Theoretical Framework THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
45
problem. One important method capable of resolving such a conflict of interest between shareholder and manager is to give shares to the manager. By resolving the
conflict of interest between the outside shareholder and manager, administrative cost will be reduced and firm value will be increased.
Yammeesri and Lodh’s 2004
study on 240 public firms in Thailand shows that family ownership is positively
associated with firms’ return of assets and net income-to-sales.
Demsetz and Lehn 1985 has also one of the negative impact of strukutur concentrated ownership in the family may also have cost negative impact that
does not appear in the form of money and do not reduce profit corporation or non-material benefit acquired when the company owners family has no control, examaple is founder of
the company will be very happy if the company he founded led by one of future generation. H
3
: There is positive influence between family ownership towards firm performance
4. Family’s ManagerDirector and Firm Performance
Usually family businesses have high involvement and long tenure in management. Thus, by their high involvement they will succeed at having a better
sense of recognition of uncertain-ties and opportunities and also by establishing a long term focus Zahra, 2005. In the study of more than 1600 Western European
companies, Maury revealed that constant and active control by family executives was linked to higher profits, justified by the mitigation of agency problems between
46
principals and agents Maury, 2006. Charbel, Elie and Georges 2013 found that moderate positive relationship between family managers in the business.
In companies that have ownership structure concentrated to the family will usually happen merger between functions management and control of the company. This
incorporation can lead making optimal investment decisions that only benefit detrimental to the family but due to minority shareholders divergence of interests between the two
types of shareholders Fama and Jensen 1983. In addition the company is experiencing family entrenchment effect, the conditionwhere management companies have not followed
the governance and control corporate control mechanisms Berger, Ofek, and Yermack; 1997, may have insesntif to take advantage of a personal nature that is detrimental which
means that once the company took over the rights of holders minority shares Facio et al , 2002.
H
4
: There is positive influence between family’s managers towards firm
performance
47