Data Description RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION

From Table above the writer found that: - The table words is filled with the data of number of words in each texts. In academic year 20102011, text number 6 has the most number of words, 330, and text number 1 with the least number of words, 38. - The table sentences is filled with the data of number of sentences in each texts. Text number 9 has the most number of sentences, 23, and text number 1 has the least number of sentences, 3. - Text with highest level of difficulty is text number 7. The score is 37.9 or in difficult level. - Text with lowest level of difficulty is text number 9. The score is 77.3 or in fairly easy level. - The average score of the for texts from academic year 20102011 is 60.71. 7 165 5 37.9 8 187 11 57.9 9 273 23 77.3 Average 174.1 10.3 60.71 Table 4.4 The Description of Text 20112012 From the Table 4.4 the writer found that: - The table words is filled with the data of number of words in each texts. In academic year 20112012, text number 4 has the most number of words, 277, and text number 1 with the least number of words, 65. - The table sentences is filled with the data of number of sentences in each texts. Text number 4 has the most number of sentences, 14, and text number 1 has the least number of sentences, 4. - Text with highest level of difficulty is text number 3. The score is 27.1 or in very difficult level. Texts Words Sentences Text Difficulties Level 1 65 4 64.6 2 104 6 46.6 3 61 5 27.1 4 277 14 35.2 5 158 6 32.4 6 183 8 27.8 7 169 8 41.7 8 250 13 43.1 9 222 13 35.2 Average 165.4 8.56 39.3 - Text with lowest level of difficulty is text number 1. The score is 64.6 or in standard level. - The average score for texts from academic year 20112012 is 39.3 Table 4.5 The Description of Texts 20102011 and 20112012 Texts Words Sentence Text Difficulties Level 20102011 20112012 20102011 20112012 20102011 20112012 1 38 65 3 4 66.8 64.6 2 67 104 5 6 64.6 46.6 3 87 61 5 5 68.4 27.1 4 222 277 13 14 66.7 35.2 5 198 158 13 6 52 32.4 6 330 183 15 8 54.8 27.8 7 165 169 5 8 37.9 41.7 8 187 250 11 13 57.9 43.1 9 273 222 23 13 77.3 35.2 Average 174.1 165.4 10.3 8.56 60.71 39.3 Table 4.5 above shows the comparison of readability level from National Examination academic year 20102011 and 20112012. The table was served with the comparison of words and sentences for each text. From Table 4.5 there are several data about readability level from both academic years: - Number of words for texts academic year 20102011 is higher than texts from year 20112012. The difference is 8.7. - Number of sentences for texts academic year 20102011 is higher than texts from year 20112012. The difference is 1.74. - The average of difficulty level from texts 20102011 is bigger, 60.71, than the average of difficulty level from texts 20112012, 39.3. The difference is 21.41.

Dokumen yang terkait

A descriptive study of the difficulties in comprehending paragraph of the second year students of SLTP 3 Jember in the 2002/2003 academic year

0 6 77

A Descriptive Study on Reading Comprehension Achievement of the Second Year Students of SLTP Negeri 1 Arjasa Jember in the 2002 / 2003 Academic Year

0 6 60

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON THE ACHIEVEMENT TO IDENTIFY MAIN IDEAS IN READING TEXTS AND ITS AFFECTING FACTORS OF THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMU I RAMBIPUJI IN 2003/2004 ACADEMIC YEAR

0 2 96

A descriptive study on the achivement of making inference through context clues in reading texts of the second year students of SMAN 1 Sampang in the 2004/2005 academic year -

0 2 79

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT OF RECOUNT TEXTS AT SMPN 1 BANYUWANGI 2014/2015 ACADEMIC YEAR

0 4 108

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON THE SIXTH GRADE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT ON DESCRIPTIVE TEXT AT SDN KARANGREJO 3 JEMBER IN THE 2011/2012 ACADEMIC YEAR

0 3 12

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON THE SIXTH GRADE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT ON DESCRIPTIVE TEXT AT SDN KARANGREJO 3 JEMBER IN THE 2011/2012 ACADEMIC YEAR

0 2 12

The portrayed of students’ achievement in comprehending reading texts on national examination test in academic year 2010/2011 and 2011/2012: a descriptive analysis

0 5 73

AN ANALYSIS OF GRADE 8 STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN COMPREHENDING READING TEXTS.

0 2 18

AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ COMPETENCE IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXTS: A CASE STUDY AT THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN 1 LINGSAR IN ACADEMIC YEAR 20142015

0 0 13