Identification of New -lactamase Inhibitor Producing Microorganisms From Indonesiandonesia.

(1)

FINAL REPORT

INDONESIA TORAY SCIENCE FOUNDATION

RESEARCH GRANT 13TH

Identification of Microorganisms

Producing New

-lactamase Inhibitor From Indonesia

By :

Sri Agung Fitri Kusuma Valentina Yurina

PADJADJARAN UNIVERSITY BANDUNG


(2)

1

Identification of New

-lactamase Inhibitor

Producing Microorganisms From Indonesia

Sri Agung Fitri Kusuma1 and Valentina Yurina2

Abstract

Despite of increasing numbers of Escherichia coli resistant to combination of ampicillin and clavulanic acid stated in recent reports, discovery of new -lactamase inhibitor become s important. Our previous experiment showed that some microorganisms isol ated from Indonesia have potency to prod uce inhibitor against clinical isolate -lactamase producing E. coli. Objectives of this research were to determine the dose dependent effect of extracellular products of ten β-lactamase inhibitor producing bacteria from Indonesia and to identify the species of the producers. β-lactamase inhibitor activity assay was conducted by agar diffusion method using clin ical isolate E. coli producing -lactamase. Our results showed that extracellular product of nine bacteria under study had -lactamase inhibitor activity. These bacteria also have antibiotic activity against both resistant and sensitive E. coli strains. The dose-dependent effect assay of one extracellular product showed more potent antibiotic activity than betalactamase inhibiting activity. Bacterial identification with phenotypic approach was done by colony and cell morphology observation as well as biochemical assays; and with genotypic approach was done by 16S rDNA-based method. Species identification of nine beta-lactamase inhibitor producing bacteria were Streptomyces brasiliensis, Staphylococcus equorum, Salmonella typhi, Pseudomonas fluorescens, P . putida, Enterobacter hormaechei, Aerom onas popoffii, Enterobacter sp. and Serratia marcescens. While the species of antibiotic producer was Alcaligenes faecalis.

Key words: beta-lactamase inhibitor, ampicillin resistant Escherichia coli, Indonesia.

Introduction

Escherichia coli is a Gram negative bacterium and represents normal inhabitant of human intestines. Although E. coli has been considered to be human normal flora, it can cause a wide variety of intestinal and extra intestinal infection, such as diarrhea, urinary tract infection, septicemia and neonatal meningitis (Jawetz et al., 1995).

An example of drug of choice for E. coli infection is ampicillin. However, many strains of E. coli were reported to be resistant to ampicillin; consequently it is not widely used anymore. -lactamase represents the main mechanism of bacterial resistance to -lactam antibiotics by hydrolyzing -lactam ring to form an inactive derivative of -lactam substance. To overcome microbial resistance to -lactam, combinations of hydrolyzable -lactam antibiotics and a -lactamase inhibitor are successfully used. Clavulanic acid, Sulbactam and Tazobactam are examples of potent -lactamase inhibitor for many -lactamase enzymes. However, about 62 % of E. coli isolates were resistant to the combination (Vanjak et al., 1995).

Production of -lactamase is very important for -lactam resistance in human pathogen including E. coli. One study reported that -lactamase was found in more than 90 % of urinary pathogens with mostly (94.8 %) of E. coli (Orret and Shurland, 1996). Therefore, this research is focused on an E. coli isolate from urine sample of cystitis patient obtained from one of hospital in Bandung and was isolated in previous study (Kusuma, 2005, unpublished data). In previous study, the existence of ampicillin resistance gene (bla gene) was detected by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) using bla specific primer (Bonar and Kusuma, 2005).

Our preliminary data showed that extracellular product of some marine and soil bacteria exhibit potency to contain -lactamase inhibitor that inactivates -lactamase produced by clinical isolate of ampicillin resistant Escherichia coli. Since the extracellular products of some marine and soil microorganisms have ability to kill ampicillin-resistant strain producing -lactamase, the compound of microbial products may contain new -lactamase inhibitor. The discovery of new -lactamase will give a significant impact in the development of drug. This research will also to enhance the exploration of microbial biodiversity because the source of -lactamase inhibitor candidates are collected from Indonesian soil and marine. The objectives of this current research were to study the dose-dependent inhibition of extracellular products from microorganisms with potential -lactamase inhibitory activity and to identify

1

Faculty of Pharmacy, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia

2


(3)

the species of ten -lactamase inhibitor producing microorganisms by phenotypic and genotypic approach.

Material and Methods Materials

Nutrient Broth, Nutrient Agar, Primer 16S rRNA, Taq Polymerase, dNTP, MgCl2, Agarosa, Ethidium bromide, Trisma base, EDTA, DNA Marker, Ampicillin pro injection, Gentian violet, Potassium iodide, iodine, Fuchsin acid, Lugol, Emersi oil, Xylene, Citrate simmon, Urea indole, MR-VP broth, Kovac’s reagen, Methyl red indicator, Barrit reagen, Glucose broth, Lactose broth, Mannose broth, Maltose broth, Sucrose broth, Phenol red indicator, Sodium chloride, Sodium dihydrophosphate, Potassium chloride, and Potassium dihydrophosphate.

Methods

1. Production of extracellular products of marine and soil microorganisms

Six marine and four soil microorganisms previously shown to produce β-lactamase inhibitor were cultured in 30 mL of Nutrient Broth at room temperature for 18 hours. Supernatants were obtained by centrifugation at 4 oC and cell pellets were removed. The

supernatants were lyophilized and dissolved in 500 µL of sterile phosphate buffer saline (PBS). These concentrated extracellular products were tested for growth inhibition of an -lactamase producing ampicillin resistant E. coli in ampicillin containing agar. This E. coli strain had been confirmed to contain bla gene (gene encoding for β-lactamase) and produced

β-lactamase using colorimetric assay. The concentration of supernatants was varied i.e.20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 % to examine dose-dependent activity.

2. Identification of Marine and Soil Microorganisms 2.1Phenotypic Identification

Ten microorganisms were identified by observing colony and cell morphology, biochemical assays and sugar utilizing activity. Shape and color of the colonies were observed visually, while cell morphologies were observed by microscope using Gram staining method. Biochemical assays were conducted by citrate acid, motile indole urea, red methyl-Voges Proskauer (MR-VP), VP, and sugar fermentation assay.

2.2 Genotypic Identification

Identification was based on comparing the nucleotide sequence of 16S rDNA gene of ten microorganisms to nucleotide sequences in Gene Bank (NCBI). First, chromosomal DNAs were extracted and isolated from ten microorganisms using Wizard kit. Chromosomal DNAs were analyzed using agarose gel electrophoresis. The quality of chromosomal DNAs were accessed by measuring the absorbance at 240 and 280 nm. 16S rDNA genes were amplified using a pair of primer specific for bacterial 16S rDNA. The nucleotide sequence of these primers are: Uni B1: 5’- GGTTAC(GC)TTGTTACGACTT3’ for forward primer and BacF1: 5’-AGAGTTTGATC(AC)TGGCTCAG-3’ for reverse primer. PCR condition was 94°C 2 minutes for pre-denaturation, 94°C 1 minute for amplification, 48°C 1 minute for annealing, 72°C 1 minute for elongation, and post-elongation at 72°C 10 minutes. PCR was conducted for 30 cycles. PCR was performed to all 10 chromosomal DNAs to amplify the 16SrDNA fragment and the PCR products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. The expected size is 1.400 base pairs.


(4)

3

The PCR products were isolated from agarose gel and purified using GFX column. The purified PCR products were then analyzed with an automatic sequencer. Then, nucleotide sequences were analyzed using Basic Local Alignment Search Tools (BLAST) program (http//www.ncbi.nih.nlm.gov) to find the highest homology/identity values with sequences in Gene Bank. Final identification of the ten microorganisms was determined by combining phenotypic and genotypic data.

Result and Discussion Dose-Dependent Activity

Dose dependent activity assay was conducted to determine the effect of -lactamase inhibitor activity for inactivating -lactamase produced by clinical isolate of ampicillin resistant Escherichia coli. The inhibition zone from one of inhibitor producing bacteria i.e CL3 was shown in Fig. 1. While other bacteria gave similar result as CL3 bacteria.

Figure1. Inhibition Zones of CL3 Bacteria at Various Concentrations a. Ampicillin resistant E. coli; b. Ampicillin sensitive E. coli

Increasing concentrations of nine tested extracellular products gave progressive greater effects on the diameter of inhibition zone of resistant E. coli, while the inhibition zone diameters of sensitive E. coli was significantly smaller. An example, the effect of CL3 extracellular product concentration to inhibition zone diameter was shown in Fig. 2. These data indicated that the extracellular products contain -lactamase inhibiting activity. Besides, it also contains antibiotics activity because the inhibition zones were formed for both of sensitive and resistant E. coli. The discovery of antibiotics substances in extracellular product could gave a new expectation to overcome E. coli resistant infection.

Figure 2. The Effect of CL3 Extracellular Product Concentration to Inhibition Zone Diameter


(5)

The relative inhibition of undiluted extracellular product to ampicillin sensitive and resistant E. coli was shown in Fig. 3. Relative inhibition (%) was measured by comparing the diameter of inhibition zone of undiluted extracellular products given by ampicillin sensitive to that of resistant E. coli X 100%.

Figure 3. Inhibition of Undiluted Extracellular Product of Tested Bacteria

From figure 3, we can see that among all tested bacteria, the extracellular product of jajaway 4 gave very different result from the other. Inhibition zone in sensitive E. coli from this sample was bigger than in the resistant one. We hypothesized that the extracellular product of sample jajaway 4 have more potent antibiotic activity than betalactamase inhibiting activity. Identification of Marine and Soil Microorganisms Using Phenotypic Identification

The identification data of ten tested bacteria using phenotypic approach by colony and cell morphology observation and biochemical assays shown in Table 1-2.

Table 1. The Morphology of Ten Betalactamase Inhibitory Producing Bacteria

No. Sample name Shape Gram

Grouping Colony color

1. Jajaway 4 Rod _ Yellowish white

2. BDG4 Rod _ Yellowish white,

tranparant

3. Cijeruk lembang3 Rod _ Yellowish white,

tranparant

4. BCD3 Rod _ Tranparant white

5. SLTA1 Coccus + Tranparant white

6. SN16 Coccus + White,opaque,

7. Vila Roro 1.3 Rod - White, opaque

8. BL6 Rod _ yellow

9. Seskau 3.1 Coccus _ Yellowish White


(6)

5

Table 2. The Result of Biochemical assays

Sampel Citrate Motil Indole Urea MR VP Glucose Maltose Sucrose Manitol Lactose

Jajaway 4 + + - + + - +/gas +/gas +/gas - +/gas

BCD 3 + + - + + - +/gas +/gas +/gas +/gas -

BDG 4 + + - - + - +/gas +/gas +/gas +/gas +/gas

Cijeruk lembang 3

+ + - + + - +/gas +/gas +/gas +/gas +/gas

Vila Roro 1.3 + + + + + - +/gas +/gas +/gas - -

Seskau 3.1 + + - + + - +/gas +/gas +/gas +/gas -

BL6 + + - + - - - +gas +gas +gas -

SN16 - - - -

MKSB3 + + + - + - - - -

STLA1 - - - -

Based on morphology and biochemical assays, bacteria can be identified at genus level only. The identity of tested bacteria is present in Table 3.

Table 3. Bacteria Identity using phenotypic Analysis

No. Sample Genus

1 Jajaway 4 Alcaligenes

2 BCD3 Pseudomonas

3 BDG4 Salmonella

4 Cijeruk lembang 3 Enterobacter 5 Vila Roro 1.3 Serratia 6 Seskau 3.1 Aeromonas

7 BL6 Pseudomonas

8 SN16 Stapylococus

9 MKSB3 Enterobacter

10 STLA1 Staphylococcus

Identification of Marine and Soil Microorganisms Using Genotypic Identification

Electrophoregram of PCR product of 16S rDNA is presented in Fig.4. PCR product is about 1410 bps in size as expected.


(7)

Figure 4. PCR Product of 16S rDNA of marine and soil microorganisms under study 1 = BDG4; 2 = Vila Roro 1.3; 3 = SN16; 4 = Jajaway4; 5, 6, 16 = 100 bps DNA marker 7= Seskau 3.1; 8 = STLA; 9 = negative control; 10= positive control, 11 = BL6; 12 =CL3,13= BCD3; 14 = Seskau; 15 = MKSB3

Nucleotide sequence analysis using forward and reverse specific for 16S rDNA gene is shown in Table 4.

Table 4. Homology of 16s rDNA Nucleotide Sequence

No Sample Homology Percentage of Homology (%) 1. Jajaway 4 Alcaligenes sp.

Alcaligenes faecalis

93 93 2. SLTA1 Staphylococcus sp.

Streptomyces brasiliensis Staphylococcus equorum

98 98 98 3. SN16 Staphylococcus sp.

Staphylococcus equorum

99 99 4. BDG4 Salmonella typhi

Citrobacter sp.

84 84 5. BCD3 Pseudomonas fluorescens 92

6. BL6 Pseudomonas sp.

Pseudomonas putida Pseudomonas syringae Pseudomonas alcaligenes 88 88 88 88 7. MKSB Enterobacter hormaechei 94 8. Seskau 3.1 Aeromonas sp.

Aeromonas popoffii Aeromonas veronii Aeromonas hydrophila 87 87 87 87

9. CL3 Enterobacter sp. 80

10. Vila Roro 1.3 Serratia sp.

Serratia marcescens

97 97

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16


(8)

7

Identification of bacteria using genotypic and phenotypic analysis gives a suitable result which is lead to the correct identity of each bacterium.

Conclusions

This research strongly showed that the extracellular product of nine bacteria under study contain -lactamase inhibitor activity and in less extend contain activity to kill both resistant and sensitive E. coli strains. One bacteria showed more potent antibiotic activity than betalactamase inhibiting activity. The substances found in this research have good potency as antibiotics to treat ampicillin resistant E. coli. The species of ten tested bacteria were Alcaligenes faecalis, Streptomyces brasiliensis, Staphylococcus equorum, Salmonella typhi, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas putida, Enterobacter hormaechei, Aeromonas popoffii, Enterobacter sp. and Serratia marcescens. From our knowledge, betalactamase inhibitor substances previously available are obtained from published betalactamase inhibitor producing microorganisms.

Acknowledgment

This work was financially supported by Indonesia Toray Science Foundation (ITSF). References

Jawetz E., J. L. Melnick, E. A. Adelberg, G. F. Brooks, J. S. Butel, L. N. Ornston, 1995, Mikrobiologi Kedokteran, ed. 20, University of California, San Francisco.

Johnson J. R., M. A. Kuskowsky, T. T. O’Bryan, R. Colodner, and R. Raz, 2005, Virulence Genotype an Phylogenetic Origin in Relation to Antibiotic Resistence Profile among Escherichia coli Urine Sample Isolates from Israeli Woman with Acute Uncomplicated Cystitis, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 49(1), 26-31.

Karlowsky J. A., L. J. Kelly, C. Thornsberry, M. E. Jones, and D. F. Sahm, 2002, Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance among Urinary Tract Infection Isolates of Escherichia coli from Female Outpatient in the United States, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 46(8), 2540-2545. Madigan M.T. et al., 1997. Biology of Microorganisms, Eighth Edition. New Jersey, Prentice Hall International.

Manges A. R., J. R. Johnson, B. Foxman, T. T. O’Bryan, K. E. Fullerton, and L. W. Riley, 2001, Widespread Distribution of Urinary Tract Infections Caused by A Multridrug Resistance Escherichia coli Clonal Group, N. Engl. J. Med., 345(14), 1007-1009.

Oliver A., M. Perez-Vazquez, M. Martinez-Ferrer, F. Baquero, L. de Rafael, and R. Canton, 1999, Ampicillin-Sulbactam and Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Susceptibility Testing on Escherichia coli of Isolates with Different Beta-Lactam Resistance Phenotypes, Antimicrob Agents Chemother., 43, 862-867.

Orrett F. and S. M. Shurland, 1996, Production of Betalactamase in Trinidad an Association with Multiple Resistance to Betalactam Antibiotics, Med Science Research., 24(8), 519-522.


(9)

Saves I., O. Burletschiltz, P. Swaren, F. Lefevre, J. M. Masson, J. C. Prome, J. P. Samama, 1995, The Asparagine to Aspartic Acid Substitution at Position-276 of TEM-35 and TEM-36 is Involved in the Betalactamase Resistance to Clavulanic Acid, J. Bio. Chem., 270(31). Teale C. J., 2005, Detection and Characterisation of Betalactamase Resistance in Gram Negatif Bacteria of Veterinary Significance, UK National Guidelines for Laboratories, 102, 1-5.

Vanjak D., C. Muller-Serieys, B. Picard, E. Bergogne-Berezin, and N. Lambert-Zechovsky, 1995, Activity of Betalactamase Inhibitor Combinations on Escherichia coli Isolates Exhibiting Various Patterns of Resistance to Beta-lactam Agents, Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 14(11), 972-978.


(10)

9

CONSUMABLE LIST

NO ITEM COST (Rp)

1. Small Equipment 5.660.000

2. Consumables 28.340.000

3. Other expenditures 1.900.000

TOTAL 35.900.000

1. Cost of Small Equipment

No. Small equipment Amount Cost per item (Rp) Cost (Rp)

1. Micropipette 1000 uL 1 2.500.000 2.500.000

2. Micropipette 10-100 uL 1 2.500.000 2.500.000

3. Sentrifuge tube 25 mL 4 50.000 200.000

4. Spiritus Bunsen 2 40.000 80.000

5. Ose 3 10.000 30.000

6. Durham tube 10 30.000 300.000

7. Test tube 10 5.000 50.000

Total 5.660.000

2. Consumables

No.

Consumables Amount

Cost per item

(Rp) Cost (Rp)

1. Nutrient Broth 250 g 3.000 750.000 2. Nutrient Agar 500 g 3.000 1.500.000 3. Gloves 2 boxes 50.000 100.000 4. Polaroid films 1 boxes 250.000 250.000 5. Eppendorf tube 1,5 mL 1 pack 500.000 500.000 6. Eppendorf tube 200 1 pack 500.000 500.000 7. Micropipettes tips 1mL 1 pack 500.000 500.000 8. Micropipettes tips 100 µL 1pack 500.000 500.000 9. Micropipettes tips 10 µL 1 pack 500.000 500.000 10. Sequencing kit 1 kit 3.000.000 3.000.000 11. Primer 16 srRNA 100 mM 2.000.000 2.000.000 12. Taq Polymerase 100 U 2.000.000 2.000.000 13. dNTP 1 vial 1.000.000 1.000.000 14. MgCl2+ 1 vial 700.000 700.000 15. Mineral oil 12 mL 16.700 200.000 16. Agarosa 100 gr 2.000 2.000.000 17. Ethidium bromide 10 mL 80.000 800.000 18. Trisma base 200 g 10.000 2.000.000

19. EDTA 50 g 6.000 300.000

20. DNA Marker 100 U 1.500.000 1.500.000 21. Ampicillin pro injection 2 vials 10.000 20.000 22. Co-amoxiclav 1 stript 10.000 10.000 23. Lysol 5 bottles 8.000 40.000


(11)

24. tissue 10 rolls 2.000 20.000 25. Spiritus 10 bottles 8000 80.000 26. Alkohol 70% 3 Liter 15.000 45.000 27. Aquadest 10 Liter 1000 10.000

28. Cotton 500 g 40 20.000

29. Object glass 2 boxes 30.000 60.000 30. Gentian violet 150 mL 800 120.000 31. Potassium iodide 200 g 3.875 775.000 32. iodine 1 pack 330.000 330.000 33. Fuchsin acid 250 mL 1.000 250.000 34. Lugol 250 mL 1.000 250.000 35. Emersi oil 100 mL 1.000 100.000 36. Xylene 200 mL 1.200 240.000 37. Citrate simmon 1 boxes 350.000 350.000 38. Urea indole 1 boxes 400.000 400.000 39. MR-VP broth 100 g 2.500 250.000 40. Kovac’s reagen 50 mL 5.100 255.000 41. Methyl red indicator 25 g 29.600 740.000 42. Barrit reagen 50 mL 5.600 280.000 43. Glucose broth 1 box 400.000 400.000 44. Lactose broth 1 box 400.000 400.000 45. Mannose broth 100 g 3.000 300.000 46. Maltose broth 100 g 3.000 300.000 47. Sucrose broth 100 g 3.000 300.000 48. Phenol red indicator 5 g 116.000 580.000 49. Sodium chloride 125 gr 2.000 250.000 50. Para film paper 1 roll 300.000 300.000 51. Sodium dihydrophosphate 50 g 1.500 75.000 52. Potassium chloride 50 g 1.500 75.000 53. Potassium

dihydrophosphate

50 g 2.300 115.000

TOTAL 28.340.000

3. Other expenditures

Other expenditures Cost (Rp)

Administration 1.100.000

Data Documentation 800.000


(1)

Table 2. The Result of Biochemical assays

Sampel Citrate Motil Indole Urea MR VP Glucose Maltose Sucrose Manitol Lactose

Jajaway 4 + + - + + - +/gas +/gas +/gas - +/gas

BCD 3 + + - + + - +/gas +/gas +/gas +/gas -

BDG 4 + + - - + - +/gas +/gas +/gas +/gas +/gas

Cijeruk lembang 3

+ + - + + - +/gas +/gas +/gas +/gas +/gas

Vila Roro 1.3 + + + + + - +/gas +/gas +/gas - -

Seskau 3.1 + + - + + - +/gas +/gas +/gas +/gas -

BL6 + + - + - - - +gas +gas +gas -

SN16 - - - -

MKSB3 + + + - + - - - -

STLA1 - - - -

Based on morphology and biochemical assays, bacteria can be identified at genus level only. The identity of tested bacteria is present in Table 3.

Table 3. Bacteria Identity using phenotypic Analysis

No. Sample Genus

1 Jajaway 4 Alcaligenes

2 BCD3 Pseudomonas

3 BDG4 Salmonella

4 Cijeruk lembang 3 Enterobacter 5 Vila Roro 1.3 Serratia 6 Seskau 3.1 Aeromonas

7 BL6 Pseudomonas

8 SN16 Stapylococus

9 MKSB3 Enterobacter

10 STLA1 Staphylococcus

Identification of Marine and Soil Microorganisms Using Genotypic Identification

Electrophoregram of PCR product of 16S rDNA is presented in Fig.4. PCR product is about 1410 bps in size as expected.


(2)

Figure 4. PCR Product of 16S rDNA of marine and soil microorganisms under study 1 = BDG4; 2 = Vila Roro 1.3; 3 = SN16; 4 = Jajaway4; 5, 6, 16 = 100 bps DNA marker 7= Seskau 3.1; 8 = STLA; 9 = negative control; 10= positive control, 11 = BL6; 12 =CL3,13= BCD3; 14 = Seskau; 15 = MKSB3

Nucleotide sequence analysis using forward and reverse specific for 16S rDNA gene is shown in Table 4.

Table 4. Homology of 16s rDNA Nucleotide Sequence

No Sample Homology Percentage of Homology (%)

1. Jajaway 4 Alcaligenes sp. Alcaligenes faecalis

93 93 2. SLTA1 Staphylococcus sp.

Streptomyces brasiliensis Staphylococcus equorum

98 98 98 3. SN16 Staphylococcus sp.

Staphylococcus equorum

99 99 4. BDG4 Salmonella typhi

Citrobacter sp.

84 84

5. BCD3 Pseudomonas fluorescens 92

6. BL6 Pseudomonas sp. Pseudomonas putida Pseudomonas syringae Pseudomonas alcaligenes

88 88 88 88

7. MKSB Enterobacter hormaechei 94

8. Seskau 3.1 Aeromonas sp. Aeromonas popoffii Aeromonas veronii Aeromonas hydrophila

87 87 87 87

9. CL3 Enterobacter sp. 80

10. Vila Roro 1.3 Serratia sp. 97

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16


(3)

Identification of bacteria using genotypic and phenotypic analysis gives a suitable result which is lead to the correct identity of each bacterium.

Conclusions

This research strongly showed that the extracellular product of nine bacteria under study contain -lactamase inhibitor activity and in less extend contain activity to kill both resistant and sensitive E. coli strains. One bacteria showed more potent antibiotic activity than betalactamase inhibiting activity. The substances found in this research have good potency as antibiotics to treat ampicillin resistant E. coli. The species of ten tested bacteria were Alcaligenes faecalis, Streptomyces brasiliensis, Staphylococcus equorum, Salmonella typhi, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas putida, Enterobacter hormaechei, Aeromonas popoffii, Enterobacter sp. and Serratia marcescens. From our knowledge, betalactamase inhibitor substances previously available are obtained from published betalactamase inhibitor producing microorganisms.

Acknowledgment

This work was financially supported by Indonesia Toray Science Foundation (ITSF). References

Jawetz E., J. L. Melnick, E. A. Adelberg, G. F. Brooks, J. S. Butel, L. N. Ornston, 1995, Mikrobiologi Kedokteran, ed. 20, University of California, San Francisco.

Johnson J. R., M. A. Kuskowsky, T. T. O’Bryan, R. Colodner, and R. Raz, 2005, Virulence Genotype an Phylogenetic Origin in Relation to Antibiotic Resistence Profile among Escherichia coli Urine Sample Isolates from Israeli Woman with Acute Uncomplicated Cystitis, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 49(1), 26-31.

Karlowsky J. A., L. J. Kelly, C. Thornsberry, M. E. Jones, and D. F. Sahm, 2002, Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance among Urinary Tract Infection Isolates of Escherichia coli from Female Outpatient in the United States, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 46(8), 2540-2545. Madigan M.T. et al., 1997. Biology of Microorganisms, Eighth Edition. New Jersey, Prentice Hall International.

Manges A. R., J. R. Johnson, B. Foxman, T. T. O’Bryan, K. E. Fullerton, and L. W. Riley, 2001, Widespread Distribution of Urinary Tract Infections Caused by A Multridrug Resistance Escherichia coli Clonal Group, N. Engl. J. Med., 345(14), 1007-1009.

Oliver A., M. Perez-Vazquez, M. Martinez-Ferrer, F. Baquero, L. de Rafael, and R. Canton, 1999, Ampicillin-Sulbactam and Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Susceptibility Testing on Escherichia coli of Isolates with Different Beta-Lactam Resistance Phenotypes, Antimicrob Agents Chemother., 43, 862-867.

Orrett F. and S. M. Shurland, 1996, Production of Betalactamase in Trinidad an Association with Multiple Resistance to Betalactam Antibiotics, Med Science Research., 24(8), 519-522.


(4)

Saves I., O. Burletschiltz, P. Swaren, F. Lefevre, J. M. Masson, J. C. Prome, J. P. Samama, 1995, The Asparagine to Aspartic Acid Substitution at Position-276 of TEM-35 and TEM-36 is Involved in the Betalactamase Resistance to Clavulanic Acid, J. Bio. Chem., 270(31). Teale C. J., 2005, Detection and Characterisation of Betalactamase Resistance in Gram Negatif Bacteria of Veterinary Significance, UK National Guidelines for Laboratories, 102, 1-5.

Vanjak D., C. Muller-Serieys, B. Picard, E. Bergogne-Berezin, and N. Lambert-Zechovsky, 1995, Activity of Betalactamase Inhibitor Combinations on Escherichia coli Isolates Exhibiting Various Patterns of Resistance to Beta-lactam Agents, Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 14(11), 972-978.


(5)

CONSUMABLE LIST

NO ITEM COST (Rp)

1. Small Equipment 5.660.000

2. Consumables 28.340.000

3. Other expenditures 1.900.000

TOTAL 35.900.000

1. Cost of Small Equipment

No. Small equipment Amount Cost per item (Rp) Cost (Rp)

1. Micropipette 1000 uL 1 2.500.000 2.500.000

2. Micropipette 10-100 uL 1 2.500.000 2.500.000

3. Sentrifuge tube 25 mL 4 50.000 200.000

4. Spiritus Bunsen 2 40.000 80.000

5. Ose 3 10.000 30.000

6. Durham tube 10 30.000 300.000

7. Test tube 10 5.000 50.000

Total 5.660.000

2. Consumables No.

Consumables Amount

Cost per item

(Rp) Cost (Rp)

1. Nutrient Broth 250 g 3.000 750.000

2. Nutrient Agar 500 g 3.000 1.500.000

3. Gloves 2 boxes 50.000 100.000

4. Polaroid films 1 boxes 250.000 250.000

5. Eppendorf tube 1,5 mL 1 pack 500.000 500.000

6. Eppendorf tube 200 1 pack 500.000 500.000

7. Micropipettes tips 1mL 1 pack 500.000 500.000 8. Micropipettes tips 100 µL 1pack 500.000 500.000 9. Micropipettes tips 10 µL 1 pack 500.000 500.000

10. Sequencing kit 1 kit 3.000.000 3.000.000

11. Primer 16 srRNA 100 mM 2.000.000 2.000.000

12. Taq Polymerase 100 U 2.000.000 2.000.000

13. dNTP 1 vial 1.000.000 1.000.000

14. MgCl2+ 1 vial 700.000 700.000

15. Mineral oil 12 mL 16.700 200.000

16. Agarosa 100 gr 2.000 2.000.000

17. Ethidium bromide 10 mL 80.000 800.000

18. Trisma base 200 g 10.000 2.000.000

19. EDTA 50 g 6.000 300.000

20. DNA Marker 100 U 1.500.000 1.500.000

21. Ampicillin pro injection 2 vials 10.000 20.000

22. Co-amoxiclav 1 stript 10.000 10.000


(6)

24. tissue 10 rolls 2.000 20.000

25. Spiritus 10 bottles 8000 80.000

26. Alkohol 70% 3 Liter 15.000 45.000

27. Aquadest 10 Liter 1000 10.000

28. Cotton 500 g 40 20.000

29. Object glass 2 boxes 30.000 60.000

30. Gentian violet 150 mL 800 120.000

31. Potassium iodide 200 g 3.875 775.000

32. iodine 1 pack 330.000 330.000

33. Fuchsin acid 250 mL 1.000 250.000

34. Lugol 250 mL 1.000 250.000

35. Emersi oil 100 mL 1.000 100.000

36. Xylene 200 mL 1.200 240.000

37. Citrate simmon 1 boxes 350.000 350.000

38. Urea indole 1 boxes 400.000 400.000

39. MR-VP broth 100 g 2.500 250.000

40. Kovac’s reagen 50 mL 5.100 255.000

41. Methyl red indicator 25 g 29.600 740.000

42. Barrit reagen 50 mL 5.600 280.000

43. Glucose broth 1 box 400.000 400.000

44. Lactose broth 1 box 400.000 400.000

45. Mannose broth 100 g 3.000 300.000

46. Maltose broth 100 g 3.000 300.000

47. Sucrose broth 100 g 3.000 300.000

48. Phenol red indicator 5 g 116.000 580.000

49. Sodium chloride 125 gr 2.000 250.000

50. Para film paper 1 roll 300.000 300.000

51. Sodium dihydrophosphate 50 g 1.500 75.000

52. Potassium chloride 50 g 1.500 75.000

53. Potassium

dihydrophosphate

50 g 2.300 115.000

TOTAL 28.340.000

3. Other expenditures

Other expenditures Cost (Rp)

Administration 1.100.000

Data Documentation 800.000