Identifikasi Penyebab Pembengkakan Biaya (Cost Overrun) Proyek Perumahan
LAMPIRAN
Lampiran 1
I.
II.
KUESIONER PENELITIAN
May 2015
Nama Mahasiswa : Mohammad Fandhu Al Addiat (Mahasiswa Teknik Sipil USU)
Judul Skripsi : Identifikasi Penyebab Overrun Biaya Proyek Konstruksi Gedung
Biodata Pengisi
a. Nama
Perusahaan
b. Jabatan
c. Type Rumah
d. Jumlah Rumah
:.................................................
:.................................................
:.................................................
:.................................................
Tabel Skala Penilaian Kuesioner
Skala
keterangan
1
Sangat Tidak Setuju
2
Tidak Setuju
3
Netral / Ragu-ragu
4
Setuju
5
Sangat Setuju
*) beri tanda (√) pada penilaian yang sesuai
66
Universitas Sumatera Utara
III.1
Dibawah Ini Merupakan Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Terjadinya Overrun Biaya
Pilihan
Jawaban
1 2 3 4 5
No.
Pernyataan
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Data dan informasi proyek yang kurang lengkap.
Tidak memperhitungkan biaya tak terduga (contingencies).
Tidak memperhatikan faktor resiko pada lokasi dan konstruksi.
Ketidak tepatan estimasi biaya.
Tingginya frekuensi perubahan pelaksanaan.
Terlalu banyak pengulangan pekerjaan karena mutu jelek.
Terlalu banyak proyek yang ditangani dalam waktu yang sama.
Terjadi perbedaan/perselisihan pada proyek.
Penanggung jawab proyek tidak kompeten/cakap.
Waktu yang panjang antara SPK (Surat Perintah Kerja) dan pelaksanaan proyek.
Sering terjadi perubahan desain.
Dokumen Kontrak yang tidak lengkap.
Penunjukan subkontraktor dan suplier yang tidak tepat.
Adanya kenaikan harga material.
Terlambat/kekurangan bahan/material pada waktu pelaksanaan.
Tidak adanya quality control (kontrol kualitas)
Pemakaian bahan/material yang salah.
Pencurian bahan/material.
Kerusakan material.
Kekurangan tenaga kerja.
Produktivitas tenaga kerja yang buruk/rendah.
Cara pembayaran yang tidak tepat waktu.
Keterlambatan jadwal karena pengaruh cuaca.
Terjadi fluktuasi upah tenaga kerja.
Sering terjadi penundaan pekerjaan.
Terjadi huruhara/kerusuhan di sekitar lokasi proyek.
III.2
Berdasarkan pengalaman Anda, berapa persen pembengkakan biaya yang terjadi di proyek
5. 261. 5-10%
2. 11-15%
3. 16-20%
4. 21-25%
30%
sumber : Jurnal Fahirah F. (Identifikasi Penyebab Overrun Biaya Proyek Konstruksi Gedung)
67
Universitas Sumatera Utara
68
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 2. Tabulasi Data
Variabel X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X11 X12 X13 X14 X15 X16 X17 X18 X19 X20 X21 X22 X23 X24 X25 X26
P1
5 4 2 4 5 4 5 2 2
2
5
4
4
4
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
4
4
5
4
P2
2 2 1 5 4 4 3 4 5
3
5
4
3
4
4
3
3
5
4
3
3
1
3
4
5
4
P3
2 2 4 4 5 4 4 3 4
4
5
2
4
5
3
4
4
5
5
3
3
4
4
4
5
4
P4
5 5 3 4 5 5 4 3 2
3
4
3
2
5
2
3
3
4
4
2
2
3
2
4
4
2
P5
4 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 3
3
5
5
4
5
5
4
5
5
5
5
4
5
4
4
4
5
P6
2 5 4 5 3 4 1 2 3
3
4
2
4
5
4
4
5
5
5
4
3
3
4
4
4
5
P7
3 4 4 5 4 4 2 4 4
4
4
4
4
5
4
4
4
5
4
2
4
2
4
5
4
4
P8
5 4 4 3 4 2 2 1 3
3
4
2
4
2
4
4
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
3
4
2
P9
3 2 4 5 5 4 4 4 4
4
5
4
4
5
5
4
4
5
5
4
4
4
3
4
4
2
P10
3 2 4 5 4 2 5 5 4
5
3
4
4
5
5
4
5
5
4
4
5
4
5
4
5
4
P11
4 4 3 4 5 3 4 4 3
2
4
3
5
4
4
5
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
5
4
3
P12
4 4 4 4 3 5 3 4 4
4
5
4
4
5
4
4
4
4
5
5
4
4
4
4
5
4
P13
5 4 3 3 3 4 3 2 2
3
3
4
4
5
4
4
4
4
5
2
4
3
4
5
4
4
P14
2 2 5 4 4 2 1 2 3
4
4
2
4
5
2
3
4
5
4
1
3
3
4
4
3
4
P15
4 5 5 4 4 2 2 4 5
5
2
2
2
4
4
5
4
4
4
2
4
3
3
4
5
3
P16
5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 5
3
1
2
4
2
4
5
5
5
4
3
4
2
4
4
4
4
P17
3 5 4 5 4 5 5 4 5
3
5
4
3
5
5
4
4
4
4
5
5
4
5
5
4
3
P18
3 3 5 4 4 5 1 3 4
3
5
3
5
5
4
3
4
2
4
2
5
3
3
4
5
5
P19
4 5 5 5 4 2 2 2 2
2
4
2
4
4
4
5
4
5
4
2
2
5
2
5
2
5
P20
4 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 3
3
5
5
4
5
5
4
5
5
5
5
4
5
4
4
4
5
P21
3 2 4 5 4 2 5 5 4
5
3
4
4
5
5
4
5
5
4
4
5
4
5
4
5
4
P22
4 5 5 4 4 2 2 4 5
5
2
2
2
4
4
5
4
4
4
2
4
3
3
4
5
3
P23
4 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 3
3
5
5
4
5
5
4
5
5
5
5
4
5
4
4
4
5
P24
5 4 2 4 5 4 5 2 2
2
5
4
4
4
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
4
4
5
4
P25
3 5 4 5 4 5 5 4 5
3
5
4
3
5
5
4
4
4
4
5
5
4
5
5
4
3
69
Universitas Sumatera Utara
P26
P27
P28
P29
P30
4
5
3
4
5
5
4
3
4
4
5
4
5
4
4
5
3
4
4
3
4
4
4
3
4
2
2
5
5
2
2
2
1
3
2
2
1
3
4
1
2
3
4
4
3
2
3
3
4
3
4
4
5
5
4
2
2
3
4
2
4
4
5
4
4
4
2
5
5
2
4
4
4
4
4
5
4
3
4
4
4
2
4
4
2
5
2
2
4
2
4
2
4
5
2
2
2
2
5
2
2
4
5
4
4
5
4
3
4
4
2
4
3
4
4
5
3
4
4
3
70
Universitas Sumatera Utara
2
4
5
5
4
5
2
5
4
2
Lampiran 3. Hasil Uji Validitas
Tahap 1
Item-Total Statistics
Corrected Item-
Cronbach's
Scale Mean if
Scale Variance
Total
Alpha if Item
Item Deleted
if Item Deleted
Correlation
Deleted
X1
98.97
144.654
-.258
.856
X2
98.77
137.289
.030
.848
X3
98.77
142.047
-.155
.852
X4
98.37
129.275
.594
.830
X5
98.50
136.466
.160
.840
X6
99.03
122.999
.512
.829
X7
99.57
119.702
.587
.825
X8
99.53
120.464
.679
.822
X9
99.20
134.166
.171
.842
X10
99.40
137.766
.037
.845
X11
98.57
133.564
.188
.841
X12
99.47
120.740
.742
.820
X13
98.90
138.438
.021
.844
X14
98.37
126.378
.517
.829
X15
98.53
127.637
.622
.828
X16
98.67
138.230
.054
.842
X17
98.73
124.754
.732
.824
X18
98.60
128.317
.399
.834
X19
98.60
126.386
.647
.827
X20
99.47
113.844
.856
.812
X21
98.83
131.178
.379
.835
X22
98.97
132.033
.271
.838
X23
98.97
131.068
.403
.834
X24
98.57
134.944
.310
.837
X25
98.47
134.878
.202
.840
X26
98.93
130.340
.336
.836
Y
99.47
113.844
.856
.812
71
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Tahap 2
Item-Total Statistics
Corrected Item-
Cronbach’s
Scale Mean if
Scale Variance
Total
Alpha if Item
Item Deleted
if Item Deleted
Correlation
Deleted
X4
47.93
91.651
.611
.903
X6
48.60
86.524
.509
.907
X7
49.13
82.671
.632
.902
X8
49.10
84.093
.695
.898
X12
49.03
83.826
.789
.894
X14
47.93
88.685
.554
.903
X15
48.10
91.266
.568
.903
X17
48.30
88.631
.695
.899
X18
48.17
89.937
.450
.908
X19
48.17
89.316
.654
.901
X20
49.03
78.999
.853
.890
X21
48.40
94.041
.341
.910
X23
48.53
92.878
.433
.907
Y
49.03
78.999
.853
.890
Tahap 3
Item-Total Statistics
Corrected Item-
Cronbach's
Scale Mean if
Scale Variance
Total
Alpha if Item
Item Deleted
if Item Deleted
Correlation
Deleted
X4
44.07
85.168
.637
.905
X6
44.73
80.547
.508
.910
X7
45.27
76.892
.628
.905
X8
45.23
78.461
.681
.901
X12
45.17
78.144
.778
.897
X14
44.07
82.409
.566
.906
X15
44.23
85.633
.531
.907
X17
44.43
82.461
.703
.902
X18
44.30
82.838
.503
.909
X19
44.30
82.769
.687
.902
X20
45.17
73.385
.848
.893
X23
44.67
87.402
.385
.912
Y
45.17
73.385
.848
.893
72
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 4. Hasil Uji Reabilitas
Case Processing Summary
N
Cases
Valid
Excluded
%
30
100.0
0
.0
30
100.0
a
Total
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the
procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
N of Items
.840
27
73
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 5. Hasil Analisa Korelasi
Correlations
X4
X4
Pearson Correlation
X6
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
X6
Pearson Correlation
.274
Sig. (2-tailed)
.142
N
X7
30
30
30
.334
.097
**
**
.107
.408
.071
.609
.001
.002
.573
.002
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
.186
**
.326
.356
.254
**
**
.325
.004
.078
.054
.176
.000
.007
.000
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
**
**
.339
**
**
**
**
.260
.002
.003
.067
.000
.009
.002
.002
.166
.002
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
1
**
**
*
.303
**
**
*
.000
.000
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
.295
.332
**
*
.157
.113
.073
.001
.013
30
30
30
1
**
**
.008
.000
30
1
30
30
.473
30
30
**
.332
**
.000
.073
.008
30
30
30
30
*
**
**
**
.579
.473
.542
.606
.542
.392
Sig. (2-tailed)
.032
.001
.000
.002
30
30
30
30
30
*
*
.186
**
**
.449
.606
.579
Pearson Correlation
Pearson Correlation
.456
Sig. (2-tailed)
.011
.013
.325
.003
.002
30
N
X15
30
.034
.113
N
X14
30
.011
.067
.632
.009
.032
.522
.552
.449
.522
.552
.538
.506
.689
.535
.724
.484
.383
.537
.689
.535
.724
**
**
**
**
**
.019
.104
.004
.000
.037
.000
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
.056
**
*
**
*
.068
.377
1
30
30
30
Pearson Correlation
.388
.157
**
.339
**
.056
Sig. (2-tailed)
.034
.408
.004
.067
.000
.767
30
30
30
30
30
30
N
.425
.469
.537
.471
.000
30
.602
.602
.626
.567
.471
.002
*
.515
.515
.517
**
Y
.838
.754
**
X23
.009
.703
**
X20
.003
.388
*
X19
.039
.456
*
X18
**
.392
*
X17
.000
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
**
X15
.067
1
.632
X14
.142
.295
Pearson Correlation
X12
.339
.339
Sig. (2-tailed)
X12
30
X8
.274
Pearson Correlation
N
X8
30
X7
30
.605
.460
.794
.377
*
.767
.000
.011
.000
.040
.723
.040
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
1
*
.100
.129
**
*
.046
.601
.497
.000
.015
.000
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
.367
.662
.439
74
Universitas Sumatera Utara
.662
**
X17
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
X18
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
X19
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
X20
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
X23
.334
.326
.000
.071
.078
.000
.019
.000
.046
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
**
.303
.460
*
.100
**
.626
**
.425
*
.605
**
.367
*
1
.671
**
.773
**
.004
30
30
30
30
30
1
**
.321
.030
.321
.000
.083
.873
.083
30
30
30
30
1
**
-.010
.004
.959
.004
30
30
30
1
**
.609
.054
.009
.104
.011
.601
.000
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
**
**
.254
**
**
**
.129
**
**
.003
.001
.176
.002
.004
.000
.497
.000
.000
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
**
**
**
**
**
*
**
**
.321
**
.471
.567
.537
.689
.538
.535
.506
.724
.794
.377
.662
.773
.505
.660
.660
.510
.009
.002
.000
.002
.000
.040
.000
.004
.083
.004
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
**
.260
.383
*
.068
.439
*
.232
.030
-.010
.510
.539
.510
1.000
**
**
.002
.000
30
30
30
**
1
.107
Sig. (2-tailed)
.838
.573
.007
.166
.037
.723
.015
.217
.873
.959
.002
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
**
**
**
**
**
*
**
**
.321
**
**
**
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
.471
.537
.689
.535
.724
.377
.662
.505
.510
.539
1.000
.539
**
.039
Pearson Correlation
.484
**
.217
.000
.517
.505
.004
.356
.671
.232
.000
.097
.469
**
.000
**
.754
.505
Pearson Correlation
N
Y
**
.703
.002
.539
.009
.002
.000
.002
.000
.040
.000
.004
.083
.004
.000
.002
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
75
Universitas Sumatera Utara
30
Lampiran 6. Tabel Nilai R Produk Momen
76
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 1
I.
II.
KUESIONER PENELITIAN
May 2015
Nama Mahasiswa : Mohammad Fandhu Al Addiat (Mahasiswa Teknik Sipil USU)
Judul Skripsi : Identifikasi Penyebab Overrun Biaya Proyek Konstruksi Gedung
Biodata Pengisi
a. Nama
Perusahaan
b. Jabatan
c. Type Rumah
d. Jumlah Rumah
:.................................................
:.................................................
:.................................................
:.................................................
Tabel Skala Penilaian Kuesioner
Skala
keterangan
1
Sangat Tidak Setuju
2
Tidak Setuju
3
Netral / Ragu-ragu
4
Setuju
5
Sangat Setuju
*) beri tanda (√) pada penilaian yang sesuai
66
Universitas Sumatera Utara
III.1
Dibawah Ini Merupakan Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Terjadinya Overrun Biaya
Pilihan
Jawaban
1 2 3 4 5
No.
Pernyataan
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Data dan informasi proyek yang kurang lengkap.
Tidak memperhitungkan biaya tak terduga (contingencies).
Tidak memperhatikan faktor resiko pada lokasi dan konstruksi.
Ketidak tepatan estimasi biaya.
Tingginya frekuensi perubahan pelaksanaan.
Terlalu banyak pengulangan pekerjaan karena mutu jelek.
Terlalu banyak proyek yang ditangani dalam waktu yang sama.
Terjadi perbedaan/perselisihan pada proyek.
Penanggung jawab proyek tidak kompeten/cakap.
Waktu yang panjang antara SPK (Surat Perintah Kerja) dan pelaksanaan proyek.
Sering terjadi perubahan desain.
Dokumen Kontrak yang tidak lengkap.
Penunjukan subkontraktor dan suplier yang tidak tepat.
Adanya kenaikan harga material.
Terlambat/kekurangan bahan/material pada waktu pelaksanaan.
Tidak adanya quality control (kontrol kualitas)
Pemakaian bahan/material yang salah.
Pencurian bahan/material.
Kerusakan material.
Kekurangan tenaga kerja.
Produktivitas tenaga kerja yang buruk/rendah.
Cara pembayaran yang tidak tepat waktu.
Keterlambatan jadwal karena pengaruh cuaca.
Terjadi fluktuasi upah tenaga kerja.
Sering terjadi penundaan pekerjaan.
Terjadi huruhara/kerusuhan di sekitar lokasi proyek.
III.2
Berdasarkan pengalaman Anda, berapa persen pembengkakan biaya yang terjadi di proyek
5. 261. 5-10%
2. 11-15%
3. 16-20%
4. 21-25%
30%
sumber : Jurnal Fahirah F. (Identifikasi Penyebab Overrun Biaya Proyek Konstruksi Gedung)
67
Universitas Sumatera Utara
68
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 2. Tabulasi Data
Variabel X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X11 X12 X13 X14 X15 X16 X17 X18 X19 X20 X21 X22 X23 X24 X25 X26
P1
5 4 2 4 5 4 5 2 2
2
5
4
4
4
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
4
4
5
4
P2
2 2 1 5 4 4 3 4 5
3
5
4
3
4
4
3
3
5
4
3
3
1
3
4
5
4
P3
2 2 4 4 5 4 4 3 4
4
5
2
4
5
3
4
4
5
5
3
3
4
4
4
5
4
P4
5 5 3 4 5 5 4 3 2
3
4
3
2
5
2
3
3
4
4
2
2
3
2
4
4
2
P5
4 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 3
3
5
5
4
5
5
4
5
5
5
5
4
5
4
4
4
5
P6
2 5 4 5 3 4 1 2 3
3
4
2
4
5
4
4
5
5
5
4
3
3
4
4
4
5
P7
3 4 4 5 4 4 2 4 4
4
4
4
4
5
4
4
4
5
4
2
4
2
4
5
4
4
P8
5 4 4 3 4 2 2 1 3
3
4
2
4
2
4
4
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
3
4
2
P9
3 2 4 5 5 4 4 4 4
4
5
4
4
5
5
4
4
5
5
4
4
4
3
4
4
2
P10
3 2 4 5 4 2 5 5 4
5
3
4
4
5
5
4
5
5
4
4
5
4
5
4
5
4
P11
4 4 3 4 5 3 4 4 3
2
4
3
5
4
4
5
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
5
4
3
P12
4 4 4 4 3 5 3 4 4
4
5
4
4
5
4
4
4
4
5
5
4
4
4
4
5
4
P13
5 4 3 3 3 4 3 2 2
3
3
4
4
5
4
4
4
4
5
2
4
3
4
5
4
4
P14
2 2 5 4 4 2 1 2 3
4
4
2
4
5
2
3
4
5
4
1
3
3
4
4
3
4
P15
4 5 5 4 4 2 2 4 5
5
2
2
2
4
4
5
4
4
4
2
4
3
3
4
5
3
P16
5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 5
3
1
2
4
2
4
5
5
5
4
3
4
2
4
4
4
4
P17
3 5 4 5 4 5 5 4 5
3
5
4
3
5
5
4
4
4
4
5
5
4
5
5
4
3
P18
3 3 5 4 4 5 1 3 4
3
5
3
5
5
4
3
4
2
4
2
5
3
3
4
5
5
P19
4 5 5 5 4 2 2 2 2
2
4
2
4
4
4
5
4
5
4
2
2
5
2
5
2
5
P20
4 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 3
3
5
5
4
5
5
4
5
5
5
5
4
5
4
4
4
5
P21
3 2 4 5 4 2 5 5 4
5
3
4
4
5
5
4
5
5
4
4
5
4
5
4
5
4
P22
4 5 5 4 4 2 2 4 5
5
2
2
2
4
4
5
4
4
4
2
4
3
3
4
5
3
P23
4 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 3
3
5
5
4
5
5
4
5
5
5
5
4
5
4
4
4
5
P24
5 4 2 4 5 4 5 2 2
2
5
4
4
4
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
4
4
5
4
P25
3 5 4 5 4 5 5 4 5
3
5
4
3
5
5
4
4
4
4
5
5
4
5
5
4
3
69
Universitas Sumatera Utara
P26
P27
P28
P29
P30
4
5
3
4
5
5
4
3
4
4
5
4
5
4
4
5
3
4
4
3
4
4
4
3
4
2
2
5
5
2
2
2
1
3
2
2
1
3
4
1
2
3
4
4
3
2
3
3
4
3
4
4
5
5
4
2
2
3
4
2
4
4
5
4
4
4
2
5
5
2
4
4
4
4
4
5
4
3
4
4
4
2
4
4
2
5
2
2
4
2
4
2
4
5
2
2
2
2
5
2
2
4
5
4
4
5
4
3
4
4
2
4
3
4
4
5
3
4
4
3
70
Universitas Sumatera Utara
2
4
5
5
4
5
2
5
4
2
Lampiran 3. Hasil Uji Validitas
Tahap 1
Item-Total Statistics
Corrected Item-
Cronbach's
Scale Mean if
Scale Variance
Total
Alpha if Item
Item Deleted
if Item Deleted
Correlation
Deleted
X1
98.97
144.654
-.258
.856
X2
98.77
137.289
.030
.848
X3
98.77
142.047
-.155
.852
X4
98.37
129.275
.594
.830
X5
98.50
136.466
.160
.840
X6
99.03
122.999
.512
.829
X7
99.57
119.702
.587
.825
X8
99.53
120.464
.679
.822
X9
99.20
134.166
.171
.842
X10
99.40
137.766
.037
.845
X11
98.57
133.564
.188
.841
X12
99.47
120.740
.742
.820
X13
98.90
138.438
.021
.844
X14
98.37
126.378
.517
.829
X15
98.53
127.637
.622
.828
X16
98.67
138.230
.054
.842
X17
98.73
124.754
.732
.824
X18
98.60
128.317
.399
.834
X19
98.60
126.386
.647
.827
X20
99.47
113.844
.856
.812
X21
98.83
131.178
.379
.835
X22
98.97
132.033
.271
.838
X23
98.97
131.068
.403
.834
X24
98.57
134.944
.310
.837
X25
98.47
134.878
.202
.840
X26
98.93
130.340
.336
.836
Y
99.47
113.844
.856
.812
71
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Tahap 2
Item-Total Statistics
Corrected Item-
Cronbach’s
Scale Mean if
Scale Variance
Total
Alpha if Item
Item Deleted
if Item Deleted
Correlation
Deleted
X4
47.93
91.651
.611
.903
X6
48.60
86.524
.509
.907
X7
49.13
82.671
.632
.902
X8
49.10
84.093
.695
.898
X12
49.03
83.826
.789
.894
X14
47.93
88.685
.554
.903
X15
48.10
91.266
.568
.903
X17
48.30
88.631
.695
.899
X18
48.17
89.937
.450
.908
X19
48.17
89.316
.654
.901
X20
49.03
78.999
.853
.890
X21
48.40
94.041
.341
.910
X23
48.53
92.878
.433
.907
Y
49.03
78.999
.853
.890
Tahap 3
Item-Total Statistics
Corrected Item-
Cronbach's
Scale Mean if
Scale Variance
Total
Alpha if Item
Item Deleted
if Item Deleted
Correlation
Deleted
X4
44.07
85.168
.637
.905
X6
44.73
80.547
.508
.910
X7
45.27
76.892
.628
.905
X8
45.23
78.461
.681
.901
X12
45.17
78.144
.778
.897
X14
44.07
82.409
.566
.906
X15
44.23
85.633
.531
.907
X17
44.43
82.461
.703
.902
X18
44.30
82.838
.503
.909
X19
44.30
82.769
.687
.902
X20
45.17
73.385
.848
.893
X23
44.67
87.402
.385
.912
Y
45.17
73.385
.848
.893
72
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 4. Hasil Uji Reabilitas
Case Processing Summary
N
Cases
Valid
Excluded
%
30
100.0
0
.0
30
100.0
a
Total
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the
procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
N of Items
.840
27
73
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 5. Hasil Analisa Korelasi
Correlations
X4
X4
Pearson Correlation
X6
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
X6
Pearson Correlation
.274
Sig. (2-tailed)
.142
N
X7
30
30
30
.334
.097
**
**
.107
.408
.071
.609
.001
.002
.573
.002
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
.186
**
.326
.356
.254
**
**
.325
.004
.078
.054
.176
.000
.007
.000
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
**
**
.339
**
**
**
**
.260
.002
.003
.067
.000
.009
.002
.002
.166
.002
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
1
**
**
*
.303
**
**
*
.000
.000
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
.295
.332
**
*
.157
.113
.073
.001
.013
30
30
30
1
**
**
.008
.000
30
1
30
30
.473
30
30
**
.332
**
.000
.073
.008
30
30
30
30
*
**
**
**
.579
.473
.542
.606
.542
.392
Sig. (2-tailed)
.032
.001
.000
.002
30
30
30
30
30
*
*
.186
**
**
.449
.606
.579
Pearson Correlation
Pearson Correlation
.456
Sig. (2-tailed)
.011
.013
.325
.003
.002
30
N
X15
30
.034
.113
N
X14
30
.011
.067
.632
.009
.032
.522
.552
.449
.522
.552
.538
.506
.689
.535
.724
.484
.383
.537
.689
.535
.724
**
**
**
**
**
.019
.104
.004
.000
.037
.000
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
.056
**
*
**
*
.068
.377
1
30
30
30
Pearson Correlation
.388
.157
**
.339
**
.056
Sig. (2-tailed)
.034
.408
.004
.067
.000
.767
30
30
30
30
30
30
N
.425
.469
.537
.471
.000
30
.602
.602
.626
.567
.471
.002
*
.515
.515
.517
**
Y
.838
.754
**
X23
.009
.703
**
X20
.003
.388
*
X19
.039
.456
*
X18
**
.392
*
X17
.000
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
**
X15
.067
1
.632
X14
.142
.295
Pearson Correlation
X12
.339
.339
Sig. (2-tailed)
X12
30
X8
.274
Pearson Correlation
N
X8
30
X7
30
.605
.460
.794
.377
*
.767
.000
.011
.000
.040
.723
.040
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
1
*
.100
.129
**
*
.046
.601
.497
.000
.015
.000
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
.367
.662
.439
74
Universitas Sumatera Utara
.662
**
X17
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
X18
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
X19
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
X20
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
X23
.334
.326
.000
.071
.078
.000
.019
.000
.046
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
**
.303
.460
*
.100
**
.626
**
.425
*
.605
**
.367
*
1
.671
**
.773
**
.004
30
30
30
30
30
1
**
.321
.030
.321
.000
.083
.873
.083
30
30
30
30
1
**
-.010
.004
.959
.004
30
30
30
1
**
.609
.054
.009
.104
.011
.601
.000
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
**
**
.254
**
**
**
.129
**
**
.003
.001
.176
.002
.004
.000
.497
.000
.000
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
**
**
**
**
**
*
**
**
.321
**
.471
.567
.537
.689
.538
.535
.506
.724
.794
.377
.662
.773
.505
.660
.660
.510
.009
.002
.000
.002
.000
.040
.000
.004
.083
.004
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
**
.260
.383
*
.068
.439
*
.232
.030
-.010
.510
.539
.510
1.000
**
**
.002
.000
30
30
30
**
1
.107
Sig. (2-tailed)
.838
.573
.007
.166
.037
.723
.015
.217
.873
.959
.002
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
**
**
**
**
**
*
**
**
.321
**
**
**
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
.471
.537
.689
.535
.724
.377
.662
.505
.510
.539
1.000
.539
**
.039
Pearson Correlation
.484
**
.217
.000
.517
.505
.004
.356
.671
.232
.000
.097
.469
**
.000
**
.754
.505
Pearson Correlation
N
Y
**
.703
.002
.539
.009
.002
.000
.002
.000
.040
.000
.004
.083
.004
.000
.002
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
75
Universitas Sumatera Utara
30
Lampiran 6. Tabel Nilai R Produk Momen
76
Universitas Sumatera Utara