Mekanisme Pengisian Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Menurut UUD 1945 Amandemen Ke III.
MEKANISME PENGISIAN HAKIM MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI
MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR 1945 AMANDEMEN
KE III
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini dilatar belakangi oleh pencalonan hakim Mahkamah
Konstitusi dari Presiden yang disinyalir tidak transparansi dan partisipatif.
Berangkat dari latar belakang tersebut, penelitian ini bermaksud untuk
mengetahui mekanisme pencalonan hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi dari
Presiden, DPR, Mahkamah Agung serta untuk mengetahui makna
penetapan hakim konstitusi oleh Presiden menurut UUD 1945
AmandemenKe III.
Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan
spesifikasi dengan penelitian deskriptif analitis. Penelitian ini juga
membandingkan mekanisme pencalonan hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi dari
Presiden, DPR, dan Mahkamah Agung. Teknikpengumpulan data yang
digunakan berupa studi kepustakaan (library research) untuk
mendapatkan data-data sekunder berupa bahan hukum primer maupun
bahan hukum sekunder yang dianalisa secara kualitatif untuk menjawab
identifikasi masalah yang diajukan.
Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pengaruh atau pertimbangan
politis dalam pengangkatan hakim tergantung pada peranan lembagalembaga yang mengangkat tersebut. Adanya peranan lembaga-lembaga
tertentu dalam melakukan seleksi calon hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi
dianggap sangat penting untuk membatasi pertimbangan politis yang
dianggap subjektif dalam pemilihan hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut.
Sedangkan makna dari Presiden menurut UUD 1945 Amandemen Ke III
merupakan kewenangan Presiden selaku kepala pemerintahan yang tidak
boleh di campuri oleh kekuasaan lembaga tinggi negara lainnya.
Kata kunci : UUD 1945 amandemen ke III, pertimbangan politis,
penetapan, kewenangan Presiden.
IV
CHARGING MECHANISM FORTHE CONSTITUTIONAL
COURT JUDGES UNDER THE THIRD AMENDMENT OF THE
1945 CONSTITUTION
ABSTRACT
This research is motivated by the nomination of the President of
the Constitutional Court judges are allegedly no transparency and
participatory. Departing from this background this study intends to
determine the mechanism of Constitutional Court judges nomination of the
President, Parliament, and Supreme of Court and to know determination
of the meaning of the constitutional judges by the President under the third
amendment of the 1945 constitution.
This study uses a normative juridical approach to the specification
descriptive analytical study. This study also compand the mechanism of
Constitutional Court judges nomination of element President, Parliament
and the Supreme of Court. Data collection techniques used in the form of
literature study to obtain data in the form of secondary data and the
primary legal materials of secondary law qualitative analyzed to identifity
problems that are taught to answer.
This study concludes that the influence or political considerations
in the appointment of judges depends on the rule of institutions that raised
it. The rule of institutions certain agencies in carrying out the selection of
candidates for Constitutional Court judges considered very important no to
limit the political considerations that are considered subjective in the
selection of judges of the Constitutional Court. While the determination of
Costitutional Court judge by the President according to the 1945 for the
third amandement means nothing other that a state agency an title to the
President for the authority. While the significance of the President under
the 1945 Constitution Amendment III is the authority of the President as
head of government should not be interfered by other state institutions of
higher power .
Keywords : The third amendment of the 1945 constitution, political
considerations,esthablisment, the President of authority
V
MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR 1945 AMANDEMEN
KE III
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini dilatar belakangi oleh pencalonan hakim Mahkamah
Konstitusi dari Presiden yang disinyalir tidak transparansi dan partisipatif.
Berangkat dari latar belakang tersebut, penelitian ini bermaksud untuk
mengetahui mekanisme pencalonan hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi dari
Presiden, DPR, Mahkamah Agung serta untuk mengetahui makna
penetapan hakim konstitusi oleh Presiden menurut UUD 1945
AmandemenKe III.
Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan
spesifikasi dengan penelitian deskriptif analitis. Penelitian ini juga
membandingkan mekanisme pencalonan hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi dari
Presiden, DPR, dan Mahkamah Agung. Teknikpengumpulan data yang
digunakan berupa studi kepustakaan (library research) untuk
mendapatkan data-data sekunder berupa bahan hukum primer maupun
bahan hukum sekunder yang dianalisa secara kualitatif untuk menjawab
identifikasi masalah yang diajukan.
Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pengaruh atau pertimbangan
politis dalam pengangkatan hakim tergantung pada peranan lembagalembaga yang mengangkat tersebut. Adanya peranan lembaga-lembaga
tertentu dalam melakukan seleksi calon hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi
dianggap sangat penting untuk membatasi pertimbangan politis yang
dianggap subjektif dalam pemilihan hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut.
Sedangkan makna dari Presiden menurut UUD 1945 Amandemen Ke III
merupakan kewenangan Presiden selaku kepala pemerintahan yang tidak
boleh di campuri oleh kekuasaan lembaga tinggi negara lainnya.
Kata kunci : UUD 1945 amandemen ke III, pertimbangan politis,
penetapan, kewenangan Presiden.
IV
CHARGING MECHANISM FORTHE CONSTITUTIONAL
COURT JUDGES UNDER THE THIRD AMENDMENT OF THE
1945 CONSTITUTION
ABSTRACT
This research is motivated by the nomination of the President of
the Constitutional Court judges are allegedly no transparency and
participatory. Departing from this background this study intends to
determine the mechanism of Constitutional Court judges nomination of the
President, Parliament, and Supreme of Court and to know determination
of the meaning of the constitutional judges by the President under the third
amendment of the 1945 constitution.
This study uses a normative juridical approach to the specification
descriptive analytical study. This study also compand the mechanism of
Constitutional Court judges nomination of element President, Parliament
and the Supreme of Court. Data collection techniques used in the form of
literature study to obtain data in the form of secondary data and the
primary legal materials of secondary law qualitative analyzed to identifity
problems that are taught to answer.
This study concludes that the influence or political considerations
in the appointment of judges depends on the rule of institutions that raised
it. The rule of institutions certain agencies in carrying out the selection of
candidates for Constitutional Court judges considered very important no to
limit the political considerations that are considered subjective in the
selection of judges of the Constitutional Court. While the determination of
Costitutional Court judge by the President according to the 1945 for the
third amandement means nothing other that a state agency an title to the
President for the authority. While the significance of the President under
the 1945 Constitution Amendment III is the authority of the President as
head of government should not be interfered by other state institutions of
higher power .
Keywords : The third amendment of the 1945 constitution, political
considerations,esthablisment, the President of authority
V