c. Observing
This is the third stage in the class action research. In this stage, the researcher ob
served students‘ performance in the teaching and learning, especially when the students were writing the assignment. In this cycle, the students asked
the researcher about the translation from Bahasa to English, how to write the sentences and the movie review, what verb that have to be used in writing
narrative text. Also, the collaborator helped the writer to observe the teaching and
learning activity. In this cycle, the enthusiasm of students in learning process was good because the researcher provided th
e good class and students‘ condition by using games before the students started the material See Appendix 11 and 12.
The students also were active role in the class. They gave their idea about the film and discussed it with their friend. However, they were still shy to ask about the
material. In this phase, the observer also observed the teaching learning process
through post-test 1. The result of post-test 1 showed that the mean score of the class derived 72.4 in which there were 20 students who passed the Minimum
Mastery Criterion KKM 74 seventy four. The following were the detail results of test used in the first cycle:
The Result of Students’ Writing Table 4.2
The R esult of Students’ Writing Score in Post-test 1
No. Criteria
Frequency 1.
Below KKM Score 74
16 2.
Passed KKM Score 74-89
8 3.
Passed KKM Score 89
12
Note For the detail, see Appendix 8.
After calculating the pre- test result, the writer calculated students‘ first
post- test score. To know the result of students‘ writing, the writer needs to
calculate the mean first. The data by using this formula:
After calculating the post-test 1 score, it showed that the mean score of post-test 1 was 72.4 and gained any improvement 11.86 . To know that
improvement to the percentage, the writer calculated using this formula:
Then, in the first cycle of post-test 1, there were 20 students who passed the KKM. If it was calculated into class percentage, it was gained 55.55 through
this formula:
From the data above, it showed that there was students‘ improvement
between pre-test and post-test 1 with percentage was 11.86. The improvement was low enough. There were many students who still not finished yet their test on
time and there were some students who still confused and have difficulties in writing narrative text with movie. There were several students who did not know
about the way to write narrative paragraph and still made a mistake when students produced the sentence using movie. Besides that, the classroom condition was
noisy. It showed that there were some students who were not ready to learn