kode etik ilmiah.
Apabila ternyata pernyataan ini terbukti tidak benar, maka sepenuhnya menjadi
tanggung jawab saya sendiri selaku penulis skripsi.
Kudus, 14 Maret 2013
Penulis
Abdul Fattah
91
CURRICULUM VITAE
The writer, Abdul Fattah, is the first child of his parents, his father is Karno
and his mother is Miasri. He was born on April 26, 1991 in Jepara.
He attended kindergarten for two years and continued to elementary school in
SDN 2 Ngabul, Tahunan Jepara as his first formal education, he graduated from
this elementary school in 2002 and then continued to MTsN Bawu in Pecangaan
Jepara. After three years studied there, then he continued to SMAN 1 Jepara, he
graduated in 2008.
After finished his study in SMA N 1 Jepara, he entered Muria Kudus
University and decided to study in English Education Department because he is
interested in English Education.
YAYASAN PEMBINA UNIVERSITAS MURIA KUDUS
UNIVERSITAS MURIA KUDUS
Kampus UMK Gondangmanis Bae Kudus PO. Box 53 Phone/Fax.0291-438229
KETERANGAN SELESAI Bll\lBIN(iAN
Yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini:
'
Nama
,
:Dr. H.A..Hilal Madjdi, M.Pd
.,
NIS
:0610713020001020
Jabatan
:Pembimbing I
Nama
:Mutohhar, S.Pd, M.Pd
NIS
:0610701000001204
Jabatan
:Pembimbing II
Menerangkan bahwa
nama
: Abdul Fattah
NThr1/Semester
: 2008-32-295/X
Program studi
:Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
telah menyelesaikan skripsi dengan judul:
The Writing Ability of Eleventh Grade Students of
Academic Year 2012/2013 Taught by Using Web Log.
MAt~
2 Kudus in the
Demikian surat keterangan ini dibuat sebagai syarat untuk permohonan ujian
terakhir.
Kudus, 14 Maret 2013
Pembimbing II
Pembimbing I
Dr.1LB~!1:d
"
NIS. 0610713020001020
.YAYASAN PEMBINA UNIVERSITAS MURIA KUDUS
UNIVERSITAS MURIA .KUDUS
KEGU~AN
FAKULTAS
DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN
Kampus UMK Gondangmanis Bae Kudus PO Box 53 ti' 0291-438229
PENETAPAN PEMBIMBING SKRIPSI
-----r------------------------------------- ---------------------Nomor: 555/FKIP.UMK/PBJ:·SEMESTER GASAUX/2011.
!
Dengan hormat, kami memberikan tugas kepada:
~r.
1. Nama Dosen
H.A. Hilal Madjdi, M.Pd
NIP/NIS
0610713020001020
Jabtn/PgkGol~
Lektor Kepala I Pembina Utama Muda I IV c
I
2. Nama Dosen
:
Mutohhar, S.Pd, M.Pd
NIP/NIS
0610701000001204
Jabatan/Pangkat/Golongan
Asisten Ahli I Penata Muda Tk. I I III b
Untuk berturut-turut menjadi Pembimbing I dan II Skripsi yang akan ditulis oleh mahasiswa :
Nama
ABDUL FATTAH
NIM/Semester
2008 - 32- 295 I VII
Jumlah SKS Diperoleh I IPK
124 I 3,67
Program Studi
PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS
Tema/Judul
THE WRITING ABILITY OF ELEVENTH GRADE OF
SMA 1 KUDUS IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 201112012
TAUGHT BY USING WEBBLOGGING
Sehubungan dengan hal tersebut, mohon usulan terscbut dapat disetujui.
Kudus, 26 Oktober 20 11.
Ka.Progdi PBI,
~ •
FORMULIR 86
YAY ASAN PEMBINA UNIVERSITAS MURIA KUDUS
UNIVERSITAS MURIA KUDUS
F AKULTAS KEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN
Kampus Gondangmanis Bae Kudus PO. Box 53 Telp/Fax.0291-438229
LEMBAR KONSULTASI PENULISAN SKRIPSI
Nama
NIM/Semester
P rogram Studi
Pembimbmg
A'o~v,\
tl'H~
:. ·;voo-·.::·1;2·-:·rv;
..l·\){ ............................................
:
.............................................
: ....o~·w:r
p; i \~r1'.t:l·JN................................
· ~\itlr· · s· _ ·vJ ;~
· p~.ts
.. f.~ ..........................
· t. ·M~w
· ·¥eo~:-Q.;ilt
· fis-·
2 . .................. }.......................................................... .
·-.
Hari
Tanggal
No.
tr~
Materi Konsultasi
Pembibing
~