54
1. For the English Teachers
In this digital era where sophisticated technology has role every aspects including educational field, students are easily to get bored with the conventional
learning activities. The teachers formerly are expected to find another interesting media to engage students in learning. Hence, this is the right time to provide the
students with the integration of technology and internet. In this case, the researcher suggests the teachers to make a use of the digital learning facilitation
Socrative App
in order to deliver the materials. Moreover, this activity should be done more often in order to prepare and make the students familiar with digital
facilitation in global world.
2. For Future Researchers
It is important to know if the kind of questions provided will help the students to relate the main topic which are being discussed with knowledge
surround. Since we are facing the development of technology, the future researchers who are interested in studying about this topic might consider about
the other digital learning facilitation which probably considered as more effective ways to engage the students in learning.
55
REFERENCES
Abas, Z. W. 2015. Fostering Learning in the 21st Century through Students Engagement.
Intenational Journal for Educational Media and Technology, 9
, 3-15. Beer, C., Clark, K., Jones, D. 2010. Indicators of Engagement.
Proceedings ASCILITE Sydney
, 65-84. Brown, J. S. 2006. New learning environments for the 21st century.
Exploring the Edge
, 18-24. Burns, A. 1999.
Collaborative action research for English language teachers.
Cambridge: Press Syndicte. Burns, A. 2003.
Collaborative action research for English language teachers.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Burns, R. B. 1994.
Introduction to Research Method.
Melbourne: Longman. Chusanachoti, R. 2009.
EFL learning through language activities outside the classroom: A case study of English education students in Thailand.
Michigan State University. Coca, D. M., Slisko, J. 2013. Software Socrative and smartphones as tools for
implementation of basic processes of active physics learning in classroom: An initial feasibility study with prospective teacher.
European Journal of Physics Education, 4
, 17-23. Creswell, J. W. 2012.
Educational research: Planning conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research
4th ed.. Boston: Pearson Education.
Cropanzano, R., Goldman, B., Folger, R. 2005. Self-interest: Defining and understanding a human motive.
Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26
, 985-991.
DeGennaro, D. 2008. Learning design: an analysis of youth-initiated technology use.
Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41
, 1-20. EdSurge.
n.d.. Retrieved
April 13,
2017, from
https:www.edsurge.comproduct-reviewssocrative PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
56 Eggen, P., Kauchak, D. 2010. Educational psychology windows on
classrooms. New Jersey: Pearson Education. Friesen, S., Jaedine, D. 2009.
21st century learning and learners
. Retrieved December
2, 2016,
from http:tftsfusa.orgfilesDocsTECanada2021st20cent20learning.pdf
Gibbs, G. 2014.
Times Higher Education
. Retrieved April 13, 2017, from Student
engagement, the
latest buzzword.:
https:www.timeshighereducation.co.uknewsstudentengagement- Harmer, J. 2001. The practice of English language teaching.
ELT Journal
, 4. Howson, P. 2013.
The English effect.
Retrieved December 9, 2016, from www.britishcouncil.org:
https:www.britishcouncil.orgsitesdefaultfilesenglish-effect-report- v2.pdf
Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P. G., et al. 2008.
Living and Learning with New Media: Summary of Findings from the Digital Youth Project.
Chicago: The MacArthur Foundation. Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R. 1988.
The action research planner
3rd ed.. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
Krapp, A., Hiddi, S., Renninger, K. 1992. Interest, learning and development. In K. Renninger, S. Hiddi, A. Krapp,
The role of interest in learning and development
pp. 3-25. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Kurilovas, E., Kubilinskiene, S., Dagiene, V. 2014. Web 3.0-Based
personalisation of learning objects in virtual learning environments.
Computers in Human Behavior
, 654-662. Louis, C., Manion, L., Morrison, K. 2013.
Research methods in education
7th ed.. New York: Routledge. Maria, D., Sagayaraj, F., Anthony, P. 2014. E-Learning in Web 3.0.
I.J. Modern Education and Computer Science
, 8-14. Naidu, S. 2006.
E-learning: A guidebook of principles, procedures, and practice
2nd ed.. New Delhi: Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia CEMCA.
Omrod, J. 2011.
Educational psychology: Developing learners
7 ed.. Boston: Pearson.
Phellas, C. N., Bloch, A., Seale, C. 2011.
Structured methods: Interviews, questionnaires and observation.
Researching society and culture. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
57 Prensky, M. 2005a. Engage me or enrage me.
Educase Review
, 61-64. Prensky, M. 2005b. Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning.
Corwin Press
, 1-35. Prensky, M. 2008. The role of technology in teaching and the classroom.
Educational Technology
, 1-3. Ruey, S. 2010. A case study of constructivist instractional strategies for adult
online learning.
British Journal of Educational Technology
, 41, 706-720. Schlechty, P. C. 2011.
Engaging students: The next level of working on the work.
United States of America: John Wiley Sons. Silverman, D. 1993.
Interpreting qualitative data: Strategies for analysing talk, text and interaction.
London: Sage. Stockley, D. 2006.
What is e-learning?
Retrieved March 12, 2017, from http:www.derekstockley.com.auej2b-what-is-elearning.html
Tapscott, D. 2002.
Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation.
New York: McGraw Hill.
Trowler. 2010.
Student engagement literature review.
Heslington, York: The Higher Education Academy.
Ulrich, S. 1991. Interest, learning, and motivation.
Educational Psychologist, 26
3-4, 299-323. Wash, p. D. 2014. Taking advantage of mobile devices: Using Socrative in the
classroom.
Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 3
, 99-101. Wood, J. 2001. Can software support ch
ildren‟s vocabulary development?
Language Learning Technology, 5
, 166-201. Yip, F. W., Kwan, A. C. 2006. In
Online vocabulary games as a tool for teaching and learning english vocabulary
Vol. 43, pp. 233-249. Hong Kong: International Council for Educational Media.
58
Appendix 1
Research Permission Letter
59 PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
60
Appendix 2
Lesson Plan
61 Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran RPP
BAHASA INGGRIS
Nama Sekolah : SMP Budi Utama
KelasSemester : VII 2
Hari, tanggal : Kamis, 30 Maret 2017
Alokasi Waktu : 4 x 40 menit 2 kali pertemuan
Topik Pembelajaran :
Present Tense
1. Standar Kompetensi