The highest improvement Conclusion

REFFERENCES Arikunto, Suharsimi. 1991.Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Brown, Douglas H. 2001. Teaching by Principles. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Byrne, D. 1976. Teaching Oral English. Harlow: Longman. DavidRoger Jhonson. “Cooperative Learning.” October 2001. 10 May 2006 http:www.clcrc.compagescl.html . Slavin, Robert E. 1984. Cooperative Learning. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Arend. 1997. Classroom Instruction Management. New York: The Mc Graw Hill Company. Depdiknas. 2007. Materi Sosialisasi dan Pelatihan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan KTSP. Jakarta: Diknas. Diknas, 2006. Buku Satuan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Diknas. Jakarta. Harris, David. 1974. English as a Second Language. New York. Mc.Graw Mill. Hatch, EFarhady. 1982. Research Design and Statistic for Applied Linguistics. Tokyo. Newbury House Publisher. Hornby, A.S. 1995. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current Language. Oxford: Oxford University Perss. Huebner, Theodore. 1969. How to Teach Foreign Languages effectively. New York: New York University Press. Hughes, Arthur.1989. Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge. University Press. New York. 172 pages. Johnson, Keith. 1983. Communicative Approach and Communicative Processes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lado, Robert.1974. Language Testing. London. Longman. Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2000. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching second edition. New York: New York University Press. Lewis, M Jimmy Hill. 1985. Practical Techniques for Language Teaching. London: Comercial Colour Press. Murcia and Mariane Celce and Mc. Intosh, Loish. 1978. Teaching English as a Second Language. Newburry. Newburry House Publisher. Purwati, Nining, 2009. Improving Students’ Speaking Ability through Jigsawtask Unpublished Script FKIP Unila. Bandar Lampung. Rivers, W.M. 1978. Teaching Foreign Language Skills. Chicago: University Press. Setiyadi, Bambang. 2006. Teaching English As A Foreign Language. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu. Setiyadi, Bambang. 2006. Metode Penelitian Untuk Pengajaran Bahasa Asing Pendekatan Kuantitatif Dan Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu. Shoamy, Elena. 1985. A Practical Handbook in Language Testing for the Second Language Teacher. Tel Aviv University. Slameto. 1988. Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta. PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Universitas Lampung. 2008. Pedoman Penulisan Karya Ilmiah. Bandar Lampung. Penerbit Universitas Lampung. Appendix 1 Pretest Time allocation 90 minutes 1. Work in group of 2-3 students.

2. Make a dialogue based on this topic.

3. Choose one situation of six situations Inviting someone, accepting and refusing an invitation available: a Inviting someone, accepting and refusing an invitation. a. You are going to invite someone in celebrating your birthday party. b. You are going to invite your friends to come to your house for dinner. c. You are going to accept your friends’ invitation to go to the beach. d. You are going to accept your friends’ invitation to watch movie. e. You are going to refuse your friends’ invitation to go swimming in Unila’s swimming pool. f. You are going to refuse your friends’ invitation to go to shopping. b Meeting and parting. Instruction 1. You have 10 minutes for preparing your dialogue in group.

2. You are free to express your idea.

3. You are given 5 minutes in group to perform the dialogue in front of the

class. 4. Speak clearly because your voice will be recorded. The criteria in scoring; pronunciation, vocabulary, fluency, comprehension and grammar is 20 for each. Good Luck Posttest Time allocation 90 minutes 4. Work in group of 2-3 students.

5. Make a dialogue based on this topic.

6. Choose one situation of six situations Inviting someone, accepting and refusing an invitation available: c Inviting someone, accepting and refusing an invitation. a. You are going to invite someone in celebrating your birthday party. b. You are going to invite your friends to come to your house for dinner. c. You are going to accept your friends’ invitation to go to the beach. d. You are going to accept your friends’ invitation to watch movie. e. You are going to refuse your friends’ invitation to go swimming in Unila’s swimming pool. f. You are going to refuse your friends’ invitation to go to shopping. d Meeting and parting. Instruction 5. You have 10 minutes for preparing your dialogue in group.

6. You are free to express your idea.

7. You are given 5 minutes in group to perform the dialogue in front of the

class. 8. Speak clearly because your voice will be recorded. The criteria in scoring; pronunciation, vocabulary, fluency, comprehension and grammar is 20 for each. Good Luck Appendix 2 Table of rating scale Aspects of speaking Rating scales Description Pronunciation 5 Speech is fluent and effortless as that native speaker. 4 Always intelligible though one is conscious of a definite accent. 3 Pronunciation problems necessitate concentrated listening and Occasionally lead to understanding. 2 Very hard to understand because of pronunciation problem most Frequently be asked to repeat. 1 Pronunciation problem so severe as to make speech unintelligible. Vocabulary 5 Use of vocabulary and idiom virtually that is of native speaker. 4 Sometimes use inappropriate terms and must rephrase ideas, because of inadequate vocabulary. 3 Frequently use the wrong word, conversation somewhat limited because of inadequate vocabulary. 2 Misuse of words and very limited vocabulary make comprehension quite difficult. 1 Vocabulary limitations so extreme as to make conversation virtually impossible. Fluency 5 Speech is fluent and effortless as that of native speaker. 4 Speed of speech seems rather strongly affected by language problems. 3 Speed and fluency are rather strongly affected by language problems. 2 Usually hesitant often forced into silence by language problems. 1 Speech is so halting and fragmentary as to make conversation virtually impossible. 5 Appear to understand everything without difficulty. 4 Understand nearly everything at normal speed although occasionally repetition may be necessary.

Dokumen yang terkait

The Effectiveness Of Using Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) Techniques in Teaching Reading

1 16 116

The Effectiveness Of Using The Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) Technique Towards Students’ Understanding Of The Simple Past Tense (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP Trimulia, Jakarta Selatan)

1 8 117

The effectiveness of using student teams achievement division (stad) technique in teaching direct and indirect speech of statement (A quasi experimental study at the eleventh grade of Jam'iyyah Islamiyyah Islamic Senior high scholl Cege)

3 5 90

Penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar akidah akhlak: penelitian tindakan kelas di MA Nihayatul Amal Karawang

0 10 156

Applying Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Technique to Improve Students’ Reading Comprehension in Discussion Text. (A Classroom Action Research in the Third Grade of SMA Fatahillah Jakarta)

5 42 142

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF STAD (STUDENTS TEAM ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION) TO IMPROVE STUDENTS' VOCABULARY MASTERY AT THE FIRST GRADE STUDENTS OF SMAN 1 TERBANGGI BESAR

0 5 60

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF STAD (STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS) TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY AT THE FIRST GRADE OF SMAN 1 TERBANGGI BESAR LAMPUNG TENGAH

0 12 127

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF STUDENT TEAM ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) TECHNIQUE IN SPEAKING CLASS AT THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA NEGERI 14 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 10 65

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) METHOD TO TEACH READING VIEWED FROM STUDENTS MOTIVATION

0 4 161

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TEACHING READING USING STUDENTS TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TEACHING READING USING STUDENTS TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) FOR THE FIRST YEAR OF SMA N 2 SUKOHARJO.

0 0 13