Pengaruh Audit Report Lag dan Opini Audit terhadap Ketepatan Waktu Penyampaian Laporan Keuangan dengan Reputasi KAP sebagai Variabel Moderating

  • 2. SMCB Holcim Indonesia Tbk
  • 3. SMGR Semen Gresik Tbk
  • 4. AMFG Asahimas Flat Glass Tbk
  • 5. ARNA Arwana Citra Mulia Tbk
  • 6.

  • 7. KIAS Keramika Indonesia Assosiasi Tbk

  • 8. MLIA Mulia Industrindo Tbk
  • 9. TOTO Surya Toto Indonesia Tbk
  • 10. ALKA Alaska Industrindo Tbk
  • 11. ALMI Alumindo Light Metal Industry Tbk
  • 12. BTON Beton Jaya Manunggal Tbk
  • 13. CTBN Citra Turbindo Tbk
  • 14. GDST Gunawan Dianjaya Steel Tbk
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 17. JKSW Jakarta Kyoei Steel Work LTD Tbk
  • 18. JPRS Jaya Pari Steel Tbk
  • 19. KRAS Krakatau Steel Tbk
  • 20. LION Lion Metal Works Tbk
  • 21. LMSH Lionmesh Prima Tbk
  • 22. MYRX Hanson International Tbk
  • 23. NIKL Pelat Timah Nusantara Tbk

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

  INAI Indal Aluminium Industry Tbk

    

  X

  ITMA Itamaraya Tbk

  X

    

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

    

    

  X

  X

  Lampiran 1. Lampiran Daftar Perusahaan yang Memenuhi Kriteria

No Kode Populasi Perusahaan Kriteria Sampel

  1

  2

  3

  4 1.

  INTP Indocement Tunggal Prakasa Tbk

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

  IKAI Inti Keramik Alam Asri Industri Tbk

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

  • 25. TBMS Tembaga Mulia Semanan Tbk

  • 26. BRPT Barito Pasific Tbk
  • 27. BUDI Budi Acid Jaya Tbk
  • 28. DPNS Duta Pertiwi Nusantara
  • 29. EKAD Ekadharma International Tbk
  • 30. ETWA Eterindo Wahanatama Tbk)
  • 31.
  • 32. SOBI Sorini Agro Asia Corporindo Tbk

  • 33. SRSN Indo Acitama Tbk

  • 34. TPIA Chandra Asri Petrochemical

  • 35. UNIC Unggul Indah Cahaya Tbk
  • 36. AKKU Alam Karya Unggul Tbk
  • 37. AKPI Argha Karya Prima Industry Tbk
  • 38. APLI Asiaplast Industries Tbk
  • 39. BRNA Berlina Tbk
  • 40. FPNI Titan Kimia Nusantara Tbk
  • 41.
  • 42.
  • 43. SIAP Sekawan Intipratama Tbk
  • 44. SIMA Siwani Makmur Tbk
  • 45. TRST Trias Sentosa Tbk
  • 46. YPAS Yana Prima Hasta Persada Tbk
  • 47. CPIN Charoen Pokphand Indonesia Tbk
  • 48. JPFA Japfa Comfeed Indonesia Tbk
  • 49. MAIN Malindo Feedmill Tbk
  • 50. SIPD Siearad Produce Tbk
  • 51. SULI Sumalindo Lestari Jaya Tbk
  • 52. TIRT Tirta Mahakam Resources Tbk
  • 53. ALDO Alkindo Naratama Tbk

  X

    

  X

  IGAR Champion Pasific Indonesia Tbk

    

  X

  IPOL Indopoly Swakarsa Industry Tbk

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

    

    

  X

    

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

  X

  X

    

  24. PICO Pelangi Indah Canindo Tbk

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

  X

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

    

    

  INCI Intan Wijaya International Tbk

  X

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

  • 55.

  • 56.
  • 57. KBRI Kertas Basuki Rachmat Indonesia Tbk
  • 58. SAIP Surabaya Agung Industri Pulp & Kertas Tbk
  • 59. SPMA Suparma Tbk
  • 60. TKIM Pabrik Kertas Tjiwi Kimia Tbk
  • 61. ASII Astra International Tbk
  • 62. AUTO Astra Auto Part Tbk

  • 63. BRAM Indo Kordsa Tbk

  • 64. GDYR Goodyear Indonesia Tbk
  • 65. GJTL Gajah Tunggal Tbk
  • 66.
  • 67.
  • 68. LPIN Multi Prima Sejahtera Tbk
  • 69. MASA Multistrada Arah Sarana Tbk
  • 70. NIPS Nippres Tbk
  • 71. PRAS Prima alloy steel Universal Tbk
  • 72. SMSM Selamat Sempurna Tbk
  • 73. ADMG Polychem Indonesia Tbk
  • 74. ARGO Argo Pantes Tbk
  • 75. CNTX Centex Tbk
  • 76. ERTX Eratex Djaya Tbk
  • 77. ESTI Ever Shine Textile Industry Tbk
  • 78. HDTX Pan Asia Indosyntec Tbk
  • 79.
  • 80. KARW Karwell Indonesia Tbk
  • 81. MYTX Apac Citra Centertex Tbk
  • 82. PAFI Pan Asia Filament Inti Tbk
  • 83. PBRX Pan Brothers Tbk

  X

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

  X

    

    

  X

    

  X

  INDR Indo Rama Synthetic Tbk

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

   X 

  X

    

    

    

  X

  INDS Indospring Tbk

  54. FASW Fajar Surya Wisesa Tbk

    

  X

  INKP Indah Kiat Pulp & paper Tbk

    

  X

  INRU Toba Pulp Lestari Tbk

    

  X

    

  X

   X 

  X

    

  X

    

  X

  X

    

  IMAS Indomobil Sukses International Tbk

  X

    

    

  X

  X

    

  X

    

  X

    

  X

  • 85. RICY Ricky Putra Globalindo Tbk

  • 86. SSTM Sunson Textile Manufacturer Tbk
  • 87. UNIT Nusantara Inti Corpora Tbk
  • 88. UNTX Unitex Tbk
  • 89. BIMA Primarindo Asia Infrastructure Tbk
  • 90. SIMM Surya Intrindo Makmur Tbk
  • 91.
  • 92. JECC Jembo Cable Company Tbk
  • 93. KBLI KMI Wire and Cable Tbk
  • 94. KBLM Kabelindo Murni Tbk
  • 95. SCCO Supreme Cable Manufacturing and
  • 96.
  • 97. PTSN Sat Nusa Persada Tbk
  • 98. ADES Akasha Wira International Tbk

     

  X

   

  105. MLBI Multi Bintang Indonesia Tbk

  6

     

  INDF Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk

  5 104.

  ICBP Indofood CBP Sukses Makmur Tbk

  106. MYOR Mayora Indah Tbk

  4 103.

     

  102. DLTA Delta Djakarta Tbk

   -

  X

   

  101. DAVO Davomas Abadi Tbk

   7

     

     

  11

  113. HMSP Hanjaya Mandala Sampoerna Tbk

  13

     

  112. GGRM Gudang Garam Tbk

  12

     

  111. ULTJ Ultrajaya Milk Industry and Trading Company Tbk

     

  8

  110. STTP Siantar Top Tbk

  10

     

  109. SKLT Sekar Laut Tbk

  9

     

    X 

  107. PSDN Prashida Aneka Niaga Tbk

  3

  100. CEKA Cahaya Kalbar Tbk

    X 

  X

  IKBI Sumi Indo Kabel Tbk

  X

   X 

  X

    

  X

    

    

  2

  X

    

  X

    

  X

    

  84. POLY Asia Pasific Fibers Tbk

    

  X

    

  X

     

  99. AISA Tiga Pilar Sejahtera Food Tbk

  1

     

  X

    

  X

    

  VOKS Voksel Electric Tbk

  X

    

  Commerce Tbk

  X

    

  X

    

  • 108. ROTI Nippon Indosari Corporindo Tbk

  29

  25

  22

  124. MBTO Martina Berto Tbk

     

  23

  125. MRAT Mustika Ratu Tbk

     

  24

  126. TCID Mandom Indonesia Tbk

     

  127. UNVR Unilever Indonesia Tbk

    X 

     

  26

  128. KDSI Kedawung Setia Industrial Tbk)

     

  27

  129. KICI Kedaung Indag Can Tbk

     

  28

  130. LMPI Langgeng Makmur Industry Tbk

     

     

  122. SQBI Taisho Pharmaceutical Indonesia Tbk

  114. RMBA Bentoel International Investama Tbk

  17

     

  14

  115. DVLA Darya Varia Laboratoria Tbk

     

  15 116.

  INAF Indofarma Tbk

     

  16

  117. KAEF Kimia Farma Tbk

     

  118. KLBF Kalbe Farma Tbk

  21

     

  18

  119. MERK Merck Tbk

     

  19

  120. PYFA Pyridam Farma Tbk

     

  20

  121. SCPI Schering Plough Indonesia Tbk

     

  • 123. TSPC Tempo Scan Pasific Tbk

Lampiran 2. Output Regresi Logistik Hipotesis Pertama Logistic Regression

  1 Block 0: Beginning Block

  c. Estimation terminated at iteration number 3 because parameter estimates changed by less than ,001.

  b. Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 118,658

  3 118.658 .301 a. Constant is included in the model.

  Constant Step 0 1 118.658 .299 2 118.658 .301

  Iteration -2 Log likelihood Coefficients

  Iteration History

a,b,c

  Case Processing Summary

  Unweighted Cases

  Dependent Variable Encoding

  a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

  Unselected Cases .0 Total 87 100.0

  Missing Cases .0 Total 87 100.0

  N Percent Selected Cases Included in Analysis 87 100.0

  a

  Original Value Internal Value Laporan keuangan disampaikan tidak tepat waktu Laporan keuangan disampaikan tepat waktu

  a,b Classification Table

  Predicted Ketepatan_Waktu

  Laporan Laporan keuangan keuangan disampaikan disampaikan Percentage

  Observed tidak tepat waktu tepat waktu Correct Step 0 Ketepatan_Waktu Laporan keuangan 37 .0 disampaikan tidak tepat waktu Laporan keuangan 50 100.0 disampaikan tepat waktu

  Overall Percentage 57.5 a. Constant is included in the model.

  b. The cut value is ,500

  

Variables in the Equation

  B S.E. Wald Df Sig. Exp(B) Step 0 Constant .301 .217 1.928 1 .165 1.351

  

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.

  Step 0 Variables Audit_Report_Lag 15.155 1 .000 Overall Statistics 15.155 1 .000

  

Block 1: Method = Enter

  Iteration History a,b,c,d

  1 8 7.403 2 2.597

  6 4 4.193 8 7.807

  8

  5 2 3.405 6 4.595

  10

  4 5 5.054 5 4.946

  9

  3 6 5.322 3 3.678

  11

  2 6 6.934 5 4.066

  10

  Step 1

  Iteration -2 Log likelihood Coefficients

  Ketepatan_Waktu = Laporan keuangan disampaikan tepat waktu Total Observed Expected Observed Expected

  Ketepatan_Waktu = Laporan keuangan disampaikan tidak tepat waktu

  

Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

  Step 1 Step 17.348 1 .000 Block 17.348 1 .000 Model 17.348 1 .000

  

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

  d. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter estimates changed by less than ,001.

  c. Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 118,658

  a. Method: Enter b. Constant is included in the model.

  Step 1 1 102.251 4.575 -.058 2 101.325 5.928 -.075 3 101.309 6.132 -.078 4 101.309 6.136 -.078 5 101.309 6.136 -.078

  Constant Audit_Report_La g

  12

  7 3 2.399 6 6.601

  9

  8 3 1.645 6 7.355

  9 9 .646 9 8.354

  9

  a

Classification Table

  Predicted Ketepatan_Waktu

  Laporan Laporan keuangan keuangan disampaikan disampaikan Percentage

  Observed tidak tepat waktu tepat waktu Correct Step 1 Ketepatan_Waktu Laporan keuangan

  22

  15

  59.5 disampaikan tidak tepat waktu Laporan keuangan

  13

  37

  74.0 disampaikan tepat waktu Overall Percentage

  67.8

  a. The cut value is ,500

  

Correlation Matrix

  Audit_Report_La Constant g

  Step 1 Constant 1.000 -.990 Audit_Report_Lag -.990 1.000

  Step number: 1 Observed Groups and Predicted Probabilities

16 +

  • |

    |

    |

    |

    F |

  |

R 12 +

  • E | 1

    | Q | 1 |

    U | 1

  |

E 8 + 1

  • N | 1

    | C | 0 1 | Y | 0 1 1 | 4 + 10 1 1 1 + | 00 1 1 1 1

  1 1 1 1 11 1 | | 00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 10 0 1 1 10 1 1 | | 0 00 0 0 1 00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 1 10 0 11 111001 1 11 11 | Predicted ---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+------

  • Prob: 0 ,1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ,9 1 Group: 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111

  Predicted Probability is of Membership for Laporan keuangan disampaikan tepat waktu The Cut Value is ,50 Symbols: 0 - Laporan keuangan disampaikan tidak tepat waktu 1 - Laporan keuangan disampaikan tepat waktu Each Symbol Represents 1 Case.

Lampiran 3. Output Regresi Logistik Hipotesis Kedua Logistic Regression

  1 Block 0: Beginning Block

  c. Estimation terminated at iteration number 3 because parameter estimates changed by less than ,001.

  b. Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 118,658

  3 118.658 .301 a. Constant is included in the model.

  Constant Step 0 1 118.658 .299 2 118.658 .301

  Iteration -2 Log likelihood Coefficients

  Iteration History

a,b,c

  Case Processing Summary

  Unweighted Cases

  Dependent Variable Encoding

  a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

  Unselected Cases .0 Total 87 100.0

  Missing Cases .0 Total 87 100.0

  N Percent Selected Cases Included in Analysis 87 100.0

  a

  Original Value Internal Value Laporan keuangan disampaikan tidak tepat waktu Laporan keuangan disampaikan tepat waktu

  Classification Table a,b

  Observed Predicted

  Ketepatan_Waktu Percentage

  Correct Laporan keuangan disampaikan tidak tepat waktu

  Laporan keuangan disampaikan tepat waktu

  Step 0 Ketepatan_Waktu Laporan keuangan disampaikan tidak tepat waktu

  37 .0 Laporan keuangan disampaikan tepat waktu

  50 100.0 Overall Percentage

  57.5 a. Constant is included in the model.

  b. The cut value is ,500

  

Variables in the Equation

  B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Step 0 Constant .301 .217 1.928 1 .165 1.351

  

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.

  Step 0 Variables Audit_Report_Lag 15.155 1 .000 Reputasi_KAP 8.868 1 .003

  Overall Statistics 19.692 2 .000

  

Block 1: Method = Enter

  a,b,c,d Iteration History

  Coefficients Audit_Report_La

  Iteration -2 Log likelihood Constant g Reputasi_KAP Step 1 1 97.422 3.566 -.050 .929 2 96.231 4.865 -.068 1.095

  3 96.208 5.088 -.070 1.116 4 96.208 5.094 -.070 1.116 5 96.208 5.094 -.070 1.116

  a. Method: Enter b. Constant is included in the model.

  c. Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 118,658

  d. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter estimates changed by less than ,001.

  

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

  Step 1 Step 22.450 2 .000 Block 22.450 2 .000 Model 22.450 2 .000

  

Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

  Ketepatan_Waktu = Laporan keuangan disampaikan tidak tepat Ketepatan_Waktu = Laporan waktu keuangan disampaikan tepat waktu

  Observed Expected Observed Expected Total Step 1

  1 7 6.335 1 1.665

  8

  2 6 6.494 3 2.506

  9

  3 5 5.253 3 2.747

  8

  4 4 4.613 4 3.387

  8

  5 5 4.296 4 4.704

  9

  6 3 3.522 6 5.478

  9

  7 3 2.525 6 6.475

  9

  8 1 1.991 8 7.009

  9

  9 2 1.460 8 8.540

  10

  10 1 .510 7 7.490

  8

  a

Classification Table

  Predicted Ketepatan_Waktu

  Laporan Laporan keuangan keuangan disampaikan disampaikan Percentage

  Observed tidak tepat waktu tepat waktu Correct Step 1 Ketepatan_Waktu Laporan keuangan

  24

  13

  64.9 disampaikan tidak tepat waktu Laporan keuangan

  12

  38

  76.0 disampaikan tepat waktu Overall Percentage

  71.3

  a. The cut value is ,500

  

Correlation Matrix

  Audit_Report_La Constant g Reputasi_KAP

  Step 1 Constant 1.000 -.982 -.176 Audit_Report_Lag -.982 1.000 .052 Reputasi_KAP -.176 .052 1.000

  Step number: 1 Observed Groups and Predicted Probabilities

8 + 1

  • | 1

    |

    | 1

    |

    F | 1

  |

R 6 + 0

  • E | 0

    | Q | 0 1 1 1 | U | 0 1 1 1 | E 4 + 10 1 1 1

  1 1 + N | 10 1 1 1 1 1 | C | 00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 | Y | 00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 | 2 + 001 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 101 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 + | 001 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 101 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 | | 0 0 0 000 10 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 1 1 100 111 0 100 1 110 1 1 1 | | 0 0 0 000 10 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 1 1 100 111 0 100 1 110 1 1 1 | Predicted ---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+------

  • Prob: 0 ,1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ,9 1 Group: 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111

  Predicted Probability is of Membership for Laporan keuangan disampaikan tepat waktu The Cut Value is ,50 Symbols: 0 - Laporan keuangan disampaikan tidak tepat waktu 1 - Laporan keuangan disampaikan tepat waktu Each Symbol Represents ,5 Cases.

  b Casewise List

  Observed Temporary Variable Ketepatan_Wakt

  a

  Case Selected Status u Predicted Predicted Group Resid ZResid

  44 S 0** .893 1 -.893 -2.889 a. S = Selected, U = Unselected cases, and ** = Misclassified cases.

  b. Cases with studentized residuals greater than 2,000 are listed.

Lampiran 4. Output Regresi Logistik Hipotesis Ketiga Logistic Regression

  1 Block 0: Beginning Block

  c. Estimation terminated at iteration number 3 because parameter estimates changed by less than ,001.

  b. Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 118,658

  3 118.658 .301 a. Constant is included in the model.

  Constant Step 0 1 118.658 .299 2 118.658 .301

  Iteration -2 Log likelihood Coefficients

  Iteration History

a,b,c

  Case Processing Summary

  Unweighted Cases

  Dependent Variable Encoding

  a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

  Unselected Cases .0 Total 87 100.0

  Missing Cases .0 Total 87 100.0

  N Percent Selected Cases Included in Analysis 87 100.0

  a

  Original Value Internal Value Laporan keuangan disampaikan tidak tepat waktu Laporan keuangan disampaikan tepat waktu

  a,b Classification Table

  Predicted Ketepatan_Waktu

  Laporan Laporan keuangan keuangan disampaikan disampaikan Percentage

  Observed tidak tepat waktu tepat waktu Correct Step 0 Ketepatan_Waktu Laporan keuangan 37 .0 disampaikan tidak tepat waktu Laporan keuangan 50 100.0 disampaikan tepat waktu

  Overall Percentage 57.5 a. Constant is included in the model.

  b. The cut value is ,500

  

Variables in the Equation

  B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Step 0 Constant .301 .217 1.928 1 .165 1.351

  

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.

  Step 0 Variables Opini_Audit .749 1 .387 Overall Statistics .749 1 .387

  

Block 1: Method = Enter

  Iteration History a,b,c,d

  Iteration -2 Log likelihood Coefficients

  Constant Opini_Audit Step 1 1 117.795 2.000 -1.721 2 117.627 3.135 -2.854

  3 117.572 4.179 -3.898 4 117.552 5.194 -4.913 5 117.545 6.200 -5.919 6 117.543 7.202 -6.921 7 117.542 8.202 -7.922 8 117.542 9.203 -8.922 9 117.541 10.203 -9.922 10 117.541 11.203 -10.922 11 117.541 12.203 -11.922 12 117.541 13.203 -12.922 13 117.541 14.203 -13.922 14 117.541 15.203 -14.922 15 117.541 16.203 -15.922 16 117.541 17.203 -16.922 17 117.541 18.203 -17.922 18 117.541 19.203 -18.922 19 117.541 20.203 -19.922 20 117.541 21.203 -20.922 a. Method: Enter b. Constant is included in the model.

  c. Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 118,658

  d. Estimation terminated at iteration number 20 because maximum iterations has been reached. Final solution cannot be found.

  

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

  Step 1 Step 1.116 1 .291 Block 1.116 1 .291 Model 1.116 1 .291

  

Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

  Ketepatan_Waktu = Laporan keuangan disampaikan tidak tepat Ketepatan_Waktu = Laporan waktu keuangan disampaikan tepat waktu

  Observed Expected Observed Expected Total Step 1

  1 37 37.000 50 50.000

  87

  a

Classification Table

  Predicted Ketepatan_Waktu

  Laporan Laporan keuangan keuangan disampaikan disampaikan Percentage

  Observed tidak tepat waktu tepat waktu Correct Step 1 Ketepatan_Waktu Laporan keuangan 37 .0 disampaikan tidak tepat waktu Laporan keuangan 50 100.0 disampaikan tepat waktu

  Overall Percentage

  57.5

  a. The cut value is ,500

  

Correlation Matrix

  Constant Opini_Audit Step 1 Constant 1.000 -1.000

  Opini_Audit -1.000 1.000

  Step number: 1 Observed Groups and Predicted Probabilities

160 +

  • |

    |

    |

    |

    F |

  |

R 120 +

  • E |

    | Q | | U |

  1 | E 80 + 1 + N | 1 | C | 1 | Y | 1 | 40 + 0 + | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | Predicted ---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+------

  • Prob: 0 ,1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ,9 1 Group: 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111

  Predicted Probability is of Membership for Laporan keuangan disampaikan tepat waktu The Cut Value is ,50 Symbols: 0 - Laporan keuangan disampaikan tidak tepat waktu 1 - Laporan keuangan disampaikan tepat waktu Each Symbol Represents 10 Cases.

Lampiran 5. Output Regresi Logistik Hipotesis Keempat Logistic Regression

  1 Block 0: Beginning Block

  c. Estimation terminated at iteration number 3 because parameter estimates changed by less than ,001.

  b. Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 118,658

  3 118.658 .301 a. Constant is included in the model.

  Constant Step 0 1 118.658 .299 2 118.658 .301

  Iteration -2 Log likelihood Coefficients

  Iteration History

a,b,c

  Case Processing Summary

  Unweighted Cases

  Dependent Variable Encoding

  a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

  Unselected Cases .0 Total 87 100.0

  Missing Cases .0 Total 87 100.0

  N Percent Selected Cases Included in Analysis 87 100.0

  a

  Original Value Internal Value Laporan keuangan disampaikan tidak tepat waktu Laporan keuangan disampaikan tepat waktu

  a,b Classification Table

  Predicted Ketepatan_Waktu

  Laporan Laporan keuangan keuangan disampaikan disampaikan Percentage

  Observed tidak tepat waktu tepat waktu Correct Step 0 Ketepatan_Waktu Laporan keuangan 37 .0 disampaikan tidak tepat waktu Laporan keuangan 50 100.0 disampaikan tepat waktu

  Overall Percentage 57.5 a. Constant is included in the model.

  b. The cut value is ,500

  

Variables in the Equation

  B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Step 0 Constant .301 .217 1.928 1 .165 1.351

  

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.

  Step 0 Variables Opini_Audit .749 1 .387 Reputasi_KAP 8.868 1 .003

  Overall Statistics 9.156 2 .010

  

Block 1: Method = Enter

  Iteration History a,b,c,d

  Iteration -2 Log likelihood Coefficients

  Constant Opini_Audit Reputasi_KAP Step 1 1 109.279 .762 -1.073 1.238 2 109.062 1.820 -2.133 1.316

  3 109.008 2.862 -3.176 1.317 4 108.988 3.877 -4.191 1.317 5 108.981 4.883 -5.196 1.317 6 108.979 5.885 -6.198 1.317 7 108.978 6.886 -7.199 1.317 8 108.977 7.886 -8.199 1.317 9 108.977 8.886 -9.200 1.317 10 108.977 9.886 -10.200 1.317 11 108.977 10.886 -11.200 1.317 12 108.977 11.886 -12.200 1.317 13 108.977 12.886 -13.200 1.317 14 108.977 13.886 -14.200 1.317 15 108.977 14.886 -15.200 1.317 16 108.977 15.886 -16.200 1.317 17 108.977 16.886 -17.200 1.317 18 108.977 17.886 -18.200 1.317 19 108.977 18.886 -19.200 1.317 20 108.977 19.886 -20.200 1.317 a. Method: Enter b. Constant is included in the model.

  c. Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 118,658

  d. Estimation terminated at iteration number 20 because maximum iterations has been reached. Final solution cannot be found.

  

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

  Laporan keuangan disampaikan tepat waktu

  Constant Opini_Audit Reputasi_KAP Step 1 Constant 1.000 -1.000 .000

  

Correlation Matrix

  a. The cut value is ,500

  65.5

  62.0 Overall Percentage

  31

  19

  70.3 Laporan keuangan disampaikan tepat waktu

  11

  26

  Step 1 Ketepatan_Waktu Laporan keuangan disampaikan tidak tepat waktu

  Correct Laporan keuangan disampaikan tidak tepat waktu

  Step 1 Step 9.680 2 .008 Block 9.680 2 .008 Model 9.680 2 .008

  Ketepatan_Waktu Percentage

  Observed Predicted

  a

  42 Classification Table

  2 11 11.000 31 31.000

  45

  1 26 26.000 19 19.000

  Step 1

  Ketepatan_Waktu = Laporan keuangan disampaikan tepat waktu Total Observed Expected Observed Expected

  Ketepatan_Waktu = Laporan keuangan disampaikan tidak tepat waktu

  

Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

  Opini_Audit -1.000 1.000 .000 Reputasi_KAP .000 .000 1.000

  Step number: 1 Observed Groups and Predicted Probabilities

80 +

  • |

    |

    |

    |

    F |

  |

R 60 +

  • E |

    |

    Q |

    | U | 1

  | E 40 + 1 1 + N | 1 1 | C | 1 1 | Y | 0 1 | 20 + 0 1 + | 0 1 | | 0 0 | | 0 0 | Predicted ---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+------

  • Prob: 0 ,1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ,9 1 Group: 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111

  Predicted Probability is of Membership for Laporan keuangan disampaikan tepat waktu The Cut Value is ,50 Symbols: 0 - Laporan keuangan disampaikan tidak tepat waktu 1 - Laporan keuangan disampaikan tepat waktu Each Symbol Represents 5 Cases.

  Daftar Unit Sampel

Sampel Audit_Report_Lag Opini_Audit Ketepatan_Waktu Reputasi_KAP

  78

  1

  1

  28

  66

  1

  1

  29

  78

  1

  45

  30

  67

  1

  31

  87

  1

  32

  1

  27

  1

  1

  1

  23

  86

  1

  1

  24

  78

  25

  1

  61

  1

  1

  1

  26

  89

  1

  1

  70

  1

  22

  40

  37

  1

  1

  1

  39

  70

  1

  86

  1

  1

  41

  82

  1

  42

  81

  1

  1

  38

  87

  33

  1

  86

  1

  1

  34

  70

  1

  1

  35

  37

  70

  1

  1

  36

  60

  1

  1

  1

  86

  1

  1 2 103

  1

  7

  60

  1

  1

  1

  8

  39

  1

  1

  9

  71

  1

  1

  1

  10

  86

  1

  1

  1

  11

  86

  1

  3

  71

  1

  1

  1

  4

  1

  74

  1

  1

  5

  74

  1

  1

  1

  6

  1

  96

  1

  1

  17

  80

  1

  1

  18

  68

  1

  1

  87

  19

  70

  1

  1

  1

  20

  59

  1 21 102

  1

  16

  1

  1

  12

  85

  1

  13

  72

  1

  1

  14

  1

  81

  1

  1

  1

  15

  46

  1

  1

  1

  43

  1

  86

  1

  1

  1

  73

  59

  1

  1

  74

  1

  80

  1

  1

  75

  50

  1

  1

  76

  72

  1

  1

  1

  1

  67

  38

  1

  1

  1

  68

  78

  1

  1

  69

  86

  1

  70

  83

  1

  71

  76

  70

  1

  85

  1

  1

  83

  64

  1

  1

  1

  84

  84

  1

  82

  1

  85

  84

  1

  1

  86

  62

  1

  83

  1

  1

  1

  77

  46

  1

  1

  1

  78

  69

  1

  79

  1

  92

  1

  1

  80

  76

  1

  81

  76

  1

  66

  85

  51

  1

  49

  59

  1

  50

  74

  1

  1

  86

  1

  1

  52

  86

  1

  53

  81

  1

  54

  1

  46

  1

  1

  1

  1

  44

  58

  1

  1

  45

  87

  1

  48

  46

  57

  1

  1

  47

  67

  1

  1

  64

  1

  1

  1

  86

  1

  1

  1

  63

  76

  1

  1

  64

  1

  76

  1

  1

  1

  65

  60

  1

  1

  62

  1

  1

  57

  55

  84

  1

  1

  56

  63

  1

  1

  73

  66

  1

  58

  79

  1

  59

  73

  1 60 106

  1

  61

  1

  87

  73

  1

  1

Dokumen yang terkait

BAB I PENDAHULUAN 1.1 Latar Belakang - Pengaruh Free Cash Flow, Struktur Kepemilikan dan Ukuran Perusahaan terhadap Kebijakan Hutang dengan Investment Opportunity Set sebagai Variabel Moderating

0 0 8

BAB II PERJANJIAN PADA UMUMNYA - Tanggung Jawab Pihak Pengangkut dalam Perjanjian Pengangkutan Pulp antara PT. Toba Pulp Lestari, Tbk dengan CV. Anugrah Toba Permai Lestari (Studi pada CV. Anugrah Toba Permai Lestari)

0 0 31

BAB I PENDAHULUAN - Tanggung Jawab Pihak Pengangkut dalam Perjanjian Pengangkutan Pulp antara PT. Toba Pulp Lestari, Tbk dengan CV. Anugrah Toba Permai Lestari (Studi pada CV. Anugrah Toba Permai Lestari)

0 0 16

BAB II TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG DAN PENGATURAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG DI INDONESIA A. Sejarah dan Tahapan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang 1. Sejarah Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang - Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Penyitaan Aset Yang Tidak Terkait Tindak P

0 0 25

Nilai Rasio NPL, ROA, NIM, CAR dan Pertumbuhan Laba (Dalam Persentase )

0 1 11

BAB II TINJAUAN PUSTAKA 2.1 Uraian Teoritis 2.1.1 Pengertian Bank - Pengaruh tingkat kesehatan bank terhadap pertumbuhan laba pada Bank Pembangunan Daerah di Indonesia

0 0 26

BAB I PENDAHULUAN 1.1 Latar Belakang - Pengaruh tingkat kesehatan bank terhadap pertumbuhan laba pada Bank Pembangunan Daerah di Indonesia

1 1 11

Pengaruh tingkat kesehatan bank terhadap pertumbuhan laba pada Bank Pembangunan Daerah di Indonesia

1 2 12

BAB II TINJAUAN PUSTAKA 2.1. Tinjauan Pustaka 2.1.1. Pengertian Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) - Pengaruh Pengungkapan Corporte Social Responsibility, Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan dan Nilai Perusahaan sebagai Varia

0 0 43

Pengaruh Pengungkapan Corporte Social Responsibility, Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan dan Nilai Perusahaan sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi pada Perusahaan Pertambangan

0 0 13