Juxtaposition and the use of na ‘and’

• When Hare goes to the field with the girl 17, this is very important because that is the place where he succeeds in making her speak. • Hare’s actions in 20b are important because they provoke the girl to speak. • Finally, in 25c, aphano introduces the most important event of all, when the girl speaks. Some Bantu languages, such as Digo, Jita and Kwaya, do not appear to make use of TDMs. In those languages which do have TDMs, they can take various forms, notably temporal connectives derived from locative demonstratives or locative relative markers, demonstratives referring to participants, and relative clauses. The Ekoti TDM aphano ‘then’ is a temporal connective derived from a class 16 locative demonstrative. Similarly, in Kabwa, the class 16 proximal demonstrative hanu ‘here’ or ‘now’ seems to function as a TDM, as it “introduces a new and important development in the plot of the story” Walker 2011:17. In Suba-Simbiti, two demonstrative forms bhoono ‘now’—a temporal connective and hano ‘when’—a subordinating conjunction both function as TDMs, occasionally in combination bhoono hano; however they do not function exclusively as TDMs, as both forms are found in the orientation and denouement of some texts, and important developments in the peak episode are more likely to be indicated with the discourse marker mbe. This may indicate that bhoono and hano are intermediate between TDMs and text-structuring connectives see §3.3 below. Similarly, in Bena the connective neke ‘then’ functions as both a TDM and to introduce events that are contingent on a previous event, and in Malila the TDM takes the form of the class 16 relative pronoun pe, which also functions as a temporal connective usually glossed as ‘then’ Eaton 2015b:13. In Fuliiru, important thematic developments are indicated by the use of distal or ‘remote’ demonstratives to refer to participants in the narrative, whilst new but less important developments are indicated by referring to participants with proximal demonstratives. Proximal demonstratives are used to indicate relatively predictable developments, whereas distal demonstratives indicate critical developments, and so perhaps only the distal demonstratives should be termed TDMs. For a detailed account of the functions of these demonstrative forms, see Van Otterloo 2015, §4.1 and 4.2. Languages also differ in how frequently TDMs usually occur. For example, Fuliiru narratives may contain as many as twenty demonstratives functioning as TDMs, whereas in Tembo, which is closely related to Fuliiru, demonstratives functioning as TDMs typically occur between one and four times in narratives of similar length. In Bena, neke occurs on average six times per narrative, but does not always function as a TDM Eaton 2015a:16. 3 Connectives The languages in this survey vary in terms of the variety of connectives used in narrative texts. Some languages, such as Digo and Suba-Simbiti, use a wide variety of connectives; in Suba-Simbiti nine different connectives are found inter-sententially and five different connectives are found within sentences. Other languages use far fewer connectives; Bena and Malila use only five inter-sentential connectives each, of which most occur infrequently. Cognate connectives forms with the same or similar form which share a common etymology do not necessarily have the same functions. For example, in Bena neke ‘then’ introduces a main clause whilst the class 16 relative pronoun pe ‘when, after’ introduces a temporal relative clause; however, in Malila the class 16 relative pronoun pe ‘then’ introduces a main clause whilst the class 14 relative pronoun we ‘when, after’ introduces a temporal relative clause. In this paper, rather than discussing specific connectives in individual languages, I shall instead describe general patterns.

3.1 Juxtaposition and the use of na ‘and’

The most common way of co-ordinating sentences and clauses in eastern Bantu narratives is by juxtaposition. For example, in Digo, only about one sentence in seven starts with a connective, and in Kwaya it is one sentence in six. Juxtaposed clauses may express various relations, as the following example from Makonde illustrates: Makonde Leach 2015:34 18 Shuni do: “Nangu mwanda, nkongwe wandikulakela ajo, mali anikulakela ala.” bird thus I journey wife whom.I.leave.you this riches that.I.leave.you these ‘The bird said, “I need to go, [but] I’m leaving this wife for you, [and] I’m leaving all these good things for you.”’ Since juxtaposition is the norm, connectives are used with specific functions. This applies to all connectives, including the comitative marker na and cognate forms, which is usually glossed as ‘and’ or ‘with’. Although na is one of the most widespread connectives in eastern Bantu languages, it is nonetheless rare in narrative texts: in Kabwa, only one out of five texts uses inter-clausal na; in Malila, two out of six texts have inter-clausal na; in Suba-Simbiti na occurs only four times in the entire text corpus; and in Makonde its frequency varies between approximately one sentence in seven in one text to three texts in which inter-clausal na does not occur at all. In Kwaya and Digo, na occurs primarily in direct speech in Digo all but one of the occurrences of na occurs in direct speech. Given that na has such a restricted distribution, when it does occur, its occurrence indicates that a particular relation holds between the conjoined clauses. Three relations in particular are signaled by the presence of na: 1 it connects non-sequential events, when the norm is for events in narrative texts to occur sequentially; 2 it introduces the most important event in a sequence of events, or gives prominence to a whole conjunct; and 3 it indicates contrast between participants in conjoined clauses, as in the following example: Makonde Leach 2015:43–44 19 Nnembo aju ni nkoko nkumene namene katika mumwitu uti pakati pavanyama Elephant this it.is animal big very about in.bush all among the.animals na Nalubwabwa ni shuni wakunyambikanga namene. but Nightjar it.is bird of.being.despised very ‘The elephant is the biggest of all the animals of the bush and [whereas] Nightjar is a bird, of no significance at all.’

3.2 Adversatives and concessives