Clarify KVP BBOX parameter interpretation
All Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Change Request 114
#:
Assigned OGC 10-174
Document #:
Name: *Andreas Schmitz
Organization: *lat/lon
Email: *[email protected]
Document
Name/Version:
*Web Feature Service (WFS) Implementation Specification / 1.1.0
OGC Project
Document:
*04-094
If this is a revision of a previous submission and you have a Change Request Number, then check here:
Enter the CR number here:
Enter the Revsion Number that you are revising here:
Title:
Source:
*Clarify KVP BBOX parameter interpretation
*[email protected]
Work item code:
Category:
* D (Editorial modification)
Reason for *
change:
It is not entirely clear from the text that the BBOX KVP parameter for
GetFeature requests is to be interpreted exactly as specified in
filter encoding.
Summary of *
change:
There has been a discussion on the mailing list
([email protected], June 22nd 2010) that it should be
1 of 2
treated as the equivalent of the filter encoding variant (the BBOX
filter).
Consequences if
not approved:
Clauses affected: *
The BBOX parameter appears in sections 14.3.3, 14.7.3.1, 14.7.5.1,
14.7.6.1 (I hope I didn't miss any).
Additional
Documents
affected:
Supporting
Documentation:
Comments:
Status:
Assigned To:
Disposition:
Assigned
WFS WG
Referred and Posted
2 of 2
Change Request 114
#:
Assigned OGC 10-174
Document #:
Name: *Andreas Schmitz
Organization: *lat/lon
Email: *[email protected]
Document
Name/Version:
*Web Feature Service (WFS) Implementation Specification / 1.1.0
OGC Project
Document:
*04-094
If this is a revision of a previous submission and you have a Change Request Number, then check here:
Enter the CR number here:
Enter the Revsion Number that you are revising here:
Title:
Source:
*Clarify KVP BBOX parameter interpretation
*[email protected]
Work item code:
Category:
* D (Editorial modification)
Reason for *
change:
It is not entirely clear from the text that the BBOX KVP parameter for
GetFeature requests is to be interpreted exactly as specified in
filter encoding.
Summary of *
change:
There has been a discussion on the mailing list
([email protected], June 22nd 2010) that it should be
1 of 2
treated as the equivalent of the filter encoding variant (the BBOX
filter).
Consequences if
not approved:
Clauses affected: *
The BBOX parameter appears in sections 14.3.3, 14.7.3.1, 14.7.5.1,
14.7.6.1 (I hope I didn't miss any).
Additional
Documents
affected:
Supporting
Documentation:
Comments:
Status:
Assigned To:
Disposition:
Assigned
WFS WG
Referred and Posted
2 of 2