Frequency of Use of the Metacognitive Strategies

57 +1. Furthermore, SUP Strategies also got the definite relation to reading comprehension with significant level .01 p .05 and Pearson Correlation level at .419 approaching +1. Eventually, Global Reading Strategies were reported as independent variable, which gained positive relation to reading comprehension as well p = .004 and r = .476. Table 4.8 Model Summary of Multiple Regression Analysis Model Summary b Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1 .658 a .433 .368 32.57276 a. Predictors: Constant, GLOB, PROB, SUP b. Dependent Variable: RComp Table 4.8 showed how much of the variance in the reading comprehension was explained by metacognitive reading strategies. It was found that the value of R Square was .433. It could be expressed into percentage multiply by 100 as 43 . It meant that metacognitive reading strategies explained 43 of the gain of reading comprehension. Table 4.9 Analysis of Variance of Students’ Metacognitive reading strategies awareness and Reading Comprehension ANOVA a Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 21094.398 3 7031.466 6.627 .002 b Residual 27585.602 26 1060.985 Total 48680.000 29 PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 58 a. Dependent Variable: RComp b. Predictors: Constant, GLOB, PROB, SUP As noted previously, this study was aimed to investigate the relationship between stu dents’ reading comprehension and awareness in utilizing metacognitive reading strategies. Then, the data of correlation was provided in the table 4.9. The table Analysis of Variance ANOVA revealed that coefficient of multiple correlation was relevantly significant in level .002 p .05. F-test was also conducted to test the statistical significance. It was found that F value was 6.76. Afterwards, the F value was compared with the value of F table 2.98. It meant F value was higher that F table 6.76 2.98. Hence, the null hypothesis H0 of hypothesis number one cannot be accepted. Table 4.10 Multiple Regression Coefficients Coefficients a Table 4.10 showed a report of regression coefficients as well as correlation among explanatory variables. By means of 95 confidence intervals of the Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. 95.0 Confidence Interval for B Correlations Collinearity Statistics B Std. Error Beta Lower Bound Upper Bound Zero- order Partial Part Tolera nce VIF 1 Constant 146.856 64.228 2.286 .031 14.834 278.878 PROB 59.648 21.606 .548 2.761 .010 15.236 104.059 .619 .476 .408 .553 1.808 SUP -6.812 18.322 -.077 -.372 .713 -44.473 30.848 .419 -.073 -.055 .512 1.952 GLOB 27.854 18.374 .266 1.516 .142 -9.915 65.622 .476 .285 .224 .710 1.408 a. Dependent Variable: RComp