47
a. The Students’ Achievement in Each Part of the Test
Table 4.1 shows the students’ scores in Part A of the test. The score for each student was determined by dividing the total correct answers by the total number
of items in Part A, then the result was multiplied by 100.
Table 4.1: The Students’ Scores in Part A of the Test Range of Scores
Number of Students Achieving the Range of Scores
90-100 80-89
70-79 60-69
50-59 40-49
30-39 20-29
10-19
0-9 3
10 13
8 6
15 3
4 1
2
It can be seen in Table 4.1, that there were three students 4.6 achieving the highest range of scores. Besides, there were also two students 3 whose scores
fell on the range 0-9. In addition, there were fifteen students 23.1 whose scores ranged from 40-49.
Table 4.2: The Students’ Scores in Part B of the Test Range of Scores
Number of Students Achieving the Range of Scores
90-100 80-89
70-79 60-69
50-59 40-49
30-39 20-29
10-19
0-9 -
1 -
5 3
11 10
17 6
12
48 Table 4.2 shows the students’ scores in Part B of the test. From Table 4.2, it
was clear that none of the students achieved range of scores 90-100. The highest score, which fell on the range 80-89, was obtained by one student only 1.5. On
the contrary, there were twelve students 18.5 whose scores ranged between 0- 9. The fact that there were quite many students with range of scores between 0-9
proved that part B of the test was difficult. This also implied that the students still had problems in constructing complex sentences containing the non-finite clauses.
b. The Students’ Achievement in the Whole Part of the Test
The final score for each student was obtained by dividing the total correct answers in both parts of the test by the total number of items, after that the result
was multiplied by 100. In other words, the total correct answers achieved by each student were divided by thirty. The result was then multiplied by 100. The data of
the final scores achieved by the students are presented in Table 4.3.
Table 4.3: The Students’ Final Scores in the Whole Part of the Test Range of Scores
Number of Students Achieving the Range of Scores
90-100 80-89
70-79 60-69
50-59 40-49
30-39 20-29
10-19
0-9 -
1 7
4 16
12 11
10
2 2
Table 4.3 shows that there were sixteen students 24.6 whose scores ranged between 50-59. There was only one student 1.5 whose score fell on the range
49 80-89. The lowest score, falling on the range 0-9, was achieved by one student
1.5. None of the students achieved range of scores 90-100. As it is written in Peraturan Akademik Universitas Sanata Dharma
Yogyakarta 2002: 14, 56 of the total score is stated to be the minimum
standard of mastery or to pass with sufficient level. The complete scoring category is listed as follows.
Score Category
80-101 very good A
70-80 good B
56-70 sufficient C
50-56 insufficient D
≤ 49 poor E
The scoring category above was applied to classify the students’ achievement in the test. Table 4.4 shows the students’ scores in relation to the category.
Table 4.4: The Students’ Scores in Relation to the Category Score
Category Number of Students Achieving the
Category
80-100 70-79
56-69 50-55
≤ 49 Very good A
Good B Sufficient C
Insufficient D Poor E
1 7
7 17
33
Referring to Table 4.4, there was only one student 1.5 out of 65 students becoming the respondents of the research who entered the category of very good.
There were seven students 10.7 who fell on the category of good. Other seven students 10.7 achieved the category of sufficient. Seventeen students 26.1
achieved the category of insufficient. More than half of the respondents entered PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
50 the category of poor. In addition, there were fifty students 76.9 out of 65 who
failed in the test because their final scores had not reached the category of sufficient. In other words, there were only fifteen students 23.1 who passed the
test.
c. The Students’ Achievement in Each Type of Clauses
Kategori