Pengaruh Role Ambiguity, Role Conflict, Role Overload dan Tipe Kepribadian Terhadap Burnout (Studi Empiris Pada Auditor Di KAP Semarang) - Unika Repository

  

LAMPIRAN 1:

KUESIONER

PENELITIAN KUESIONER “PENGARUH ROLE AMBIGUITY, ROLE CONFLICT, ROLE OVERLOAD DAN TIPE

  KEPRIBADIAN TERHADAP BURNOUT

(STUDI EMPIRIS PADA AUDITOR DI KAP SEMARANG)

” Nama KAP :

  Jenis Kelamin : ฀ Pria ฀ Wanita Umur : ....................................................tahun Lama bekerja di KAP ini : ....................................................tahun Pendidikan : ฀ D3 ฀ S1 ฀ S2

  BURNOUT : Kalbers dan Fogarty (2005)

  Pilihlah salah satu jawaban di bawah dengan memberi tanda ( ) tickmark: STS = Sangat Tidak Setuju S = Setuju TS = Tidak Setuju SS = Sangat Setuju N = Netral

  

No Pernyataan STS TS N S SS

1 Bekerja dengan klien benar-benar menegangkan bagi saya.

  2 Saya merasa bahwa saya bekerja terlalu keras untuk klien.

  3 Bekerja dengan atasan langsung menempatkan terlalu banyak tekanan pada saya.

  4 Saya merasa terkuras secara emosional oleh tekanan atasan saya.

  5 Saya merasa frustasi karena bekerja secara langsung dengan rekan kerja.

  : Agustina (2009)

ROLE AMBIGUITY

  Pilihlah salah satu jawaban di bawah dengan memberi tanda ( ) tickmark: STS = Sangat Tidak Setuju S = Setuju TS = Tidak Setuju SS = Sangat Setuju N = Netral

  

No Pernyataan STS TS N S SS

Saya tidak mengetahui dengan jelas apa yang diharapkan KAP 1 dari saya.

  Saya tidak memahami tentang wewenang yang saya miliki saat

  2 ini untuk memutuskan hal-hal yang berkaitan dalam penugasan.

  Saya tidak jelas mengenai pekerjaan yang seharusnya saya

  3 lakukan dalam KAP.

  Saya merasa rencana dan tujuan pekerjaan saya tidak jelas dalam

  4 mencari indikasi adanya kecurangan.

  Saya tidak dapat membagi waktu dengan baik antara harus 5 menyelesaikan penugasan di lapangan dengan menyelesaikan laporan yang diminta atasan maupun klien.

  : Agustina (2009)

ROLE CONFLICT

  Pilihlah salah satu jawaban di bawah dengan memberi tanda ( ) tickmark: STS = Sangat Tidak Setuju S = Setuju TS = Tidak Setuju SS = Sangat Setuju N = Netral

  

No Pernyataan STS TS N S SS

Saya menerima penugasan dari dua atau lebih senior yang saling 1 bertentangan secara prinsip.

  Saya melakukan penugasan yang mungkin ditolak oleh orang 2 lain seperti penugasan tanpa didukung pengetahuan yang memadai tentang bidang usaha klien. Saya melakukan pekerjaan dalam penugasan yang sebenarnya

  3 menurut saya tidak perlu.

  Dalam menjalankan akivitas, saya bekerja dengan dua tim kerja

  4 atau lebih dengan cara kerja yang berbeda-beda.

  Penugasan yang saya terima tanpa didukung sumber daya

  5 manusia (rekan kerja) yang kompeten.

  : Agustina (2009)

ROLE OVERLOAD

  Pilihlah salah satu jawaban di bawah dengan memberi tanda ( ) tickmark: STS = Sangat Tidak Setuju S = Setuju TS = Tidak Setuju SS = Sangat Setuju N = Netral

  

No Pernyataan STS TS N S SS

Saya memiliki terlalu banyak pekerjaan untuk dilaksanakan pada 1 suatu waktu tertentu

  Saya merasa dalam suatu penugasan, saya mengerjakan 2 pekerjaan yang seharusnya dikerjakan lebih dari satu orang, tetapi saya kerjakan sendiri. Saya merasa bahwa standar pekerjaan saya terlalu banyak

  3 daripada yang seharusnya.

  Pada masa peak season di mana KAP kebanjiran pekerjaan, saya 4 harus mengerjakan semua pekerjaan pada periode waktu yang sama. Saya sering diberi pekerjaan yang seharusnya bukan merupakan

  5 bagian saya.

  

TIPE KEPRIBADIAN: Robbins (2008)

Pilihlah salah satu jawaban di bawah dengan memberi tanda ( ) tickmark pada pernyataan yang menurut Anda

paling mencerminkan diri Anda.

  Semua pernyataan di bawah wajib diisi.

  No Pernyataan A Pernyataan B

  1 Tidak suka bersantai Suka bersantai

  2 Orientasi pada hasil Tidak terlalu berorientasi pada hasil

  3 Selalu terburu-buru Tidak terburu buru

  4 Tidak mengenal waktu istirahat Selalu menyempat diri untuk beristirahat

  5 Selalu tidak puas Selalu merima kekurangan dan kelemahan diri

  6 Selalu individual dalam berbagai hal Selalu menjaga kekompakan

  7 Cepat emosi Tidak cepat emosi

  LAMPIRAN 2:

TABULASI DATA

NO KAP

  28 W

  32 W

  3.0 S2

  27

  31 KAP TRI BOWO YULIANTI W

  1.0 S1

  23

  30 W

  1.0 S1

  23

  29 W

  1.0 S1

  25

  1.0 S1

  1.0 S1

  23

  27 W

  1.5 S1

  25

  26 W

  1.0 S1

  24

  25 KAP BYSA W

  3.0 S1

  25

  24 W

  3.0 S1

  25

  22

  33 P

  3.0 S1

  26

  2.0 S1

  24

  42 W

  1.0 S1

  24

  41 W

  4.0 S1

  27

  40 P

  2.0 S1

  25

  39 P

  3.0 S1

  38 P

  25

  2.0 S1

  24

  37 KAP KUMALAHADI, KUNCAARA, & SUGENG PAMUDJI W

  3.0 S2

  29

  36 P

  2.0 S1

  25

  35 P

  2.0 S1

  23

  34 W

  2.0 S1

  23 P

  PENDIDIKAN KELAMIN ( THN ) ( THN )

  1 KAP SODIKIN & HARIJANTO W

  7 KAP BENNY , TONY , FRANS , DANIEL P

  11 W

  4.0 S1

  26

  10 P

  5.0 S1

  27

  9 P

  3.0 S1

  25

  8 P

  9.0 S1

  32

  10.0 S1

  3.0 S1

  33

  6 W

  2.0 S1

  24

  5 P

  3.5 S1

  25

  4 W

  2.0 S1

  24

  2 W

  2.0 S1

  24

  25

  12 W

  22 W

  26

  3.0 S1

  25

  21 P

  3.0 S1

  25

  20 W

  5.0 S2

  29

  19 KAP ACHMAD , RASYID , HISBULLAH & JERRY P

  3.5 S2

  26

  18 P

  3.0 S2

  17 P

  24

  3.0 S2

  26

  16 P

  3.5 S2

  26

  15 P

  3.5 S2

  26

  14 P

  3.5 S2

  26

  13 KAP RIZA , ADI , SYAHRIL DAN REKAN P

  2.0 S1

  25

BURNOUT ROLE_AMB ROLE_CONF ROLE_OVER TIPE_KEP

  6 33 5 5 4 4 4 22 5 4 5 5 5 24 4 3 3 4 3 17 3 4 4 4 4 19

  7 25 4 4 4 4 3 19 4 5 4 4 4 21 2 2 2 2 2 10 3 4 4 4 3 18

  4 26 2 2 2 2 2 10 2 2 3 4 2 13 2 2 2 2 2 10 3 2 2 3 2 12

  3 27 3 4 3 4 2 16 4 4 3 3 1 15 4 3 3 3 4 17 4 5 3 5 4 21

  5 28 5 4 5 5 5 24 5 5 4 5 5 24 3 5 3 3 3 17 5 4 5 5 5 24

  4 29 5 2 3 3 4 17 5 5 4 5 5 24 4 3 2 3 4 16 5 5 4 5 5 24

  4 30 4 3 4 5 4 20 3 4 5 3 4 19 2 2 2 2 2 10 4 5 5 4 3 21

  4 31 4 3 4 5 4 20 4 3 4 5 4 20 3 5 4 2 3 17 4 5 3 4 2 18

  7 32 5 4 4 4 5 22 5 5 5 4 4 23 2 3 3 4 4 16 4 4 4 4 5 21

  6 34 4 5 5 5 5 24 4 2 4 5 5 20 3 4 5 4 3 19 4 4 4 5 5 22

  3 23 4 2 3 4 2 15 3 4 4 4 3 18 2 2 2 2 2 10 4 3 4 4 3 18

  5 35 4 5 5 5 4 23 3 3 4 5 5 20 3 4 4 4 3 18 4 4 3 5 5 21

  7 36 4 5 4 5 4 22 5 4 3 2 3 17 3 3 4 3 4 17 4 3 4 5 5 21

  6 37 4 3 2 3 4 16 4 3 4 3 4 18 3 4 3 4 3 17 3 4 5 4 3 19

  7 38 3 4 4 3 4 18 3 3 4 3 2 15 3 3 3 3 5 17 4 5 5 3 4 21

  5 39 3 4 2 3 4 16 2 3 4 2 1 12 3 2 4 4 4 17 3 4 5 3 4 19

  5 40 2 4 4 4 4 18 4 2 4 4 3 17 4 3 3 3 4 17 4 5 2 5 4 20

  4 41 4 5 4 5 4 22 3 4 5 3 5 20 4 4 5 3 3 19 4 5 3 4 3 19

  4 42 4 5 5 3 4 21 4 5 3 4 5 21 3 4 3 3 3 16 5 4 5 5 4 23

  7

  2 24 3 4 2 3 3 15 3 2 3 3 2 13 2 2 2 2 2 10 3 4 3 4 4 18

  NO

  

1 2 3 4 5 Σ 1 2 3 4 5 Σ 1 2 3 4 5 Σ 1 2 3 4 5 Σ Σ

  2 10 3 4 4 3 4 18 4 3 3 4 3 17 3 4 4 3 3 17 4 4 3 2 4 17

  1 2 3 3 4 5 17 3 4 3 3 4 17 3 4 3 4 4 18 3 3 4 3 4 17

  7 2 3 4 3 5 3 18 3 3 4 3 3 16 4 4 4 4 3 19 3 4 4 5 5 21

  4 4 3 3 3 4 3 16 2 4 5 4 3 18 3 4 3 4 3 17 2 4 2 2 3 13

  4 5 3 5 3 2 3 16 2 3 3 4 1 13 3 3 4 4 3 17 3 5 4 4 5 21

  4 6 4 3 5 3 5 20 2 4 3 5 5 19 3 3 4 3 2 15 4 4 5 5 3 21

  7 7 3 4 3 4 3 17 3 4 4 4 3 18 3 4 3 4 3 17 4 5 5 4 5 23

  4 8 3 4 5 4 5 21 4 3 4 5 4 20 5 5 4 4 4 22 4 4 5 4 5 22

  7 9 4 3 4 5 4 20 4 3 4 5 5 21 5 3 5 4 4 21 4 5 4 3 4 20

  4 11 5 4 3 2 2 16 5 3 5 3 4 20 3 2 4 4 4 17 2 3 3 5 3 16

  4 21 3 4 3 3 4 17 4 5 5 3 3 20 2 2 2 2 2 10 4 3 4 3 5 19

  5 12 4 4 3 3 4 18 2 4 4 5 2 17 3 3 3 3 4 16 4 3 2 3 4 16

  5 13 3 4 3 4 5 19 3 4 4 5 3 19 2 2 2 2 2 10 4 5 4 5 5 23

  5 14 2 1 3 4 4 14 3 4 3 2 4 16 3 3 3 3 2 14 4 4 3 3 4 18

  3 15 2 3 4 3 2 14 4 3 2 3 4 16 3 3 4 3 3 16 3 4 3 2 3 15

  3 16 4 3 4 4 3 18 3 4 4 5 3 19 4 3 3 4 4 18 3 4 5 5 5 22

  4 17 3 5 3 5 3 19 5 3 4 3 2 17 4 2 5 4 4 19 5 3 5 3 2 18

  4 18 2 3 4 5 3 17 2 3 2 4 3 14 5 3 3 3 3 17 4 3 4 2 5 18

  4 19 5 5 5 4 4 23 5 4 4 5 5 23 2 2 2 2 2 10 4 4 4 5 4 21

  4 20 4 3 3 2 3 15 3 4 5 4 5 21 2 2 2 2 2 10 3 3 3 4 2 15

  4 22 3 4 3 2 3 15 3 3 4 3 4 17 3 3 5 4 5 20 4 3 4 5 3 19

  

LAMPIRAN 3:

OUTPUT SPSS

  GAMBARAN UMUM RESPONDEN JENISKELAMIN

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

  P

  20

  47.6

  47.6

  47.6 W

  22

  52.4 52.4 100.0 Valid

  Total 42 100.0 100.0

  PENDIDIKAN

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

  S1

  33

  78.6

  78.6

  78.6 S2

  9

  21.4 21.4 100.0 Valid

  Total 42 100.0 100.0

  

Descriptive Statistics

  N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation UMUR

  42

  22.00 33.00 25.4286 2.15432 Valid N (listwise)

  42 Descriptive Statistics N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

  LAMABEKERJA

  42

  1.00 10.00 2.9048 1.82208 Valid N (listwise)

42 CROSSTAB

  JENISKELAMIN * PENDIDIKAN Crosstabulation

  PENDIDIKAN Total S1 S2

  Count

  12

  8

  20 P % of Total 28.6% 19.0% 47.6%

  JENISKELAMIN Count

  21

  1

  22 W % of Total 50.0% 2.4% 52.4% Count

  33

  9

  42 Total % of Total 78.6% 21.4% 100.0%

STATISTIK DESKRIPTIF

  

Descriptive Statistics

  N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation BURNOUT

  42

  10.00 24.00 18.3095 3.08013 ROLE_AMB

  42

  12.00 24.00 18.3333 3.06568 ROLE_CONF

  42

  10.00 22.00 15.8810 3.43726 ROLE_OVER

  42

  12.00 24.00 19.3810 2.75816 TIPE_KEP

  42

  2.00 7.00 4.6905 1.42261 Valid N (listwise)

42 UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS BURNOUT

  Case Processing Summary

  N % Valid 42 100.0

  a

  Cases Excluded .0 Total 42 100.0

  a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha

  Cronbach's Alpha Based on

  Reliability Statistics

  Correlation Cronbach's Alpha if

  Item Deleted ROLE_AMB1 14.8333 6.533 .370 .193 .569 ROLE_AMB2 14.7381 7.076 .348 .143 .580 ROLE_AMB3 14.5000 7.378 .322 .114 .592 ROLE_AMB4 14.4762 7.036 .288 .176 .608 ROLE_AMB5 14.7857 4.904 .562 .341 .447

  UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS ROLE CONFLICT Case Processing Summary

  N % Cases

  Valid 42 100.0 Excluded

  a

  .0 Total 42 100.0

  a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Cronbach's Alpha

  Item Deleted Corrected Item-Total

  Cronbach's Alpha Based on

  Standardized Items

  N of Items .828 .832

  5 Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item

  Deleted Scale Variance if

  Item Deleted Corrected Item-

  Total Correlation Squared Multiple

  Correlation Cronbach's Alpha if

  Correlation Squared Multiple

  Deleted Scale Variance if

  Standardized Items

  N % Cases

  N of Items .668 .673

  5 Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item

  Deleted Scale Variance if

  Item Deleted Corrected Item-Total

  Correlation Squared Multiple

  Correlation Cronbach's Alpha if

  Item Deleted BURNOUT1 14.7857 6.953 .350 .160 .647 BURNOUT2 14.5952 6.930 .317 .139 .664 BURNOUT3 14.7143 5.965 .633 .408 .521 BURNOUT4 14.5238 6.548 .378 .230 .637 BURNOUT5 14.6190 6.485 .457 .254 .600

  UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS ROLE AMBIGUITY Case Processing Summary

  Valid 42 100.0 Excluded

  5 Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item

  a

  .0 Total 42 100.0

  a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics

  Cronbach's Alpha

  Cronbach's Alpha Based on

  Standardized Items

  N of Items .621 .613

  Item Deleted ROLE_CONF1 12.7619 7.844 .669 .450 .782 ROLE_CONF2 12.7619 8.430 .479 .276 .836 ROLE_CONF3 12.5714 7.178 .679 .492 .779 ROLE_CONF4 12.6905 7.829 .743 .580 .765 ROLE_CONF5 12.7381 8.149 .584 .442 .806

  UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS ROLE OVERLOAD Case Processing Summary

  N % Valid 42 100.0

  a

  Cases Excluded .0 Total 42 100.0

  a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics

  Cronbach's Cronbach's N of Items Alpha Alpha Based on

  Standardized Items

  .598 .605

  5 Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Scale Variance if Corrected Item- Squared Multiple Cronbach's Alpha if

  Deleted Item Deleted Total Correlation Correlation Item Deleted ROLE_OVER1 15.6667 5.789 .386 .158 .535 ROLE_OVER2 15.4048 5.808 .316 .106 .563 ROLE_OVER3 15.5714 5.178 .359 .151 .541 ROLE_OVER4 15.4048 5.076 .340 .118 .554 ROLE_OVER5 15.4762 4.938 .390 .153 .523

UJI NORMALITAS

  

Tests of Normality

a

  Kolmogorov-Smirnov Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

• Unstandardized Residual .081

  42 .200 .972 42 .384 *. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

  a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

  UJI HETEROSKEDASTISITAS a Variables Entered/Removed

  Model Variables Variables Method Entered Removed

  TIPE_KEP, ROLE_AMB, 1 . Enter ROLE_CONF,

  b

  ROLE_OVER

  a. Dependent Variable: ABSRES b. All requested variables entered.

  Model Summary

  Model R R Square Adjusted R Std. Error of the Square Estimate

  a

  1 .360 .130 .036 1.14616

  a. Predictors: (Constant), TIPE_KEP, ROLE_AMB, ROLE_CONF, ROLE_OVER

  a

ANOVA

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. b

  Regression 7.237 4 1.809 1.377 .261 Residual 48.607 37 1.314

  1 Total 55.844

  41

  a. Dependent Variable: ABSRES

  b. Predictors: (Constant), TIPE_KEP, ROLE_AMB, ROLE_CONF, ROLE_OVER

  a

Coefficients Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. B Std. Error Beta

  1 (Constant) -1.603 1.579 -1.015 .317 ROLE_AMB .096 .063 .251 1.514 .138 ROLE_CONF .039 .054 .114 .714 .479 ROLE_OVER .061 .073 .144 .837 .408 TIPE_KEP -.118 .130 -.144 -.911 .368

  a. Dependent Variable: ABSRES

UJI MULTIKOLINEARITAS

  .648 .610 1.92373

  a. Dependent Variable: BURNOUT

  1 (Constant) -2.955 2.651 -1.115 .272 ROLE_AMB .492 .106 .490 4.646 .000 .857 1.167 ROLE_CONF .182 .091 .203 2.007 .052 .929 1.077 ROLE_OVER .376 .122 .337 3.075 .004 .792 1.263 TIPE_KEP .440 .218 .203 2.021 .051 .941 1.062

  VIF

  B Std. Error Beta Tolerance

  Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. Collinearity Statistics

  

Coefficients

a

  b. Predictors: (Constant), TIPE_KEP, ROLE_AMB, ROLE_CONF, ROLE_OVER

  a. Dependent Variable: BURNOUT

  41

  Residual 136.927 37 3.701 Total 388.976

  b

  1 Regression 252.049 4 63.012 17.027 .000

  

ANOVA

a Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

  a. Predictors: (Constant), TIPE_KEP, ROLE_AMB, ROLE_CONF, ROLE_OVER

  

Coefficients

a

  Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. Collinearity Statistics

  Variables Removed

  B Std. Error Beta Tolerance

  VIF

  1 (Constant) -2.955 2.651 -1.115 .272 ROLE_AMB .492 .106 .490 4.646 .000 .857 1.167 ROLE_CONF .182 .091 .203 2.007 .052 .929 1.077 ROLE_OVER .376 .122 .337 3.075 .004 .792 1.263 TIPE_KEP .440 .218 .203 2.021 .051 .941 1.062

  a. Dependent Variable: BURNOUT

  UJI HIPOTESIS Variables Entered/Removed a

  Model Variables Entered

  Method

  Std. Error of the Estimate 1 .805

  1 TIPE_KEP, ROLE_AMB, ROLE_CONF, ROLE_OVER

  b

  . Enter

  a. Dependent Variable: BURNOUT b. All requested variables entered.

  Model Summary

  Model R R Square Adjusted R Square

  a

  

Filename:

SKRIPSI_10.60.0144_&_Adi_Rizky_PENGARUH_ROLE_AMBIGUITY,_ROLE_CONFLICT,_ROLE_OVERLOAD_DAN_TIPE_KEPRIBADIAN_TERHADAP_

  

Date: 2017-05-24 00:26 UTC

Results of plagiarism analysis from 2017-05-24 01:44 UTC

5008 matches from 114 sources, of which 18 are online sources.

  PlagLevel: 5.0% /61.4% [0] (180 matches, 2.1% /23. 1 documents with identical matches) [2] (139 matches, 1.7% /20.

  [3] (167 matches, 1.9% /19. [5] (127 matches, 0.5% /19. [7] (67 matches, 0.2% /8.1% [9] (37 matches, 0.1% /4.3% [11] (31 matches, 0.1% /3.3 [13] (16 matches, 0.1% /2.3 [15] (26 matches, 0.1% /2.8 [17] (20 matches, 0.0%2.3

  1 documents with identical matches) [20] (88 matches, 0.1% /8.1 [21] (86 matches, 0.1% /7.9 [23] (61 matches, 0.5% /8.0 [25] (1 matches, 0.0%1.1%) [27] (57 matches, 0.5% /7.0 [29] (57 matches, 0.2% /7.0

  1 documents with identical matches) [32] (66 matches, 0.2% /6.1 1 documents with identical matches) [34] (51 matches, 0.2% /6.3

  [35] (40 matches, 0.3% /5.8 [37] (40 matches, 0.2% /5.0 [39] (41 matches, 0.0%4.1 [41] (33 matches, 0.2% /4.3 [43] (50 matches, 0.1% /3.6 [45] (49 matches, 0.1% /3.7 [47] (40 matches, 0.3% /3.2 [49] (24 matches, 0.0%3.5 [51] (42 matches, 0.0%3.2 [53] (38 matches, 0.1% /3.1 [55] (34 matches, 0.3% /3.1 [57] (33 matches, 0.8% /2.9

  1 documents with identical matches) [60] (32 matches, 0.3% /2.6 [61] (37 matches, 0.0% /2.7 [63] (30 matches, 0.1% /2.9 [65] (34 matches, 0.0%2.6 1 documents with identical matches) [67] (34 matches, 0.0%2.6 1 documents with identical matches) [69] (27 matches, 0.1% /2.7

  

[70] (30 matches, 0.2% /2.8%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI/PRA...ukungan_Manaj.doc" dated 2016-11-27

  (+ 1 documents with identical matches) [72] (39 matches, 0.1% /2.2

[73] (41 matches, 0.0% /2.4

  (+ 1 documents with identical matches)

[76] (33 matches, 0.1% /2.4

[77] (29 matches, 0.2% /2.3

[79] (17 matches, 0.0%2.6 [81] (17 matches, 0.0%2.6

[83] (30 matches, 0.1% /2.5

[85] (32 matches, 0.0%2.2

[87] (33 matches, 0.1% /2.2

[89] (19 matches, 1.1% /2.3

  (+ 1 documents with identical matches) [92] (28 matches, 0.1% /2.1

[93] (26 matches, 0.0% /2.2

[95] (25 matches, 0.2% /2.1

[97] (30 matches, 0.0%2.1 (+ 2 documents with identical matches)

[100] (33 matches, 0.1% /2.

[102] (29 matches, 0.0%2.

[104] (28 matches, 0.0%2.

   1 documents with identical matches) [106] (28 matches, 0.0%1.

[108] (15 matches, 0.0%2.

[110] (25 matches, 0.1% /1.

  (+ 1 documents with identical matches)

[113] (24 matches, 0.0%1.

Settings

  Sensitivity: Medium Bibliography: Bibliography excluded Citation detection: Reduce PlagLevel Whitelist: --

  Analyzed document =====================1/75====================== MATRIKS REVISI SIDANG PRA No Revisi Yang Harus Dilakukan Hasil Revisi Hal

  1 Lebih tekankan pada tipe kepribadian

Tipe kepribadian adalah sifat dasar yang dibawa dari

lahir dan dimiliki oleh masing-masing auditor. Terdiri dari tipe kepribadian: A dan B. Variabel ini

menggunakan pengukuran dari Robbins (2008). Saat

pengujian menggunakan variabel dummy berupa 1

untuk tiap karakteristik tipe kepribadian A yang

dipilih dan 0 untuk tiap karakteristik tipe kepribadian

B yang dipilih. Hasilnya didapat dari penjumlahan 7

poin karakteristik tickmark, dengan jumlah skor