Reliability Level of Difficulty Discrimination Power

51 The content of try out was presented in the table of specification below: Table I. Table of Specification of the Try out Test No Word Classes Vocabulary Number of items Percentage 1 Concrete Nouns Postman, cheerleader, attendant, painter, typist, hairdresser, radio mechanic, nurse, bank clerk, mechanic, butcher, dentist, custom officer, stewardess, farmer, factory worker, teacher, carpenter, fisherman, actress, waiter, judge, firefighter, referee, doctor, architect, shop assistant, tailor, florist, astronaut, journalist, lawyer, headmaster, soldier, bookseller. 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 7., 8., 10., 11., 13., 14., 17., 18., 19., 20., 22., 25., 27., 28., 30., 32., 33., 34., 35., 36., 37., 38., 39., 40., 41., 42., 43., 44., 46., 47., 50 72 2 Verbs Study, work, dance, drive, sing, watch, teach, clean, cook, play, sail, sell, drink, water 6., 9., 12., 15., 16., 21., 23., 24., 26., 29., 31., 45., 48., 49 28 Total 100 b. Construct Validity Construct validity was focused on the kind of test that was used to measure the ability. According to Setiyadi 2006:26 if the instrument just measure one aspect, for example vocabulary, the construct validity can be measured by evaluate all items in the test. If all items have measured vocabulary mastery, the instrument has fulfilled construct validity.

c. Reliability

“Reliability refers to extent to which the test is consistent in the score and gives us an indication of how accurate the test score are” hatch Farhady, 1982:244. To estimate the reliability of the test, the researcher used half technique to analyze the odd x and even number Y of the test items. 52 To measure the coefficient of the reliability between odd and even group, the researcher used Pearson Product Moment formula as follows: r xy =       2 2 y x xy Notes r xy : coefficient of reliability between odd numbers and even numbers items  2 x : the right answer of odd part  2 y : the right answer of even part  xy : number of students who take part in the test Then this research used “Spearmen Brown’s prophecy formula” Hatch and Farhady, 1982:286 to know the coefficient correlation of whole items. The formula is as follows: rk = rl rl  1 2 rk : the reliability of the test rl : the reliability of half test The criteria of reliability are: 0.90 – 1.0 : High 0.50 – 0.89 : Moderate 0.00 – 0.49 : Low If the result of the reliability us less than 0.50 the items would be revised. Hatch Farhady, 1982:247

d. Level of Difficulty

Level of difficulty LD relates to how easy or difficult the item from the students’ points of view who take the test. Then level of difficulty can be determined by 53 dividing the number of students who get it right by the total number of students. The formulation is as follows: LD = N R Notes LD : level of difficulty R : the number of students who answer correctly N : the total number of students who take part in the test. Criteria of level difficulty as follows: LD 0.30 : difficult LD= 0.30 – 0.70 : satisfactory LD0.70 : easy Shohamy, 1985:79

e. Discrimination Power

Discrimination power is used to indicate the discrimination of the failure and the success of the students. It refers to the extent to which the item differentiates between high and low level students on that test. To find out the discrimination power this research used the following formula: D = correct U – correct L 1 2 N D = Discrimination Power Correct U = The number of upper group students who answer correctly Correct L = The number of lower group students who answer correctly N = The total number of students who take the test 54 The criteria are: 1. If the value is positive discrimination, there are a larger number of more knowledgeable students than poor students who get the item correct. If the value is zero, it means that there is no discrimination. 2. If the value is negative, it means that there are more low-students than high level students who get corrects item. 3. In general, the higher discrimination index the better. In classroom situations most items should be higher than 0.20 or negative the test will be revised.

3.10 Scoring System

Dokumen yang terkait

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THE STUDENTS WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH LOGICO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATION AT THE THIRD YEAR OF SDN 6 METRO PUSAT KOTA METRO

0 8 37

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THE STUDENTS WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH LOGICO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATION AT THE THIRD YEAR OF SD N 6 METRO PUSAT

0 5 8

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN PREPOSITION OF PLACE TAUGHT THROUGH REALIA AND TAUGHT THROUGH PICTURES AT THE SEVENTH GRADE OF SMPN 21 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 3 27

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH RECIPROCAL TEACHING TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 5 METRO

1 7 62

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH RECIPROCAL TEACHING TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 5 METRO

0 3 50

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH ROLE PLAY AND THOSE THROUGH JIGSAW TECHNIQUES

1 13 64

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THE STUDENTS’ WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH DIRECT METHOD AND THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH SILENT WAY AT THE FOURTH YEAR OF SDN 1 PISANG PENENGAHAN LAMPUNG SELATAN

4 20 53

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS READING ACHIEVMENT BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH RETELLING STORY AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATING A FAIRY TALE THE FIRST GRADE OF MA MA'ARIF 4 KALIREJO LAMPUNG TENGAH

0 8 46

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH RETELLING STORY AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATING A FAIRY TALE AT THE FIRST GRADE OF MA MA’ARIF 4 KALIREJO LAMPUNG TENGAH

0 12 46

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH PREDICTIVE TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH MAKING INFERENCES TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 KOTAGAJAH

0 10 61