54
1. For the English Teachers
In  this  digital  era  where  sophisticated  technology  has  role  every  aspects including educational field, students are easily to get bored with the conventional
learning activities. The teachers formerly are expected to find another interesting media to engage students in learning. Hence, this is the right time to  provide the
students  with  the  integration  of  technology  and  internet.  In  this  case,  the researcher  suggests  the  teachers  to  make  a  use  of  the  digital  learning  facilitation
Socrative App
in order to deliver the materials. Moreover, this activity  should be done  more  often  in  order  to  prepare  and  make  the  students  familiar  with  digital
facilitation in global world.
2. For Future Researchers
It  is  important  to  know  if  the  kind  of  questions  provided  will  help  the students  to  relate  the  main  topic  which  are  being  discussed  with  knowledge
surround.  Since  we  are  facing  the  development  of  technology,  the  future researchers  who  are  interested  in  studying  about  this  topic  might  consider  about
the other digital learning facilitation which probably considered as more effective ways to engage the students in learning.
55
REFERENCES
Abas,  Z.  W.  2015.  Fostering  Learning  in  the  21st  Century  through  Students Engagement.
Intenational Journal for Educational Media and Technology, 9
, 3-15. Beer,  C.,  Clark,  K.,    Jones,  D.  2010.  Indicators  of  Engagement.
Proceedings ASCILITE Sydney
, 65-84. Brown,  J.  S.  2006.  New  learning  environments  for  the  21st  century.
Exploring the Edge
, 18-24. Burns,  A.  1999.
Collaborative  action  research  for  English  language  teachers.
Cambridge: Press Syndicte. Burns,  A.  2003.
Collaborative  action  research  for  English  language  teachers.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Burns, R. B. 1994.
Introduction to Research Method.
Melbourne: Longman. Chusanachoti,  R.  2009.
EFL  learning  through  language  activities  outside  the classroom:  A  case  study  of  English  education  students  in  Thailand.
Michigan State University. Coca, D. M.,  Slisko, J. 2013. Software Socrative and smartphones as tools for
implementation of basic processes of active physics learning in classroom: An initial feasibility study with prospective teacher.
European  Journal  of Physics Education, 4
, 17-23. Creswell,  J.  W.  2012.
Educational  research:  Planning  conducting  and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research
4th ed.. Boston: Pearson Education.
Cropanzano,  R.,  Goldman,  B.,    Folger,  R.  2005.  Self-interest:  Defining  and understanding  a  human  motive.
Journal  of  Organizational  Behavior,  26
, 985-991.
DeGennaro, D. 2008. Learning design: an analysis of youth-initiated technology use.
Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41
, 1-20. EdSurge.
n.d.. Retrieved
April 13,
2017, from
https:www.edsurge.comproduct-reviewssocrative PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
56 Eggen,  P.,    Kauchak,  D.  2010.  Educational  psychology  windows  on
classrooms. New Jersey: Pearson Education. Friesen,  S.,    Jaedine,  D.  2009.
21st  century  learning  and  learners
.  Retrieved December
2, 2016,
from http:tftsfusa.orgfilesDocsTECanada2021st20cent20learning.pdf
Gibbs,  G.  2014.
Times  Higher  Education
.  Retrieved  April  13,  2017,  from Student
engagement, the
latest buzzword.:
https:www.timeshighereducation.co.uknewsstudentengagement- Harmer, J. 2001. The practice of English language teaching.
ELT Journal
, 4. Howson,  P.  2013.
The  English  effect.
Retrieved  December  9,  2016,  from www.britishcouncil.org:
https:www.britishcouncil.orgsitesdefaultfilesenglish-effect-report- v2.pdf
Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P. G., et al. 2008.
Living and Learning with New Media: Summary of Findings from the Digital Youth Project.
Chicago: The MacArthur Foundation. Kemmis,  S.,    McTaggart,  R.  1988.
The  action  research  planner
3rd  ed.. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
Krapp, A., Hiddi, S.,  Renninger, K. 1992. Interest, learning and development. In  K.  Renninger,  S.  Hiddi,    A.  Krapp,
The  role  of  interest  in  learning and development
pp. 3-25. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Kurilovas,  E.,  Kubilinskiene,  S.,    Dagiene,  V.  2014.  Web  3.0-Based
personalisation  of  learning  objects  in  virtual  learning  environments.
Computers in Human Behavior
, 654-662. Louis,  C.,  Manion,  L.,    Morrison,  K.  2013.
Research  methods  in  education
7th ed.. New York: Routledge. Maria,  D.,  Sagayaraj,  F.,    Anthony,  P.  2014.  E-Learning  in  Web  3.0.
I.J. Modern Education and Computer Science
, 8-14. Naidu, S. 2006.
E-learning: A guidebook of principles, procedures, and practice
2nd ed.. New Delhi: Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia CEMCA.
Omrod, J. 2011.
Educational  psychology:  Developing  learners
7 ed..  Boston: Pearson.
Phellas,  C.  N.,  Bloch,  A.,    Seale,  C.  2011.
Structured  methods:  Interviews, questionnaires and observation.
Researching society and culture. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
57 Prensky, M. 2005a. Engage me or enrage me.
Educase Review
, 61-64. Prensky,  M.  2005b.  Teaching  digital  natives:  Partnering  for  real  learning.
Corwin Press
, 1-35. Prensky,  M.  2008.  The  role  of  technology  in  teaching  and  the  classroom.
Educational Technology
, 1-3. Ruey,  S.  2010.  A  case  study  of  constructivist  instractional  strategies  for  adult
online learning.
British Journal of Educational Technology
, 41, 706-720. Schlechty,  P.  C.  2011.
Engaging  students:  The  next  level  of  working  on  the work.
United States of America: John Wiley  Sons. Silverman, D. 1993.
Interpreting qualitative data: Strategies for analysing talk, text and interaction.
London: Sage. Stockley,  D.  2006.
What  is  e-learning?
Retrieved  March  12,  2017,  from http:www.derekstockley.com.auej2b-what-is-elearning.html
Tapscott,  D.  2002.
Growing  up  digital:  The  rise  of  the  net  generation.
New York: McGraw Hill.
Trowler.  2010.
Student  engagement  literature  review.
Heslington,  York:  The Higher Education Academy.
Ulrich,  S.  1991.  Interest,  learning,  and  motivation.
Educational  Psychologist, 26
3-4, 299-323. Wash, p. D. 2014. Taking advantage of mobile devices: Using Socrative in the
classroom.
Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 3
, 99-101. Wood,  J.  2001.  Can  software  support  ch
ildren‟s  vocabulary  development?
Language Learning  Technology, 5
, 166-201. Yip,  F.  W.,    Kwan,  A.  C.  2006.  In
Online  vocabulary  games  as  a  tool  for teaching  and  learning  english  vocabulary
Vol.  43,  pp.  233-249.  Hong Kong: International Council for Educational Media.
58
Appendix 1
Research Permission Letter
59 PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
60
Appendix 2
Lesson Plan
61 Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran RPP
BAHASA INGGRIS
Nama Sekolah : SMP Budi Utama
KelasSemester : VII  2
Hari, tanggal : Kamis, 30 Maret 2017
Alokasi Waktu : 4 x 40 menit 2 kali pertemuan
Topik Pembelajaran :
Present Tense
1. Standar Kompetensi