Thailand gender policy brief 10 02 15
January 2015
Gender and forests in a changing landscape
Understanding women’s participation in
forestry in Thailand
Policy brief
Photo by Ratchada Arpornsilp
Key messages
• DespitethecommitmentoftheRoyalThaiGovernment(RTG)topromotegenderequality,women’s
decision-makingandrepresentationinleadershippositionsintheforestrysectorremainextremely
low.
• Evidence-based research and gender-disaggregated statistics in forestry are needed to enhance
understanding of the diversity of forest-dependent communities and women’s concerns and
priorities.
• Thetechnicalcapacityofforestryoficials,includingdecision-makers,ongenderanalysismustbe
developedtopromotegendermainstreaminginforestry.
Background
AsasignatorytovarioushumanrightsconventionssuchastheConventionontheEliminationofAllFormsofDiscrimination
AgainstWomen(CEDAW),theUNDeclarationontheRightsofIndigenousPeoples(UNDRIP)andtheBeijingDeclaration
and Platform for Action, Thailand has undertaken various initiatives to promote gender equality across all sectors. For
example, the Eleventh National Economic and Social Development Plan (2012-2016) is a departure from the previous
growth-oriented approach to more of a people-centred development approach. This plan has prioritized promotion of
women’sparticipationindecision-makingprocessesatsubnationalandnationallevelsforgreatercontributiontonational
socio-economicdevelopment.TheOficeofWomen’sAffairsandFamilyDevelopmentoftheMinistryofSocialDevelopment
andHumanSecurity1ismandatedtopromotegenderequalityandwomen’sempowermentthroughitsive-yearlyNational
Women’sDevelopmentPlans(AlizaiandApipoonyanon2013).
MenandwomeninThailandhavedistinctroles,skillsandknowledgeinrelationtoforestry.Womengenerallyfocusmoreon
protectingtraditionalknowledge,forestritualsandkeepingrecordsofcustomarylawsonforestprotectionandconservation
(Box1).Morethan60percentofforest-dependentwomengathernon-woodforestproducts(NWFPs)forsubsistenceand
sale(KanjanandKaewchote2004;Upadhyayetal.2013).Men,ontheotherhand,generallyenforcewrittenagreements
andlawsthatpertaintologgingandforestpatrolling,andtendtodominatedecision-makingprocessesconcerningthe
managementofforestsandforestresources.
Duetowomen’srelianceonforests,primarilyforsubsistence,theirrightsandresponsibilitiesinforestmanagementand
protectionhaveoftenbeenperceivedassecondarytothoseofmen.Womenarerarelyacceptedasprogrammeandield
team leaders at the subnational level and in executive positions in forestry institutions at the national level. As a result,
womenareunder-representedindecision-makinginforestryplanningandmanagementatbothlevels.Thisiscompounded
byinadequateevidence-basedresearchanddatacollectiononwomen’scontributionstosustainableforestmanagement,
whichinhibitsinformedgender-inclusiveforestpolicyplanningandformulation(AlizaiandApipoonyanon2013).
ThisbriefdiscusseshowgenderperspectivesarebeingintegratedinThailand’sforestpoliciesandlawsintermsofwomen’s
representation,participation,accesstoanddecision-makinginforestuseandmanagement.Ithighlightskeychallengesand
offersrecommendationsforfurtherpromotionofgendermainstreaminginforestry.
Box 1. Capacity development for women forest users
ThewomenofBanThungYaovillagehaveplayedindispensablerolesinmanagingandprotectingthecommunityforest
anditsresources;theyputinheritedritualsandtraditionalpracticesatthecoreofallactivitiesandenforcecontemporary
lawsandregulations.Theyserveascommunity-basedentrepreneurs,environmentalmonitors,researchers,decisionmakers and instructors; this has resulted in greater recognition of Ban Thung Yao as a model community forest in
termsofgenderrepresentation,therebyofferingsubstantiallearningtootherstakeholders.BanThungYaowomen
stronglyfeelthattheyneedsupportfromvariousnetworksandorganizationstodeveloptheircapacities,particularly
oncontemporaryforest-relatedissueslikeclimatechangeinitiativessothattheirvoicescanbeheardatdifferentlevels.
Thiswouldbeusefulindevisingforest-relatedpoliciesandprogrammes(Upadhyayetal.2013).
1
Asthenationalinstrumentforwomen’swelfare,theoficepromotesthedevelopmentofwomen’scapacity,genderequalityandthestrengthofthe
familyinstitution.Italsodevelopspolicies,measuresandmechanismstopromoteandsupportotherunitsinthepublicandprivatesectorstoimplement
policiesonthedevelopmentofwomen’scapacity,theprotectionofwomen’srightsandthepromotionofgenderequalityandsocialjustice.
Gender concerns in forest policies
FollowingthedevastatinglashloodsinSouthernThailandin1988andrealizingtheimpactofincreasingdeforestation
anddegradation,theRTGenforcedanationwideloggingbanin1989.Sincethen,overhalfofthecountry’s19millionha
offoresthasbeendesignatedasprotectedforest,coveringaroundone-ifthofthetotallandarea(RECOFTC2013).Laws
governingnationalparksandwildlifesanctuaries,suchastheNationalParkAct,havemadeitillegaltoharvesttimberor
evenNWFPsfromforests.Thishasaffectedforest-dependentcommunitiesadverselyastheyareunabletoaccesswhathad
previouslysupportedtheirlivelihoods.
TheprovisionsoftheNationalForestPolicyNo.18(1985),theForestAct(1941),theNationalForestReserveAct(1964),the
ForestPlantationAct(1992)andtheNationalParkAct(1961)havefocusedontheprotectionandpreservationofnatural
resourcesandprohibittheircollectionandexploitationforthedirectorindirectbeneitofthestateorlocalcommunities.As
womenaretheprimaryusersofNWFPsforbothsubsistenceandincomegeneration,theserestrictionshaveaffectedtheir
consumptionpatternsandlivelihoodsconsiderably.
TheRTGsubsequentlybegansupportingincreaseddevolutionfollowingthe1998CabinetResolution,whichallowedlocal
communitiestouseforestsfortheirlivelihoodsandliveinsidenationalparks.TheDecentralizationAct(1999)enabledlocal
governmentunitstofacilitatelocalpeople’sengagementinnaturalresourcemanagement,includingforestry,byfacilitating
development of management plans, access to resources and networking. As a result, the Royal Forest Department was
successfulinformallyregisteringapproximately7000communityforestrysitesoutsideprotectedareasby2010(RECOFTC
2013).
Thailand’s Constitution enshrines the rights of local communities in policy planning on environmental development and
conservation,includingwomen’sparticipation(SOHR2007).Buttherecognitionofgenderrightsandresponsibilitiesand
women’sparticipationandrepresentationaskeystakeholdersinforestmanagementanddecision-makingremainabsent
inforestlawsandacts(AlizaiandApipoonyanon2013).TomainstreamgenderfurtherinThaiforestpoliciesandpractices,
moreeffortsareneededtoaddressthefollowingkeychallenges:
•
•
•
Forestlawsandregulationspresumeforestcommunitiesashomogenoussocialentitiesanddonottakeintoaccountthe
rightsofmenandwomenandtheirdifferentresponsibilities.
Womenareunder-representedindecision-makingandinleadershiprolesatnationalandsubnationallevelsinforestry
institutions.
Limitedresearchongenderandforestryandlackofgender-disaggregateddatacompoundedbyinadequatetechnical
expertisehindergendermainstreaminginforestryplanning.
Moving forward
CommunityforestryinThailandisconvergingwiththeneedforclimatechangeimpactmitigationandadaptation,which
presentspossiblemeansfordevelopingparticipatoryforestmanagementlegislationandpracticestoensuregreaterbeneits
forwomenandothervulnerablegroups.Forest-dependentmenandwomen,however,facemanychallengesthatneedto
beaddressedbeforethesegroupswillbeabletobeneitfromemergingcommunityforestryinitiatives.TheRTGcanaddress
theseissuesthroughthefollowingrecommendations:
•
•
•
•
Convenedialoguesandconsultationmeetingsatnationalandsubnationallevelsfortheinclusionofwomen’sconcerns
inforestry-relatedlegalinstrumentsandmeasures;reviewexistingforestplansandprogrammestomakethemmore
gender-sensitiveandtopromotegenderequality.
Strengthenthesustainedengagementofcivilsocietyorganizationsinnationalconsultationstohelpensuredevelopment
andimplementationofgender-responsiveforestplansandprogrammes.
Developthetechnicalcapacitiesofforestoficialsongenderanalysistoenablethemtofacilitatetheinvolvementof
womeninforestry-relatedplanning.
Anappropriatemechanismisrequiredtocollectgender-disaggregateddataaslackofevidence-baseddataongenderin
forestryimpedesinformedpolicyplanning.Thiscanbedonebyinvestinginresearchandcreatingagender-disaggregated
databasetofacilitatebetterknowledgegenerationongenderconcernsandprioritiesinforestry.
References
Alizai, A. & Apipoonyanon, C. 2013. Assessing the integration of gender perspectives into Thai national forest policy.
Bangkok.Unpublished.
Kanjan,C.&Kaewchote,J.2004.Communities for watershed protection: Mae Khan, Thailand.Manila,AsiaForestNetwork.
SecretariatoftheHouseofRepresentatives(SOHR).2007.The Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand.Bangkok,SOHR.
Availableat,www.senate.go.th/th_senate/English/constitution2007.pdf).
The Center for People and Forests (RECOFTC). 2013. Community forestry in Thailand. Bangkok, RECOFTC. Available at,
http://www.recoftc.org/country/thailand/basic-page/community-forestry-thailand)
Upadhyay,B.,Arpornsilp,R.&Soontornwong,S.2013.Gender and community forests in a changing landscape: Lessons
from Ban Thung Yao, Thailand.Bangkok,RECOFTC.
Thisbriefispartofaprojectentitled‘MainstreamingGenderIssuesintoForestPoliciesofDevelopingAsia-PaciicForestryCommission
(APFC)MemberCountries’fundedbytheFoodandAgricultureOrganizationoftheUnitedNations(FAO)andimplementedbyRECOFTC
–TheCenterforPeopleandForests.Theobjectiveistopromotegenderequalityinnationalforestpolicies,includingstrengtheningthe
capacitiesofpolicy-makersandrelevantstakeholdersinmainstreaminggenderissuesinnationalforestpolicies.Formoreinformation,
see:http://www.recoftc.org/site/Gender/.
©FAOandRECOFTCJanuary2015
Bangkok,Thailand
All rights reserved. Reproduction of material in this brief for commercial purposes is prohibited without permission of the copyright
holders.TheviewsexpressedinthispublicationarenotnecessarilythoseofFAOandRECOFTC.
RECOFTC–TheCenterforPeopleandForests
P.O.Box1111
KasetsartPostOfice
Bangkok10903,Thailand
Tel+66(0)29405700
Fax+66(0)25614880
info@recoftc.org
www.recoftc.org
FAORegionalOficeforAsiaandthePaciic
39PhraAtitRoad
Bangkok10200,Thailand
Tel+66(0)26974000
Fax+66(0)26974445
FAO-RAP@fao.org
www.fao.org
Gender and forests in a changing landscape
Understanding women’s participation in
forestry in Thailand
Policy brief
Photo by Ratchada Arpornsilp
Key messages
• DespitethecommitmentoftheRoyalThaiGovernment(RTG)topromotegenderequality,women’s
decision-makingandrepresentationinleadershippositionsintheforestrysectorremainextremely
low.
• Evidence-based research and gender-disaggregated statistics in forestry are needed to enhance
understanding of the diversity of forest-dependent communities and women’s concerns and
priorities.
• Thetechnicalcapacityofforestryoficials,includingdecision-makers,ongenderanalysismustbe
developedtopromotegendermainstreaminginforestry.
Background
AsasignatorytovarioushumanrightsconventionssuchastheConventionontheEliminationofAllFormsofDiscrimination
AgainstWomen(CEDAW),theUNDeclarationontheRightsofIndigenousPeoples(UNDRIP)andtheBeijingDeclaration
and Platform for Action, Thailand has undertaken various initiatives to promote gender equality across all sectors. For
example, the Eleventh National Economic and Social Development Plan (2012-2016) is a departure from the previous
growth-oriented approach to more of a people-centred development approach. This plan has prioritized promotion of
women’sparticipationindecision-makingprocessesatsubnationalandnationallevelsforgreatercontributiontonational
socio-economicdevelopment.TheOficeofWomen’sAffairsandFamilyDevelopmentoftheMinistryofSocialDevelopment
andHumanSecurity1ismandatedtopromotegenderequalityandwomen’sempowermentthroughitsive-yearlyNational
Women’sDevelopmentPlans(AlizaiandApipoonyanon2013).
MenandwomeninThailandhavedistinctroles,skillsandknowledgeinrelationtoforestry.Womengenerallyfocusmoreon
protectingtraditionalknowledge,forestritualsandkeepingrecordsofcustomarylawsonforestprotectionandconservation
(Box1).Morethan60percentofforest-dependentwomengathernon-woodforestproducts(NWFPs)forsubsistenceand
sale(KanjanandKaewchote2004;Upadhyayetal.2013).Men,ontheotherhand,generallyenforcewrittenagreements
andlawsthatpertaintologgingandforestpatrolling,andtendtodominatedecision-makingprocessesconcerningthe
managementofforestsandforestresources.
Duetowomen’srelianceonforests,primarilyforsubsistence,theirrightsandresponsibilitiesinforestmanagementand
protectionhaveoftenbeenperceivedassecondarytothoseofmen.Womenarerarelyacceptedasprogrammeandield
team leaders at the subnational level and in executive positions in forestry institutions at the national level. As a result,
womenareunder-representedindecision-makinginforestryplanningandmanagementatbothlevels.Thisiscompounded
byinadequateevidence-basedresearchanddatacollectiononwomen’scontributionstosustainableforestmanagement,
whichinhibitsinformedgender-inclusiveforestpolicyplanningandformulation(AlizaiandApipoonyanon2013).
ThisbriefdiscusseshowgenderperspectivesarebeingintegratedinThailand’sforestpoliciesandlawsintermsofwomen’s
representation,participation,accesstoanddecision-makinginforestuseandmanagement.Ithighlightskeychallengesand
offersrecommendationsforfurtherpromotionofgendermainstreaminginforestry.
Box 1. Capacity development for women forest users
ThewomenofBanThungYaovillagehaveplayedindispensablerolesinmanagingandprotectingthecommunityforest
anditsresources;theyputinheritedritualsandtraditionalpracticesatthecoreofallactivitiesandenforcecontemporary
lawsandregulations.Theyserveascommunity-basedentrepreneurs,environmentalmonitors,researchers,decisionmakers and instructors; this has resulted in greater recognition of Ban Thung Yao as a model community forest in
termsofgenderrepresentation,therebyofferingsubstantiallearningtootherstakeholders.BanThungYaowomen
stronglyfeelthattheyneedsupportfromvariousnetworksandorganizationstodeveloptheircapacities,particularly
oncontemporaryforest-relatedissueslikeclimatechangeinitiativessothattheirvoicescanbeheardatdifferentlevels.
Thiswouldbeusefulindevisingforest-relatedpoliciesandprogrammes(Upadhyayetal.2013).
1
Asthenationalinstrumentforwomen’swelfare,theoficepromotesthedevelopmentofwomen’scapacity,genderequalityandthestrengthofthe
familyinstitution.Italsodevelopspolicies,measuresandmechanismstopromoteandsupportotherunitsinthepublicandprivatesectorstoimplement
policiesonthedevelopmentofwomen’scapacity,theprotectionofwomen’srightsandthepromotionofgenderequalityandsocialjustice.
Gender concerns in forest policies
FollowingthedevastatinglashloodsinSouthernThailandin1988andrealizingtheimpactofincreasingdeforestation
anddegradation,theRTGenforcedanationwideloggingbanin1989.Sincethen,overhalfofthecountry’s19millionha
offoresthasbeendesignatedasprotectedforest,coveringaroundone-ifthofthetotallandarea(RECOFTC2013).Laws
governingnationalparksandwildlifesanctuaries,suchastheNationalParkAct,havemadeitillegaltoharvesttimberor
evenNWFPsfromforests.Thishasaffectedforest-dependentcommunitiesadverselyastheyareunabletoaccesswhathad
previouslysupportedtheirlivelihoods.
TheprovisionsoftheNationalForestPolicyNo.18(1985),theForestAct(1941),theNationalForestReserveAct(1964),the
ForestPlantationAct(1992)andtheNationalParkAct(1961)havefocusedontheprotectionandpreservationofnatural
resourcesandprohibittheircollectionandexploitationforthedirectorindirectbeneitofthestateorlocalcommunities.As
womenaretheprimaryusersofNWFPsforbothsubsistenceandincomegeneration,theserestrictionshaveaffectedtheir
consumptionpatternsandlivelihoodsconsiderably.
TheRTGsubsequentlybegansupportingincreaseddevolutionfollowingthe1998CabinetResolution,whichallowedlocal
communitiestouseforestsfortheirlivelihoodsandliveinsidenationalparks.TheDecentralizationAct(1999)enabledlocal
governmentunitstofacilitatelocalpeople’sengagementinnaturalresourcemanagement,includingforestry,byfacilitating
development of management plans, access to resources and networking. As a result, the Royal Forest Department was
successfulinformallyregisteringapproximately7000communityforestrysitesoutsideprotectedareasby2010(RECOFTC
2013).
Thailand’s Constitution enshrines the rights of local communities in policy planning on environmental development and
conservation,includingwomen’sparticipation(SOHR2007).Buttherecognitionofgenderrightsandresponsibilitiesand
women’sparticipationandrepresentationaskeystakeholdersinforestmanagementanddecision-makingremainabsent
inforestlawsandacts(AlizaiandApipoonyanon2013).TomainstreamgenderfurtherinThaiforestpoliciesandpractices,
moreeffortsareneededtoaddressthefollowingkeychallenges:
•
•
•
Forestlawsandregulationspresumeforestcommunitiesashomogenoussocialentitiesanddonottakeintoaccountthe
rightsofmenandwomenandtheirdifferentresponsibilities.
Womenareunder-representedindecision-makingandinleadershiprolesatnationalandsubnationallevelsinforestry
institutions.
Limitedresearchongenderandforestryandlackofgender-disaggregateddatacompoundedbyinadequatetechnical
expertisehindergendermainstreaminginforestryplanning.
Moving forward
CommunityforestryinThailandisconvergingwiththeneedforclimatechangeimpactmitigationandadaptation,which
presentspossiblemeansfordevelopingparticipatoryforestmanagementlegislationandpracticestoensuregreaterbeneits
forwomenandothervulnerablegroups.Forest-dependentmenandwomen,however,facemanychallengesthatneedto
beaddressedbeforethesegroupswillbeabletobeneitfromemergingcommunityforestryinitiatives.TheRTGcanaddress
theseissuesthroughthefollowingrecommendations:
•
•
•
•
Convenedialoguesandconsultationmeetingsatnationalandsubnationallevelsfortheinclusionofwomen’sconcerns
inforestry-relatedlegalinstrumentsandmeasures;reviewexistingforestplansandprogrammestomakethemmore
gender-sensitiveandtopromotegenderequality.
Strengthenthesustainedengagementofcivilsocietyorganizationsinnationalconsultationstohelpensuredevelopment
andimplementationofgender-responsiveforestplansandprogrammes.
Developthetechnicalcapacitiesofforestoficialsongenderanalysistoenablethemtofacilitatetheinvolvementof
womeninforestry-relatedplanning.
Anappropriatemechanismisrequiredtocollectgender-disaggregateddataaslackofevidence-baseddataongenderin
forestryimpedesinformedpolicyplanning.Thiscanbedonebyinvestinginresearchandcreatingagender-disaggregated
databasetofacilitatebetterknowledgegenerationongenderconcernsandprioritiesinforestry.
References
Alizai, A. & Apipoonyanon, C. 2013. Assessing the integration of gender perspectives into Thai national forest policy.
Bangkok.Unpublished.
Kanjan,C.&Kaewchote,J.2004.Communities for watershed protection: Mae Khan, Thailand.Manila,AsiaForestNetwork.
SecretariatoftheHouseofRepresentatives(SOHR).2007.The Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand.Bangkok,SOHR.
Availableat,www.senate.go.th/th_senate/English/constitution2007.pdf).
The Center for People and Forests (RECOFTC). 2013. Community forestry in Thailand. Bangkok, RECOFTC. Available at,
http://www.recoftc.org/country/thailand/basic-page/community-forestry-thailand)
Upadhyay,B.,Arpornsilp,R.&Soontornwong,S.2013.Gender and community forests in a changing landscape: Lessons
from Ban Thung Yao, Thailand.Bangkok,RECOFTC.
Thisbriefispartofaprojectentitled‘MainstreamingGenderIssuesintoForestPoliciesofDevelopingAsia-PaciicForestryCommission
(APFC)MemberCountries’fundedbytheFoodandAgricultureOrganizationoftheUnitedNations(FAO)andimplementedbyRECOFTC
–TheCenterforPeopleandForests.Theobjectiveistopromotegenderequalityinnationalforestpolicies,includingstrengtheningthe
capacitiesofpolicy-makersandrelevantstakeholdersinmainstreaminggenderissuesinnationalforestpolicies.Formoreinformation,
see:http://www.recoftc.org/site/Gender/.
©FAOandRECOFTCJanuary2015
Bangkok,Thailand
All rights reserved. Reproduction of material in this brief for commercial purposes is prohibited without permission of the copyright
holders.TheviewsexpressedinthispublicationarenotnecessarilythoseofFAOandRECOFTC.
RECOFTC–TheCenterforPeopleandForests
P.O.Box1111
KasetsartPostOfice
Bangkok10903,Thailand
Tel+66(0)29405700
Fax+66(0)25614880
info@recoftc.org
www.recoftc.org
FAORegionalOficeforAsiaandthePaciic
39PhraAtitRoad
Bangkok10200,Thailand
Tel+66(0)26974000
Fax+66(0)26974445
FAO-RAP@fao.org
www.fao.org