Climate challenges in the Arctic

77 Document 3:3 2014–2015 Report Figure 4 Blomstrand Peninsula in Svalbard Svalbardkommisjonæren 1927, Utmålskart, blad 2 London The map on the left is from 1927 and shows the whole of the Blomstrand Peninsula covered by a glacier. The map on the right shows the glacier snout as it was in 1998. The Peninsula has now melted completely out of the glacier and proved to be an island. Illustration: Norwegian Polar Institute.

5.2 Pollution and monitoring in the Arctic

Pollution in the Arctic has been one of the most important ields of work in the Arctic Council since the Council was created in 1996, and was a continuation of the Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy from 1991. 164 Over the years, the Arctic Council has developed several reports on environmental toxins in the Arctic, a topic which is discussed in Section 5.2.3. The Arctic contains all common main groups of pollutants, such as persistent organic pollutants 165 such as pesticides, industrial chemicals and by-products from industry and combustion, heavy metals such as mercury, lead and cadmium and radioactive substances. This type of pollution is not very degradable. The substances can accumulate in living organisms and are toxic and can cause adverse health efects . The Arctic is basically a very clean area. There are few local sources of pollution in Svalbard and the Arctic in general. The contamination that is detected there is transported over long distances by winds and ocean currents, and is derived from human activities and industrial operations in more densely populated areas and from the industrialised world. 166 164 The Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy AEPS was formally established by the Rovaniemi Declaration in 1991. The purpose of the AEPS was to have a collaborative forum to discuss and collaborate on the Arctic environment, and all eight of the Arctic states were part of this. 165 The English term POP persistent organic pollutant is also used in Norwegian. 166 There are several reports about this including AMAP studies. Information on the topic also came up in the interview with AMAP on 13 June 2013. 78 Document 3:3 2014–2015 Report Figure 5 Air and ocean currents carry environmental toxins to the High North Blue arrows: Arctic waters. Red arrows: Atlantic waters. Green arrows: Coastal waters Source: NILU and the Institute of Marine Research. Photo of normal conditions and long-range polluted air at Zeppelin research station in Svalbard. Right: Result of stubble burning in agriculture in Eastern Europe, mainly in Russia. Photo: Norwegian Institute for Air Research

5.2.1 Environmental toxins and heavy metals in the Norwegian Arctic, and monitoring of them

According to Miljøstatus.no 167 Svalbard is globally considered to be one of the clea- nest areas on the planet. The Norwegian Polar Institute pointed out that international regulations and bans on selected pollutants produced good results. However, the Norwegian Environment Agency 168 , Norwegian Polar Institute and AMAP 169 pointed out that ever more new chemicals are being produced and used, and that it is therefore 167 Miljøstatus.no was developed by the environmental agencies at the request of the Ministry of the Environment. The website contains the latest information about the state of the environment and development, and is regularly updated. 168 The Norwegian Environment Agency in cooperation with the Norwegian Food Safety Authority and the Norwegian Foundation for Environmental Labelling. Er det farlig? – om farlige stoffer i forbrukerprodukter. Is it harmful? – Hazardous substances in consumer products www.erdetfarlig.no. 169 Interviews on 7 May and 13 June 2013, respectively. Air currents Ocean currents 79 Document 3:3 2014–2015 Report necessary to monitor the development of pollution resulting from new pollutants. In November 2013, a report was published showing that there are high levels of some of these new contaminants in animals and in human milk. 170 Figure 6 The highest concentrations of environmental toxins are usually at the top of the food chain Human in the Arctic Polar bear Ring seal Cod Shrimp Plankton Concentration of environmental toxins in the food chain The larger the dots, the higher the concentration Source: Miljøstatus.no Although there has been positive change in many areas, the Norwegian Polar Institute also noted that contamination from pollutants in the air and animals varies in scope and development. Some of this development in Svalbard is shown in Figure 7. Figure 7 shows a pronounced decline in the incidence of the main pollutants HCH, PCBs, chlordanes, DDT and PAHs in Svalbard. Measurements for the pesticide HCB have not fallen despite the fact that there is an international ban on its use. 170 Chlorinated parafins, see the Norwegian Environment Agency 2013 Perfluorinated alkylated substances, brominated flame retardants and chlorinated paraffins in the Norwegian Environment-Screening 2013. Report M40­2013.