1. Home
  2. Lainnya

Research subjects RESEARCH METHOD

digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id b. Documentation The researcher will use this technique to collect the data from the subjects in the field.Documentation of Data is a technique to search the data based on the certain study by transcript, books, newspaper, magazine, meeting writer, etc. 5 here some documentation that searched by researcher: No. Data of Documentation Result 1 The students’ final written work 2 The SAP of the teacher 3 The students’ achievement The Table 3.2 Data of Documentation Result Besides collecting the students’ achievement and the teachers’ SAP, the researcher will analyze the data with the theory completely. Moreover, the researcher uses the rubric to assess the students’ final written work or the students’ argumentative essay. See in the table 3.3 below. 5 Suharsimi Arikanto, Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek Jakarta: PT. Rineke Cipta, p. 236. FEATURES 6 5 4 3 2 1 Score INTRODUCTION Background or history, define the problem, thesis Statement Well-developed introductory paragraph contains detailed background, a clear explanation or definition of the problem and a thesis statement Begin to develop introductory paragraph contains detailed background, explanation or definition of the problem and states the thesis of the paper well Begin to develop introductory paragraph contains detailed background, but lack of explanation or definition of the problem and a thesis statement Introductory paragraph contains some background information and states the problem, but does not explain using details. States the thesis of the paper Introductory states the thesis but does not adequately of the problem. The problem is stated but lacks detail Thesis andor problem is vague or Unclear. Background details are a seemingly random collection of information, unclear, or not related to the topic. MAIN POINTS Body paragraphs, Refutation Three or more points are well developed with supporting details and the weakness of ideas and also reasoning are presented well. Refutation paragraphs acknowledges the opposing view and summarize their Three or more points begin to develop with supporting details and the weakness of ideas but the reasoning are not presented well. Refutations paragraphs acknowledges the opposing view but may Three or more main points begin to develop with supporting details and also the weakness of ideas but the reasoning are not presented. Refutation paragraphs acknowledges the opposing view but lack of summarizes their Three or more main points are present but may lack detail or the weakness of ideas are presented and development in one or two. Refutation paragraphs acknowledges the opposing view but doesn’t summarize Three or more main points, but all lack development and also the weakness of ideas are not presented. Refutation paragraphs missing andor vague. Less than three main points, with poor development of ideas. The weakness of ideas is not presented Refutation missing or vague. Rubric of The Students’ Critical Thinking in Writing Argumentative Essay 52

Dokumen yang terkait

The effectiveness of critical reading strategies on students’ critical thinking ability at English teacher education Department of State Islamic University of Sunan Ampel.

0 2 77

The languange attitude of English Education Department students in Sunan Ampel Islamic State University in learning english.

1 4 93

An error analysis on derivational suffixes in the students' writing assignments of English Teacher Education Department of State Islamic University of Sunan Ampel Surabaya.

6 9 71

THE STUDENTS' ABILITY OF BUILDING COHERENCE AND UNITY IN ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING AT ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF UIN SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA.

0 1 81

STUDENTS’ WRITING ANXIETY LEVELS IN PROPOSAL WRITING COURSE IN FIFTH SEMESTER AT ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA.

0 5 81

STUDENTS’ WRITING APPREHENSION IN THESIS WRITING AT ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF UIN SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA.

0 1 76

An Analysis the argumentative writing skill of students at English Education Teacher Department of UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.

0 0 83

THE STUDENTS` ABILITY TO THINK CRITICALLY IN CRITICAL READING CLASS AT ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF FACULTY OF EDUCATION AND TEACHER TRAINING OF STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA 2015.

0 0 71

STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY AT ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF THE STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA.

0 1 85

CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ LEARNING STYLE AND ACHIEVEMENT IN CRITICAL READING CLASS OF ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT AT SUNAN AMPEL STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY SURABAYA.

0 0 78