Discussion Definition of Texts

Formula. Their research also contributes to this research, such as the process of analyzing the data. Kodom Gyasi’s research has a big contribution in this research. His research has given an explanation about how to analyze readability level of texts. In his research he also gives an image about Flesch-Kinclaid Reading Ease, the formula used by the writer. Not different with Gyasi’s, Falconer’s research about readability of educational brochures of APTA has contributes to the writer, especially in the understanding of techniques in analyzing readability. Falconer’s also gives a good example about more techniques that can be used. Perekeme’s research about readability has a good contribution to the writer. Even though the techniques used by Perekeme is Fry Readability and Cloze-Reading test, but his research has given an inspiration to the writer in how to improve the writer’s research. 28

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

A. Method and Design

Based on the purpose of the research this research use Descriptive Analysis Method where the researcher tries to describe comparative data of readability level of English text in UN academic year 20102011 and 20112012. On the other hand, based on how the researcher collects the data, this research uses Document Analysis. In order to get the data needed the researcher uses The Flesch’s Reading Ease Formula where the researcher uses reading tests from UN as the objects. Besides, the researcher also does library research from books, articles, journals, and some internet- based data.

B. Data and Data Source

The researcher takes the data, in this case English texts, from UN test academic years 20102011 and 20112012. Based on the test, the researcher found that in year 20102011 there are nine texts in its reading section and in year 20112012 there are fourteen texts. It is concluded that there are twenty-three texts from both years. After checking all the texts, the researcher found that the last text in year 20112012 cannot be used as the comparison data. The reason of why the 14 th text is unable to be used is that the format of the text is filled in the blank text. Therefore, the Flesch’s Reading Ease formula cannot be used on the text as the Flesch’s Reading Ease formula only works to a complete text. As the conclusion, the population data from those years are reduced to twenty-two texts.

Dokumen yang terkait

A descriptive study of the difficulties in comprehending paragraph of the second year students of SLTP 3 Jember in the 2002/2003 academic year

0 6 77

A Descriptive Study on Reading Comprehension Achievement of the Second Year Students of SLTP Negeri 1 Arjasa Jember in the 2002 / 2003 Academic Year

0 6 60

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON THE ACHIEVEMENT TO IDENTIFY MAIN IDEAS IN READING TEXTS AND ITS AFFECTING FACTORS OF THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMU I RAMBIPUJI IN 2003/2004 ACADEMIC YEAR

0 2 96

A descriptive study on the achivement of making inference through context clues in reading texts of the second year students of SMAN 1 Sampang in the 2004/2005 academic year -

0 2 79

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT OF RECOUNT TEXTS AT SMPN 1 BANYUWANGI 2014/2015 ACADEMIC YEAR

0 4 108

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON THE SIXTH GRADE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT ON DESCRIPTIVE TEXT AT SDN KARANGREJO 3 JEMBER IN THE 2011/2012 ACADEMIC YEAR

0 3 12

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON THE SIXTH GRADE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT ON DESCRIPTIVE TEXT AT SDN KARANGREJO 3 JEMBER IN THE 2011/2012 ACADEMIC YEAR

0 2 12

The portrayed of students’ achievement in comprehending reading texts on national examination test in academic year 2010/2011 and 2011/2012: a descriptive analysis

0 5 73

AN ANALYSIS OF GRADE 8 STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN COMPREHENDING READING TEXTS.

0 2 18

AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ COMPETENCE IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXTS: A CASE STUDY AT THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN 1 LINGSAR IN ACADEMIC YEAR 20142015

0 0 13