Data Analysis Technique RESEARCH METHOD

digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id indicates the strength of the relationship between the variables. The values of the correlation coefficient can range from -1 to +1. A coefficient close to +1 or to -1 indicates a strong relationship between two variables. Scores closes to zero indicated the absence of a relationship between the two variables. The variables are positively related, if the coefficient has positive sign. 8 Furthermore, in order to make calculating the data of research easier and valid, the researcher used application SPSS 16.0 from windows computer program. The value of sig from the output of SPSS with the level of significance 0, 05 is compared. If the value of sig is higher than the level of significance, the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternative hyphothesis is accepted , it means that there is significant correlation and “vice versa” If the value of sig is lower than the level of significance, the null hyphothesis is accepted and the alternative hyphothesis is rejected, it means that there is no significant correlation. 8 Mark Balnaves and Peter Caputri, Introduction to Quantitative Research Methods an Investigative Approach. London: SAGE Publication Ltd, 2001, 155. digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id 38

CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDING

In this chapter the researcher describes the findings and the discussion which is covered during the research. The data obtained is expected to be able to answer the research questions mentioned in the first chapter. The descriptions of finding are students’ preference learning style and students’ critical reading achievement. The researcher presents them based on the data collected and the procedures presented in the chapter III.

A. Students’ Learning Style Preference in Critical Reading Class

In the first research of this study the researcher has distributed learning style questionnaire to students. It was done on May 11st, 2015 and May 13rd, 2015 . In this section the researcher distributed learning style questionnaires to the 62 students the students from class A and class B of critical reading class as the sample of this research. It contains 30 questions. Students can answer by circling the options that they prefer. One question only has one answer. The format of answer as follow: = Never 1 = Rarely 2 = Sometimes 3 = Often 4 = Always digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id The researcher gathers the data from questionnaire as follows: Table 4.1 The Result of Students’ Total Score from Questionnaire No. Name Total score Question A Question B Question C 1 AHR 30 25 17 2 BAAP 24 21 16 3 DAC 26 29 27 4 IN 22 14 16 5 KKN 33 23 28 6 MJ 20 21 22 7 MB 24 24 18 8 PKY 24 23 24 9 RH 28 27 26 10 RM 22 19 19 11 SAF 20 20 15 12 SI 27 32 28 13 WU 27 14 21 14 AMA 27 29 29 15 ECR 25 26 15 16 IPY 30 15 19 17 YA 31 25 22 18 MTK 21 19 20 19 BAR 22 18 23 20 DL 23 21 26 21 DAW 22 26 19 22 EMBP 25 21 24 23 EWA 25 24 28 24 HJ 23 23 24 25 MI 20 21 25 26 MN 25 24 19 27 RN 25 22 16 28 SA 32 23 24 digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id 29 YT 28 19 18 30 ZB 30 25 28 31 AFH 24 18 17 32 AN 22 25 28 33 AHM 32 24 23 34 HS 26 26 20 35 ALA 21 19 20 36 SM 32 26 30 37 WAH 27 24 26 38 DM 30 16 16 39 FAG 25 24 28 40 FNU 21 16 17 41 MD 26 26 25 42 IN 30 25 28 43 NAS 30 20 24 44 WH 25 24 28 45 ADA 23 26 23 46 AL 31 27 27 47 BRH 29 26 17 48 DAP 24 17 20 49 EAP 23 18 21 50 ENW 30 17 28 51 EKA 30 25 28 52 FYA 30 21 20 53 HK 28 28 23 54 IMA 21 19 21 55 KA 24 31 21 56 LM 31 26 32 57 LFS 22 19 23 58 MM 25 21 24 59 MF 24 23 26 60 RP 20 25 16 61 AM 29 23 24 62 MZ 20 13 11 N = 62 digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id The researcher makes the percentage from 30 items that consist of 10 questions for visual learner categories, 10 questions for auditory learner categories and 10 questions for kinesthetic learner categories. The researcher categorizes students’ learning style based on their score from each question. Visual learners get highest score in question A, Auditory learners get highest score in question B, and Kinesthetic learners get highest score in question C. But, from the data the researcher finds some students have the same high score in different learning style. It means that a student can prefer to have more than one learning style, it is also known as mix of learning style or multiple learning styles. Everyone has a mix of learning styles. Some people may find that they have a dominant style of learning, with far less use of the other styles. Others may find that they use different styles in different circumstances. 1 Because of the explanation above the researcher adds the total of respondent becomes 70 respondents N = 70. In the table the researcher categorizes the type of learners and makes percentages. The researcher breaks down the data into percentage to make it easy for the readers to understand the result of the observation. The formula to count the percentage as follows: 1 “Overview of Learning Styles,” accessed June 25, 2015, http:www.learning-styles- online.comoverview.

Dokumen yang terkait

Logical statement in student’s research proposal at English Teacher Education Department Islamic State University Sunan Ampel Surabaya.

0 1 63

An analysis of the students’ critical thinking in writing argumentative essay: a case study in fourth semester students of English Teacher Education Department at Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya.

0 0 136

The effectiveness of critical reading strategies on students’ critical thinking ability at English teacher education Department of State Islamic University of Sunan Ampel.

0 2 77

English reading habit of student teachers at english teacher education department of Sunan Ampel State Islamic University: level and common factor analysis.

0 1 75

The languange attitude of English Education Department students in Sunan Ampel Islamic State University in learning english.

1 4 93

Conversational hand gestures of student teachers to give instruction in microteaching class of English Teacher Education Department at Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya.

0 1 120

CULTURAL CONTENT IN SPEAKING FOR EVERYDAY COMMUNICATION CLASS IN ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA.

0 0 110

VOCABULARY LEARNING STRATEGIES IN INTERNSHIP PROGRAM AT ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF SUNAN AMPEL STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY SURABAYA.

0 0 108

THE STUDENTS` ABILITY TO THINK CRITICALLY IN CRITICAL READING CLASS AT ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF FACULTY OF EDUCATION AND TEACHER TRAINING OF STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA 2015.

0 0 71

STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY AT ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF THE STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA.

0 1 85