Planning Finding of the First Cycle

After calculating the pre- test result, the writer calculated students‘ first post- test score. To know the result of students‘ writing, the writer needs to calculate the mean first. The data by using this formula: After calculating the post-test 1 score, it showed that the mean score of post-test 1 was 72.4 and gained any improvement 11.86 . To know that improvement to the percentage, the writer calculated using this formula: Then, in the first cycle of post-test 1, there were 20 students who passed the KKM. If it was calculated into class percentage, it was gained 55.55 through this formula: From the data above, it showed that there was students‘ improvement between pre-test and post-test 1 with percentage was 11.86. The improvement was low enough. There were many students who still not finished yet their test on time and there were some students who still confused and have difficulties in writing narrative text with movie. There were several students who did not know about the way to write narrative paragraph and still made a mistake when students produced the sentence using movie. Besides that, the classroom condition was noisy. It showed that there were some students who were not ready to learn narrative text using movie because they were still walking around the class while the teacher conveyed the material in front of the class. When the students did the writing assignment, they were also noisy in the class. Thus, the writer continued the action to the next cycle.

d. Reflecting

Based on the result in teaching and learning narrative text using movie in the cycle 1, the researcher and the collaborator discussed the conclusion that was taken from the cycle 1. The conclusions are:  There were some students who had not finished yet their assignment, it was caused the time was not enough.  There were some students who still got difficulty to make a narrative text using movie. It may be because the movie had a long story.

3. Findings of the Second Cycle

a. Planning

In this phase, the writer made a plan for the action based on the problems faced by the students in the previous cycle. The writer solved the problem above by adding the time to write. Fortunately, the next subject teacher gave the writer an additional teaching time. To solved the problem of the students‘ difficulty to make a narrative text, the writer monitoring the students and help them to make them easy to do the task and also skipped the unimportant scene movie to save time. In addition, she also prepared the instrument of research for students like movie. The writer also prepared the post-test 2 for the students, observation, and teacher‘s journal. Besides that, the writer prepared the narrative text material by using movie in two meetings. The researcher and the collaborator planned this action because the result of the students‘ writing in the first cycle was still low. It could be seen in the result of students‘ writing only 20 students or 55.55 who passed the KKM from 36 students in the class.