the collaborators and distributed the answer sheets of the cycle 2 test. After all, I thanked the students and also the museum guide as appreciating their participation in
this research. The fieldtrip was ended by this.
4.3.4. Observing
As the second cycle was conducted in two meetings, the result of the observing stage would be presented into two parts.
4.3.4.1 Analysis of meeting 1 The material of study in this meeting was still the same with the previous, which was
about writing recount text. The data of the observing stage was obtained through the field note made by
the collaborator who observed the teaching learning process. Those data was also being compared with the data obtained by the researcher me. The collaborator
observed the students and teacher‟s activities and jotted down the result into the observation sheets. The result of the observation was as follow:
Observation of the students‟ activities: 1 36 students were present 100
2 10 students actively asked questions 27 3 8 students actively answered teacher‟s questions 22
4 32 students did the activities given by the teacher well 88 5 30 students paid attention to the teacher 83
6 33 students did not make some trouble noise 91 7 32 students were active in the group discussion 88
The data of the observation of the teacher‟s activities show that: 1 The teacher was good at opening the lesson and motivating the students.
2 The teacher good also in explaining the material to the students. 3 The teacher had a very loud and clear voice and intonation that could be heard by
the whole students. However, sometimes she spoke too fast. 4 The teacher was not ignorant to the students by giving her students chances to
actively engage in the lesson. 5 The teacher could not manage the situation of the class after giving the result of
students‟ work. 6 The teacher tried to create the English speaking atmosphere in the classroom by
not using too many „Bahasa Indonesia‟ in delivering the lesson. 7 The teacher was good at leading the discussion about determining the cultural
awareness of the model text. 8 The teacher
was good on stimulating students‟ awareness of culture by giving some reflective cases.
9 The teacher was good on ending up the class by giving the students‟ chances to
wrap up the conclusion. 4.3.4.2 Analysis of Treatment II Fieldtrip
The field trip was conducted not more than ninety minutes considering the concentration span of the students were not last for more than it. Moreover, the
students already had had end of semester test, so that I decided not to take extended time.
During the fieldtrip, I and two collaborators took some field note to observe the activity. After the fieldtrip had finished, the data obtained were compared and
evaluated by discussion. The elaboration of the observation can be seen as described here.
Observation of the students‟ activities: 1 36 students were present 100
2 20 students actively asked questions 55 3 8 students actively answered teacher‟s questions 22
4 32 students did the activities given by the teacher well 88 5 28 students paid attention to the teacher 77
6 33 students did not make some trouble noise 91 7 30 students were active in the group discussion 83
The data of the observation of the teacher‟s researcher and the museum guide‟s activities show that:
1 The teacher was good at opening the fieldtrip and motivating the students. 2 The guide was good also in explaining the material to the students.
3 The guide had a very loud and clear voice and intonation that could be heard by the whole students. However, sometimes he spoke too fast.
4 Sometimes the teacher was ignorant to the students by letting them to take pictures and made some noise.
5 The guide could not manage the situation of the fieldtrip when
6 The teacher tried to create the English speaking atmosphere in the museum by not using too many „Bahasa Indonesia‟ in delivering the lesson. However, since the
museum guide still used Bahasa, then it was difficult to create fully English atmosphere.
7 The teacher and the guide were good at giving feedback to the students‟ questions.
8 The teacher and the guide were good on stimulating students‟ awareness of
culture by giving some reflective cases after showing every room in the museum. 9 The teacher
was good on ending up the class by giving the students‟ some reinforcements and assignments.
4.3.5 Reflecting
