1. Home
  2. Lainnya

Research Validity RESEARCH METHOD

digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id 7 7 15 9 3 2 2 2 8 4 15 17 2 2 - - 9 8 18 7 7 - - - 10 2 9 24 5 - - - 11 10 19 10 1 - - - 12 11 14 8 1 1 1 - 13 9 10 13 7 1 - - 14 6 14 14 5 1 - - 15 5 21 10 3 - - 1 16 2 17 15 6 - - - 17 2 17 16 2 - 3 - 18 4 17 19 5 - - - Total Score 76 207 209 145 65 15 4 Table 4.1 The Students’ Ability in Critical Thinking Level From the table shown above, there are 4 students choose to leave the answer. One of students said that they did not answer the question because of they are doubt of their skill. Essentially, this is common for the students answer their skill. The strengths of believe will be challenged in this test. Nevertheless, their critical thinking is only known by themselves. How is low or how is deeper their thinking in assumingsomething can be felt by digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id themselves. He them to solve the Addit critical thinking Figure 4.2 The Perc In thi six levels. Thos level 2, the be advanced thinke details as followi

a. The Unref

The thinking. In seen from t 20 2 The Hence, the researcher can show their critical thinki their difficulties in solving their assumptions about Additionally before describing the table above, tota ng level can be described by the following diagram rcentages of the Students’ Ability in critical thinki n this research, the researcher uses the level of critic Those are the unreflective thinker level 1, the cha beginning thinker level 3, the practicing thinker nker level 5, and the accomplished thinker leve owing: eflective Thinker Level The unreflective thinker student was the first le . In the conducted test, students level of this thi their ability to answer questions.The students lar 10 29 29 9 1 The Percentages of the Students Ability in Critical Thingking Level L L L L L L hinking and help bout around. otal score of the gram: nking Level tical thinking by hallenge thinker nker level 4, the vel 6. Here are level in critical hinker could be largely unaware in Level 6 Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1

Dokumen yang terkait

The effectiveness of critical reading strategies on students’ critical thinking ability at English teacher education Department of State Islamic University of Sunan Ampel.

0 2 77

The languange attitude of English Education Department students in Sunan Ampel Islamic State University in learning english.

1 4 93

An error analysis on derivational suffixes in the students' writing assignments of English Teacher Education Department of State Islamic University of Sunan Ampel Surabaya.

6 9 71

THE STUDENTS' ABILITY OF BUILDING COHERENCE AND UNITY IN ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING AT ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF UIN SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA.

0 1 81

STUDENTS’ WRITING ANXIETY LEVELS IN PROPOSAL WRITING COURSE IN FIFTH SEMESTER AT ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA.

0 5 81

STUDENTS’ WRITING APPREHENSION IN THESIS WRITING AT ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF UIN SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA.

0 1 76

An Analysis the argumentative writing skill of students at English Education Teacher Department of UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.

0 0 83

THE STUDENTS` ABILITY TO THINK CRITICALLY IN CRITICAL READING CLASS AT ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF FACULTY OF EDUCATION AND TEACHER TRAINING OF STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA 2015.

0 0 71

STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY AT ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF THE STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA.

0 1 85

CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ LEARNING STYLE AND ACHIEVEMENT IN CRITICAL READING CLASS OF ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT AT SUNAN AMPEL STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY SURABAYA.

0 0 78