19.0 within Motivasi Kerja 10.5 26.3 63.2 100.0 Total Count 3 14 13 30 Expected Count 3.0 14.0 13.0 30.0 within Motivasi Kerja 10.0 46.7 43.3 100.0 - Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Motivasi Kerja Penyuluh Pertanian di Kabupaten Karo

  Lampiran 1. Hasil Uji Chi-Square untuk Penyuluh Pertanian PNS Kabupaten Karo Motivasi Kerja * Kematangan Pribadi Crosstab Kematangan Pribadi Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi

  14.0

  19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 10.5% 26.3% 63.2% 100.0%

  Total Count

  3

  14

  13

  30 Expected Count

  3.0

  13.0

  8.9

  30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 10.0% 46.7% 43.3% 100.0%

  Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 12.019

a

  4 .017 Likelihood Ratio 13.667 4 .008 Linear-by-Linear Association 5.459 1 .019 N of Valid Cases

  

30

  Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.

  Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .535 .017

  N of Valid Cases

  30

  8.2

  1.9

  Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count

  7

  1

  2

  3 Expected Count .3

  1.4

  1.3

  3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 33.3% 66.7% .0% 100.0%

  Sedang Count

  1

  19 Expected Count

  8 Expected Count .8

  3.7

  3.5

  8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%

  Tinggi Count

  2

  5

  12

a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,30.

  Motivasi Kerja * Tingkat Pendidikan Crosstab Tingkat Pendidikan Total Rendah Tinggi

  19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 21.1% 78.9% 100.0% Total Count

  30

  N of Valid Cases

  Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .275 .292

  Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.

  30

  2 .292 Likelihood Ratio 3.658 2 .161 Linear-by-Linear Association .057 1 .811 N of Valid Cases

  Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 2.463 a

  30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 16.7% 83.3% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests

  25.0

  5.0

  30 Expected Count

  25

  5

  15.8

  Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count

  3.2

  19 Expected Count

  15

  4

  8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 100.0% 100.0% Tinggi Count

  6.7

  1.3

  8 Expected Count

  8

  3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% Sedang Count

  2.5

  3 Expected Count .5

  2

  1

a. 4 cells (66,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,50.

  Motivasi Kerja * Kelelahan dan Kebosanan Crosstab Kelelahan dan Kebosanan Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi

  4.0

  Total Count

  7

  19

  4

  30 Expected Count

  7.0

  19.0

  30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 23.3% 63.3% 13.3% 100.0%

  2.5

  Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 3.101 a

  4 .541 Likelihood Ratio 4.585 4 .333 Linear-by-Linear Association .394 1 .530 N of Valid Cases

  30

  Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.

  Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .306 .541

  N of Valid Cases

  30

  19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 26.3% 57.9% 15.8% 100.0%

  12.0

  Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count

  8 Expected Count

  2

  1

  3 Expected Count .7 1.9 .4

  3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

  Sedang Count

  2

  6

  1.9

  4.4

  5.1

  1.1

  8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 25.0% 75.0% .0% 100.0%

  Tinggi Count

  5

  11

  3

  19 Expected Count

a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,40.

  Motivasi Kerja * Keinginan Crosstab Keinginan Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi

  17.0

  19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 5.3% 78.9% 15.8% 100.0%

  Total Count

  8

  17

  5

  30 Expected Count

  8.0

  5.0

  10.8

  30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 26.7% 56.7% 16.7% 100.0%

  Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 14.465 a

  4 .006 Likelihood Ratio 16.098 4 .003 Linear-by-Linear Association 5.318 1 .021 N of Valid Cases

  30

  Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.

  Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .570 .006

  N of Valid Cases

  30

  3.2

  5.1

  Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count

  2

  2

  1

  3 Expected Count .8 1.7 .5

  3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 66.7% 33.3% .0% 100.0%

  Sedang Count

  5

  1

  8 Expected Count

  19 Expected Count

  2.1

  4.5

  1.3

  8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 62.5% 12.5% 25.0% 100.0%

  Tinggi Count

  1

  15

  3

a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,50.

  Motivasi Kerja * Kepuasan Kerja Crosstab Kepuasan Kerja Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi

  13.0

  7.0

  19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 15.8% 31.6% 52.6% 100.0%

  Total Count

  6

  13

  11

  30 Expected Count

  6.0

  11.0

  3.8

  30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 20.0% 43.3% 36.7% 100.0%

  Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 9.881

a

  4 .042 Likelihood Ratio 9.795 4 .044 Linear-by-Linear Association 5.343 1 .021 N of Valid Cases

  

30

  Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.

  Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient

  .498 .042 N of Valid Cases

  30

  8.2

  19 Expected Count

  Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count

  6

  2

  1

  3 Expected Count .6

  1.3

  1.1

  3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 66.7% 33.3% .0% 100.0%

  Sedang Count

  1

  1

  10

  8 Expected Count

  1.6

  3.5

  2.9

  8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 12.5% 75.0% 12.5% 100.0%

  Tinggi Count

  3

  6

a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,60.

  Motivasi Kerja * Kompensasi Crosstab Kompensasi Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi

  15.0

  19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 10.5% 36.8% 52.6% 100.0%

  Total Count

  5

  15

  10

  30 Expected Count

  5.0

  10.0

  9.5

  30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 16.7% 50.0% 33.3% 100.0%

  Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 13.877

a

  4 .008 Likelihood Ratio 15.015 4 .005 Linear-by-Linear Association 8.175 1 .004 N of Valid Cases

  

30

  Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.

  Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .562 .008

  N of Valid Cases

  30

  6.3

  3.2

  Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count

  7

  2

  1

  3 Expected Count .5

  1.5

  1.0

  3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 66.7% 33.3% .0% 100.0%

  Sedang Count

  1

  8 Expected Count

  19 Expected Count

  1.3

  4.0

  2.7

  8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 12.5% 87.5% .0% 100.0%

  Tinggi Count

  2

  7

  10

a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,50.

  Motivasi Kerja * Peraturan Crosstab Peraturan Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi

  4.0

  19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 26.3% 10.5% 63.2% 100.0%

  Total Count

  6

  4

  20

  30 Expected Count

  6.0

  20.0

  2.5

  30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 20.0% 13.3% 66.7% 100.0%

  Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 2.339 a

  4 .674 Likelihood Ratio 2.678 4 .613 Linear-by-Linear Association .673 1 .412 N of Valid Cases

  30

  Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.

  Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .269 .674

  N of Valid Cases

  30

  12.7

  3.8

  Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count

  6

  1

  2

  3 Expected Count .6 .4

  2.0

  3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

  Sedang Count

  1

  1

  8 Expected Count

  19 Expected Count

  1.6

  1.1

  5.3

  8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 12.5% 12.5% 75.0% 100.0%

  Tinggi Count

  5

  2

  12

a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,40.

  Lampiran 2. Hasil Uji Chi-Square untuk Penyuluh Pertanian THL-TB PP Kabupaten Karo Motivasi Kerja * Kematangan Pribadi Crosstab Kematangan Pribadi Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi

  4.0

  Total Count

  5

  21

  4

  30 Expected Count

  5.0

  21.0

  30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 16.7% 70.0% 13.3% 100.0%

  2.5

  Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 9.890 a

  4 .042 Likelihood Ratio 10.629 4 .031 Linear-by-Linear Association 2.998 1 .083 N of Valid Cases

  30

  Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.

  Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .498 .042

  N of Valid Cases

  30

  19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 15.8% 63.2% 21.1% 100.0%

  13.3

  Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count

  1.3

  2

  1

  3 Expected Count .5 2.1 .4

  3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 66.7% 33.3% .0% 100.0%

  Sedang Count

  8

  8 Expected Count

  5.6

  3.2

  1.1

  8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 100.0% .0% 100.0%

  Tinggi Count

  3

  12

  4

  19 Expected Count

a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,40.

  Motivasi Kerja * Tingkat Pendidikan Crosstab Tingkat Pendidikan Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi

  22.0

  6

  2

  22

  30 Expected Count

  6.0

  2.0

  30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 20.0% 6.7% 73.3% 100.0%

  19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 26.3% 10.5% 63.2% 100.0%

  Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided) Pearson Chi-Square 4.466 a

  4 .347 Likelihood Ratio 6.589 4 .159 Linear-by-Linear Association .710 1 .399 N of Valid Cases

  30

  Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.

  Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .360 .347

  N of Valid Cases

  30

  Total Count

  13.9

  Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count

  8 Expected Count 1.6 .5

  1

  2

  3 Expected Count .6 .2

  2.2

  3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 33.3% .0% 66.7% 100.0%

  Sedang Count

  8

  5.9

  1.3

  8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% .0% 100.0% 100.0%

  Tinggi Count

  5

  2

  12

  19 Expected Count

  3.8

a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,20.

  Motivasi Kerja * Kelelahan dan Kebosanan Crosstab Kelelahan dan Kebosanan

  5.0

  Total Count

  4

  21

  5

  30 Expected Count

  4.0

  21.0

  30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 13.3% 70.0% 16.7% 100.0%

  3.2

  Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 3.422 a

  4 .490 Likelihood Ratio 4.864 4 .302 Linear-by-Linear Association .052 1 .819 N of Valid Cases

  30

  Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.

  Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .320 .490

  N of Valid Cases

  30

  19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 10.5% 68.4% 21.1% 100.0%

  13.3

  Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count

  8 Expected Count

  2

  1

  3 Expected Count .4 2.1 .5

  3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

  Sedang Count

  2

  6

  1.1

  2.5

  5.6

  1.3

  8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 25.0% 75.0% .0% 100.0%

  Tinggi Count

  2

  13

  4

  19 Expected Count

a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,40.

  Motivasi Kerja * Keinginan Crosstab Keinginan Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi

  17.0

  Total Count

  2

  11

  17

  30 Expected Count

  2.0

  11.0

  30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 6.7% 36.7% 56.7% 100.0%

  10.8

  Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 23.210 a

  4 .000 Likelihood Ratio 15.912 4 .003 Linear-by-Linear Association 11.985 1 .001 N of Valid Cases

  30

  Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.

  Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .660 .000

  N of Valid Cases

  30

  19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 26.3% 73.7% 100.0%

  7.0

  Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count

  5

  2

  1

  3 Expected Count .2

  1.1

  1.7

  3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 66.7% 33.3% .0% 100.0%

  Sedang Count

  3

  1.3

  8 Expected Count .5

  2.9

  4.5

  8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 62.5% 37.5% 100.0%

  Tinggi Count

  5

  14

  19 Expected Count

a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,20.

  Motivasi Kerja * Kepuasan Kerja Crosstab Kepuasan Kerja Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi

  14.0

  19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 21.1% 26.3% 52.6% 100.0%

  Total Count

  4

  14

  12

  30 Expected Count

  4.0

  12.0

  8.9

  30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 13.3% 46.7% 40.0% 100.0%

  Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 9.615 a

  4 .047 Likelihood Ratio 11.801 4 .019 Linear-by-Linear Association .467 1 .495 N of Valid Cases

  30

  Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.

  Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .493 .047

  N of Valid Cases

  30

  7.6

  2.5

  Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count

  2

  3

  3 Expected Count .4

  1.4

  1.2

  3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 100.0% .0% 100.0%

  Sedang Count

  6

  8 Expected Count

  19 Expected Count

  1.1

  3.7

  3.2

  8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 75.0% 25.0% 100.0%

  Tinggi Count

  4

  5

  10

a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,40.

  Motivasi Kerja * Kompensasi Crosstab Kompensasi Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi

  30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 3.3% 73.3% 23.3% 100.0%

  22

  7

  30 Expected Count

  1.0

  22.0

  7.0

  Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 14.115

a

  Total Count

  4 .007 Likelihood Ratio 11.996 4 .017 Linear-by-Linear Association 7.296 1 .007 N of Valid Cases

  

30

  Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.

  Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient

  .566 .007 N of Valid Cases

  30

  1

  19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 63.2% 36.8% 100.0%

  Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count

  8 Expected Count .3

  1

  2

  3 Expected Count .1 2.2 .7

  3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 33.3% 66.7% .0% 100.0%

  Sedang Count

  8

  5.9

  4.4

  1.9

  8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 100.0% .0% 100.0%

  Tinggi Count

  12

  7

  19 Expected Count .6

  13.9

a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,10.

  Motivasi Kerja * Peraturan Crosstab Peraturan Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi

  24.0

  4

  2

  24

  30 Expected Count

  4.0

  2.0

  30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 13.3% 6.7% 80.0% 100.0%

  19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 21.1% 5.3% 73.7% 100.0%

  Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 3.281

a

  4 .512 Likelihood Ratio 4.729 4 .316 Linear-by-Linear Association 1.974 1 .160 N of Valid Cases

  

30

  Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.

  Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .314 .512

  N of Valid Cases

  30

  Total Count

  15.2

  Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count

  8 Expected Count 1.1 .5

  3

  3 Expected Count .4 .2

  2.4

  3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% .0% 100.0% 100.0%

  Sedang Count

  1

  7

  6.4

  1.3

  8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 12.5% 87.5% 100.0%

  Tinggi Count

  4

  1

  14

  19 Expected Count

  2.5

a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,20.

   Pertanian PNS di Kabupaten Karo

1. Data Faktor Kematangan Pribadi Penyuluh Pertanian PNS di Kabupaten Karo No. Resp Gangguan kesehatan Masa kerja Ilmu Pengetahuan Faktor Lingkungan Pesta Adat Jumlah Score 1.

  3

  3 22.

  4

  3

  19

  2 21.

  4

  3

  4

  5

  5

  21

  4

  4

  4

  4

  5

  4

  21

  3 23.

  4

  3

  4

  5

  4

  4

  21

  4

  1

  16

  2 17.

  5

  4

  3

  5

  4

  21

  3 18.

  3

  3 20.

  4

  5

  5

  21

  3 19.

  3

  4

  4

  5

  5

  21

  5

  3 24.

  3

  5

  5

  4

  3

  5

  5

  22

  3 29.

  4

  3

  4

  5

  17

  21

  3 30.

  4

  3

  4

  5

  1

  17

  2 Score : Rendah = 10-15 Sedang = 16-20

  Tinggi = ˃ 20

  2 28.

  3

  4

  1

  3

  3

  3

  3

  16

  2 25.

  4

  3

  2

  3

  13

  4

  1 26.

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  14

  1 27.

  4

  3

  3

  5

  3

  3

  21

  3

  4

  2

  17

  2 6.

  5

  4

  3

  4

  5

  3 7.

  4

  4

  4

  2

  5

  1

  16

  2 8.

  5

  4

  3

  4

  3 5.

  3

  2 3.

  3

  3

  16

  2 2.

  4

  3

  2

  3

  5

  17

  4

  21

  3

  3

  4

  2

  16

  2 4.

  4

  4

  3

  5

  5

  4

  19

  4

  3

  1 13.

  4

  3

  2

  3

  4

  16

  2 14.

  4

  4

  5

  2

  1

  17

  2 15.

  4

  4

  4

  5

  4

  21

  3 16.

  15

  3

  2 9.

  5

  3

  3

  3

  3

  4

  16

  2 10.

  5

  4

  3

  4

  3

  21

  3 11.

  5

  3

  4

  5

  4

  21

  3 12.

  4

  3

  4

2. Data Faktor Tingkat Pendidikan Penyuluh Pertanian PNS di Kabupaten Karo No. Resp Tingkat Pendidikan Score 1.

  2

  5

  3 19.

  4

  3 20.

  4

  3 21.

  4

  3 22.

  4

  3 23.

  4

  3 24.

  2 25.

  4

  2

  2 26.

  1

  3 27.

  1

  1 28.

  1

  1 29.

  3

  3 30.

  1

  1 Score : Rendah = 1 Sedang = 2-3

  Tinggi = 4-5

  3 18.

  4

  3 2.

  3 9.

  4

  3 3.

  4

  3 4.

  4

  3 5.

  4

  3 6.

  4

  3 7.

  4

  3 8.

  4

  1

  4

  1 10.

  4

  3 11.

  4

  3 12.

  4

  3 13.

  4

  3 14.

  1

  1 15.

  4

  3 16.

  3 17.

3. Data Faktor Kelelahan dan Kebosanan Penyuluh Pertanian PNS di Kabupaten Karo

  4

  3

  2

  3

  12

  2 21.

  4

  3

  5

  16

  2 20.

  3 22.

  4

  4

  2

  5

  15

  3 23.

  4

  4

  4

  12

  3

  9

  2

  4

  12

  2 17.

  4

  2

  1

  2

  1 18.

  3

  4

  4

  2

  2

  12

  2 19.

  4

  2

  3

  2

  13

  4

  2

  5

  1

  5

  3

  14

  2 29.

  4

  3

  4

  15

  13

  2 30.

  4

  3

  3

  4

  14

  2 Score : Rendah = 9-14 Sedang = 12-14

  Tinggi = ˃ 14

  3 28.

  3

  2 24.

  2

  5

  3

  3

  4

  15

  2 25.

  4

  3

  2

  11

  4

  1 26.

  4

  3

  3

  2

  12

  2 27.

  4

  4

  2

  No. Resp Kebijakan Pimpinan

  Jam Kerja Dinas

  4

  14

  2 5.

  4

  3

  1

  4

  12

  2 6.

  3

  2

  3

  3

  13

  2 7.

  4

  3

  1

  4

  12

  3

  5

  4

  2

  Jam Kerja diluar Dinas Pekerjaan sebagai Penyuluh

  Jumlah Score 1.

  4

  3

  5

  2

  14

  2 2.

  4

  1

  4

  3

  10

  1 3.

  4

  3

  1

  3

  11

  1 4.

  2 8.

  2

  11

  2 14.

  1

  12

  2 13.

  4

  4

  2

  2

  12

  4

  3

  3

  2

  2

  11

  1 15.

  4

  2

  2

  3

  4

  4

  2

  4

  5

  13

  2 9.

  5

  4

  3

  4

  16

  2 10.

  5

  1 12.

  5

  3

  17

  3 11.

  4

  2

  2

  2

  10

  1 16. No.Resp Penghasi lan Pengelu aran

  Benda yg dibutuhkan Perlengkapan kerja

  4

  5

  3

  3

  1

  5

  1

  23

  1 21.

  4

  4

  5

  5

  4

  5

  31

  2 20.

  3 22.

  5

  5

  1

  5

  4

  5

  2

  27

  2 23.

  5

  5

  5

  5

  5

  28

  5

  26

  5

  5

  3

  5

  5

  31

  3 17.

  3

  3

  2

  5

  3

  5

  5

  2 18.

  2

  1 19.

  5

  5

  5

  5

  3

  3

  24

  2

  2

  5

  3

  5

  5

  2

  3

  3

  4

  5

  26

  2 28.

  4

  4

  5

  5

  3

  5

  2

  28

  2 29.

  4

  4

  5

  2

  5

  5

  2

  27

  2 30.

  4

  4

  5

  5

  2

  5

  2

  27

  2 Score : Rendah = 21-24

  Sedang = 25-28 Tinggi =

  4

  3

  31

  1

  3 24.

  4

  4

  5

  4

  1

  5

  2

  25

  2 25.

  4

  4

  5

  3

  5

  5

  5

  3

  3

  3

  3 27.

  30

  4

  5

  4

  5

  5

  3

  3

  2 26.

  26

  4

  2 16.

  Kebutu han rasa aman Jaminan peker jaan

  3

  2

  27

  2 5.

  4

  3

  3

  5

  3

  5

  1

  24

  1 6.

  5

  5

  5

  5

  3

  5

  1

  27

  2 7.

  3

  3

  5

  5

  4

  5

  2

  27

  2 8.

  5

  3

  2

  4

  Penghar gaan yg diharap kan

  Jum lah Score 1.

  3

  3

  1

  5

  5

  5

  4

  26

  2 2.

  4

  4

  1

  3

  5

  1

  3

  4

  1 4.

  23

  1

  5

  5

  5

  5

  2

  4

  1 3.

  23

  2

  5

  5

  27

  1 14.

  5

  1

  5

  2

  22

  1 13.

  3

  3

  1

  5

  3

  5

  4

  24

  4

  2

  2

  5

  5

  3

  5

  5

  2

  2 15.

  4

  28

  1

  5

  4

  5

  5

  5

  2

  3

  3

  3

  5

  1

  24

  1 9.

  3

  3

  5

  5

  4

  5

  3

  28

  2 10.

  3

  3 12.

  5

  30

  4

  5

  1

  5

  5

  5

  5

  2 11.

  27

  2

  5

  4

  5

  ˃ 28 No. Resp

  Wilayah kerja Dukungan rekan sekerja

  3

  2

  4

  3

  1

  14

  2 21.

  5

  2

  4

  4

  18

  3 20.

  3 22.

  4

  4

  5

  2

  2

  17

  2 23.

  4

  2

  4

  18

  4

  15

  4

  4

  2

  15

  2 17.

  4

  1

  4

  3

  3

  2 18.

  4

  4

  2

  4

  4

  4

  18

  3 19.

  3

  3

  4

  4

  5

  3

  4

  2

  12

  1 28.

  5

  2

  4

  3

  2

  16

  2 29.

  3

  4

  2

  1

  1

  11

  1 30.

  3

  2

  5

  4

  4

  18

  3 Score : Rendah = 10-13 Sedang = 14-17

  2

  2

  18

  4

  3 24.

  5

  1

  2

  1

  2

  11

  1 25.

  4

  3

  4

  2

  4

  19

  3 26.

  5

  2

  4

  4

  3

  18

  3 27.

  4

  1

  3 16.

  Hubungan kerja Hasil kerja

  2

  19

  3 5.

  5

  1

  3

  2

  3

  14

  2 6.

  4

  4

  4

  2

  3

  15

  2 7.

  4

  1

  4

  3

  1

  13

  1 8.

  2

  5

  2

  4

  Penghargaan pimpinan Jumlah Score 1.

  3

  3

  4

  5

  2

  17

  2 2.

  4

  2

  2

  4

  1

  13

  1 3.

  4

  1

  4

  3

  2

  14

  2 4.

  4

  4

  4

  18

  1 14.

  4

  2

  17

  2 13.

  3

  2

  4

  2

  2

  13

  4

  3

  2

  4

  5

  4

  19

  3 15.

  4

  2

  4

  4

  4

  4

  4

  2

  3

  2

  14

  2 9.

  5

  2

  4

  2

  2

  15

  2 10.

  3

  2 12.

  4

  4

  4

  18

  3 11.

  5

  2

  4

  2

  3

  16

  Tinggi = ˃ 17 No. Resp Tingkat Pendidikan

  Jarak tempat tugas

  5

  1

  2

  3

  8

  2 21.

  2

  2

  2

  11

  3 20.

  3 22.

  2

  1

  1

  1

  5

  1 23.

  2

  2

  2

  11

  3

  8

  2

  1

  7

  2 17.

  2

  1

  2

  3

  2 18.

  5

  1

  1

  2

  3

  7

  2 19.

  2

  2

  2

  1

  8

  2

  2

  1 28.

  2

  1

  2

  3

  8

  2 29.

  1

  2

  1

  5

  10

  3 30.

  2

  1

  2

  5

  10

  3 Score : Rendah = 4-6 Sedang = 7-9

  6

  2

  2 24.

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  8

  2 25.

  2

  2

  5

  1

  11

  3 26.

  1

  2

  1

  1

  5

  1 27.

  2

  2

  3 16.

  Prestasi kerja Jujur dan adil

  2

  11

  3 5.

  2

  2

  1

  1

  6

  1 6.

  2

  2

  2

  5

  11

  3 7.

  2

  2

  1

  2

  7

  5

  2

  2

  1

  Jumlah Score 1.

  1

  2

  2

  3

  8

  2 2.

  2

  1

  2

  3

  7

  2 3.

  2

  2

  1

  3

  8

  2 4.

  2 8.

  2

  11

  2 14.

  1

  5

  1 13.

  2

  2

  2

  3

  9

  2

  1

  2

  2

  1

  7

  2 15.

  2

  2

  2

  5

  2

  1

  1

  2

  2

  7

  2 9.

  2

  1

  2

  5

  10

  3 10.

  2

  3 12.

  1

  2

  7

  2 11.

  2

  2

  2

  5

  11

  Tinggi = ˃ 9 No. Resp Pelaksana Peraturan

  Sanksi pelanggaran peraturan

  5

  3

  3

  3

  3

  12

  1 21.

  5

  5

  5

  20

  20

  3 22.

  5

  2

  2

  2

  11

  1 23.

  5

  3 20.

  5

  5

  3

  5

  5

  5

  20

  3 17.

  5

  5

  3

  16

  5

  2 18.

  5

  5

  5

  5

  20

  3 19.

  5

  5

  5

  5

  3 16.

  5

  3 28.

  5

  5

  5

  5

  20

  3 29.

  5

  5

  5

  5

  20

  3 30.

  5

  5

  5

  5

  20

  3 Score : Rendah = 10-13 Sedang = 14-17

  20

  5

  20

  3

  3 24.

  3

  3

  3

  3

  12

  1 25.

  3

  3

  3

  5

  12

  1 26.

  5

  5

  5

  5

  20

  3 27.

  5

  5

  19

  Penghargaan pelaksana peraturan

  3 6.

  5

Dokumen yang terkait

BAB II MELIHAT BUKIT, MEMANDANG DANAU - Penataan dan Pengembangan Kawasan Geopark Kaldera Toba (Engagement With Stone)

0 0 32

2.1. Tinjauan Ruko 2.1.1. Defenisi Ruko - Studi Perkembangan Tipologi Rumah Toko di Kota

0 0 13

Pengaruh Mutu Pelayanan Kesehatan Terhadap Kepuasan Pasien Rawat Inap Peserta JKN di Puskesmas Rawat Inap Batang Kuis Kabupaten Deli SerdangTahun 2015

0 0 25

BAB II TINJAUAN PUSTAKA 2.1 Konsep Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN) - Pengaruh Mutu Pelayanan Kesehatan Terhadap Kepuasan Pasien Rawat Inap Peserta JKN di Puskesmas Rawat Inap Batang Kuis Kabupaten Deli SerdangTahun 2015

0 0 22

BAB 1 PENDAHULUAN 1.1 Latar Belakang - Pengaruh Mutu Pelayanan Kesehatan Terhadap Kepuasan Pasien Rawat Inap Peserta JKN di Puskesmas Rawat Inap Batang Kuis Kabupaten Deli SerdangTahun 2015

0 0 10

Pengaruh Mutu Pelayanan Kesehatan Terhadap Kepuasan Pasien Rawat Inap Peserta JKN di Puskesmas Rawat Inap Batang Kuis Kabupaten Deli SerdangTahun 2015

0 1 15

BAB II TINJAUAN PUSTAKA 2.1 Pengertian Mixing - Perancangan Dan Simulasi Mesin Mixer Kapasitas 6,9 Liter Putaran 280 Rpm Menggunakan Ansys Fluent 14.0 Dan Pengujian

0 2 34

PERANCANGAN DAN SIMULASI MESIN MIXER KAPASITAS 6,9 LITER PUTARAN 280 RPM MENGGUNAKAN ANSYS FLUENT 14.0 DAN PENGUJIAN

0 0 24

BAB II TINJAUAN PUSTAKA 2.1 Pelapisan Permukaan Logam - Analisa Kekerasan Dan Struktur Mikro Pada Daerah Interface Hasil Proses Cladding Material Stainless Steel Terhadap Baja Karbon Menengah

0 0 31

Pengaruh Penggunaan Metode Story Telling Terhadap Kemampuan Berbicara pada Peserta Didik Kelas VII di SMPN 2 Padangsidimpuan

0 3 10