students who passed the KKM. If it was calculated into percentage, it was 86.11 through this formula:
Based on the data test above, the average students‘ writing achievement on this cycle is 83.1 and there were 31 students passed the KKM or 86.11 students.
On the other hand, there were 13.89 students who did not pass the KKM or 5 students. The improvement in this cycle was high and met the criteria of the action
research of CAR in which minimum 75 students passed the KKM could be achieved. From the result of this cycle, the writer stopped this research and would
not continue to the next cycle.
d. Reflecting
The reflection was carried out after gaining the score result of writing test. The researcher and the English teacher felt satisfied in as much their made efforts
to improve the students‘ writing skill in narrative text had been realized. The students could understand how to make narrative text and could explore their idea
easily through movies. It was proven by their improving scores from the pre-test to post-test 2.
After achieving the target research that minimal 75 who passed the KKM, the writer and the teacher decided to stop the CAR because it had already
succeed. Therefore, the researcher and the real teacher did not have to revise the plan.
According to the result of evaluating between the writer and the collaborator, it could be assumed that the implementation of CAR by using
movies to improve students‘ writing skill in narrative text was appropriate with
the planning that had been discussed by the researcher and the real teacher or
collaborator previously. In this case, each section was planned as good as possible in order to the writing activities could be accomplished well.
From all the calculations above, the d iagram of Students‘ Mean Score, The
Passed Students in the Percentage, and Improvement o f Students‘ Score in the
Percentage could be seen from the diagram below:
Figure 4.1. The Mean Score of Students’ Pre Test – Post Test
Figure 4.2. The Passed Students in the Pre Test – Post Test
