Materials and methods Directory UMM :Journals:Journal of Insect Physiology:Vol46.Issue10.Oct2000:

1416 C. Hirayama et al. Journal of Insect Physiology 46 2000 1415–1421 The origin of urease in the silkworm hemolymph, however, is not clear due to the lack of biochemical and structural information about the enzyme. Yamada et al. 1984 speculated that the urease activity found in the larvae fed the mulberry leaves originates from the mul- berry leaves; the host plant urease itself could pass across the gut wall by an unknown mechanism. How- ever, we can not rule out the possibility that urease could be produced in the tissues of the silkworm reared on the mulberry leaves. In the present study, we purified and characterized the urease from the hemolymph of larvae reared on mulberry leaves. Our results show that mulberry leaf urease passes across the larval gut wall into the hemolymph without digestion. In addition, quantitative analysis on the efficiency of the enzyme transport from the midgut into the insect hemolymph was made by feeding larvae with artificial diets containing defined amounts of the mul- berry leaf urease.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Chemicals Q–Sepharose FF, Superdex 200 pg, and Mono Q 55 were purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Uppsala. Sweden. Jack bean seed urease type C–3 was obtained from Sigma St Louis, USA. Mulberry leaf urease was purified using the purification procedure as described Hirayama et al., 2000. All other chemicals used were of the highest purity commercially available. 2.2. Insects and collection of hemolymph Silkworm larvae, Bombyx mori, N601·2 × C602·3 race, were reared on commercial artificial diet Silk mate, Nihon Nosan Kogyo Co, Japan from hatching through the 4th larval instar at 25 ° C. Newly ecdysed 5th instar larvae were reared on an artificial diet Hirayama et al., 1997 or fresh mulberry leaves Morus alba L. cv. Shin- ichinose. In the present experiments, almost all larvae began to spin six days after the 4th ecdysis. These mature larvae were transferred into cages for spinning. Hemolymph was collected by cutting the abdominal legs. To prevent melanogenesis, 13 volume of 0.5 asc- orbic acid solution was added to the collected hemo- lymph. 2.3. Urease assay Urease was assayed as previously described Hirayama et al., 2000. Briefly, the standard reaction mixture containing 0.1 M–Tris HCl buffer pH 9.0, 30 mM urea and the enzyme in a total volume of 100 µ l was incubated at 30 ° C. The reaction was terminated by adding 10 µ l 1 N H 2 SO 4 to the mixture and ammonia produced was determined using the ammonia assay reagent 171–C, Sigma. One unit of the enzyme was defined as the amount of enzyme that hydrolyses 1 µ mol of urea per min under the assay condition. 2.4. Urease purification from the hemolymph All the purification procedures were carried out at 0– 4 ° C, unless stated otherwise. Hemolymph was collected from spinning larvae reared on fresh mulberry leaves seven days after the 4th ecdysis. Twenty ml of ice cooled 1 M Tris–HCl buffer pH 7.5 containing 50 mM EDTA and 50 mM 2–mercaptoethanol was added to 200 ml of the collected hemolymph. The floating debris in the sol- ution was discarded after centrifugation at 22,000 g for 20 min. The resultant supernatant was considered to be a crude urease preparation and was loaded on a Q– Sepharose FF column 5.0 × 10 cm, which had been equilibrated with buffer A [100 mM Tris–HCl, 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM 2–mercaptoethanol, pH 7.5]. After wash- ing with this buffer, the column was extensively washed with buffer A containing 0.2 M KCl at a flow rate 5 mlmin. The urease activity was released when the KCl concentration was increased to 0.35 M and the fractions containing urease were pooled. Solid ammonium sulfate was added to the pooled fraction to 60 saturation, then centrifuged at 22,000 g for 20 min. The supernatant was discarded and the precipitated proteins were resuspended in a minimum volume of buffer B [20 mM Tris–HCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM 2–mercaptoethanol, pH 7.5] contain- ing 0.15M KCl. Insoluble material was removed by cen- trifugation. The solution obtained in the above step was further purified by gel filtration using a Superdex 200 pg column 1.6 × 60 cm previously equilibrated with buffer B containing 0.15 M KCl. Fractions of 2.0 ml were collected at a flow rate of 1.0 mlmin and assayed for urease activity. The urease active fractions were combined and concentrated by ultrafiltration Ultrafree 15, Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA. The concentrated solution was applied to a Mono Q 55 column connected to HPLC Model Bio–LC System, TOSOH, Tokyo, Japan, which had been equilibrated with buffer B con- taining 0.15 M KCl at room temperature. The protein was eluted with a linear gradient of KCl 0.15 to 0.5 M in buffer B at a flow rate of 0.5 mlmin. The urease active fractions were pooled and stored at 4 ° C. 2.5. Protein assay Protein concentration was determined by using a pro- tein assay kit Coomassie  Plus Protein Assay Reagent, Pierce, Co. with bovine serum albumin as the stan- dard protein. 1417 C. Hirayama et al. Journal of Insect Physiology 46 2000 1415–1421 2.6. SDS–PAGE analysis Sodium dodecyl sulfate SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis PAGE was carried out on a 7.5 poly- acrylamide gel containing 0.1 SDS according to Laemmli 1970. Proteins separated by SDS–PAGE were transferred to PVDF membrane in 25 mM Tris– 197 mM glycine pH 8.3 according to the method of Towbin et al. 1979. A constant 100 volts were applied for 2hr at 4 ° C. Proteins on the membranes were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R–250. Molecular mass of ureases under the reducing condition was determined by comparison to a standard curve using a high molecu- lar weight calibration kit purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech myosin, 212 kDa; α 2–macroglobu- lin, 170 kDa; β –galactosidase, 116 kDa; transferrin, 76 kDa; glutamate dehydrogenase, 53 kDa. 2.7. N–terminal amino acid sequence analysis Purified urease from the hemolymph was concentrated using an Ultrafree 15 apparatus and subjected to SDS– PAGE, electroblotted onto PVDF membrane. The pro- teins on the membrane were visualized by Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining. The 90.5 kDa protein band was cut out and subjected to N–terminal sequence analysis using a gas phase protein sequencer Model LF–3400 DT, Beckman, USA. 2.8. Preparation of monoclonal antibodies Mabs A BALBc mouse was immunized with 50 µ g of jack bean urease in Freund’s complete adjuvant followed by three additional injections at intervals of two weeks. Spleen cells were removed three days after the last boosting and fused with P3U1 mouse myeloma cells using polyethylene glycol 1500 as described by Ko¨hler and Milstein 1975. Cells were fused at a ratio of five spleen cells to one myeloma and plated into 96-well plates in RPMI1640 medium GIBCO BRL, USA con- taining 15 VV fetal calf serum and HAT sup- plements. Hybridomas producing anti-jack bean anti- body were selected using a Mini–PROTEAN II multiscreen apparatus Bio–Rad, USA on Western blots. Positive hybrid cells were cloned by the limiting dilution method and six stable hybridomas were cloned. Ascitic fluids were obtained by introducing hybridoma cells into pristane primed BALBc mice. Ascitic fluids were applied on an ion-exchange column and sub- sequently a protein A column in order to purify anti- bodies. The antibodies obtained were designated as MabU3, MabU10, MabU13, MabU21, MabU23, and MabU27, respectively. 2.9. Western blot analysis Proteins separated by SDS–PAGE were transferred to PVDF membrane as described above. The membrane was then blocked for 1 hr at room temperature with 1 wv BSA in 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5 containing 150 mM NaCl Tris–buffered saline; TBS. After washing three times with TBS, the membrane was hybridized with mouse monoclonal IgGs raised against jack bean urease in 1 BSA in 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5 contain- ing 0.05 Tween 20 and 150mM NaCl Tween–Tris– buffered saline; TTBS for 1 hr at room temperature. After washing with TTBS, the membrane was incubated with goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated with alkaline phos- phatase Bio–Rad at 1:3000 dilution in 1 BSA–TTBS. Color development was carried out with 5–bromo, 4– chloro, 3–indolyl phosphate BCIP as the substrate. 2.10. Oral administration of mulberry leaf urease to the silkworm larvae Mulberry leaf urease was partially purified by combi- nation of heat treatment, ammonium sulfate fraction- ation, acetone fractionation and ion-exchange chromato- graphy from frozen leaves as described Hirayama et al., 2000. The urease solution was diluted with 0.2 M phos- phate, 5 mM EDTA, 0.1 2–mercaptoethanol to make solutions of different concentrations 1, 3, and 9 Uml and 50 µ l of the enzyme solution was applied on a small piece of the artificial diet. Three-day or five-day-old 5th instar male larvae that had been reared on the normal artificial diet were used in the experiment. Each larva was given four pieces of the diet treated with the enzyme solutions at 6 hr intervals. We confirmed that the larvae used here ate all the diets given. Hemolymph was col- lected from the larvae 12 hr after receiving the last diet piece and urease activity in the hemolymph was measur- ed.

3. Results