to P18 and benefi t for Balinese people B. Variables and code of variables of familiarity, satisfaction, motivation, perception and benefi ts for Balinese can be
seen in Table 2.1
. Familiarity is a quality or condition for being familiar which is classifi ed into
spatial proximity and expertise of the country Bashar 2010
. Spatial proximity describes proximity to an area, while country expertise is the accumulation of a
person’s experience of the quality of a destination. In this chapter, familiarity is related to the satisfaction of tourists during their visit in Bali . It was based on ‘coun-
try of residence’ F1 which covers fi ve continents, namely, Europe, America, Australia, Africa and Asia, while ‘large code of residence’ F2 denotes the residen-
tial areas where they live, namely, Old Europe, North Europe, East Europe, South Europe, the USA, South America, Africa and Saudi Arabia, Australia, Asia and
Indonesia. Meanwhile, country expertise is the accumulation of experience of the quality of a destination Bashar
2010 . In this chapter, it is measured in terms of
‘periodicity’ in visiting Bali F3 and ‘visit more than 5 times’ F4. All of the above variables infl uence people’s travel choices Reisinger
2009 . This kind of experi-
ence was also discussed in this chapter.
2.4.2.1 Relationship Between Familiarity and Satisfaction
Most of variables familiarity F1, F2 and F4 have signifi cant relationships with variable satisfaction S, see Fig.
2.2 . Variable familiarity F1 code of country of
residence and F2 large code of residence has signifi cant relationships with vari- ables S1 satisfaction with accommodation and restaurant services in Bali , S2 sat-
isfaction with the whole trip, S3 satisfaction level of emotion during visit and S4 satisfaction level of expectation. However, variable familiarity F4 visit more than
fi ve times has a signifi cant relationship only with variable S4 satisfaction level of expectation.
Fig. 2.1 Opinion, expectation and satisfaction of foreign tourists
balitrulyyahoo.com
Mechanisms in forming interaction between tourists and destinations play an important role in creating a relationship between tourists and destinations. As
Lundberg et al. 1991
said that emotional experience of foreign tourists is one of the indicators which can be used to assess the level of satisfaction during visiting a des-
tination. They emphasise that being familiar of a destination is one of the indicators. Their study on customer familiarity and its effects on expectations found that famil-
iarity is signifi cantly associated with performance of perceptions and satisfaction. Their fi nding is supported by Bashar
2010 who reveals that familiarity infl uences
Table 2.1 Variables and code of variables of familiarity, satisfaction, motivation, perception and benefi ts for Balinese
No. Variables
Remarks Code
1 Familiarity
Country of residence F1
Large code of residence F2
Periodicity visiting Bali F3
Visit more than 5 times F4
2 Satisfaction
Satisfaction of accommodation and restaurant services in Bali S1
Satisfaction of the whole trips S2
Satisfaction on the level of emotion during visiting Bali S3
Satisfaction on the level of expectation S4
3 Motivation
Reason for coming visit friend and relativesVFR M1
Main purpose M2
Activities M3
4 Perception
Perception on services of: Accommodation
P1 Restaurants
P2 Perception of products
Imported meat P3
Local meat P4
Imported fi sheries P5
Local fi sheries P6
Imported dairy products P7
Local dairy products P8
Imported fruits P9
Local fruits P10
Imported vegetables P11
Local vegetables P12
Imported beverages P13
Local beverages P14
Building style P15
Furniture P16
Room decoration P17
Architecture P18
5 Benefi t
Benefi ts for Balinese B
balitrulyyahoo.com
satisfaction on travelling which consist of spatial proximity and expertise of the country. Spatial proximity describes proximity to an area, while expertise of the
country is the accumulation of a person’s experience of the quality of a destination. The results of this study support the above studies that variable familiarity related to
spatial proximity, namely, F1 code of country of residence and F2 large code of residence had signifi cant relationships with variables S1 satisfaction with accom-
modation and restaurant services in Bali , S2 satisfaction with the whole trip, S3 satisfaction level of emotion during visit and S4 satisfaction level of expectation.
Variable F1 code of country of residence covers fi ve continents, namely, Europe, America, Australia, Africa and Asia, meanwhile variable F2 large code of resi-
dence denotes the residential areas where they live, namely, Old Europe, North Europe, East Europe, South Europe, the USA, South America, Africa and Saudi
Arabia, Australia, Asia and Indonesia. Results of this study indicate that proximity or feeling of closeness to the visiting country infl uences feeling of being satisfi ed to
a destination.
Another factor of familiarity is accumulation of a person’s experience on quality of a destination which consists of F3 periodicity to visit and F4 visit more than 5
times. The periodicity to visit F3 does not infl uence tourists’ satisfaction. However, visit more than fi ve times F4 had a signifi cant relationship with variable
S4 satisfaction level of expectation. These results indicate that the more often they visit, the higher the level of satisfaction on their perceived expectation.
FAMILIARITY SATISFACTION
P ≤ 0.001 P ≤ 0.0001
P ≤ 0.05 S1
S2 S3
S4 F1
F2 F4
Fig. 2.2 Relationships between familiarity and satisfaction. Remarks: F1 = code of country of residence, F2 = large code of residence, F3 = periodicity of visit, F4 = more than fi ve times visit,
S1 = satisfaction with the services of accommodation and restaurant in Bali , S2 = satisfaction with the whole trip, S3 = level of emotion during visit, S4 = level of expectation
balitrulyyahoo.com
2.4.2.2 Relationship Between Familiarity and Perception of Quality of Services and Quality of Products
a Relationship Between Familiarity and Perceptions on Quality of Services P1 and P2
The results show that variable F1 code of country of residence had signifi cant relationships with variable P1 quality of accommodation services and with vari-
able P2 quality of restaurant services. In addition, variable F2 large code of resi- dence had signifi cant relationships with variable P1 quality of accommodation
services and with variable P2 quality of restaurant services, see Fig. 2.3
. b Relationship Between Familiarity and Perceptions on Quality of Products P3 up
to P18 There were some signifi cant relationships between variable F familiarity and
variables P3 up to P18 perception of the quality of products, as outlined below see also Fig.
2.4 . There were signifi cant relationships between variable F1 code of
country of residence and the variables of imported meat P3, local meat P4, local fi shery products P6, imported dairy products P7, local fruits P10, imported
beverages P13, local beverages P14 and local building style P15. There were signifi cant relationships between variable F2 large code of residence and the vari-
ables of imported meat P3, imported dairy products P7, imported fruits P9 and imported vegetables P11. There were signifi cant relationships between variable
F4 visit more than fi ve times and the variables of imported meat P3, imported
Fig. 2.3 Relationships between familiarity and perceptions on quality, and motivation. Remarks: P1 = quality of accommodation services, P2 = quality of restaurant services, M1 = visit friends and
relatives VFR I.G.A.O. Suryawardani et al.
balitrulyyahoo.com
beverages P13, local beverages P14 and local building style P15. However, there was no relationship between variable F3 periodicity of visit and perception
of the quality of local products. More details can be seen in Table 2.2
.
2.4.3 Relationship Between Familiarity and Motivation