Reliability Level of Difficulty Discrimination Power

2. Reliability

Reliability is a measure of accuracy, consistency, dependability or fairness of scores resulting from administration of particular examination. Reliability of the test can be determined by using the Spilt half method in order to estimate the reliability of the test. To measure coefficient of the reliability the first and second half group, the researcher uses the following formula: Where: rl : The coefficient of reliability between first half and second half group X : The total numbers of first half group Y : total numbers of second half group X2 : The square of X Y2 : The square of Y Lado in Hughes, 1991:3 Then the researcher uses “Spearman Brown’s Prophecy Formula” Hatch and Farhady, 1982: 256 to determine the reliability of the test as follow: Where: Rk : the reliability of the test rl : the reliability of half test       2 2 Y X XY r l rl rl Rk   1 2 The criteria of reliability are: 0.90 – 1.00 = high 0.50 – 0.89 = moderate 0.00 – 0.49 = low

3. Level of Difficulty

To see the level of difficulty, the researcher uses the following formula: LD = N R Where: LD : level of Difficulty R : number of students who answer correctly N : the total number of students following the test The criteria are: 0.30 : difficult 0.30-0.70 : average 0.70 : easy Shohamy, 1989:79

4. Discrimination Power

To see the discrimination power, the researcher will use the following formula: DP = N L U 2 1  Where: DP : discrimination power U : the proportion of upper group students L : the proportion of lower group students N : total number of students The criteria are: 1. If the value is positive, it has discrimination because a large number or more knowledgeable students than poor students get the item correct. If the value is zero, it means no discrimination. 2. If the value is negative, it means that more low-students than high level students get the item correct 3. In general, the higher the discrimination index, the better. In the classroom situation most items should be higher than 0.20 indexes

F. Scoring System

In scoring the student’s result of the test, this research uses Arikunto’s formula. The ideal highest score is 100. The score of pretest and posttest are calculated by using the formula as follows: 100   N R s Where, S = the score of test R = total of the right answer N = total items

Dokumen yang terkait

Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension Achievement through Reciprocal Teaching Technique at the Second Year of SMPN 21 Bandar Lampung (A Classroom Action Research)

0 5 59

INCREASING STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN READING COMPREHENSION OF RECOUNT TEXT THROUGH SQ4R STRATEGY AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMPN 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 7 51

INCREASING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH DERIVATIONAL APPROACH AT THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN 3 BANDAR LAMPUNG

1 8 65

THE EFFECT OF OUTLINING STRATEGY IN IMPROVING STUDENTS’ RECOUNT TEXT WRITING ABILITY AT THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMPN 13 BANDAR LAMPUNG

3 26 76

INCREASING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH STUDENT TEAM ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMPN 1 KIBANG LAMPUNG TIMUR

1 23 56

INCREASING STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN READING COMPREHENSION OF NARRATIVE TEXT THROUGH SELF- QUESTIONING STRATEGY AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMPN 2 TERUSAN NUNYAI, LAMPUNG TENGAH

0 17 57

INCREASING STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXT THROUGH PEER CORRECTION AT THE FIRST YEAR OF SMA NEGERI 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 12 52

The Implementation of Get the Gist Strategy in Improving Students' Reading comprehension Achievement of Recount Text at the Second Grade of SMPN 13 Bandar Lampung

10 50 81

Increasing Students' Reading Comprehension Achievement by Using Collaborative Strategic Reading at the Second Grade of SMPN 29 Bandar Lampung

0 6 62

INCREASING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH EXTENSIVE READING AT SECOND YEAR OF SMPN 6 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 3 84