Research Method RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

commit to user males and females students. In mixed classroom, the female students are sitting in front of rows of the male students. The research was conducted from July 2010 to January, 2011. The following is the schedule for conducting the action research at SMPN 1 Pelaihari. Table 3.1 Time Schedule of the Research in the Academic Year of 20102011 ACTIVITIES JULY AUGUS T SE P T OC T NOV DE C JAN FE B MAR CH APRIL Pre Survey X Making Proposal X Reviewing Literatures X X X Developing Instruments X X Collecting and Analyzing the Data X X X Writing the Report X X X Submitting the document X X X X

B. Research Method

The research method used in this research is a classroom action research. In this case, the researcher wants to improve the students’ ability in writing a descriptive text through collaborative writing technique. Here, there are some definitions of action research. Kember 2000: 25 states that action research is commit to user portrayed as a cyclical or spiral process involving steps of planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. Action research methodology offers a systematic approach to introduce innovations in teaching and learning. It is normal for a project to go through two or more cycles. Improvement is brought about by a series of cycles, each incorporating lesson from the previous ones. The cycle of Kember is the simplest and tidiest form. Elliot 1991: 69 states that action research might be defined as the study of a social situation with a view to improve the quality of action within it. It aims at feeding practical judgment in concrete situation and the validity of theories or hypothesis. It depends not so much on scientific test of truth, as on their usefulness in helping people to act more intelligently and skillfully. In action research theories are not validated independently and then applied to practice. They are validated through practice. Furthermore, Ebbut in Hopkin, 1993: 45 argues that action research is the systematic study of attempts to improve educational practice by groups of participants by means of their own practical actions and by means of their own reflection upon the effects of those actions. Besides, classroom action research has characteristics that meet the need of the researcher. They are, according to Dick in Nurkamto, 2002: 7 as follows: 1 Classroom action research is designed and applied in a certain classroom setting; therefore, the research findings are applicable only to that classroom. The extent to which the findings may be applicable elsewhere depends on the empirical similarity of setting and receiving contexts. commit to user 2 Classroom action research is aimed at finding the solution for local and practical problems. Therefore, the researcher does not apply methodology as rigidly as that in other formal researches in developing universal theories. 3 Classroom action research tends to be cyclical, meaning that certain steps planning, acting, observing, and reflecting tend to recur in a more or less similar sequence at different phases of an action research study. 4 Classroom action research tends to be participative. It means that the clients and informants are involved as partner, or at least active participants, in the researcher process. 5 Classroom action research tends to be reflective. Critical reflection upon the process and outcomes are important parts of each cycle. From the definitions above, it can be concluded that a classroom action research in this study means the systematic study of attempts to improve educational practices in order that the students’ achievement is very satisfying. It tends to be cyclical, participative and reflective. In addition, the design of classroom action research used in this research is a cyclical process adapted from the model proposed by Kemmis and McTaggart 1992: 11. It consists of four main steps namely: planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. Here is the Spiral Model by Kemmis and McTaggart: commit to user Figure 3.1 The Model of Classroom Action Research In each cycle, the procedures are: 1. Planning The activities in planning are: a. Conducting the diagnostic test, interviewing, and observing to identify the real problem of the students in writing. b. Planning the action program which will be conducted and preparing everything dealing with the action research requirements such as: preparing the material which consists of students’ worksheet, making lesson plans, students’ questionnaires, preparing the sheets for classroom observation, preparing test instrument, etc. 2. Action The activities in action are: a. Carrying out activities step by step based on the lesson plan. b. Conducting teaching writing by using collaborative writing technique. c. Conducting the posttest in every cycle. commit to user 3. Observation The activities which are going to be observed are process of teaching and learning in the classroom and learning progress that students achieved. The field notes of both the researcher and collaborator and the result of recording will be the main resources for this observation. 4. Reflection The researcher and the collaborator will analyze what is going on during the teaching and learning process and the result of the writing test. Through this activity, both the researcher and collaborator will hopefully find the strengths and the weaknesses found during teaching and learning process. Both the researcher and the collaborator will discuss the weaknesses and try to look for the solution of the problems found during the observation for the benefit of betterment of students’ writing ability.

C. Subject of the Research