14 habermas, jürgen (1929–)

14 habermas, jürgen (1929–)

but must instead collectively face up to the Habermas, J. (1988) “Concerning the Public Use of experience of the Holocaust (1988).

History,” New German Critique, 44 (1), 40–50. Habermas’s engagements within the public

Habermas, J. (1989) The Philosophical Discourse sphere reflect not only his concern for the

of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, trans. F. G. vibrant debates and discussions of deliberative Lawrence. Cambridge: Polity. Habermas, J. (1990a) Moral Consciousness and

democracy. They also reflect his unique under- Communicative Action, trans. C. Lenhardt and standing of the role of the philosopher within

S. Weber Nicholson. Cambridge: Polity. democratic society. In a post-metaphysical

Habermas, J. (1990b) “Der DM Nationalismus,” world, the philosopher qua philosopher cannot

Die Zeit (March 30).

claim privileged authority on the basis of their Habermas, J. (1992) “Further Reflections on the discernment of divine or transcendent truth.

Public Sphere,” trans. T. Burger, in C. Calhoun Philosophers can only “reconstruct” the proce-

(Ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere. dures by which rationality might manifest itself

Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 421–61. within social life. Similarly, the critical theorist

Habermas, J. (1992/1996) Between Facts and can no longer offer a substantive picture of

Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory emancipated society; he or she can only eluci-

of Law and Democracy, trans. W. Rehg. Cambridge: Polity.

date the emancipatory norms implicit within Habermas, J. (1993) Justification and Application: democratic societies. Philosophers, according

Remarks on Discourse Ethics, trans. C. Cronin. to Habermas, should describe the conditions

Cambridge: Polity.

under which ethical, moral, and political ques- Habermas, J. (1996/1998) The Inclusion of the tions might be productively addressed, and

Other: Studies in Political Theory, trans. then join in the conversation.

C. Cronin. Cambridge: Polity. Habermas, J. (1998/2001) The Postnational

SEE ALSO: Adorno, Theodor W. (1903–69); Constellation: Political Essays, trans. M. Pensky. Austin, J. L. (1790–1859); Critical Theory;

Cambridge: Polity.

Deliberative Democracy; Frankfurt School; Habermas, J. (2001) “From Kant’s ‘Ideas’ of Pure Honneth, Axel (1949–); Horkheimer, Max

Reason to the ‘Idealizing’ Presuppositions of (1895–1973); Kant, Immanuel (1724–1804);

Communicative Action,” trans. B. Fultner, in Liberalism; Modernization; Public Sphere;

W. Rehg and J. Bohman (Eds.), Pluralism and Reason; Rights; Weber, Max (1864–1920)

the Pragmatic Turn: The Transformation of Critical Theory. Essays in Honor of Thomas

References McCarthy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,

pp.11–39.

Cooke, M. (Ed.) (2000) On the Pragmatics of Habermas, J. and Ratzinger, J. (2005) The Dialectics Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

of Secularization: On Reason and Religion, trans. Habermas, J. (1962/1989) The Structural

B. McNeil. San Francisco: Ignatius Press. Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry

Horkheimer, M. (1937/1986) “Traditional and into a Category of Bourgeois Society, trans.

Critical Theory,” in Critical Theory: Selected T. Burger. Cambridge: Polity.

Essays, trans. M. J. O’Connell. New York: Habermas, J. (1971) Toward a Rational Society,

Continuum, pp. 188–243.

trans. J. J. Shapiro. Boston: Beacon Press. Horkheimer, M. and Adorno, T. (1974/2002) Habermas, J. (1979) Communication and the

Dialectic of Enlightenment, trans. E. Jephcott. Evolution of Society. Toronto: Beacon Press.

Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Habermas, J. (1981/1984) The Theory of

Kant, I. (1784/1991) “An Answer to the Question: Communicative Action: Reason and the

‘What is Enlightenment?’” In Political Writings, Rationalization of Society, Volume I, trans.

trans. H. B. Nisbet, ed. H. Reiss. Cambridge: T. McCarthy. Cambridge: Polity.

Cambridge University Press, pp. 54–60. Habermas, J. (1981/1987) The Theory of

Kelly, M. (Ed.) (1994) Critique and Power. Communicative Action: The Critique of

Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Functionalist Reason, Volume II, trans. Kohlberg, L. (1981) Essays on Moral Development. T. McCarthy. Cambridge: Polity.

San Francisco: Harper & Row.

habermas , jürgen (1929–) 15

Marx, K. (1845/1978) “Theses on Feuerbach.” In Honig, B. (2006) “Dead Rights, Live Futures: On R. C. Tucker (Ed.), The Marx-Engels Reader.

Habermas’s Attempt to Reconcile Constitutional New York: W. W. Norton, pp. 143–45.

Democracy,” in L. Thomassen (Ed.), The Weber, M. (1905/2002) The Protestant Ethic and the

Derrida–Habermas Reader. Edinburgh: Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Penguin Books.

Edinburgh University Press, pp. 161–75. Honneth, A. and Joas, H. (Eds.) (1991)

Further Reading Communicative Action. Cambridge, MA:

MIT Press.

Benhabib, S. (1986) Critique, Norm, and Utopia: Ingram, D. (2010) Habermas: Introduction and A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory.

Analysis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. New York: Columbia University Press.

McCarthy, T. (1978) The Critical Theory of Jürgen Benhabib, S. and Passerin d’Entreves, M. (Eds.)

Habermas. London: Hutchinson. (1997) Habermas and the Unfinished Project

Scheuerman, W. E. (1999) “Between Radicalism of Modernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

and Resignation: Democratic Theory in Bernstein, R. (Ed.) (1985) Habermas and

Habermas’s Between Facts and Norms.” In Modernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

P. Dews (Ed.), Habermas: A Critical Reader. Bohman, J. (2000) Public Deliberation: Pluralism,

Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 153–77. Complexity, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA:

Specter, M. G. (2010) Habermas: An Intellectual MIT Press.

Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Calhoun, C. (Ed.) (1992) Habermas and the Public

Press.

Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Thomassen, L. (Ed.) (2006) The Derrida–Habermas Chambers, S. (1996) Reasonable Democracy: Jurgen

Reader. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Habermas and the Politics of Discourse. Ithaca,

Thomassen, L. (2010) Habermas: A Guide for the NY: Cornell University Press.

Perplexed. New York: Continuum. Dews, P. (1992) Autonomy and Solidarity: Interviews

Thompson, J. and Held, D. (Eds.) (1982) Habermas: with Jürgen Habermas. London: Routledge.

Critical Debates. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Dryzek, J. (2000) Deliberative Democracy and

White, S. K. (1989) The Recent Work of Jürgen Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Habermas: Reason, Justice and Modernity. Fraser, N. (1992) “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing

White, S. K. (Ed.) (1995) The Cambridge Democracy.” In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and

Companion to Habermas. Cambridge: Cambridge the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,

University Press.

pp. 109–42. Young, I. M. (1990) Justice and the Politics of Habermas, J. (1968) Knowledge and Human

Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Interests, trans. J. J. Shapiro. Cambridge: Polity.

Press.