D IPA 0808728 Bibliography
180
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Acar, O. & Patton, B.R. (2012). “Argumentation and Formal Reasoning Skills in
an Argumentation-Based Guided Inquiry Course”. Procedia - Social and
Behavioral Sciences. 46, (12), 4756-4760.
Albe, V. (2008). “When Scientific Knowledge, Daily Life Experience,
Epistemologygical and Social Considerations Intersect: Students’
Argumentation in Group Discussions on a Socio-Scientific Issue”.
Research in Science Education. 38, (1), 67-90.
Anderson, L. et al. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assesing:
A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Addison
Wesley Longman.
Asterhan, C.S.C. & Schwarz, B.B. (2009). Argumentation and Explanation in
Conceptual Change: Andications from Protocol Analyses of Peer-to-Peer
Dialog. Cognitive Science. (33), 374-400.
Aufschnaiter, C. (2009). Argumentation About and Understanding of Science:
Research Exploring How To Interrelate These Two Different Perspectives.
Paper presented at ESERA 2009 Conference. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem
Akademi.
Bassham, G. et al. (2008). Critical Thinking A Student’s Introduction. Boston:
McGraw-Hill.
Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social
psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blake, B and Pope, T. (2008). “Developmental Psychology: Incorporating
Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s Theories in Classrooms”. Journal of CrossDisciplinary Perspectives in Education. 1, (1), 59-67.
Burden, P.R. & Byrd, D.M. (1999). Methods for Effective Teaching. 2nd Edition.
Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Cakir, M. (2008). “Constructivist Approaches to Learning in Science and Their
Implications for Science Pedagogy: A Literature Review. International
Journal of Environmental & Science Education. 3, (4), 193-206.
Muslim, 2014
PENGEMBANGAN PROGRAM PERKULIAHAN FISIKA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI KEMAMPUAN
BERARGUMENTASI CALON GURU FISIKA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
181
Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of Proximal Development in Vygotsky’s Analysis of
Learning and Instruction, in Vygotsky’s Educational Theory and Practice
in Cultural Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chang, S. N., & Chiu, M. H. (2008). “Lakatos’ Scientific Research Programmes
as a Framework for Analysing Informal Argumentation about
Socio-Scientific Issues”. International Journal of Science Education.
30, (13), 1753-1773.
Chen, C.H., & She, H.-C. (2012). “The Impact of Recurrent On-line Synchronous
Scientific Argumentation on Students' Argumentation and Conceptual
Change”. Educational Technology & Society. 15 (1), 197–210.
Chen, J., Lin, H., Hsu, Y & Lee, H. (2011). “Data and Claim: The Refinement of
Science Fair Work Through Argumentation”. International Journal of
Science Education. 1, (2), 147 – 164.
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Dagher, Z. R. (1994). “Does the Use Analogies Contribute to Conceptual
Change?”. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 78, (6), 601-614.
Dawson, V.M. & Venville, G. (2010). “Teaching Strategies for Developing
Students’ Argumentation Skills About Socioscientific Issues in High
School Genetics”. Research in Science Education. (40), 133-148.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2007). Lampiran Permendiknas No.16 Tahun
2007: Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru. Jakarta:
Depdiknas.
Derri. (2000). Argumentatif Reasoning Assessments. [Online]. Tersedia:
http://www.alnresearch.Org/HMTL/Assessmentstutorial/Strategis/
Argumen.html. [12 September 2011].
Driver, R. (1995). Constructivist Approaches to Science Learning. In L. P. Steffe
& J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in Education (pp. 385-400). Hillsdale,
NJ: Erlbaum.
Driver, R., Newton, P. & Osborne, J. (2000). “Establishing The Norms of
Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms”. Science Education. 84, (3), 287312.
Muslim, 2014
PENGEMBANGAN PROGRAM PERKULIAHAN FISIKA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI KEMAMPUAN
BERARGUMENTASI CALON GURU FISIKA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
182
Duschl R.A. & Osborne, J. (2002). “Supporting and Promoting Argumentation
Discourse in Science Education”. Studies in Science Education.(38), 3972.
Duschl, R. (2008). Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing
Conceptual, Epistemic, and Social Learning Goals. Review of Research in
Education. (32), 268-291.
Eisenhart, M.A.(1991). Conceptual Framework for Research. Proceeding of The
Thirteenth Annual Meeting: Psychology of Mathematics Education.
Virginia:USA.
Elena, S. et al (2012). Promoting Argumentation Skills through a web-based
learning environment on the topic of Climate Change. ICEM 2012:
Learning in Science Group, University of Cyprus.
Engelhardt, P.V and Bechner, R.J. (2004). “Students’ Understanding of Direc
Current Resistive Electrical Circuits”. American Journal Physics.72, (1),
98-115.
Erduran S., Sımon, S. & Osborne, J. (2004). “Tapping into Argumentation:
Developments in The Application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for
Studying Science Discourse”. Science Education. 88, (6), 915-933.
Erduran, S., Ardac, D., and Guzel, B.Y. (2006). “Learning To Teach
Argumentation: Case Studies Of Pre-Service Secondary Science
Teachers”. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology
Education. 2, (2).
Erduran, S. & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.P., Eds. (2007). Argumentation in Science
Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research. Dordrecht, The
Netherlands: Springer
Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2008). Argumentation in Science
Education. Florida State University-USA: Spinger.
Etkina, E. (2010). “Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Preparation of High
School Physics Teachers”. The American Physical Society. Physical
Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research. 6, (2), January 2010.
Fensham, P. J. et al. (1994). The Content of Science: A Contructivist Approach to
its Teaching & Learning. Washington DC: The Falmer Press.
Garratt, J., Overton, T. & Threlfall, T. (1999). A Question of Chemistry: Creative
Muslim, 2014
PENGEMBANGAN PROGRAM PERKULIAHAN FISIKA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI KEMAMPUAN
BERARGUMENTASI CALON GURU FISIKA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
183
Problems for Critical Thinkers. Harlow, UK: Pearson.
Griffin, P., McGraw, B. & Care, E. (2012). Assessment and Teaching of 21st
Century Skills . Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer
Hake, R.R (1998). “Interactive-Engagement versus Traditional Methods: A SixThousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory
Physics Courses”. American Journal Physics. 66, (1), January 1998.
Hannon, V. (2009). A New Paradigm for Learning Innovation in The 21st.
Century. Centre for Strategic Education. Victoria.
Herron, J. Dudley. (1977). “Problems Associated With Concept Analysis”.
Journal of Science Education. 61, (2), 185-199.
Inch, E. S., & Warnick, B., Endres, D. (2006). Critical Thinking and
Communication (5th Ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Jamaludin, A., Caloline, H.M.L., and San, C.Y. (2007). “The Impact of Structured
Argumentation and Enactive Role Play on students’ Argumentative
Writing Skills”. Proceeding Ascilite Singapore 2007.
Jumadi. (2003). Wawasan Keilmuan IPA/Fisika. Makalah Disajikan pada
Pelatihan PKG-C yang Diselenggarakan oleh Dinas Pendidikan Propinsi
DIY pada Tanggal 28 Juni sampai dengan 3 Juli 2003 di Yogyakarta.
[Online]. Tersedia: http://staff.uny.ac.id/system/files/pengabdian/jumadimpd-dr/wawasan-keilmuan-ipa.pdf (15 September 2012).
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2013). Rasional Kurikulum 2013.
Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2013). Elemen Perubahan Kurikulum
2013. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Keraf, G. (1981). Argumentasi dan Narasi. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Kolsto, S. D., & Ratcliffe, M. (2008). Social Aspects of Argumentation. In S.
Erduran & M.P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in Science
Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research (pp.114-133).
Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Kozulin, A. (2004). “Vygotsky's Theory in The Classroom”. European Journal of
Psychology of Education. XIX , (13), 3 -7.
Muslim, 2014
PENGEMBANGAN PROGRAM PERKULIAHAN FISIKA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI KEMAMPUAN
BERARGUMENTASI CALON GURU FISIKA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
184
Kuhn, D. (1993). “Science Argument: Implications for Teaching and Learning
Scientific Thinking”. Science Education. 77, (3), 319-337.
Lamb, K. L. (1998). “Test-retest Reliability in Quantitative Physical Education
Research”. European Physical Education Review. (4), 145-152.
Lee, E., & Luft, J. (2008). “Experienced Secondary Science Teachers’
Representation of Pedagogical Content Knowledge”. International Journal
of Science Education. 30, (10), 1343 – 1363.
Lewis, J., & Leach, J. (2006). “Discussion of Socioscientific Issues: The Role of
Science Knowledge. International Journal of Science Education. 28, (11),
1267-1287.
Luft, J. A., & Patterson, N. C. (2002). “Bridging The Gap: Supporting Beginning
Science Teachers” .Journal of Science Teacher Education. (13), 267–282.
Maloney, J., & Simon, S. (2006). “Mapping Children’s Discussion of Evidence in
Science to Assess Collaboration and Argumentation”. International
Journal of Science Education. 28, (15), 1817-1841.
Manurung, S.R. (2013). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Dengan Media
Hiperteks Berdasarkan Skema Pemecahan Masalah Berintikan
Argumentasi Toulmin. Disertasi Doktor pada Sekolah Pascasarjana
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: tidak diterbitkan.
Marttunen, M., Leena, L., Litosseliti, L., & Lund, K. (2005), “Argumenation
Skills as Prerequisites for Collaborative Learning among Finnish, French,
and English Secondary School Students”. Educational Research and
Evaluation. 11, (4), 365–384.
Matlock, S & Hetzel. (1997). Basic Concepts in Item and Test Analysis. Paper
presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research
Association, Austin, January 1997.
McAlister, S.R. (2001). Argumentation and A Design for Learning. [Online].
Tersedia:
http://İet.Open.Ac.Uk/Pp/S.R.Mcalister/Personal/197.Pdf
[21 Oktober 2011].
McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., & Krajcik, J. (2006). “Supporting Students’
Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Scaffolds in
Instructional Materials”. The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 15, (2),
153-191.
Muslim, 2014
PENGEMBANGAN PROGRAM PERKULIAHAN FISIKA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI KEMAMPUAN
BERARGUMENTASI CALON GURU FISIKA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
185
McNeill, K. L. (2009). “Teachers’ Use of Curriculum to Support Students in
Writing Scientific Arguments to Explain Phenomena”. Journal of Science
Education. (93), 223-268.
McNeill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. S. (2010). “Scientific Discourse in Three Urban
Classrooms: The Role of The Teacher in Engaging High School Students
in Argumentation”. Journal of Science Education. 9, (2), 203 – 229.
McNeill, K. L., Knight, A. M. (2013). “Teachers’ Pedagogical Content
Knowledge of Scientific Argumentation: The Impact of Professional
Development on K–12 Teachers”. Journal of Science Education. 97, (6),
936-972.
Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. B. (2008). “Deliberative Discourse
Idealized and Realized: Accountable Talk in The Classroom and in Civic
Life”. Studies in Philosophy and Education. 27, (4), 283 – 297.
Montaña, G., González, J., & Castillo, F.D. (2012). Argumentation in the Science
Classroom. [Online]. Tersedia: http://ikit.org/SummerInstitute2012/
Papers/2998-Gonzalez.pdf (20 November 2011).
Muslim. (2011). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Sekolah untuk
Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Kemampuan Berargumentasi
Calon Guru Fisika. Laporan Penelitian Hibah Disertasi Doktor.
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: tidak diterbitkan.
Nasional Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards.
Washington DC: National Academy Press.
National Science Teachers Association. (2003). Standards for Science Teacher
Preparation.
Newton, P. (1999). “The Place of Argumentation in The Pedagogy of School
Science”. International Journal of Science Education. 21, (5), 553-576.
Niaz, M. et al. (2002). “Arguments, Contradictions, Resistances and Conceptual
Change in Students’ Understanding of Atomic Structure”. Science
Education. 86, (4), 505-525.
Nussbaum, E.M. & Sinatra, G.M. (2003). Argument and Conceptual Engagement.
Contemporary Educational Psychology. (28), 384-395.
Muslim, 2014
PENGEMBANGAN PROGRAM PERKULIAHAN FISIKA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI KEMAMPUAN
BERARGUMENTASI CALON GURU FISIKA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
186
Nussbaum, E.M. (2008). Collaborative Discourse, Argumentation and Learning:
Preface and Literature Review. Contemporary Educational Psychology.
(33), 345–359.
OECD/UNESCO-UIS. (2003). Literacy Skill for the World of Tomorrow: Further
results from PISA 2000. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.oecd.org/
publications. (10 Juni 2011).
Oluwatayo, J.A. (2012). “Validity and Reliability Issues in Educational
Research”. Journal of Educational and Social Research. 2, (2), May 2012.
Ormrod, J. E. (2008). Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development. [Online].
Tersedia:
http://people.uncw.edu/caropresoe/EDN203/203_Fall_07/
Chapter%202_edit2.ppt (25 September 2012).
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., Simon, S and Monk, M. (2001). Enhancing The Quality
of Argument in School Science. School Science Review.
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). “Enhancing The Quality of
Argumentation in School Science”. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching. 41, (10), 994-1020.
Osborne, J. (2007). “Science Education for the Twenty First Century”. Eurasia
Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. 3, (3), 173184.
Park, S., & Oliver, S. (2008). “Revisiting the Conceptualisation of Pedagogical
Content Knowledge (PCK): PCK as a Conceptual Tool to Understand
Teachers as Professionals”. Research in Science Education. 38, 261 – 284.
Piaget, J. (1985). The Equilibration of Cognitive Structures. Chicago: University
of Chicago Press.
Riduwan. (2012). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian. Bandung:
Alfabeta.
Riemeier, T. et al. (2009). The Quality Of Students’ Argumentation And Their
Conceptual Understanding – An Exploration Of Their Interrelationship.
Paper presented at ESERA 2009 Conference. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem
Akademi.
Roshayanti, F. (2012). Pengembangan Model Asesmen Argumentatif untuk
Mengukur Keterampilan Argumentasi Mahasiswa Pada Konsep Fisiologi
Manusia. Disertasi Doktor pada Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas
Pendidikan Indonesia: tidak diterbitkan.
Muslim, 2014
PENGEMBANGAN PROGRAM PERKULIAHAN FISIKA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI KEMAMPUAN
BERARGUMENTASI CALON GURU FISIKA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
187
Rustaman, N.Y. (2012). Trend Penelitian Pendidikan: Kasus Penelitian
Pendidikan Sains. Proceeding Seminar Nasional IPA III Tahun 2012Peningkatan Kompetensi Profesionalisme Guru Sains Berkelanjutan
Melalui Penelitian dan Publikasi Ilmiah. Prodi Pendidikan IPA FMIPA
Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). “The Significance of Content Knowledge
for Informal Reasoning Regarding Socioscientific Issues”: Applying
Genetics Knowledge to Genetic Engineering Issues”. Science Education.
(89), 71-93.
Sadler, T. D. (2006). “Promoting Discourse and Argumentation in Science
Teacher Education”. Journal of Science Teacher Education. (17), 323-346.
Sagir, S.U., & Kihc, Z. (2012). “Analysis of the Contribution of ArgumentationBased Science Teaching on Student Success and Retention”. Eurasian
Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education. 4, (2), 139-156.
Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of The Ways Students Generate
Arguments in Science Education: Current Perspectives and
Recommendations for Future Directions.
Sampson, V. & Gerbino, F. (2010). “Two Instructional Models That Teachers
Can Use to Promote and Support Scientific Argumentation in the Biology
Classroom”. The American Biology Teacher. 72, (7), 427-431.
She, H.C. & Liao, Y.W. (2010). “Bridging Scientific Reasoning and Conceptual
Change through Adaptive Web-based Learning”. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching. 47, (1), 91-119.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in
Teaching”. Educational Researcher. 15, (2), 4 – 14.
Siegel, H. (1989). “The Rationality of Science, Critical Thinking and Science
Education”. Synthese. 80, ( 1), 9-42.
Simon, S., Erduran, S. & Osborne, J. (2006). “Learning to Teach Argumentation:
Research and Development in The Science Classroom”. International
Journal of Science Education. 28, (2), 235-260.
Simon, S. (2008). “Using Toulmin's Argument Pattern in The Evaluation of
Argumentation in School Science. International Journal of Research &
Method in Education. 31, (3), 277-289.
Muslim, 2014
PENGEMBANGAN PROGRAM PERKULIAHAN FISIKA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI KEMAMPUAN
BERARGUMENTASI CALON GURU FISIKA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
188
Slavin, R.E. (1994). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice. 5th Edition.
Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Solomon, J., Duveen, J. & Scott, L. (1992). Exploring The Nature of Science:
Key Stage 4. Hatfield, UK: Association for Science Education.
Suparno, P. (2010). Filsafat Konstruktivisme Dalam Pendidikan.Yogyakarta:
Kanisius.
Suyatno. (2010). Peran Pendidikan Sebagai Modal Utama Membangun Karakter
Bangsa. Makalah disampaikan dalam Sarasehan Nasional “Pengembangan
Pendidikan Budaya dan Karakter Bangsa” oleh Kopertis Wilayah 3 DKI
Jakarta, 12 Januari 2010. [Online]. Tersedia: http://anannur. blogspot.com
/2011/02/peran-pendidikan-sebagai-modal-utama.html. (12 Oktober 2012).
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D.S., & Semmel, M. (1974). Instructional Development
for Training Teachers of Exeptional Children. Source Book. Bloominton:
Center for Innovation on teaching the Handicapped.
Toulmin, S. (1969). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press
Trent, R. (2009). “Fostering Students’ Argumentation Skills in Geoscience
Education”. Journal of Geoscience Education. 5, (1), 224-232.
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. (2010). Re-Desain Pendidikan Profesional
Guru. Bandung: UPI Press.
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. (2011). Kurikulum Universitas Pendidikan
Indonesia Tahun 2011. Bandung: UPI Press.
Uyanto, S.S. (2009). Pedoman Analisis Data dengan SPSS. Yogyakarta: Graha
Ilmu.
Venville, G., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). “Exploring Conceptual Change in
Genetics”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 35, (9), 1031-1055.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). “Mind in Society: The Development of Higher
Psychological Processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E.
Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wenning, C. J. (2006). “A Framework for Teaching The Nature of Science.”
Journal of Physics Teacher Education. 3, (3), 3-10.
Muslim, 2014
PENGEMBANGAN PROGRAM PERKULIAHAN FISIKA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI KEMAMPUAN
BERARGUMENTASI CALON GURU FISIKA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
189
Wheatley, G.H. (1991). “Constructivist Perspectivists on Science and
Mathematics Learning”. Science Education. 75, (1), 9-22.
Xie, Q and Mui So, W.W. (2012). Understanding and practice of argumentation:
A pilot study with Mainland Chinese pre-service teachers in secondary
science classrooms. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and
Teaching.
Yan, X. & Erduran, S. (2008). “Arguing Online: Case Studies of Pre-Service
Science Teachers’ Perceptions of Online Tools in Supporting The
Learning of Argument’s”. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 5, (3),
2-31.
Yu Chi, C.et al. (2010). Content Analysis of Argumentation in Middle School
Science Textbooks in Korea, Mainland China, and Taiwan. EASE: East
Asian Association Science Education.
Zohar, A. & Nemet. F. (2002). “Fostering Student’s Knowledge and
Argumentation Skills through Dilemmas in Human Genetics”. Journal of
Research in Science Teaching. 39, (1), 35-62.
Zhou, G. (2010). “Conceptual Change in Science: A Process of Argumentation.
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. 6, (2),
101-110.
Muslim, 2014
PENGEMBANGAN PROGRAM PERKULIAHAN FISIKA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI KEMAMPUAN
BERARGUMENTASI CALON GURU FISIKA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Acar, O. & Patton, B.R. (2012). “Argumentation and Formal Reasoning Skills in
an Argumentation-Based Guided Inquiry Course”. Procedia - Social and
Behavioral Sciences. 46, (12), 4756-4760.
Albe, V. (2008). “When Scientific Knowledge, Daily Life Experience,
Epistemologygical and Social Considerations Intersect: Students’
Argumentation in Group Discussions on a Socio-Scientific Issue”.
Research in Science Education. 38, (1), 67-90.
Anderson, L. et al. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assesing:
A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Addison
Wesley Longman.
Asterhan, C.S.C. & Schwarz, B.B. (2009). Argumentation and Explanation in
Conceptual Change: Andications from Protocol Analyses of Peer-to-Peer
Dialog. Cognitive Science. (33), 374-400.
Aufschnaiter, C. (2009). Argumentation About and Understanding of Science:
Research Exploring How To Interrelate These Two Different Perspectives.
Paper presented at ESERA 2009 Conference. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem
Akademi.
Bassham, G. et al. (2008). Critical Thinking A Student’s Introduction. Boston:
McGraw-Hill.
Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social
psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blake, B and Pope, T. (2008). “Developmental Psychology: Incorporating
Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s Theories in Classrooms”. Journal of CrossDisciplinary Perspectives in Education. 1, (1), 59-67.
Burden, P.R. & Byrd, D.M. (1999). Methods for Effective Teaching. 2nd Edition.
Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Cakir, M. (2008). “Constructivist Approaches to Learning in Science and Their
Implications for Science Pedagogy: A Literature Review. International
Journal of Environmental & Science Education. 3, (4), 193-206.
Muslim, 2014
PENGEMBANGAN PROGRAM PERKULIAHAN FISIKA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI KEMAMPUAN
BERARGUMENTASI CALON GURU FISIKA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
181
Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of Proximal Development in Vygotsky’s Analysis of
Learning and Instruction, in Vygotsky’s Educational Theory and Practice
in Cultural Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chang, S. N., & Chiu, M. H. (2008). “Lakatos’ Scientific Research Programmes
as a Framework for Analysing Informal Argumentation about
Socio-Scientific Issues”. International Journal of Science Education.
30, (13), 1753-1773.
Chen, C.H., & She, H.-C. (2012). “The Impact of Recurrent On-line Synchronous
Scientific Argumentation on Students' Argumentation and Conceptual
Change”. Educational Technology & Society. 15 (1), 197–210.
Chen, J., Lin, H., Hsu, Y & Lee, H. (2011). “Data and Claim: The Refinement of
Science Fair Work Through Argumentation”. International Journal of
Science Education. 1, (2), 147 – 164.
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Dagher, Z. R. (1994). “Does the Use Analogies Contribute to Conceptual
Change?”. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 78, (6), 601-614.
Dawson, V.M. & Venville, G. (2010). “Teaching Strategies for Developing
Students’ Argumentation Skills About Socioscientific Issues in High
School Genetics”. Research in Science Education. (40), 133-148.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2007). Lampiran Permendiknas No.16 Tahun
2007: Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru. Jakarta:
Depdiknas.
Derri. (2000). Argumentatif Reasoning Assessments. [Online]. Tersedia:
http://www.alnresearch.Org/HMTL/Assessmentstutorial/Strategis/
Argumen.html. [12 September 2011].
Driver, R. (1995). Constructivist Approaches to Science Learning. In L. P. Steffe
& J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in Education (pp. 385-400). Hillsdale,
NJ: Erlbaum.
Driver, R., Newton, P. & Osborne, J. (2000). “Establishing The Norms of
Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms”. Science Education. 84, (3), 287312.
Muslim, 2014
PENGEMBANGAN PROGRAM PERKULIAHAN FISIKA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI KEMAMPUAN
BERARGUMENTASI CALON GURU FISIKA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
182
Duschl R.A. & Osborne, J. (2002). “Supporting and Promoting Argumentation
Discourse in Science Education”. Studies in Science Education.(38), 3972.
Duschl, R. (2008). Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing
Conceptual, Epistemic, and Social Learning Goals. Review of Research in
Education. (32), 268-291.
Eisenhart, M.A.(1991). Conceptual Framework for Research. Proceeding of The
Thirteenth Annual Meeting: Psychology of Mathematics Education.
Virginia:USA.
Elena, S. et al (2012). Promoting Argumentation Skills through a web-based
learning environment on the topic of Climate Change. ICEM 2012:
Learning in Science Group, University of Cyprus.
Engelhardt, P.V and Bechner, R.J. (2004). “Students’ Understanding of Direc
Current Resistive Electrical Circuits”. American Journal Physics.72, (1),
98-115.
Erduran S., Sımon, S. & Osborne, J. (2004). “Tapping into Argumentation:
Developments in The Application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for
Studying Science Discourse”. Science Education. 88, (6), 915-933.
Erduran, S., Ardac, D., and Guzel, B.Y. (2006). “Learning To Teach
Argumentation: Case Studies Of Pre-Service Secondary Science
Teachers”. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology
Education. 2, (2).
Erduran, S. & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.P., Eds. (2007). Argumentation in Science
Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research. Dordrecht, The
Netherlands: Springer
Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2008). Argumentation in Science
Education. Florida State University-USA: Spinger.
Etkina, E. (2010). “Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Preparation of High
School Physics Teachers”. The American Physical Society. Physical
Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research. 6, (2), January 2010.
Fensham, P. J. et al. (1994). The Content of Science: A Contructivist Approach to
its Teaching & Learning. Washington DC: The Falmer Press.
Garratt, J., Overton, T. & Threlfall, T. (1999). A Question of Chemistry: Creative
Muslim, 2014
PENGEMBANGAN PROGRAM PERKULIAHAN FISIKA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI KEMAMPUAN
BERARGUMENTASI CALON GURU FISIKA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
183
Problems for Critical Thinkers. Harlow, UK: Pearson.
Griffin, P., McGraw, B. & Care, E. (2012). Assessment and Teaching of 21st
Century Skills . Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer
Hake, R.R (1998). “Interactive-Engagement versus Traditional Methods: A SixThousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory
Physics Courses”. American Journal Physics. 66, (1), January 1998.
Hannon, V. (2009). A New Paradigm for Learning Innovation in The 21st.
Century. Centre for Strategic Education. Victoria.
Herron, J. Dudley. (1977). “Problems Associated With Concept Analysis”.
Journal of Science Education. 61, (2), 185-199.
Inch, E. S., & Warnick, B., Endres, D. (2006). Critical Thinking and
Communication (5th Ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Jamaludin, A., Caloline, H.M.L., and San, C.Y. (2007). “The Impact of Structured
Argumentation and Enactive Role Play on students’ Argumentative
Writing Skills”. Proceeding Ascilite Singapore 2007.
Jumadi. (2003). Wawasan Keilmuan IPA/Fisika. Makalah Disajikan pada
Pelatihan PKG-C yang Diselenggarakan oleh Dinas Pendidikan Propinsi
DIY pada Tanggal 28 Juni sampai dengan 3 Juli 2003 di Yogyakarta.
[Online]. Tersedia: http://staff.uny.ac.id/system/files/pengabdian/jumadimpd-dr/wawasan-keilmuan-ipa.pdf (15 September 2012).
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2013). Rasional Kurikulum 2013.
Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2013). Elemen Perubahan Kurikulum
2013. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Keraf, G. (1981). Argumentasi dan Narasi. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Kolsto, S. D., & Ratcliffe, M. (2008). Social Aspects of Argumentation. In S.
Erduran & M.P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in Science
Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research (pp.114-133).
Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Kozulin, A. (2004). “Vygotsky's Theory in The Classroom”. European Journal of
Psychology of Education. XIX , (13), 3 -7.
Muslim, 2014
PENGEMBANGAN PROGRAM PERKULIAHAN FISIKA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI KEMAMPUAN
BERARGUMENTASI CALON GURU FISIKA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
184
Kuhn, D. (1993). “Science Argument: Implications for Teaching and Learning
Scientific Thinking”. Science Education. 77, (3), 319-337.
Lamb, K. L. (1998). “Test-retest Reliability in Quantitative Physical Education
Research”. European Physical Education Review. (4), 145-152.
Lee, E., & Luft, J. (2008). “Experienced Secondary Science Teachers’
Representation of Pedagogical Content Knowledge”. International Journal
of Science Education. 30, (10), 1343 – 1363.
Lewis, J., & Leach, J. (2006). “Discussion of Socioscientific Issues: The Role of
Science Knowledge. International Journal of Science Education. 28, (11),
1267-1287.
Luft, J. A., & Patterson, N. C. (2002). “Bridging The Gap: Supporting Beginning
Science Teachers” .Journal of Science Teacher Education. (13), 267–282.
Maloney, J., & Simon, S. (2006). “Mapping Children’s Discussion of Evidence in
Science to Assess Collaboration and Argumentation”. International
Journal of Science Education. 28, (15), 1817-1841.
Manurung, S.R. (2013). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Dengan Media
Hiperteks Berdasarkan Skema Pemecahan Masalah Berintikan
Argumentasi Toulmin. Disertasi Doktor pada Sekolah Pascasarjana
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: tidak diterbitkan.
Marttunen, M., Leena, L., Litosseliti, L., & Lund, K. (2005), “Argumenation
Skills as Prerequisites for Collaborative Learning among Finnish, French,
and English Secondary School Students”. Educational Research and
Evaluation. 11, (4), 365–384.
Matlock, S & Hetzel. (1997). Basic Concepts in Item and Test Analysis. Paper
presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research
Association, Austin, January 1997.
McAlister, S.R. (2001). Argumentation and A Design for Learning. [Online].
Tersedia:
http://İet.Open.Ac.Uk/Pp/S.R.Mcalister/Personal/197.Pdf
[21 Oktober 2011].
McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., & Krajcik, J. (2006). “Supporting Students’
Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Scaffolds in
Instructional Materials”. The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 15, (2),
153-191.
Muslim, 2014
PENGEMBANGAN PROGRAM PERKULIAHAN FISIKA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI KEMAMPUAN
BERARGUMENTASI CALON GURU FISIKA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
185
McNeill, K. L. (2009). “Teachers’ Use of Curriculum to Support Students in
Writing Scientific Arguments to Explain Phenomena”. Journal of Science
Education. (93), 223-268.
McNeill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. S. (2010). “Scientific Discourse in Three Urban
Classrooms: The Role of The Teacher in Engaging High School Students
in Argumentation”. Journal of Science Education. 9, (2), 203 – 229.
McNeill, K. L., Knight, A. M. (2013). “Teachers’ Pedagogical Content
Knowledge of Scientific Argumentation: The Impact of Professional
Development on K–12 Teachers”. Journal of Science Education. 97, (6),
936-972.
Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. B. (2008). “Deliberative Discourse
Idealized and Realized: Accountable Talk in The Classroom and in Civic
Life”. Studies in Philosophy and Education. 27, (4), 283 – 297.
Montaña, G., González, J., & Castillo, F.D. (2012). Argumentation in the Science
Classroom. [Online]. Tersedia: http://ikit.org/SummerInstitute2012/
Papers/2998-Gonzalez.pdf (20 November 2011).
Muslim. (2011). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Sekolah untuk
Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Kemampuan Berargumentasi
Calon Guru Fisika. Laporan Penelitian Hibah Disertasi Doktor.
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: tidak diterbitkan.
Nasional Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards.
Washington DC: National Academy Press.
National Science Teachers Association. (2003). Standards for Science Teacher
Preparation.
Newton, P. (1999). “The Place of Argumentation in The Pedagogy of School
Science”. International Journal of Science Education. 21, (5), 553-576.
Niaz, M. et al. (2002). “Arguments, Contradictions, Resistances and Conceptual
Change in Students’ Understanding of Atomic Structure”. Science
Education. 86, (4), 505-525.
Nussbaum, E.M. & Sinatra, G.M. (2003). Argument and Conceptual Engagement.
Contemporary Educational Psychology. (28), 384-395.
Muslim, 2014
PENGEMBANGAN PROGRAM PERKULIAHAN FISIKA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI KEMAMPUAN
BERARGUMENTASI CALON GURU FISIKA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
186
Nussbaum, E.M. (2008). Collaborative Discourse, Argumentation and Learning:
Preface and Literature Review. Contemporary Educational Psychology.
(33), 345–359.
OECD/UNESCO-UIS. (2003). Literacy Skill for the World of Tomorrow: Further
results from PISA 2000. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.oecd.org/
publications. (10 Juni 2011).
Oluwatayo, J.A. (2012). “Validity and Reliability Issues in Educational
Research”. Journal of Educational and Social Research. 2, (2), May 2012.
Ormrod, J. E. (2008). Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development. [Online].
Tersedia:
http://people.uncw.edu/caropresoe/EDN203/203_Fall_07/
Chapter%202_edit2.ppt (25 September 2012).
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., Simon, S and Monk, M. (2001). Enhancing The Quality
of Argument in School Science. School Science Review.
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). “Enhancing The Quality of
Argumentation in School Science”. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching. 41, (10), 994-1020.
Osborne, J. (2007). “Science Education for the Twenty First Century”. Eurasia
Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. 3, (3), 173184.
Park, S., & Oliver, S. (2008). “Revisiting the Conceptualisation of Pedagogical
Content Knowledge (PCK): PCK as a Conceptual Tool to Understand
Teachers as Professionals”. Research in Science Education. 38, 261 – 284.
Piaget, J. (1985). The Equilibration of Cognitive Structures. Chicago: University
of Chicago Press.
Riduwan. (2012). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian. Bandung:
Alfabeta.
Riemeier, T. et al. (2009). The Quality Of Students’ Argumentation And Their
Conceptual Understanding – An Exploration Of Their Interrelationship.
Paper presented at ESERA 2009 Conference. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem
Akademi.
Roshayanti, F. (2012). Pengembangan Model Asesmen Argumentatif untuk
Mengukur Keterampilan Argumentasi Mahasiswa Pada Konsep Fisiologi
Manusia. Disertasi Doktor pada Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas
Pendidikan Indonesia: tidak diterbitkan.
Muslim, 2014
PENGEMBANGAN PROGRAM PERKULIAHAN FISIKA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI KEMAMPUAN
BERARGUMENTASI CALON GURU FISIKA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
187
Rustaman, N.Y. (2012). Trend Penelitian Pendidikan: Kasus Penelitian
Pendidikan Sains. Proceeding Seminar Nasional IPA III Tahun 2012Peningkatan Kompetensi Profesionalisme Guru Sains Berkelanjutan
Melalui Penelitian dan Publikasi Ilmiah. Prodi Pendidikan IPA FMIPA
Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). “The Significance of Content Knowledge
for Informal Reasoning Regarding Socioscientific Issues”: Applying
Genetics Knowledge to Genetic Engineering Issues”. Science Education.
(89), 71-93.
Sadler, T. D. (2006). “Promoting Discourse and Argumentation in Science
Teacher Education”. Journal of Science Teacher Education. (17), 323-346.
Sagir, S.U., & Kihc, Z. (2012). “Analysis of the Contribution of ArgumentationBased Science Teaching on Student Success and Retention”. Eurasian
Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education. 4, (2), 139-156.
Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of The Ways Students Generate
Arguments in Science Education: Current Perspectives and
Recommendations for Future Directions.
Sampson, V. & Gerbino, F. (2010). “Two Instructional Models That Teachers
Can Use to Promote and Support Scientific Argumentation in the Biology
Classroom”. The American Biology Teacher. 72, (7), 427-431.
She, H.C. & Liao, Y.W. (2010). “Bridging Scientific Reasoning and Conceptual
Change through Adaptive Web-based Learning”. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching. 47, (1), 91-119.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in
Teaching”. Educational Researcher. 15, (2), 4 – 14.
Siegel, H. (1989). “The Rationality of Science, Critical Thinking and Science
Education”. Synthese. 80, ( 1), 9-42.
Simon, S., Erduran, S. & Osborne, J. (2006). “Learning to Teach Argumentation:
Research and Development in The Science Classroom”. International
Journal of Science Education. 28, (2), 235-260.
Simon, S. (2008). “Using Toulmin's Argument Pattern in The Evaluation of
Argumentation in School Science. International Journal of Research &
Method in Education. 31, (3), 277-289.
Muslim, 2014
PENGEMBANGAN PROGRAM PERKULIAHAN FISIKA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI KEMAMPUAN
BERARGUMENTASI CALON GURU FISIKA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
188
Slavin, R.E. (1994). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice. 5th Edition.
Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Solomon, J., Duveen, J. & Scott, L. (1992). Exploring The Nature of Science:
Key Stage 4. Hatfield, UK: Association for Science Education.
Suparno, P. (2010). Filsafat Konstruktivisme Dalam Pendidikan.Yogyakarta:
Kanisius.
Suyatno. (2010). Peran Pendidikan Sebagai Modal Utama Membangun Karakter
Bangsa. Makalah disampaikan dalam Sarasehan Nasional “Pengembangan
Pendidikan Budaya dan Karakter Bangsa” oleh Kopertis Wilayah 3 DKI
Jakarta, 12 Januari 2010. [Online]. Tersedia: http://anannur. blogspot.com
/2011/02/peran-pendidikan-sebagai-modal-utama.html. (12 Oktober 2012).
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D.S., & Semmel, M. (1974). Instructional Development
for Training Teachers of Exeptional Children. Source Book. Bloominton:
Center for Innovation on teaching the Handicapped.
Toulmin, S. (1969). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press
Trent, R. (2009). “Fostering Students’ Argumentation Skills in Geoscience
Education”. Journal of Geoscience Education. 5, (1), 224-232.
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. (2010). Re-Desain Pendidikan Profesional
Guru. Bandung: UPI Press.
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. (2011). Kurikulum Universitas Pendidikan
Indonesia Tahun 2011. Bandung: UPI Press.
Uyanto, S.S. (2009). Pedoman Analisis Data dengan SPSS. Yogyakarta: Graha
Ilmu.
Venville, G., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). “Exploring Conceptual Change in
Genetics”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 35, (9), 1031-1055.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). “Mind in Society: The Development of Higher
Psychological Processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E.
Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wenning, C. J. (2006). “A Framework for Teaching The Nature of Science.”
Journal of Physics Teacher Education. 3, (3), 3-10.
Muslim, 2014
PENGEMBANGAN PROGRAM PERKULIAHAN FISIKA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI KEMAMPUAN
BERARGUMENTASI CALON GURU FISIKA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
189
Wheatley, G.H. (1991). “Constructivist Perspectivists on Science and
Mathematics Learning”. Science Education. 75, (1), 9-22.
Xie, Q and Mui So, W.W. (2012). Understanding and practice of argumentation:
A pilot study with Mainland Chinese pre-service teachers in secondary
science classrooms. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and
Teaching.
Yan, X. & Erduran, S. (2008). “Arguing Online: Case Studies of Pre-Service
Science Teachers’ Perceptions of Online Tools in Supporting The
Learning of Argument’s”. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 5, (3),
2-31.
Yu Chi, C.et al. (2010). Content Analysis of Argumentation in Middle School
Science Textbooks in Korea, Mainland China, and Taiwan. EASE: East
Asian Association Science Education.
Zohar, A. & Nemet. F. (2002). “Fostering Student’s Knowledge and
Argumentation Skills through Dilemmas in Human Genetics”. Journal of
Research in Science Teaching. 39, (1), 35-62.
Zhou, G. (2010). “Conceptual Change in Science: A Process of Argumentation.
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. 6, (2),
101-110.
Muslim, 2014
PENGEMBANGAN PROGRAM PERKULIAHAN FISIKA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI KEMAMPUAN
BERARGUMENTASI CALON GURU FISIKA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu