Classical Assumption Test Data Analyze Method

54 time by including dummy variables. In general, the approach Fixed Effect Least Square Dummy Variable can be written as follows : In the equation, there is the addition of as many variables N-1 and T-1 as a dummy variable in the model as well as eliminating the two other variables to avoid perfect collinearity among explanatory variables. This led to a degree of freedom of NT - 2 - N-1 - T-1 or a NT - N - T which affect the efficiency of the parameters to be estimated. 3. Random Effect Model REM Random Effect models assume that the sample is randomly in each period, so it is assumed u i and v t in case consideration of heterogeneity intertemporal follow a normal distribution. This model provides benefits in terms of savings compared to the number of variables Fix Effect, so as to improve the efficiency of the model. In Random Effect models, parameters that vary from time put into the component error error component model. The form of a random effects model with two independent variables is Y it = β 1 + β 2 X 2it + w it w it = u i + v t + ɛ it 55 Where, u i is the error component of the cross-section, v t is the error component time series, and εit is the error component of the combination. By using the model of random effect, the use of degrees of freedom can be saved and not reduce the amount as in the fix effect models. The result parameter estimation result will be more efficient. 1 Selection Test Model In Panel Data In choosing a panel data model that will be used, first Chow test to determine whether the use of panel data processing Pooled Least Square method or Fixed Effect. If significant then proceed with the Hausman test to choose between Fixed Effects and Random Effect. If significant Hausman test results it was concluded the processing performed by the FEM method. Fix Effect Random Effect Pooled Least Square Hausman Test LM Test Chow Test 56 1. Chow test Called the F test statistic for selecting the panel data model PLS or FEM. The hypothesis is formed is: H : PLS model H 1 : FE model Basic rejection of the null hypothesis is by using the F statistic. Chow formulated: Chow = – where: RRSS: Restricted Residual Sum Square value Residual Sum Square with PLS method USSR: Unrestricted Residual Sum Square Sum Square Residual value method FE N: Number of cross-section data Q: The number of time series data K: The number of explanatory variables This test follows the distribution of the F statistic is F N-1, NT-NK. If the value of the F statistic Chow greater than F table, it is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and FE methods are used. 57 2. Hausman test Hausman test is a statistical test that became the basis of the considerations in choosing a model FE or RE. The test is performed with the following hypothesis: a. Ho: RE model b. H1: FE model Basic rejection of the null hypothesis is by using chi-square statistical considerations. Hausman test can be done in programming eviews as follows: if the result of the significant Hausman test Hausman probability α, the null hypothesis is rejected and the FE method is used.

3. t-Test

T-test shows how much effect of every single dependent variable toward the dependent variable. The hypothesis for t-test is : H = the independent variable are not influence the dependent variable H 1 = the independent variable are influence the dependent variable H is rejected if the t statistic t table or if the probability of t statistic α. The significance level that use is 5 0.05.

4. F-test

F-test used to measure, do the independent variables simultaneously influence the dependent variable. The hypothesis for this test is : H = the independent variable are simultaneously not influence the dependent variable

Dokumen yang terkait

The Effect Of Firm Value And Profitability On Corporate Social Responsibility Of Telecommunication Companies Listed In Indonesia Stock Exchange

0 44 102

The Influence Of Earnings Management On Firm Value And Good Corporate Governance As Moderating Variable: Empirical Studies Real Estate And Properties Companies Listed In Indonesia Stock Exchange Period 2012-2014

0 4 135

The Influence Of Good Corporate Governance Implementation Towards The Firm Performance: The Study On Manufacturing Companies Listed In Malaysian Stock Exchange Period (2010-2014)

0 7 131

Pengaruh Investment Opportunity Set (IOS) dan GoodCorporate Governance (GCG) terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan

5 40 108

THE IMPACT OF FAMILY INVOLVEMENT IN OWNERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT TOWARDS COMPANY’S THE IMPACT OF FAMILY INVOLVEMENT IN OWNERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT TOWARDS COMPANY’S PERFORMANCE, COMPARISON BETWEEN PT. GUDANG GARAM TBK. AND PT. BENTOEL INTERNATIONAL.

0 4 14

INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AND FIRM PERFORMANCE IN FAMILY CONTROLLED FIRMS: EVIDENCE FROM INDONESIA.

0 0 25

Characteristics Influence of Corporate Governance and Firm Performance Against Tax Avoidance (Empirical Study On Dan Baverage Company Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange Year 2012 to 2015)

0 0 10

DETERMINATION FACTORS OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE POLICY AND FIRM VALUE IN INDONESIA STOCK EXCHANGE

0 1 16

Corporate governance perception index, performance and value of the firm in Indonesia

0 0 13

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, AUDIT FIRM SIZE AND RESTATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT IN INDONESIA STOCK EXCHANGE - Repository UNTAR

0 0 14