INTRODUCTION LITERATURE REVIEW RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

CONTENTS Page Legalization Paper i Bibliography ii Abstract iii Acknowledgement vi Contents Figure List Table List Appendix List v x xi xiii

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background

1.2 Identification of Problem

1.3 The Scope of Problem

1.4 Research Question

1.5 Research Objectives

1.6 Research Benefits

1.7 Operational Definition

1 5 6 6 6 7 7

CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Theoretical Framework 2.1.1 Cooperative Learning 2.1.1.1 Overview of Cooperative Learning 2.1.1.2 The Element and Principal in Cooperative Learning 2.1.1.3 Cooperative Learning Effects 2.1.1.4 Cooperative Learning Phases 2.1.1.5 Why must Cooperative Learning can be Applying in Teaching Math 2.1.1.6 Approaches to Cooperative Learning 9 9 9 10 10 11 12 13 vi 2.1.2 Jigsaw Approach 2.1.2.1 The Steps of jigsaw 2.1.2.2 The Lesson Plan of Jigsaw Approach 2.1.2.3 The Advantages and Weakness of Jigsaw Approach 2.1.3 Think Pair Share TPS Approach 2.1.3.1 The Steps of Think Pair Share TPS 2.1.3.2 The Advantages and Weakness of Think Pair Share TPS Approach 2.1.4 Technique to Give Recognition of Group 2.1.5 Problem Solving Skill of Mathematics 2.1.5.1 Evaluation Tools for Problem Solving Skills 2.1.6 The Mistake in Learning Mathematic 2.2 Subject Matter 2.2.1 Prisms 2.2.2 Surface Area of Prisms 2.2.3 Volume of Prisms 2.3 Relevant Research 2.4 Conceptual Framework 2.4 Research Hypothesis 15 16 17 18 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 26 26 27 28 29 31

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3.1 Research Time and Place 3.2 Population and Sample 3.2.1 Population 3.2.2 Sample 3.3 Research Variable 3.3.1 Independent Variable 3.3.2 Dependent variable 3.4 Research Design 3.5 Research Procedure 3.6 Instrument of Data Collecting 32 32 32 32 32 32 33 33 33 37 vii 3.6.1 Kinds of Instrument 3.6.1.1 Skill Test 3.6.2 Instrument Analysis Technique 3.6.2.1 Validation of Instrument 3.6.2.2 Reliability of Instrument 3.7 Data Analysis Technique 3.7.1 Normality test 3.7.2 Homogeneity test 3.7.3 Gain score 3.7.4 Hypothesis testing 3.8 Level of Problem Solving Skill of Student in Mathematic Problem 37 37 37 37 38 39 39 40 40 41 44 3.9 Observation Result of Learning Process 45

CHAPTER IV RESULT AND DISCUSSION

Dokumen yang terkait

The efectiveness of jigsaw tetechnique in inproving student's reading comrhension at the english grade of SMP islam Parung

0 3 93

Perbandingan hasil belajar biologi dengan menggunakan metode pembelajaran cooperative learning tipe group investigation (GI) dan think pair share (TPS)

1 5 152

THE COMPARISON OF STUDENTS’ MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITY TAUGHT BY COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL OF NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER AND THINK PAIR SHARE AT SMP NEGERI 13 MEDAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2016/2017.

0 2 25

THE DIFFERENCE OF STUDENTS’ PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITY THAT TAUGHT USING COOPERATIVE TYPE THINK – PAIR – SHARE (TPS) AND STUDENT TEAMS – ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) IN GRADE XI SMA NEGERI 5 MEDAN A.Y 2016/ 2017.

0 2 25

THE DIFFERENCE OF STUDENTS PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITY BY USING COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL TYPE THINK-PAIR-SHARE (TPS)AND TYPE STUDENT TEAMS-ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD) IN THE TOPIC OF TRIGONOMETRY IN GRADE X OF SMA NEGERI 1 PERBAUNGAN A.Y. 2013/2014.

0 5 27

INTEGRATION OF AUTOGRAPH IN IMPROVING MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM SOLVING AND MATHEMATICAL CONNECTION ABILITY USING COOPERATIVE LEARNING THINK-PAIR-SHARE.

2 6 25

THE DIFFERENCE STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES USING THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) OF THINKING EMPOWERMENT BY QUESTIONS (TEQ)TECHNICAL AND CONVENTIONAL LEARNING AT FIRST GRADE OF SMAN 1 BERASTAGI 2011/2012.

0 1 17

THE COMPARISON OF STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH ASSURE LEARNING MODEL AND PROBLEM BASED LEARNING MODEL ON SUB TOPIC OF PLATONIC SOLID PYRAMID IN GRADE VIII SMP NEGERI 1 TEBING TINGGI.

0 2 19

THE COMPARISON OF CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING ABILITY OF STUDENTS USING CRATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING (CPS) APPROACH AND PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) APPROACH ON QUARDRILATERAL TOPIC IN VII GRADE AT SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 1 MEDAN.

0 0 18

PROBLEM SOLVING LEARNING APPROACH USING SEARCH, SOLVE, CREATE AND SHARE (SSCS) MODEL AND THE STUDENT’S MATHEMATICAL LOGICAL THINKING SKILLS.

0 0 8