WINRIP DOC WPM Pre Bid Meeting Sp.Rampa Poriaha 20140822 00163

ANTI CORRUPTION ACTION PLAN (ACAP)

RENCANA TINDAK ANTI KORUPSI (RTAK)

LAPORAN PEMANTAUAN KEGIATAN PRE-BID MEETING DAN SITE VISIT

PENGADAAN JASA PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI

Oleh:

WAKIL PENGAMAT DARI MASYARAKAT (WPM)

Nama WPM

: Medis Sejahtera Surbakti, ST.,MT

Nama Paket : 05, Simpang Rampa - Poriaha

Provinsi

: Sumatera Utara

Medan, 28 September 2014

Nomor

: -

Lampiran : 1 Berkas

Perihal

: Laporan Pemberisan Penjelasan (Aanwijzing)

Kepada Yth :

Ketua Project Management Unit (PMU) WINRIP

Direktorat Bina Program.Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga

Kementrian Pekerjaan Umum

Jl. Patimura 20, Kebayoran Baru,Jakarta Selatan

Dengan Hormat,

Sehubungan telah diadakannya Rapat Penjelasan ranggal Juli 2014 dan Kunjungan

Lapangan tanggalJUli 2014, maka bersama ini kami sampaikan Laporan pemberian

penjelasan (Aanwijzing)untuk Paket 5 Rampa-Poriaha.

Demikianlah, atas perhatian dan kerjasamanya disampaikan terimakasih.

WPM Paket 5 Rampa

–

Poriaha

Medis Sejahtera Surbakti, ST, MT

Tembusan disampaikan kepada Yth.

1. Kepala Balai Besar Pelaksana Jalan Nasional I Provinsi Sumatera Utara

2. Ketua Pokja SNVTPJN Wilayah I Provinsi Medan

Laporan Hasil Pengamatan Proses Pengadaan Jasa Pekerjaan Konstruksi

i

DAFTAR ISI

DAFTAR ISI

i

I.

PENDAHULUAN

1

II.

DATA PAKET, PQ DAN PENGUMUMAN PELELANGAN

3

III.

PENGAMATAN PELAKSANAAN RAPAT PENJELASAN AWAL

DAN KUNJUNGAN LAPANGAN/PRE-BID MEETING AND SITE VISIT 5

IV.

PENUTUP

8

WESTERN INDONESIA NATIONAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (WINRIP)

IBRD LOAN No. 8043-ID

RENCANA TINDAK ANTI KORUPSI (RTAK)

ANTI-CORRUPTION ACTION PLAN (ACAP)

LAPORAN HASIL PENGAMATAN

PROSES PENGADAAN JASA KONSTRUKSI

Nama WPM

:

Medis Sejahtera Surbakti

Nomor Paket

:

05

Nama Paket

:

Simpang Rampa - Poriaha

Provinsi

:

Sumatera Utara

AGUSTUS 2014

KEMENTERI AN PEKERJ AAN UMUM

DIREKTORAT JENDERAL BINA MARGA

D I R E K T O R A T B I N A P R O G R A M

P R O J E C T M A N A G E M E N T U N I T ( P M U )

Laporan Hasil Pengamatan Proses Pengadaan Jasa Pekerjaan Konstruksi

Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project (WINRIP) IBRD Loan No: 8043-ID

1

LAPORAN HASIL PENGAMATAN PROSES PENGADAAN JASA

KONSTRUKSI

TAHAP PERTAMA

BAGIAN I

PENDAHULUAN

Pemerintah Indonesia dengan Bank Dunia telah menandatangani Naskah Perjanjian

Pinjaman (

Loan Agreemnet

) untuk Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement

Project (WINRIP) IBRD Loan No. 8043-ID pada tanggal 14 Desember 2011. Loan efektif

12 Maret 2012 dan akan berakhir pada tanggal 31 Desember 2017, senilai USD250 juta.

Porsi

sharing

Loan dan GOI adalah 70:30 untuk Civil Works, dimana Pemerintah

Indonesia menyediakan Dana USD 100 juta, sehingga total nilai proyek adalah USD 350

juta. Pinjaman tersebut akan digunakan untuk mendukung penguatan berkelanjutan

Sistem Jaringan Jalan Nasional di wilayah Indonesia Barat,yaitu untuk pekerjaan jalan

dan jembatan.

Tujuan utama proyek WINRIP adalah untuk meningkatkan status jaringan yang

sebelumnya berfungsi sebagai jalan provinsi atau jalan non status agar sesuai dengan

standar yang baru yaitu jalan nasional; memastikan bahwa jaringan jalan nasional

tersebut menjadi lebih lancar dan berkeamanan; dan mampu mendukung peningkatan

ekonomi daerah. Sesuai dengan Schedule 2 Section IC Naskah Perjanjian Pinjaman

WINRIP,dan Bab 11 Project Management Manual (PMM) WINRIP, Pemerintah

Indonesia dan Bank Dunia menyepakati pelaksanaan

Anti-Corruption Action Plan

(ACAP)

atau Rencana Tindak Anti Korupsi (RTAK) dalam pelaksanaan proyek.

Adapun tujuan RTAK adalah untuk;

1. Mengidentifikasi resiko bagi pemerintah dan langkah-langkah pencegahan

sehingga mencapai standard sistem kendali yang lebih baik dari yang telah

dilakukan pada program-program sebelumnya.

2. Mengatasi semua resiko dalam bentuk rencana tindak yang dikendalikan oleh

Ditjen. Bina Marga.

3. Mencapai pelaksanaan RTAK WINRIP yang sejalan dengan Pedoman Bank

Dunia tentang Pencegahan dan Upaya Memerangi Penipuan dan Tindak Korupsi

pada program-program yang didanai oleh Bank Dunia.

Pelaksanaan komponen RTAK WINRIP pada dasarnya adalah dalam rangka

peningkatan transparansi dalam proses pelaksanaan proyek dengan menarik pelajaran

dan pengalaman dari pelaksanaan RTAK pada proyek-proyek sebelumnya agar lebih

kuat dan efektif, dengan melakukan langkah-langkah pencegahan dan meningkatkannya

pada pelaksanaan rencana tindak-nya. Berdasarkan pelajaran dan pengalaman pada

proyek sebelumnya, maka RTAK yang akan dilakukan meliputi lima area sebagaimana

Laporan Hasil Pengamatan Proses Pengadaan Jasa Pekerjaan Konstruksi

Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project (WINRIP) IBRD Loan No: 8043-ID

2

diformulasikan dalam Matrik Pemetaan Resiko Korupsi dan Rencana Tindak yaitu:

a. Meningkatkan Penyebarluasan Informasi dan Transparansi

b. Meningkatkan Pemantauan yang dilakukan oleh Masyarakat Madani

c. Meningkatkan Mekanisme Penanganan Pengaduan

d. Pencegahan Kolusi serta Pemalsuan dan Resiko Penipuan, dan

e. Penerapan Sanksi dan Tindakan Hukum

Sedangkan ruang linkup pelaksanaan RTAK atau ACAP meliputi komponen-komponen berikut:

1. Pelibatan Wakil Pengamat dari Masyarakat (WPM) /

Community Representative

Observers (CROs)

dalam pemantauan atau pengamatan terhadap proses pelelangan /

pengadaan jasa konstruksi.

2. Keterbukaan informasi kepada public /

Public Disclosure

.

3.

Penanganan dan pengelolaan Pengaduan dari Masyarakat /

Complaint Handling

Mechanism System (CHS).

4. Pelibatan Pemantauan oleh Pihak Ketiga /

Third Party Monitoring (TPM)

dalam

pemantauan proses konstruksi.

WPM berperan sebagai kompone yang mewakili masyarakat madani dalam mengamati dan

mencermati proses pelelangan / pengadaan jasa konstruksi untuk mencegah terjadinya praktek

korupsi, kolusi, dan nepotisme, serta tindak pemalsuan dan resiko penipuan.

Laporan Hasil Pengamatan Proses Pengadaan Jasa Pekerjaan Konstruksi

Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project (WINRIP) IBRD Loan No: 8043-ID

3

BAGIAN II

DATA PAKET, PQ DAN PENGUMUMAN PELELANGAN

1.

DATA POKOK

No Paket

: Paket 05 WINRIP

Nama Paket

: Simpang Rampa – Poriaha

Lokasi Paket

: Kabupaten Tapanuli Tengah

Provinsi

: Sumatera Utara

Satuan Kerja

: Satuan Kerja Pelaksanaan Jalan Wilayah II Provinsi Sumatera Utara

2.

PRA-QUQLIFIKASI

2.1. Pengumuman Pra-Qualifikasi untuk paket 05 pada tanggal 16 Desember 2013. Data

peserta Pra-Qualifikasi untuk paket ini:

1. PT Multi Structure

2. PT Lince Romauli Raya

3. PT Conbloc Infratecno

4. PT Brantas Abipraya

5. PT Nindya Karya (persero)

6. PT Jaya Konstruksi Manggala Pratama Tbk.

7. PT Yasa Patria Perkasa

8. PT PP (persero) Tbk.

9. PT Waskita Karya (persero)

10. PT Adhi Karya (persero), Tbk.

11. PT Widya Sapta Colas.

12. PT Hutama Karya-seneca Indonesia (JO)

13. PT Bangun Cipta Kontraktor

14. PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring Tbk.

2.2. Pengumuman No Objection Letter (NOL) Pra-Qualifikasi dari Bank Dunia pada tanggal

15 Juli 2014. Peserta yang dinyatakan lulus Pra-Qualifikasi adalah:

1. PT Multi Structure

2. PT Brantas Abipraya

3. PT Nindya Karya (persero)

4. PT Yasa Patria Perkasa

5. PT PP (persero) Tbk.

6. PT Waskita Karya (persero)

7. PT Adhi Karya (persero), Tbk.

8. PT Widya Sapta Colas.

9. PT Hutama Karya-seneca Indonesia (JO)

10. PT Bangun Cipta Kontraktor

Laporan Hasil Pengamatan Proses Pengadaan Jasa Pekerjaan Konstruksi

Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project (WINRIP) IBRD Loan No: 8043-ID

4

a. Peserta PQ yang dinyatakan tidak lulus PQ dan alasannya:

1. PT Lince Romauli Raya, alasannya tidak memiliki pengalaman umum dalam

mengerjalan pekerjaan sejenis

2. PT Conbloc Infratecno alasannya alasannya tidak cukup untuk memenuhi

kriteria pada aktivitas-aktivitas vital yang terdapat pada pekerjaan yang akan

dilakukan.

3. PT Jaya Konstruksi Manggala Pratama Tbk alasannya tidak cukup untuk

memenuhi kriteria pada aktivitas-aktivitas vital yang terdapat pada pekerjaan

yang akan dilakukan

b. Masa sanggah PQ selama 5 hari kalender, mulai dari tgl. 22 Juli s.d tgl. 26 Juli

2014

c.

Bila ada peserta yang mengajukan sanggahan dijelaskan apa sanggahanya dan

bagaimana penyelesaiannya

. (tidak ada sanggahan)

3.

PENGUMUMAN PELELANGAN

Apakah diumumkan di Koran?

Ya

√

Tidak

Bila ‘Ya’ sebutkan nama Koran tersebut: ……….., tgl. dimuat: ………..

Apakah pengumuman di Koran tersebut lengkap dan jelas?

Ya

kurang lengkap.

Bila “Tidak’ sebutkan alasannya ……….…….

Apakah diumumkan di Website? Ya Tidak

Bila ‘Ya’ sebutkan website institusi: Kementrian PU,

https://eproc.pu.go.id/public/eproc2014/semieproc/info_lelangdetail.asp

?

Tanggal dimuat: ………..

Apakah pengumuman di website tersebut lengkap dan jelas? Ya kurang lengkap

Apakah informasi pelelangan diumumkan pada papan pengumuman? Ya Tidak

Bila Ya, tuliskan lokasinya ………

Apakah ada pihak (calon peserta) yang mengalami kesulitan mendapatkan dokumen

pelelangan? Ya Tidak

Jika Ya, harap menjelaskan kesulitan yang dihadapi dalam mendapatkan dokumen

pelelangan, (harap menulis kasus yang terjadi/menimpa pada pihak tersebut).

………

Apakah ada pemungutan biaya diluar ketentuan yang telah ditetapkan di dalam dokumen

lelang, bila ada mohon dijelaskan disini

Tidak ada (ditanyakan pada perwakilan Nindya Karya)

Apakah ada proses registrasi untuk bisa mengikuti pelelangan ini? Bila ada, harap

dijelaskan disini Tidak

Catatan:

1. Lampirkan fotocopy iklan pelelangan melalui Koran atau Website

2. Laporan Tahap pertama paling lambat 1 (satu) minggu setelah Rapat Penjelasan Awal (Aanwijzing),

√

√

√

Laporan Hasil Pengamatan Proses Pengadaan Jasa Pekerjaan Konstruksi

Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project (WINRIP) IBRD Loan No: 8043-ID

5

BAGIAN III

PENGAMATAN PELAKSANAAN RAPAT PENJELASAN AWAL DAN

KUNJUNGAN LAPANGAN

/

PRE-BID MEETING AND SITE VISIT

1.

PELAKSANAAN RAPAT PENJELASAN AWAL / PRE-BID MEETING (Aanwijzing)

Rapat Penpenjelasan Awal /Pre-Bid Meeting (aanwizjing dilaksanakan pada hari Kamis tgl.

21 Agustus 2014 dibuka pada jam 10 s.d jam 12.00 bertempat di Kantor Balai Besar Jalan

Jl. Kota Medan

Pembukaan rapat oleh Kepala Balai Besar Pelaksanaan Jalan Nasional Wilayah I.

Rapat dihadiri unsur-unsur instansi terkait yaitu:

1. Dit. Bina Pelaksanaan Wilayah : Agusta Sinulingga ( Kasubdis Sistem Pengendalian

Wilayah I)

2. Satker PJN Wilayah Siduhuaro Dachi (Satker PPK 12 Sibolga)

3. CTC WINRIP Sanjev (posisinya)

Edi

4. WPM Medis Surbakti

Rekanan atau calon peserta lelang yang hadir pada rapat Aanwijzing tersebut:

(tulis nama perusahaan dan alamat domisilinya)

1. PT Multi Structure

2. PT Brantas Abipraya

3. PT Nindya Karya (persero)

4. PT Yasa Patria Perkasa

5. PT PP (persero) Tbk.

6. PT Waskita Karya (persero)

7. PT Adhi Karya (persero), Tbk.

8. PT Widya Sapta Colas.

9. PT Hutama Karya-seneca Indonesia (JO)

10. PT Bangun Cipta Kontraktor

11. PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring Tbk.

Tuliskan ringkasan penjelasan/arahan yang disampaikan oleh:

1. Kepala Balai Besar Pelaksanaan Jalan Nasional (BBPJN)/Unit Layanan Pengadaan

(ULP).

Menjelaskan bahwa paket ini dibiayayai sebagian oleh WB.

Jika menawar kurang dari 80% akan dilakukan perhitungan yang lebih ketat terhadap

dokumen

2. Ketua Pokja Pengadaan tentang:



Ringkasan data paket-paket yang akan ditenderkan



Nomor dan nama paket

Laporan Hasil Pengamatan Proses Pengadaan Jasa Pekerjaan Konstruksi

Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project (WINRIP) IBRD Loan No: 8043-ID

6



Panjang efektif 9.7 km, titik awal berada 9 mk dari simpang poriaha dan titik

akhir proyek di Rampah (Simpang jalan Sibolga-Barus).



Jenis pekerjaan meliputi peningkatan dan pelebaran badan jalan, drainase,

pekerjaan jembatan .



Kondisi existing

berupa jalan tanah selebar6meter

dan rencana

peningkatannya.menjadi jalan nasional dengan lebar 6 meter ditambah bahu

1,5 meter,dengan penambahan 5 jembatan.



Nilai Owner Estimate (HPS) sebesar

145.815.316.000.-

Durasi pelaksanaan 540 hari kalender



Tata cara dan persyaratan mengikuti pelelangan.



Jaminan Penawaran sebesar

3.600.000.000,-

Pemasukan Penawaran pada Tanggal 22 September 2014 (30 hari kalender)



Hal-hal yang menggugurkan penawaran



Format guarantee bank yang tidak boleh diubah kalimatnya



Batas waktu pertanyaan terhadap dokumen adalah 2 minggu sebelum pemasukan



Audit keuangan terakhir tahun 2013 harus diikutsertakan (CTC WINRIP)



Hitungan financial resources untuk memenuhi kreteria (CTC WINRIP)



Pemasukan penawaran sistem 2 amplop



Surat sukungan bank harus dapat di realisasikan sebelum penandatanganan

kontrak



Rincian Mobilisasi dianggap tidak ada

Tuliskan ringkasan tanya jawab pada rapat penjelasan/aanwizjing:

PT Adhi Karya

berkenaan dengan lama waktu jaminan pelaksanaan serta apakah material on site akan

dibayar:

Jawab : Jaminan Pelaksanaan sampai pada PHO: materialon site yang dibayar terdapat

pada 14.5 (c) .i

PT PP

Untuk material on site berapa besaran yang akan dibayar

Jawab : 100% harga satuan material

PT PP

Untuk gaian apakah disposal area disediakan ?

Jawab : (PPK)

Ada, sejauh 3 km

PT PP

Lokasi proyek apa sudah bebas ?

Laporan Hasil Pengamatan Proses Pengadaan Jasa Pekerjaan Konstruksi

Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project (WINRIP) IBRD Loan No: 8043-ID

7

3. Rapt ditutup pada jam 12.15 dengan makan siang bersama

Catatan Khusus/Tambahan:

Berdasarkan hasil pengamatan Saudara, apakah ada catatan khusus/tambahan? Tuliskan

(jika ada):

Laporan Hasil Pengamatan Proses Pengadaan Jasa Pekerjaan Konstruksi

Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project (WINRIP) IBRD Loan No: 8043-ID

8

BAGIAN IV

PENUTUP

1.

KESIMPULAN

Acara yang dihadiri oleh WPM pada Aanwijzing, memberikan kesan bahwa acara tersebut

berjalan dengan baik dan lancer.Tidakterdapat protes dari peserta acara tersebut, serta

tidak ada pertanyaan yang tidak bisa dijawab baikoleh POKJA, Satker,PMU WINRIP

ataupun CTC WINRIP.

.

2.

CATATAN DAN SARAN

Laporan Hasil Pengamatan Proses Pengadaan Jasa Pekerjaan Konstruksi

Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project (WINRIP) IBRD Loan No: 8043-ID

9

DAFTAR LAMPIRAN

Lampiran 1.

Surat Persetujuan atau No Objection Letter (NOL) PQ dari Bank Dunia.

Lampiran 2.

Surat Pengumuman Hasil PQ dan Berita Acara Sanggah (Bila ada)

Lampiran 3.

Pengumuman Undangan Lelang

Lampiran 4.

Surat Undangan Pre-Bid Meeting + Site Visit

Lampiran 5.

Berita Acara Aanwijzing / Minutes of Pre-Bid Meeting + Site Visit

Lampiran 6.

Absensi kehadiran pada kegiatan Pre-Bid Meeting dan Absensi kehadiran

pada kegitan Kunjungan Lapangan / Site Visit.

ii

Laporan Hasil Pengamatan Proses Pengadaan Jasa Pekerjaan Konstruksi

DAFT

AR

LAMPIRAN

Lampiran 1.

Surat Persetujuan atau No Objection Letter (NOL) PQ dari Bank Dunia

Lampiran 2.

Surat Pengumuman Hasil PQ dan Berita Acara Sanggah (Bila Ada)

Lampiran 3.

Pengumuman Undangan Lelang

Lampiran 4.

Surat Undangan Pre-Bid Meeting + Site Visit

Lampiran 5.

Berita Acara Aanwijzing / Minutes of Pre-Bid Meeting + Site Visit

Lampiran 6.

Absensi Kehadiran Pada Kegiatan Pre-Bid Meeting dan Absensi Kehadiran Pada Kegiatan

Kunjungan Lapangan/Site Visit

LAMPIRAN I

SURAT PERSETUJUAN ATAU NO OBJECTION LETTER (NOL) PQ

DARI BANK DUNIA

r::~i=.o Box 1324!Ji<:T.Jakarta 10013mTelex:IBRDIA600860Headquarters: The World Bank, WashingtonDC,USA

2. We noted that Section 7.16 and Section 8.7 were rmssmg from the proposed Technical Specifications, thus there are no specifications for Item 7.16(1) of package 5 (Sp Rampa - Poriaha), item 8.7(6)(a) of package 11 (Bantal Mukomuko); and also Items 8.7(5) and 8.7(6)(a) of package 13 (Sp .Rukis - Tj Kemuning). Please define these Sections and these items to be inserted in the Technical Specification.

1. We noted that items of Section Day Works have not been included in the Engineering Estimate of package 11 (Bantal - Mukomuko) and package 13 (Sp.Rukis - Tj Kemuning. Please ensure that such items be included

in

the Engineering Estimate.

Engineering Estimate and Technical Specifications

Based 011 the information provided, we have reviewed the draft PQ documents and have the

following comments:

Please be advised that the remaining contract packages shall follow post-qualification and that Pak Djoko agreed to it in the meeting of November 8, 2013.

\

Inreference to Aide Memoire June 2013, it was agreed that DGH may continue to follow pre-qualification for the next round of only four packages (package 11, 13, 15 and 17). However, since package 5 has already been prepared and in order to avoid further delay, the Bank has no objection to DGH's proposal in using pre-qualification for package 5.

\Ve refer to your letter No.HL0202/Bp.l11l405!2013 dated October 31, 2013, which we received on November 7,2013 submitting for our review the draft Pre-qualification Document (PQD) for the following packages:

1. Package 5: Sp. Rampa - Poriaha, South Sumatera 2. Package 11, Bantal- Mukolvluko,Bengkulu 3. Package 13, Sp. Rubs - Tj Kemuning, Bengkulu

Indonesia: Western Indonesia National RoadsImprovement project (WINRIP) (Ln. 8043-1I)) Submission of Propose feB Pre Qualification (PQ) Documentfor Package No.5: Sp.

Rampa-Poriaha, Package No. 11:Bantal-Muko-muko, Package No. 13Sp. Rukis - 1}.Kemuning

Dear Mr. Batubara: Mr. Harris H. Batubarra Director of Planning

Directorate General of Highways Ministry of Public Works

.11. Pattimura No.20/5

Jakarta 12110, Indonesia

Ref.WINRlP /143 November 18,2013

The

World Bank

WORLD BANK OFFICE, JAKARTA

INTERNATIONALBANK FOR RECONSTRUCTIONAND DEVELOPMENT J8EB Tower 2, J/. .Jend.SudirmanKav.52-53, Jakarta 12190 INTERNATIONALDEVELOPMENTASSOCIATION Telephone (62-21) 52993000• Facsimile (62-21)52993111

G0zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBAr.o.Box 1324fJKT.Jakarta 10013rnTelex: IBRDIA50086r,)Headquarters:The World 8ank, Was'l;ngton DC, USA

Elisabeth Goller Task Team Leader WINRlP

Indonesia Sustainable Development Department East Asia and Pacific Region

'..'~'.

....;..

Sincerely yours,

Please provide us a copy of final PQD(s) for our documentation.

Subject to incorporation of the above comments, the Bank has no objection to the issuance of PQD for the above three packages. Please update all dates before the document is issued to the applicants and please also provide not less than six weeks after the date the documents are available or the last date of the advertisement, whichever is later, for the applicants to submit their applications.

We would like to remind you that the advertisement of invitation for prequalification of ICB package is required to be published in UNDB-online and also in a national newspaper or MPW's

website. .

'''Ie understand that the above revisions would not have impact significantly to the current EE and for which the Bank has no objection to the minimum qualification requirements as mentioned in Section

III.

5. We noted that for the following items there is a11inconsistency between the BOQ and the Technical Specifications in term of denomination, numbering and definition:

- 16 items in BOQ package 5 (Sp Rampa - Poriaha), including item 1.20(1), item 3.1(1)a), item 3.1(1)(b), item 3.4(2), item. 3.4(3), item 4.2(2)(b), itein 6.3(8)(a), item 6.3(9), item 7.1(5), item 7.1(7), item 7.1(9), item 7.1(10), item 7.6(6)(d), item 7.6(lS)(b), item 7.11(1)(b), and item 7.13(1).

8

items in both BOQ package

1I

(Banta1- Mukomuko) and BOQ package 13 (Sp Rukis -

Tj

Kemuning}, including item 3.4(1), item 3.4(3), item 6.1(1)(a), item 6.2(1)(a), item 6.3(10)(a), item 7.1(7), item 7.1(8), and item 7.1(10).

Please review these items and revise the document as appropriate.

4. We noted that the following items were not included in the Technical Specification:

- 4 items in BOQ package 5 (Sp Rampa - Poriaha), including item 3.1(2), item 7.3(3), item 7.7(1)(b), and item 7.12(3).

3 items in both BOQ package 11 (Bantal- Mukomuko) and BOQ package 13 (Sp Rubs - Tj Kemuning), including item 2.4(4)(a), item 8.4(3)(a), and item 8.4(7)(a).

Please define these items and insert them in the Teclmical Specification.

3. We noted that item 7.2(1) (a), item 7.2(1)(b), item 7.2(2)(a), and item 7.2(2)(d) in BOQ package 5 (Sp Rampa - Poriaha) were conflicting with article 7.2.10.2(a) of the Technical Specifications, in

which it is clearly stated that such prices and payments in the Items concrete precast (including

the

IGirder) shall be deemed full compensation and including erection, transportation, installment and others.

Please revise and change these items; also please keep the consistency between BOQ and Technical Specification.

November 18, 2013

-2-Mr. Harris Batubara

S5 P.O. Box i 3241JKT. Jakarta j0013zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBAClTelex: IE>RDIA60086 EelHeadquarters: The World Bank, Washington DC, USA

Director General of Highways

Director of Implementation Affairs Region I Director of Technical Affairs

Head of Sub Directorate of Financing and Foreign Cooperation, DGH Head of Sub Directorate of Technical Roads

Head of Sub Directorate of System and Controlling Region I as Officer

in

Charge PMU WfNRIP eTC WINRIP

Cc:

November 18, 2013

3

-Mr. Harris Batubara ,

.

LAMPIRAN II

SURAT PENGUMUMAN HASIL PQ DAN BERITA ACARA

SANGGAH (BILA ADA)

Ternbusan disampaikan kepadazyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBAYtn. :

-1. Bapak Direktur Jenderal Bins Marga (sebagaiI""n'~,.""w ,\ ? Kasubott Pembiayaan dan Kerjasarna Li.Kif",,"~egeri

(~ KasuiJdit Sistern Pengendalian WHayahilKetua Peleksana Harlan Prv1U V\f!r,lRIP

4. eTC:\!\In\n~lP

5.

r~{)hon kiranya untuk oaoat rnenysmpalkan xspada Batai terkait untuk dapat menindaklanjuf d~Enganpengun1uman hasH PO dan perslepan peielangan, Selanjutnya,

monon

untuk dapat

kepada f\3m~Draft Dokumen fengkap yang akan d!gunakar1 dan

rencenajadv:Jaf !e~anguntuk dapat karni terusxanguns perseusuenBe3nkDunia,

Bersama in! karni sampalkan surat dart Bank Dunia Ref. W!NR!P/H2 tanggal 15 Juii 2014

rnangenaj persetuiuan Bank Dunia ternadapzyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBAA .EF{ untuk paket o: Sp. Rampa - Poriaha

(tertarnpir).

E\t1\a~u~tic4n-Por~~fH~di fi::rw'(.r:{.in~iSf;j!YHIftfif.~

P\~ny~jl1p~ii2:rlP~r~~;tujlH% £l J3t~n~zfJtH1~~ (tU~:R)untuk

r~a.•

~et5: R~rn.p~ 'l,flJ!NRiP iBRD LOi!i1i1~C~4J· IO

Dari

2. lembar Larnpran

t

g

Jull2014 Nemer

EMEf~TER.

A

DiREKTORAT

.,lEN

f.1 ~

R···

E,;

K'

TO··

R·.

J.\

LAMPIRAN III

G':POBox 132~JjKT.JakartazyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBAiODi3 CJTelex: iBRDIA 60086 eHeadquarters: The World Bank, Washington DC, USA

Please inform the result of prcqualification to all applicants who submitted their applications. V/e request you to submit the draft bidding document of this package for the Bank's prior review in order to enable you to proceed with the issuance of bidding documents to the prequalified firms and to avoid further delays on procurement process,

Subject to incorporation of the above comments and based on the information provided, the Bank has no objection to your recommendation to pre-qualify the followingapplicants for the above mentioned package:

1. PT Adbi Karya (Persero), Tbk (Indonesia) 2.· PT Bangun Cipta Kontraktor (Indonesia) 3. PT Brsntas Abipraya (Persero) (Indonesia)

4. PT Hutama Karya (Persero) - PT Seneca Indonesia, 10(Indonesia) 5. PT Multi Structur~ (Indonesia)

6, PT Nindya Karya (Persero) (Indonesia)

7. PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring, Tbk (Indonesia)

8, PI' Pembangunan Perusahaan (Persero (Indonesia) 9. PI' Waskita Karya (Persero, Tbk (Indones ia) 10, PT Widya Sapta Colas (Indonesia)

1I PT Yasa Patria Perkasa (Indonesia)

Vve refer to your letterzyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBANo.HL.0202lBp.lU0742/2014 dated July 7,2014, which we received on July 8, 2014 submitting the: revised Application Evaluation Report (A,ER) tor package 5: Simpang Ramps .. Poriaha at PrOVJllCe of North Sumatera including your clarification to the Bank's comments. We still found inconsistency on the cash flow amount of each applicant between summary of evaluation and individual evaluation sheet for each applicant while it is also shown that the amount of Gash flow of two applicants {PT Brantas Abipraya and PT Hutama Karya (Persero) - PT Seneca JO) are blank as indicated in the individual evaluation sheet. Please revise and ensure consistency throughout the d ocuments,

Indonesia: Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project (WINRIP) (Ln. 8M3-IV) Submission of Application Evaluation Report (A,ER), proposed Qualified Application jo!'

Package /'0/0. 5:Simpang Rampa - Poria/us on"Nortt» Sumatera Province Dear Mr. Batubara:

Director of Planning

Directorate General of Highways Ministry of Public Works II. Pattimura No. 20/5 Jakarta 121 10" Indonesia Mr. Harris H. Batubarra

RefWn-TRIP /172 July 15, 2014

The \oVorld Bank

WORLD BANK OFFICE, JAJ<ARTA

II'HERr'~ATIONAL 8AM< FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT J5EB Tower 2,.n..Jend,Sudirrnan Kav.52-53,Jakerta 12190 INTERNf',nON!'.L DE\/ELOPMEr~T ASSOCIATION Telephone: (62-21) 52993000. Facsimile: (62-21) 5299311 i

Director ofImplementation A~ffairsofRegion I, DGB

Director lor Financing and Foreign Cooperation, D{)Pj :C~GH

Director for System and Controlling of Region l as e)Ie: P1\;ftJ V/IT',rp~~.p"J.)TP.~

Director for Reg-ion I I)~D1.A.T

C~· 1~C· \l/Il~F.UP

Cc: Director General

Indonesia Sustainable DeveJoprnent

East Asia and Pacific · TaskTeam Leader \\IIl~FJP

Elisabeth Goller

" .~'

Sincerely yours, Mr Harris Batubars

[i'J P.O. Sox 1324/JKT, Jakarta 10013 ruTelex: IBRDIA 60086zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA®Headquarters: The World Bank, Washington DC, USA

4. It is indicated in the AER that one applicant (PT Lince Romali Raya) does not meet the requirement of general experience and two applicants (PT Conbloc Infratecno and PT Jaya Konstruksi Manggala Pratama) do not meet the requirement of key activities. Please clarify how you calculate the production rate of each applicant by providing calculation breakdowns and supporting pages

on

firm's applications and/or clarification responses. It is also noted that PT Jaya Konstruksi had done past contract experience in joint venture for which the portion of 3. We note

thatrequest

for clarification letters were sent by PIU to only 7 (out of the total 14) applicants on the Key Activities. Please

confirm

that other than the missing qualification information which was requested from the 7applicants through request for clarification letters, the remaining qualification

information

provided by

all

14 applicants in

their

applications

was

found by PIU to be sufficient for making the determination of the applicants' qualifications against the specified qualification criteria.

If

not, please send a written request to seek

clarification

from

the applicants

in

relation to the

produetien :rate of key

activities.

2. Finally,

an inconsistency is also found in section

4

Conclusions and Recommendations of

AER

in the last paragraph. Please revise all as appropriate to ensure consistency.

l. We found some inconsistencies all the documents such as point 3.3 of AER under "General Construction Experience", inthe first and the end paragraph of this subject, it appears that it does not consistent with the narrative description of four applicants as written. Moreover, under point applicant No.3 (PT Brantas Abipraya) and applicant No.14 (PT Yasa Patria Perkasa),

it

still refers to PT Nandya Karya. As to applicant No.7, from the narrative it is not clear why

this

applicant

did not meet the

required

experience.

We refer to your letterzyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBANo.HL.0202/Bp.ll/0404/2014 dated June 9, 2014, which we received Qll_JlJ:T_1~

to,

~Ol_4 ~lJ:llt)1.it:tjl1gth_e

Alml_i~atiQl1.

Eva_IWl:ti~)l)K~l:>Qrt

(A.J;:J~)

(Qr pa.c~ag~ 5:

~il11paBgRa.rnpa.

- Poriaha at Province of North Sumatera, Based on the information provided, we have the following comments:

Indonesia: Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project (WINRIP) (Ln.804_3-ID)

Submission oj Application Evaluation Report (AER), "ProposedQuatiftedApplication for Package

No. 05: Sp. Rampa - Porlaha ( North Sumatera) Dear Mr.Batubara:

Mr. Harris

H.

Batubarra Director of

Planning

:O:ir~gtomt~

Q~~'H~ntl

of

Highways

Ministry of Public Works II.Pattimura No. 20/5 Jakarta 12110, Indonesia

Ref.\\TINRIP 1168 June 17, 20,14

The World Bank

WORLD BANK OFFICE, JAKARTA

INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT JSEB Tower 2, JI .Jend. Sudirman Kav.52-53,.Jakarta12190

~.; P.O.Box1324!~KT.Jakarta 40013r[jTelex:IB,RDIA 60086zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBAr-)Headquarters:TheWorld Sank.Washington DC.• USA

Cc: Director General of Highways

Director of Implementation Affairs of Region I, DOH

Deputy Director for Financing and Foreign Cooperation, DOP, DGH

Deputy Director for System andControlling of Region IasOlePMU WINRIP , DIA 1.

Deputy Director for Region I B, DIA I CTCWINRIP

Elisabeth Goller Task Team Leader WINRlP

Indonesia Sustainable Development Department East Asia and Pacific Region

Sincerely yours,

We look forward toreceiving your responses on the above including the revised AER. If you would like to discuss regarding our comments above, please let us know.

6. Please also confirm that in addition to the advertisement in UNDB online, this procurement process was also published in local newspaper and/or in PIU's website.

). For the cash flow requirement, it is stated

in

the- footnote of Section IIIzyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBAPUll1t J.l(b) ofilie

Pre-qualification document that the applicant must demonstrate the availability of the required liquid assets in the form ofa statement showing the amount

in

the applicant's bank account and/or through line of credit supported by letter from the applicant's commercial bank confirming availability of those funds for this contract

if

awarded to the bidder. However,

in

the table of AER, it appears that PlU incorrectly calculated the total amount of the applicant's

available liquid assets by also including the amount equal to the difference between current

assets and current liabilities based on the latest period of the applicant's audited financial statements. This is inconsistent with the requirements specified in the pre-qualification document. Please revise the AER accordingly by determining the available liquid asset of each applicant based onthe documented amount inthe applicant's bank account and/or line of credit, as specified in the qualification criteria of the pre-qualification document, In case after having correctly calculated the available liquid asset of each applicant,

if

the applicant does not meet the requirement of cash flow (in the form of liquid asset and/or credit line) and

if

the applicant meets all other qualification criteria, then in order to avoid restricted competition at the subsequent bidding stage and also given that the cash flow requirement in any case has to be verified

'as being met at the later stage of

bidding,

'the B.an1~will be

willing to.consider ifPIU would like to still conditionally pre-qualify

all

such applicants subject to the applicant meeting the required minimum amount of liquid assets at the later time of bidding

joint venture is specified. Itis unclear whether the production rate mentioned in the report is a

total rate after

or

before calculated by specific portion.

It

seems that the

:firm

carried out the past contract experience as lead partner of 55% portion of

IV.

Please confirm that the total amount of 10,338.02 ton/month for asphalt and 9,011.25 m3/month is the total production rate done by PI Jaya Konstruksi,

June 13, 2014

PT Lince Romauli Raya did not submitted completely data for general experience and this applicant had failed in MCTO requirement so we assumed the clarification was not need anymore for general experience. PT Jaya Konstruksi Manggala Pratama submitted the complete data. The committee evaluated the biggest experience of key specific activities that had submitted to us (calculation of production rate and supporting pages of data included in the report). Same case for PT Conbloc infratecno based on completely data received, the committee evaluated the highest production rate of the applicant related to Aggregate and Asphalt works.

Clarification only to the 7 applicant because they submitted data especially for general experiences and key activities incompletely while the other applicants submitted sufficient and complete data in their document. While other applicant is not clarified because the data entered is meeting the requirements specified

4. It is indicated in the AER that one applicant (PT Lince Romali 4. Raya) does not meet the requirement of general experience and two applicants (PT Conbloc Infratecno and PT Jaya Konstruksi Manggala Pratama) do not meet the requirement of key activities. Please clarify how you calculate the production rate of each applicant by providing calculation breakdowns and supporting pages on firm's applications and/or clarification responses. It is also noted that PT Jaya Konstruksi had done past contract experience in joint venture for which the portion of joint venture is specified. It is unclear whether the production rate mentioned in the report is a total rate after or before calculated by specific portion. It seems that the firm carried out the past contract experience as lead partner of 55% portion of JV. Please confirm that the total amount of 10,338.02 ton/month for asphalt and 9,011.25 m3/month is the total production rate done by PT Jaya Konstruksi.

3. Request for clarification letters were sent by PU to only 7 (out 3. of the total 14) applicants on the Key Activities. Please confirm that other than the missing qualification information which was requested from the 7 applicants through request for clarification letters, the remaining qualification information provided by all 14 applicants in their applications was found by PU to be sufficient for making the determination of the applicants qualifications against the specified qualification criteria. If not, please send a written request to seek clarification from the applicants in relation to the production rate of key activities.

2. Section 4 conclusion and recommendations also had been corrected and now consistent with other section. 2. Inconsistency is also found in section 4 Conclusions and

Recommendations of AER in the last paragraph. Please revise all as appropriate to ensure consistency.

1. The narration of point 3.3 points for general Experience in the first paragraph and the last one had corrected.

1. Some inconsistencies on the documents such as point 3.3 of AER under "General Construction Experience", in the first and the end paragraph of this subject, it appears that it not consistent with the narrative description of four applicants as written. Moreover, under point applicant No.3 (PT Brantas Abipraya) and applicant No. 14 (PT Yasa Patria Perkasa), it still refers to PT Nindya Karya, As to applicant No.7, from the narrative it is not clear why this applicant did not meet the required experience.

The Committee Answers: The World Bank Comments:

We refer to The World Bank Letter WINRIP/168 dated June 17, 2014 submitting AER for package 5 : Simpang Rampa - Poriaha at Province of North Sumatera, committee has been answering the question below:

6. Please also confirm that in addition to the advertisement in 6. The Committee also announced the advertisement in UNDB online, this procurement process was also published LPSE (Electronic Procurement Services Portal) in local newspaper and/or in PIU's website. Ministry of Public Works Website.

For cash flow requirements in section III point 3.1 (b) we have to fix in accordance with the requested World Bank, where in the evaluation sheet have included data support the bank and current account of each applicant. The committee had corrected the evaluation regard to this criteria, some applicant did not submitted the data and some others based on evidences includes in document did not fulfill the requirements, as suggested by the Bank to avoid restricted competition, the committee made consideration to qualified in applicant who did not fulfill the requirement for cash flow but meet the requirement in other criteria. For all applicants the financial resources must be updated and meet the requirement for this criteria at the bidding stage. 5. For the cash flow requirement, it is stated in the footnote of 5.

Section III point 3.1(b) of the Pre- qualification document that the applicant must demonstrate the availability of the required liquid assets in the form of a statement showing the amount in the applicant's bank account and/or through line of credit supported by letter from the applicant's commercial bank confirming availability of those funds for this contract if awarded to the bidder. However, in the table of AER, it appears that PIU incorrectly calculated the total amount of the applicant's available liquid assets by also including the amount equal to the difference between current assets and current liabilities based on the latest period of the applicant's audited financial statements. This is inconsistent with the requirements specified in the pre-qualification document. Please revise the AER accordingly by determining the available liquid asset of each applicant based on the documented amount in the applicant's bank account and/or line of credit, as specified in the qualification criteria of the pre-qualification document. In case after having correctly calculated the available liquid asset of each applicant, if the applicant does not meet the requirement of cash flow (in the form of liquid asset and/or credit line) and if the applicant meets all other qualification criteria, then in order to avoid restricted competition at the subsequent bidding stage and also given that the cash flow requirement in any case has to be verified as being met at the later stage of bidding, the Bank will be willing to consider if PU would like to still conditionally pre-qualify all such applicants subject to the applicant meeting the required minimum amount of liquid assets at the later time of bidding.

....

,...

'VizyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA c ~

.~.~

zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA m"i

.QzyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA:::l

E::':: CII· • C).lI:: c 0 evO Q.c

:a[

.lI::C'C «"6, I/) c tV 41

...._t!l

-.41 CO::.:: <:)

o

E ,!.\1., <:) <:) en

....

e <11

..,

....

M

....

E ,!.\1., "<t

....

o N C C'C

..,

00 N o

o

_... N

....

T""

....

'C o E o c c:i c ro "'C II! 2 "'C t-o z .E ro r0-O 'CijzyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA z: m c ·CO .<:: CO (f) ::::J c CO "'C CO III e ~ ~ "'C C 41 a. "<t

o

N c ro --, <X) N 3? C/) C") "'"" o .N C/) II! o (0 c C'C C'C "'C C'C 01 C ev Q. l!! ttl U II) a. ::c e <11 <11 'I::' II! .,lI: II! a.

_...

~ <11 a. <11 E <11 Z ro 'i:' ~ s:: <11 :::I

...

_<11 II) .Q :::I II) <11 E <11. Z ~ c, c.. .:.::: a. a, (j) o

«

CJ ...J

o

III @. N '<0 C o· 'iii ro Z c ro "iii_--, c ro ro c ro ~ ro (jj Q. ....: C ttl C'C 'I::' ~ ev Q. C) c C'C "'C ,iIi f/) :.::: ::::J 0:: l-o: Z o :.::: z ~ --, 0:: w :.::: w a, c:( (5 w >-z w a.

z

«

o

z

«

..J UJ ..J UJ Q. Z

«

~ ::J ~ ::J

o

Z UJ a.

As an information in relation on the 14 (fourteen)

applicants

who submitted the

application

documents,

i

(one) of the applicants were submitted the applications as a Joint Opeartions/Joint Venture.

11. PT. Widya Sapta

Colas.

12. PT. Hutama Karya - Seneca Indonesia (JO). 13. PT. Bangun Cipta Kontraktor.

1!~. PI. Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring Tbk.

9.

PT. Waskita Karya (Persero).

10. PI. Adhi Karya (Persero), Tbk.

"I

I. 6.

PT. Brantas Abipraya. PT. Nindya Karya (Persero).

PT.

Jsya

Kenstreksi Manggala

Pratama,

Tbk.

PT. Vasa Patria Perkasa.

PT.PP (Persero), Tbk. 4.

PT. Conbloe Infratecno.

"zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

,.).

PT, Lince Romauli

Raya,

PT.1Vlulti

Structure, 1

J.

The name of the applicants were submitted the applications, as follows:

1-zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

.s,

5 8

applicants.

14 apPlicants

44

applicants

applicants Number ofappticants registered

for

pre-qualificatioa "

Number of spplicants submitted the applicatien documents'

Number

of applicants did not submitted

the application

documents

Nmnber of applicants late to

submitted

the application documents

L

2.

documeat submitted,

Based on

above

doc u

men

t

s

and data

i

n

pre-qnalification

Procurement Tea m summarized the

result

as follows:

21,2013 .

The application subm is-sian was conducted

by

Procurement Team were based on :

" Standard Procurement Document, Prequsliflcerion Document for Prcuresaeat of Works and User's

Guide, The World Bank, August 2006

revised May

2007 atld

September

201 0

Guidelines: Procurement Under lBRD Loans and IDA

Credits

puhlished by \~lorld Bank May 2004,

RevisedOctober 1,2006&

May

t,

2010

". Decree of the Presidest of Repu'oJic Indonesia, number 70 year 2012,

Decree of the President

of Repablic Indonesia, number

54 veal"2010.

LOZU1

Agreement Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project.Lcaa

No.

8043-ID

6. Decree of Kepala Balai Besar Pelaksaaaan Jalan Nasional 1 No, 70lKpts-Brl20D dated on Nov Today, Monday dated tenth of February in the year of

Two

thousand fourteen (Feb lOth, 2(14), Procurement Team of Satker Pelaksanaan Jalan Nasional Wilayah II Sumatera Utara Province for \VINRfP IBRD Loan 8043-1D firstly declare that the application. submission of Package 05 Sp. Rampa-Poriaha (Satker Pelaksanaan Jalan Nasional Wilayah

n

Provinsi Su m ate r a Utara r.Province of

North

Sumatera has closed at

10.nO

am (local

time).

The Application

Submission

held in the

meeting

morn

of

Balai Diktat PU

Wilayah

I J1.

Bus!

Da larn No.

i

A Me dan

,

North Sumatera Province

LAMPIRAN IV

Tt':!11bl§an disamDalkan kepada Ylh;

'1. KF.pal'l Ba!ai sesar Pelaksanaan Ja;an Nasmall

dl Madan;

2. Kasalker Pelaksanaan Jalan Nasional \¥.la'tah "

p(()'i

SJmul

di

~aJan;

3 PPJ<12 (Sibdga, Cs)

Ketua POKJA

zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

l>

Psn-~atJaaf1Rarang/.Jasa W!NRiP

r

Paket Sp. Rsnpa • Poriaha

zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

~ J

zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

~\j\l-~

Ir.lrwan. MT

NIP. 19520213 199203 1 002

LJernlklan ~aml sampalkan, atas pernallan d6'1 kerjasamanya kMil UC!lpkan teoma kas h.

· ...am1S

!

21

AguslllS 2014

· 10.00 W1B •

selssaJ

· Balai

Booar

Pel1l'<sanaa- Jalan Nasi'lnall

Jalen

$al\j

Lubis No 1 Medan

Hart! T3I'l!)9al

Waklu

TA!npill

Cehubu'lgan akan dladakan Pre·b d Meeting Pakel 05 WINRIP Sp Rampe - Poriahll, :lfmg;;n

1111

kami tronon

berkensn lIehadiran Bapak pads :)re-blc ~ti!'19 Icrsebu' pada'

Penisl

.

Pre-bid

Meeting Pallet 05 WINRlP Sp. Rampa • Poriaha

l\ep<ldaYilt:

1. Bapak Ketua Pe!aksallOl Hanan PrAU WlNRlP laRD LOAN No. 8043·l!}

2. Bapak Kasubdi!. Wilayah IB, Oit. Binlak 1M11,

3. CTCW1NRIP.

di-ill..lllJl

Medan,

t

g

AgdstlJS

2014

: 25 Ipo~JoIwl(1f1p:B!.S3l2014

Nomer

Lampiran

SATKER PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONALWIlAYAH II PROV1N$1SUMUT

Alamat:

Jn,

8os1Galant No 7

M!l1N"

Tetp

1J61·7Wl804, Fax.:>61

7866604, il-."'la!l: wiorip pc2@~maiLoom

(KELOMPOK

KERJA)

JALAN NASIONAL • I

PROCUREMENT

COMMITTEE

TEAM

LAMPIRAN V

BERITA ACARA AANWIJZING/MINUTES OF PRE BID MEETING +

SITE VISIT

LAMPIRAN VI

LAMPIRAN VII

a p o ra

nasil Pe antamagn giaetan Pre -Bid Meeting, Proses Pengadaan Jasa Pekerjaan Konstruksi

WINRIP Loan IBRD No. 8043-ID

Wakil Pengamat dari Masyarakat/Community Representative Observer (WPM/CRO) Paket 05

LAMPIRAN VII

a p o ra

nasil Pe antamagn giaetan Pre -Bid Meeting, Proses Pengadaan Jasa Pekerjaan Konstruksi

WINRIP Loan IBRD No. 8043-ID

Wakil Pengamat dari Masyarakat/Community Representative Observer (WPM/CRO) Paket 05