T FIS 1402625 Bibliography

122

DAFTAR PUSTAKA
American Association for the Advancement Of Science [AAAS]. (1993).
Benchmarks for Scientific Literacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Arikunto, S. (2009). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta:
Bumi Aksara
Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta:
Rineke Cipta.
Baker, W. P., Barstack, R., Clark, D., Hull, E., Goodman, B., Kook, J., Kraft, K.,
Ramakrishna, P., Roberts, E., Shaw, J., Weaver, D., Lang, M. (2008). Writing-toLearn in the Inquiry-Science Classroom: Effective Strategies from Middle School
Science and Writing Teachers. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational
Strategies, Issues and Ideas
Balgopal, M. & Wallace, A. (2013). Writing-to-Learn, Writing-to-Communicate,
&Scientific Literacy. The American Biology Teacher, Vol. 75, No.3. University of
California Press.
Balitbang Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2011). Survei Internasional
PISA. [online].
Boujaoude, S. (2010). Balance of scientific literacy themes in science curricula:
The case of Lebanon. International Journal of Science Education
Brown, B. A., Reeveles, J.M., & Kelly, G. J. (2005) Scientific Literacy and

Discursive Identity: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding Science
Learning. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Bunterm, T., Lee, K., Ng Lan Kong, J., Srikoon, S., Vangpoomyai, P.,
Rattanavongsa, J., Rachahoon, G. (2014). Do Different Levels of Inquiry Lead to
Different Learning Outcomes? A comparison between guided and structured
inquiry. International Journal of Science Education. 36 (12): 1937–1959
Reza Ruhbani A, 2016
PENGGUNAAN LEVELS OF INQUIRY DENGAN PENUGASAN WRITING-TO-LEARN UNTUK
MENINGKATKAN LITERASI SAINTIFIK SISWA SMK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

123

Bybee, R. & McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific Literacy and Student Attitudes:
Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education
Vol. 33, No. 1, 1 January 2011, pp. 7–26
Bybee, R.W. (1997). Toward an understanding of scientific literacy. In: W.
Gräber & C. Bolte (Eds.). Scientific literacy: An international symposium (pp. 3768). Kiel, Germany: IPN.
Bybee, R.W. (1997). Toward an understanding of scientific literacy. In: W.
Gräber & C. Bolte (Eds.). Scientific literacy: An international symposium (pp. 3768). Kiel, Germany: IPN

Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education.
Routledge, London.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design; Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed
Method Approach. Third Edition. California: SAGE Publication
Dahar, R.W. (1996). Teori-Teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga
DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific Literacy: Another Look at Its Historical and
Contemporary Meanings and Its Relationship to Science Education Reform.
Journal Of Research In Science Teaching
Ellis, R. A. Taylor, C. E., & Drury, H. (2007). Learning science through writing:
associations with prior conceptions of writing and perceptions of a writing
program. Higher Education Research & Development, 26:3, 297-311
Ellis, R. A., Taylor, C.E., & Drury, H. (2006). University Student Conceptions of
Learning Science Through Writing. Australian Journal of Education, Vol. 50, No.
1, 2006, 6–28
Fang, Z. & Wei, Y. (2010). Improving Middle School Students’ Science Literacy
Through Reading Infusion. The Journal of Educational Research

Reza Ruhbani A, 2016
PENGGUNAAN LEVELS OF INQUIRY DENGAN PENUGASAN WRITING-TO-LEARN UNTUK
MENINGKATKAN LITERASI SAINTIFIK SISWA SMK

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

124

Glynn S. M. & Muth K. D. (1994). Reading and Writing to Learn Science:
Achieving Scientific Literacy. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching Vol. 31,
No. 9, Pp. 1057-1073 (1994)
Gormally, C., Brickman, P., Hallar, B., and Armstrong, N. (2009). Effects of
Inquiry-based Learning on Students’ Science Literacy Skills and Confidence.
International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Hake, R.R. (1999). Analyzing Charge Gain Score. Tersedia http://www.physics
.indiana.edu/Analyzing Change Gain.pdf
Hake, R.R. (1999). Interactive-engagement vs traditional methods: A six thousand
student survey of mechanic test data for introductory physics courses. Journal of
Physics. 66 (1): 64-74.
Hand, B., Lawrence, C., & L. D. Yore, (1999) A writing in science framework
designed to enhance science literacy.International Journal of Science Education,
21:10, 1021-1035
Hand, B., Wallace C.W., Yang, E. .(2004). Using a Science Writing Heuristic to
enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh‐grade science:


quantitative and qualitative aspects. International Journal of Science Education,
26:2, 131-149

Hand, B., Yang, E. & Bruxvoort, C. (2006). Using Writing-To-Learn Science
Strategies To Improve Year 11 Students’ Understandings Of Stoichiometry.
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education (2007) 5: 125Y143
Hewitt, P. G. (2006). Conceptual Physics, Tenth Edition. Pearson, USA
Hobson, A. (2008). The Surprising Effectiveness of College Scientific Literacy
Courses. The Physics Teacher.Vol. 46, October 2008

Reza Ruhbani A, 2016
PENGGUNAAN LEVELS OF INQUIRY DENGAN PENUGASAN WRITING-TO-LEARN UNTUK
MENINGKATKAN LITERASI SAINTIFIK SISWA SMK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

125

Holbrook, J. & Rannikmäe, M. (1997). Supplementary teaching materials promoting


scientific and technological literacy. Tartu, Estonia: ICASE (International Council
of Associations for Science Education).
Holbrook, J. & Rannikmäe, M. (2007). The Nature of Science Education for
Enhancing Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11),
1347-1362.
Holbrook, J. & Rannikmäe, M. (2009). The Meaning of Scientific Literacy.
International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 275-288.
Jarrett, D. (1997). Inquiry Strategies for Science and Mathematics Learning, It’s
Just Good Teaching. Oregon: Nertwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
Jauhar,

M.

(2011).

Implementasi

PAIKEM

dari


Behavioristik

sampai

Konstruktivistik Sebuah Pengembangan Pembelajaran Berbasis CTL (Contextual
Teaching & Learning). Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.
Keys, C. W., Hand, B., Prain, V., Collins, S. (1999). Using the Science Writing
Heuristic as a Tool for Learning from Laboratory Investigations in Secondary
Science. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching
Keys, C.W. (1999). Revitalizing instruction in scientific genres: Connecting
knowledge production with writing to learn in science. Science Education, 83,
115–130.
Kjærnsli, M. & Lie, S.(2004). PISA and scientific literacy: similarities and
differences between the nordic countries. Scandinavian Journal of Educational
Research
Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific Literacy: A conceptual overview. Science
Education, 84(1), 71–94
Lawson, A. E. (1985). A review of research on formal reasoning and science
teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 22 (7): 569–618.

Li, H., Oliver, J.S., & Jackson, D.F., (2002). A Technique for the Identification of
an Operational Definition for Scientific Literacy. Paper presented at the annual

Reza Ruhbani A, 2016
PENGGUNAAN LEVELS OF INQUIRY DENGAN PENUGASAN WRITING-TO-LEARN UNTUK
MENINGKATKAN LITERASI SAINTIFIK SISWA SMK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

126

meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston,
MA.
Miller, J. D. (1998). The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public
Understand. Sci. 7 (1998) 203–223.
MOE. (2001). Standards for nine-year continuous curriculum at elementary and
junior high level in Taiwan. Taipei: Ministry of Education, R.O.C.
Moore, R. (1993). Does writing about science improve learning about science?.
Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(2), 212–17.
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards.
Washington DC: National Academy Press.

Norris & Phillips. (2003). How Literacy in Its Fundamental Sense Is Central to
Scientific Literacy. Wiley Periodicals, Inc
OECD. (2003). PISA 2003 Assessment Framework.
OECD. (2006). PISA 2006 Assessment Framework
OECD. (2007). PISA 2006 Released item – science
OECD. (2009). PISA 2009 Assessment Framework
OECD. (2012). PISA 2012 Assessment Framework
OECD. (2013). PISA 2015 Draft Science Framework
Okada, A., Pinto, S., & Riberio, S. (2014). Scientific Literacy through co-inquiry
for non-formal and informal learning. 13th International Public Communication
of Science and Technology Conference. Salvador, Brazil.
Pelger, S. & Nilsson, P. (2015). Popular Science Writing to Support Students’
Learning of Science and Scientific Literacy. Springer Science & Business Media
Dordrecht
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional No. 24 Tahun 2006 tentang Pelaksanaan
Standar Isi dan Standar Komptensi Lulusan

Reza Ruhbani A, 2016
PENGGUNAAN LEVELS OF INQUIRY DENGAN PENUGASAN WRITING-TO-LEARN UNTUK
MENINGKATKAN LITERASI SAINTIFIK SISWA SMK

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

127

Peraturan Rektor Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Nomor 5804/Un40/Hk/2015
Tentang Pedoman Penulisan Karya Ilmiah Upi Tahun Akademik 2015
Peterson, S.S. & Rochwerger,. (2006). Cross-Curricular Literacy: Writing for
Learning in a Science Program. Voices from the Middle, Volume 14 Number 2,
December 2006
Prain, V., & Hand, B. (1999). Students Perceptions of Writing for Learning in
Secondary School Science. Sci Ed 83:151–162, 1999.
Prain, V., Hand, B., & Yore, L. (2003). Learning From Writing in Secondary
Science: A Case Study of Students' Composing Strategies. Science Education
Research in the Knowledge-Based Society, 163-171.
Roberts, D.A. (2007). Handbook of research on science education. Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Rohmi, Puspo.

(2015). Penerapan Levels Of Inquiry untuk Meningkatkan


Domain Kompetensi dan Pengetahuan Literasi Sains Siswa SMP pada Tema
Pencemaran Lingkungan. Tesis Sekolah Pascasarjana UPI. Tidak diterbitkan.
Sanjaya, W. (2005). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses
Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Shen, B.S.P. (1975). Science literacy and the public understanding of science. In
Stacey. B. D. (Ed.), Communication of scientific information (pp. 44-52). Basel,
Switzerland: S. Karger A.G.
Soobard, R. & Rannikmäe, M. (2011). Assessing student’s level of scientific
literacy using interdisciplinary scenarios. Science Education International.
Sudjana, M.A. (2005). Metoda Statistika. Bandung: Tarsito.
Sugiyono. (2008). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D. Bandung:
Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2013). Statistika untuk penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Reza Ruhbani A, 2016
PENGGUNAAN LEVELS OF INQUIRY DENGAN PENUGASAN WRITING-TO-LEARN UNTUK
MENINGKATKAN LITERASI SAINTIFIK SISWA SMK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

128


Sund & Trowbridge. (1972). Teaching Science by Inquiry in The Secondary
School. Charles E Merril Publishing Company. Colombus.Ohio.
Tierney, B. & Dorroh, J. (2004).

How to write to learn science. Virginia:

National Science Teachers Association
Tomas, L. & Ritchie, S. M. (2014). The Challenge of Evaluating Students’
Scientific Literacy in a Writing-to-Learn Context. Springer Science & Business
Media Dordrecht
Tsai, C. (2015). Improving Students' PISA Scientific Competencies Through
Online Argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 37:2, 321-339
Wallace, C. S., Hand, B. B., & Prain. V. (2004). Writing and Learning in the
Science Classroom. Springer Science+Business Media New York
Wenning, C. J. (2005). Levels of inquiry: Hierarchies of pedagogical practices
and inquiry processes. Journal Physics Teacher Education Online 2(3), February
2005.
Wenning, C. J. (2007). Asessing Inquiry Skills as a component of Scientific
Literacy. Journal Physics Teacher Education Online, 4(2), hlm.3-14
Wenning, C. J. (2011). Experimental inquiry in introductory physics courses.
Journal Physics Teacher Education Online, 6(2),
Wenning, C. J. (2011). The Levels of Inquiry Model of Science Teaching. Journal
Physics Teacher Education Online, 6(2), Summer 2011
Wenning, C. J. (2010). Levels of inquiry: Using inquiry spectrum learning
sequences to teach science. Journal Physics Teacher Education Online, 5(3),
Winter 2010
Xu, H. & Talanquer, V. (2012). Effect of the Level of Inquiry of Lab Experiments
on General Chemistry Students’ Written Reflections. Journal of Chemical
Education.
Reza Ruhbani A, 2016
PENGGUNAAN LEVELS OF INQUIRY DENGAN PENUGASAN WRITING-TO-LEARN UNTUK
MENINGKATKAN LITERASI SAINTIFIK SISWA SMK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

129

Yalcin, S. A., Acish, S., & Turgut, U.(2011). Determining the levels of preservice science teachers’ scientific literacy and investigating effectuality of the
education faculties about developing scientific literacy. Procedia Social and
Behavioral Sciences 15 (2011) 783–787
Yore, L. D. (2000). Enhancing Science Literacy for All Students With Embedded
Reading Instruction and Writing-to-Learn Activities. Journal of Deaf Studies and
Deaf Education 5:1 Winter 2000.
Yore, L. D. Bisanz, G. L. & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy
component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research.
International Journal of Science Education. 25:6, 689-725
Yore, L. D., & Treagust, D. F.(2006). Current Realities and Future Possibilities:
Language and science literacy—empowering research and informing instruction,
International Journal of Science Education, 28:2-3, 291-314
Zulaiha, R. (2008). Analisis Soal Secara Manual. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian
Pendidikan Depdiknas

Reza Ruhbani A, 2016
PENGGUNAAN LEVELS OF INQUIRY DENGAN PENUGASAN WRITING-TO-LEARN UNTUK
MENINGKATKAN LITERASI SAINTIFIK SISWA SMK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu