commit to user
c. Revised plan
Based on the result of the first cycle, the researcher realized that there were improvements of the students’ writing ability, but the researcher still found
problems faced by the students. The students had difficulties in choosing appropriate vocabularies and sentence structure or grammar of using simple
present tense. In doing writing collaboratively, they spent the long time in conducting the steps of collaborative writing. Besides, there were also some
students who were busy with other activities during teaching and learning process. Dealing with those problems in the first cycle, the researcher revised his plans.
The revised plan were: 1 the researcher needed to engage the students to find many vocabularies related to the descriptive texts and give the students
understanding of the meaning of any difficult or new words; 2 the researcher gave more explanation about grammar of simple present tense; and 3 the
researcher should give more time and attention much more for the students to do the tasks.
To understand about collaborative writing technique easier, the teacher asked the students to play their role as a helper and a writer as well as possible in
doing writing process. In this case, they should work together and need to jointly discuss a topic, plan an outline, gave suggestions, and contributed the success of
the final product of writing in order to make a good composition.
commit to user
C. Cycle 2
Based on the reflection in the previous cycle, the students encountered the problems what the students faced. The problems dealt with language aspects,
especially grammar, concept of simple present tense, their function, and its time, and also vocabulary. That is why the researcher introduced and explained them
about the good writing dealing with the grammar and vocabulary. In addition, the process of writing needed a long time especially in conducting the steps of
collaborative writing. So, the teacher provided more time in doing each step so that the students could finish their work well.
1. Planning the action
After knowing the result of cycle 1, the researcher designed the action. The researcher also shared with his collaborator related to the activities that could
be implemented in the second cycle. The researcher as a teacher prepared a lesson plans which consisted of objectives, materials, technique, and learning
steps for cycle 2. Besides preparing lesson plans, the researcher also copied some worksheets for the students and teaching aids to support the teaching learning
process. In this case, the topic was about describing the trees using the descriptive text. In this cycle was also designed for three meetings. The first meeting was
brainstorming and modeling, second and third meeting were the implementation of collaborative writing technique, and the fourth meeting was conducting the
post-test. This action plan was to improve the results of cycle 1. The solutions
offered by the researcher were: 1 introducing and explaining more about