Questionnaires How the responsibility of learning is transferred Students’ perception of autonomous learning Interview

three students from class D were chosen as representative to be interviewed to complete the data. These students were selected based on their answer of the questionnaires.

C. Research Setting

The research was carried out during the even semester of 20072008 academic year in the English Language Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta. The research was conducted in Extensive Reading II class C and D. The main reason for choosing these classes was because the students learned that the teacher implemented autonomous learning in Extensive Reading II. The teacher taught two classes. They were class C and class D.

D. Research Instruments

In this research, the researcher explored the students’ perception of autonomous learning in Extensive Reading II class. The researcher employed two types of instruments to gather the data from the participants. They were questionnaires and interviews. The questionnaire and individual interview are the most common instruments for data collection in survey research Ary, et al, 2002: 406.

1. Questionnaires

In order to investigate the students’ perceptions of autonomous learning as presented in the second problem formulation, the researcher administered questionnaires to the research participants. Ary et al 1990: 421 define a questionnaire as an instrument to gather information by having the participants respond to a list of questions. The questionnaire implemented in this research was a directly-administered-questionnaire. The questionnaire was distributed to a group of people assembled at a certain place for a specific purpose p: 385. Hence, the questionnaires were distributed to the students of Extensive Reading II class C and D. The questionnaire used in this study was a close-ended questionnaire. Fifty one close-ended questions in each questionnaire were administered to discern students’ perception of autonomous learning. The questionnaires used Likert Scale, a scale that is constructed by assembling a number of statements about an object, about a half of which express a clearly favourable attitude and half of which are clearly unfavourable attitude Ary at al, 1990: 235. A set of related responses, one for each point, was provided. The responses were valued from strongly disagree, disagree, uncertain, agree and strongly agree. The rank was one to five. The questions were divided into eight parts. Table 3.1 summarized the questionnaires blueprint. Table 3.1 is in the next page. Table 3.1 Questionnaire Blueprint NO Features Item Numbers 1 Students’ previous experience of autonomous learning 1-3

2. How the responsibility of learning is transferred

a. Teacher’s roles b. Students’ roles c. Group-work roles 1-6 1-7 1-7 3 Students’ Perception of the transfer of responsibility a. Students’ perception of the teacher’s roles b. Students’ perception of their roles c. Students’ perception of group-work roles 1-6 1-8 1-9

4. Students’ perception of autonomous learning

1-5

2. Interview

The second instrument employed in this study was interview. This interview was used to obtain data to answer the first problem presented in the problem formulation that was how autonomous learning is implemented in Extensive reading II class. The strategy used in conducting interview was interview guide approach, in which topics and issues to discuss were specifically outlined. The interviewer decided the sequence and wording of the questions. By using this strategy, the comprehensiveness of the data was improved and the data could be specifically collected. In addition, gaps in the data could be anticipated. To help the researcher to conduct the interview, interview blueprint was made. Table 3.1 was the interview blueprint. Table 3.2 Interview Blueprint Features Item Numbers Process of autonomous learning 1,2,3,4,5,6 Students opinion on autonomous learning 7,8, Positive and negative effect of autonomous learning 9,10 The interview was conducted before and after the students filled out the questionnaire. The participants of the interview were the teacher and six students of class C and D of Extensive Reading II. The researcher asked ten open-ended questions which were designed to find out the process of implementation of autonomous learning and to verify the students’ answers to the questionnaire. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

E. Data Gathering Technique

Dokumen yang terkait

Identifying students` learning styles and their implications using kolb`s learning style inventory in the learning process of extensive reading II class.

0 3 80

Improving students` participation of XB class of SMAN 11 Yogyakarta in learning reading skill by implementing extensive reading.

0 0 231

Students` perception on cooperative learning used in extensive reading II class of English Language Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University.

0 2 127

Developing student`s metacognitive learning strategies through mind mapping technique in extensive reading II class at Sanata Dharma University.

0 0 138

A study of student`s critical reading development through self-generated questioning technique in extensive reading I.

0 1 160

Institutional Repository | Satya Wacana Christian University: Students Perception Toward the Use of Diaries in Extensive Reading Class

0 0 1

PROMOTING AUTONOMOUS LEARNING IN READING CLASS revised 3rd

0 0 16

STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION OF AUTONOMOUS LEARNING IN EXTENSIVE READING II CLASS A THESIS Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements to Obtain the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree in English Language Education

0 0 107

Developing student`s metacognitive learning strategies through mind mapping technique in extensive reading II class at Sanata Dharma University - USD Repository

0 0 135

Students` perception on cooperative learning used in extensive reading II class of English Language Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University - USD Repository

0 1 125