CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION THE COMPARISON OF PROBLEM SOLVING SKILLS OF STUDENT USING COOPERATIVE LEARNING JIGSAW APPROACH AND THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) APPROACH ON PRISM SUBTOPIC IN VIII GRADE AT SMP N 1 TEBING TINGGI.

Jigsaw Approach 4.2.2.2 For the Second Experiment Class using Cooperative Learning Think Pair Share approach 75 4.2.2.3 The Comparison of Student Mistake in the First and Second Experiment Classes 78

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

5.1 Conclusion 80 5.2 Suggestion 81 REFERENCES 82 APPENDIX 84 ix TABLE LIST Table 2.1 Cooperative Learning Phase Page 12 Table 2.2 Approaches to Cooperative Learning 14 Table 2.3 The Steps of Think Pair Share TPS 20 Table 2.4 Calculating of Gaining Score 21 Table 2.5 Example of Giving Gaining Score 22 Table 2.6 Technique of Giving Score For Each Step in Problem Solving 25 Table 3.1 Research Design 33 Table 3.2 Criteria of Student Mastering Level 45 Table 4.1 Pretest result of the first and second experiment classes 47 Table 4.2 Post test result of the first and second experiment classes 48 Table 4.3 Gain of the first and second experiment classes 49 Table 4.4 Result of Normality Testing 51 Table 4.5 Result of Homogeneity Testing 51 Table 4.6 The Result of Hypothesis Testing 53 Table 4.7 Description of Student Misatake for number 1using jigsaw approach 55 Table 4.8 Description of Student Misatake for number 2 using jigsaw approach 56 Table 4.9 Description of Student Misatake for number 3 using jigsaw approach 57 Table 4.10 Description of Student Misatake for number 4 using jigsaw approach 59 Table 4.11 Description of Student Misatake for number 1using TPS approach 61 Table 4.12 Description of Student Misatake for number 2using TPS approach 62 Table 4.13 Description of Student Misatake for number 3using TPS approach 63 xi Table 4.14 Description of Student Misatake for number 4using TPS approach 65 Table 4.15 Level of Problem solving Skills 66 Table 4.16 The average of observation result of learning process 69 xii FIGURE LIST Page Figure 2.1 Jigsaw Teams 15 Figure 2.2 Jigsaw Steps 17 Figure 2.3 Example of prism 27 Figure 2.4 Triangular Prism and its nets 27 Figure 2.5 Dividing Cuboids become Two Triangular Prisms 28 Figure 3.1 Research Procedures Scheme 36 Figure 4.1 Average of pre test, post test and gain 49 Figure 4.2 Level of Problem Solving 67 Figure 4.3 Students Mistake in Understanding Problem Number 2,3,1,and 4 using Jigsaw 72 Figure 4.4 Student Mistake for arranging Strategy using Jigsaw Approach 73 Figure 4.5 Mistake in calculating using Jigsaw 74 Figure 4.6 Mistake in Putting Some Values 74 Figure 4.7 Student’s Mistake for Understanding Problem using TPS Approach 76 Figure 4.8 Student’s Mistake for Arranging Strategy to Solve Problem 77 Figure 4.9 Student’s Mistake in Implementing the Planning 78 x APPENDIX LIST Appendix 1 First Lesson Plan for Experiment Class A Page 84 Appendix 2 Second Lesson Plan for Experiment Class A 91 Appendix 3 First Lesson Plan for Experiment Class B 98 Appendix 4 Second Lesson Plan for Experiment Class B 104 Appendix 5 Student Work Sheet I 110 Appendix 6 Student Work Sheet II 115 Appendix 7 Blue Print of Pre-test 120 Appendix 8 Blue Print of Post-test 121 Appendix 9 Pre-test Question 122 Appendix 10 Alternative Solution of Pre-test 124 Appendix 11 Post-test Question 127 Appendix 12 Alternative Solution of Post-test 129 Appendix 13 Observer Assessment Scale 132 Appendix 14 Validator Assessment Paper 134 Appendix 15 Validator Names 135 Appendix 16 Observation Paper of Learning Process Using Cooperative Learning Jigsaw Approach 136 Appendix 17 Observation Paper of Teacher Activity for cooperative learning Think Pair Share TPS Approach 138 Appendix 18 Technique of Giving Score For Mathematic Problem Solving 140 Appendix 19 Validation Analysis of Validator Agreement for Pre Test 141 Appendix 20 Validation Analysis of Validator Agreement for Post Test 143 Appendix 21 Reliability Analysis of Pre Test 145 Appendix 22 Reliability Analysis of Post Test 147 Appendix 23 Pre Test for the First Experiment Class 149 Appendix 24 Pre Test for the Second Experiment Class 150 Appendix 25 Post Test for the First Experiment Class 151 xiii Appendix 26 Post Test for the Second Experiment Class 152 Appendix 27 Pre Test and Post Test Mark for the First and Second Experiment Classes 153 Appendix 28 Calculation of Normality Testing 154 Appendix 29 Calculation of HomogenietyTesting 158 Appendix 30 Calculation of Gain Score 160 Appendix 31 Calculation of Hypothesis Testing 162 Appendix 31 Documentation of Research 165 xiv

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

Dokumen yang terkait

The efectiveness of jigsaw tetechnique in inproving student's reading comrhension at the english grade of SMP islam Parung

0 3 93

Perbandingan hasil belajar biologi dengan menggunakan metode pembelajaran cooperative learning tipe group investigation (GI) dan think pair share (TPS)

1 5 152

THE COMPARISON OF STUDENTS’ MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITY TAUGHT BY COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL OF NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER AND THINK PAIR SHARE AT SMP NEGERI 13 MEDAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2016/2017.

0 2 25

THE DIFFERENCE OF STUDENTS’ PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITY THAT TAUGHT USING COOPERATIVE TYPE THINK – PAIR – SHARE (TPS) AND STUDENT TEAMS – ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) IN GRADE XI SMA NEGERI 5 MEDAN A.Y 2016/ 2017.

0 2 25

THE DIFFERENCE OF STUDENTS PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITY BY USING COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL TYPE THINK-PAIR-SHARE (TPS)AND TYPE STUDENT TEAMS-ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD) IN THE TOPIC OF TRIGONOMETRY IN GRADE X OF SMA NEGERI 1 PERBAUNGAN A.Y. 2013/2014.

0 5 27

INTEGRATION OF AUTOGRAPH IN IMPROVING MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM SOLVING AND MATHEMATICAL CONNECTION ABILITY USING COOPERATIVE LEARNING THINK-PAIR-SHARE.

2 6 25

THE DIFFERENCE STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES USING THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) OF THINKING EMPOWERMENT BY QUESTIONS (TEQ)TECHNICAL AND CONVENTIONAL LEARNING AT FIRST GRADE OF SMAN 1 BERASTAGI 2011/2012.

0 1 17

THE COMPARISON OF STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH ASSURE LEARNING MODEL AND PROBLEM BASED LEARNING MODEL ON SUB TOPIC OF PLATONIC SOLID PYRAMID IN GRADE VIII SMP NEGERI 1 TEBING TINGGI.

0 2 19

THE COMPARISON OF CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING ABILITY OF STUDENTS USING CRATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING (CPS) APPROACH AND PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) APPROACH ON QUARDRILATERAL TOPIC IN VII GRADE AT SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 1 MEDAN.

0 0 18

PROBLEM SOLVING LEARNING APPROACH USING SEARCH, SOLVE, CREATE AND SHARE (SSCS) MODEL AND THE STUDENT’S MATHEMATICAL LOGICAL THINKING SKILLS.

0 0 8