Hypothesis FRAME OF THEORIES

2.15 Hypothesis

Before the researcher presented forward the hypotheses, she would like to give an explanation about what a hypothesis was. A hypothesis is a tentative statement about how to deal with the defined problems Bernard Philips 1974 in B. Dubey 2008. Using a hypothesis enabled the writer to focus her work so she could gather the data she needed in order to come to some conclusions. Based on the frame of theory and theoretical assumption above, the researcher formulated the hypothesis. These hypotheses were used to prove whether the hypotheses propose in this research is accepted or not. The researcher used SPSS Independent T-test. The hypothesis would be analyzed at the significant level of 0.05 in which the hypotheses were approved if sign α. T means that the probability of error in the hypotheses are only about 5. The hypotheses were: 1. There is significant difference of vocabulary achievement between the students who are taught through logico and those who are taught through crossword puzzle. 2. Logico is more effective than crossword puzzle for teaching vocabulary. 40

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD

1.1 Research Design The research was a quantitative research. Hatch and Farhady 1982 stated that quantitative is kind of research in which the data used tend to use statistics as measurement in deciding the conclusion. In this research, the researcher used pretest posttest control group design which belongs to the true experimental designs. There are three basic characteristics of true experimental designs into three: a. A control group is present. b. The students are randomly select and assigned to the groups. c. A pretest is administered to capture the initial differences between the two groups. Hatch and Farhady 1982:22 These three characteristics allow us to avoid almost all the problems associated with external and internal validity. They said that this design deals with two groups; both of the two groups receive the treatments, experimental class receive treatment through logico and control class as comparison receive treatment through crossword puzzle.

Dokumen yang terkait

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THE STUDENTS WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH LOGICO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATION AT THE THIRD YEAR OF SDN 6 METRO PUSAT KOTA METRO

0 8 37

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THE STUDENTS WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH LOGICO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATION AT THE THIRD YEAR OF SD N 6 METRO PUSAT

0 5 8

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN PREPOSITION OF PLACE TAUGHT THROUGH REALIA AND TAUGHT THROUGH PICTURES AT THE SEVENTH GRADE OF SMPN 21 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 3 27

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH RECIPROCAL TEACHING TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 5 METRO

1 7 62

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH RECIPROCAL TEACHING TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 5 METRO

0 3 50

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH ROLE PLAY AND THOSE THROUGH JIGSAW TECHNIQUES

1 13 64

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THE STUDENTS’ WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH DIRECT METHOD AND THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH SILENT WAY AT THE FOURTH YEAR OF SDN 1 PISANG PENENGAHAN LAMPUNG SELATAN

4 20 53

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS READING ACHIEVMENT BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH RETELLING STORY AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATING A FAIRY TALE THE FIRST GRADE OF MA MA'ARIF 4 KALIREJO LAMPUNG TENGAH

0 8 46

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH RETELLING STORY AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATING A FAIRY TALE AT THE FIRST GRADE OF MA MA’ARIF 4 KALIREJO LAMPUNG TENGAH

0 12 46

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH PREDICTIVE TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH MAKING INFERENCES TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 KOTAGAJAH

0 10 61