CLARK’S METHOD

17.7 CLARK’S METHOD

In the Clark’s approach, the ordinates of TAD are converted to volume rate of runoff in cumec

catchment, as

cumec or m 3 /s

100 t × 60 × 60 t where t = Computation time interval, hr of TAD, i.e., isochrone interval or routing period

t c = t × N, N = No. of inter-isochrone areas or sub areas, A r km 2 Catchment are A = ΣA r

In Example 16.1, t c = 1 hr × 9 # = 9 hr ~ − t i ,N=9

Note: 8 Isochrones are drawn to yield 9 zones (N = 9) or Subareas A r .

The inflow (I) from the sub area A r calculated as above, i.e., the resulting translation hydrograph is then routed through a linear reservoir to simulate the storage effects of the basin; Clark’s method utilises Muskingum method of routing through a linear reservoir, i.e., x = 0 in Eq. (9.9); S = KQ, Q = O.

The general equations for the linear reservoir is (See Eq. (16.21))

IUHO = O 2 = Q = C′I + C 2 O 1 ,O 1 =Q 1

i.e.,

Q 2 = C′I + C 2 Q 1 ,

for IUH derivation

INSTANTANEOUS UNIT HYDROGRAPH (IUH)

The resulting IUHO (IUH ordinates) are averaged at t r intervals to produce a t r -hr UG, ANNACIVIL Ex. 16.1.

The routing coefficients are obtained from (see Eqs. 16.20, 16.20a, 16.21)

C ′=

...(17.14) k + /2 t

∴ C′ + C =1

u t + u tt −

Note: u t of t r -hr UG = u

r I of IUH =

of IUH, i.e., by averaging IUHO, assuming linear.

HG 2

2 KJ

Example 17.3 The recession ordinates of the flood hydrograph (FHO) for the Lakhwar dam site across river Yamuna are given below. Determine the value of K.

Time (hr): 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 FHO (cumec):

90 45 30 20 Solution Eq. (5.1) can be expressed in an alternative form of the exponential decay as

t Q t =Q 0 e –t/k , when K = ln ( Q 0 / Q t )

‘Q vs. t’ is plotted on the semi-log paper (Fig. 17.1). K is the slope of the recession-flood- hydrograph plot.

BLOG 100

6 Semi-log paper 500:5

cycle cycle

D ln 1000

Ordinates 150:1.5 raph

Time t (hr)

Fig. 17.1 Recession flood hydrograph

HYDROLOGY

= 31 hr – 59 hr, from the plot ANNACIVIL − 31 59 28 K = =− =− . 12 15 , say 12 hr

∆t = t

–t cumec

Example 17.4 The isochronal map of Lakhwar damsite catchment, Fig. 17.2 (a) has areas between successive 3 hr isochrones as 32, 67, 90, 116, 135, 237, 586 and 687 km 2 . Taking k = 12 hr (as determined in Ex. 17.3), derive the IUH of the basin by Clark’s approach and hence a 3-hr UG .

# hr Basin

hr

end

7 21 t = 24 hr c A r ll boundary

12 hr-4

R.Y R.Y am am una 9 una Hanuman

t=t hr-3 Ñ c

area

A 7 8 A Ganga

= 3 hr 6 hr-2

Lakhw Bhadri Gad Bhadri Gad

c BLOG

A 3 hr-Isochrones, 7 #

Inter-isochrone

subareas: A -A 1 8

R.Yamuna

A 3 A 6 A= S 1 r

A = 1950 km

A 5 t = 24 hr, t = t = 3 hr Ñ c c A 3 A A 4 Basin outlet

9h 12 15 18 3 hr A 1 ´ 2 8 # = 24 hr Mussorie

Time (hr) (a) Isochronal map of Lakhwar

DS Catchment. (b) Time-area diagram (TAD)

Fig. 17.2 Isochrones and TAD for Lakhwar Dam Site

Solution Note

A = ΣA r = 1950 km 2

t c = t × N = 3 × 8 = 24 hr, K = 12 hr

No. of isochrones = N – 1 = 8 – 1 = 7# 24 t

Computation interval t = ∆t c between successive isochrones = 3 hr = = c 8 N

Clark’s approach Eq. (17.13):

= 0.7778 k + /2 t

C ′+C 2 = 0.2222 + 0.7778 = 1

∴ O.K.

INSTANTANEOUS UNIT HYDROGRAPH (IUH)

ANNACIVIL Table 17.3 Computation of IUH by Clark’s approach and hence 3-hr UG.

From the sub areas A r , Eq. (17.11): I = 2.78

= 0.9267 A

Clark’s: Q 2 =C ′I + C 2 Q 1 , C 2 Q 1 = 0.7778 Q 1 Q 2 = IUHO

C ′I = 0.2222 × 0.9267 A r = 0.203 A r

1 2 3 4 5 6 Time

3-hr (hr)

A r 2 , (km )

C ′I

C 2 Q 1 IUHO

UGO TAD)

(from

= 0.203 A r

= 0.7778 Q 1 Q 2 (cumec)

=C ′I + C 2 Q 1 (cumec)

previous

(by averaging) 0 0 0 0 0

BLOG 139.5 159.2

294.5 peak of 245.7

230 r IUH 262.2 (peak of UG)

27 Σ A = 1950 km 2 0 230

Plot Col. (5) vs. col (1) to get IUH, and Col (6) vs. col. (1) to get 3-hr UG. Note that the two peaks are staggered by 3 hr; i.e., IUH is more skewed.

QUESTIONS

1 Define IUH and state its important properties illustrated in a neat sketch. What are the advan- tages of IUH over a UG of finite duration? 2 Determine the values of n and k, and hence derive an IUH for the drainage basin in Example 5.2.

State its peak and time to peak. 3 For the IUH obtained in (2) above, derive a 6-hr UG and compare with that obtained in

Example 5.2. 4 Derive an IUH by Clark’s approach and hence a 2-hr UG for a catchment of 140 km 2 ,t c = 18 hr,

K = 12 hr. The catchment was divided into 9 zones by drawing 8 isochrones. The areas planimetered between the successive 2-hr isochrones are 8 (near outlet) 12, 25, 35, 22, 16, 10, 8 and 4 (remote

end) in km 2 .

HYDROLOGY 5 (a) Explain the concept of Clark’s IUH.

ANNACIVIL IUH for the basin with K = 5 hr

(b) The shape of a catchment can be approximated to a square with diagonal of 60 km. The main channel is nearly along a diagonal; the isochrones may be assumed perpendicular to the main channel. The travel speed along the main channel may be taken as 5 km/hr. Derive the

Hint: t c = 12 hr. Divide the diagonal into 6 parts to obtain successive 2-hr isochrones. 6 The IUH of a basin can be approximated to a triangle of base 36 hr and peak of 30 cumec at 9 hr from the start. Derive a 3-hr UG for this basin.