Determine rate of recovery by repeating the above measurements through time (Raison et al. 1998) (e.g. 5, 10, 30 and 80 years for compaction recovery).

11. Determine rate of recovery by repeating the above measurements through time (Raison et al. 1998) (e.g. 5, 10, 30 and 80 years for compaction recovery).

Table 1. A system for classifying soil impacts following timber harvesting and site preparation.

A: Operational categories

Operational category

Definition

Unharvested Area (UA)

Areas of retained forest or other vegetation

Harvested Area (HA) General logging area within which trees are felled Firebreak (FB)

Perimeter boundary

Snig Tracks (ST) Tracks created by towing or winching logs to the landing Log Landings (LL)

Area where logs are snigged for sorting and loaded for transportation Access Roads (AR)

Temporary roads used during the harvesting operation

B: Soil disturbance categories:

Degree of soil profile Dominant

Type of mixing/ removal

disturbance horizon

Undisturbed (S0)

Forest intact (FI)

O1

Understorey intact (UI)

O1

O1 Lightly disturbed(S1)

Litter layer intact (LI)

Litter layer disturbed (LD)

O2

O2 Moderately disturbed (S2)

Litter layer partially removed (LR)

Litter completely removed and topsoil exposed (TE) A

Litter mixed with topsoil (LM)

A Topsoil disturbed (TD) 1 A

Topsoil mixed with subsoil (TM)

A Severely disturbed (S3)

Topsoil partially removed (TP)

Topsoil completely removed and subsoil exposed (SE) B

Topsoil mixed with subsoil (SM)

B Subsoil disturbed (SD) 2 B

Subsoil mixed with parent material (SC)

Subsoil partially removed (SR)

B Subsoil removed and parent material exposed (PE)

C. Soil and slash piling categories:

Category Definition

Soil piling (SP)

Soil piled at a height >0.3 m

Soil and slash piling (SS)

Soil and slash piled at height >0.3 m

Slash and/or bark piling (SB)

Slash and/or bark piling at height >0.3 m

D. Fire intensity categories:

Category Definition

Unburned (F0)

Litter, soil or vegetation unburned.

Low intensity (F1) Partial burn of slash and litter of diameter up to 20 mm. Litter O 2 horizon,

where present, predominantly unburned.

Moderate intensity (F2) Near-complete burn of slash and litter of diameter up to 20 mm, partial burn of branches greater than 20 mm. Some soil oxidation present, but generally charcoal or ash-seedbed.

High intensity (F3) Near-complete burn of slash and litter of diameter up to 70 mm, partial burn of branches greater than 70 mm. Soil oxidation (orange ash-bed) predominant.

1 Topsoil consists of A 1 ,A 2 and A 3 horizons except where A 2 is conspicuously bleached, whereby A 2 and A 3 are regarded as subsoil. 2

Subsoil includes B 1 and B 2 horizons and conspicuously bleached A 2 horizon (and any other A-horizon below the A 2 ).

Table 2 Data sheet for recording soil disturbance

Coupe: Anderson Spur

KEY: * Random Starting quadrat; Coupe Number:

08/307/003/; Coupe Location: Toolangi State Forest

Project Number:

2.6 ESD; Date of Surveying:

18-28/5/98

Transect Fire Breaks

Bearing Distance Aspect Slope Topographic Operation Mixing /

Horizon Disturbanc Fire

Cover

Piling Core Bd Sample

e Snig Tracks (metres) (degrees) (degrees Position Area Removal Core Class (%)

Number Number

1 *3.0 FB: 0-2.7

F2 85 N 703 1 ST: 37.4-46.0

FO 35 N L344 2 335 50 (6) 210 13 LS HA TM A S2 F2 45 SS

FO 40 N L206 4 335 90 (10) 180 9 MS HA TD A S2 FO 85 SP 335 100 (11) 175 5 MS HA LR A S2 F2 55 SP

FO 25 N L60 5 335 130 (14) 170 6 MS HA TM A S2 F1 15 SS

L290 6 Boundary end-

AR: 144.0-161.1

161.1 335 160 (17) 185 2 MS AR TD A S2 FO 5 SP

2 *1.5 FB: 0.2-2.4

F1 10 N L396 8

F3 25 N L106 9

F1 15 N L346 10 ST: 70.0-74.6

F3 15 N ST: 100.0-116.8

3 MS

HA LR

A S2

3 MS

ST

TD

A S2

F3 5 N

L418 11

References

Aust, W.M., Reisinger, T.W., Burger, J.A., and Stokes, B.J., 1993. Soil physical and hydrological changes associated with logging a wet pine flat with wide-tired skidders. SJAF., 17: 22-25.

Bloomberg, W.J., Cumderbirch, P.M. and Wallis, G.W., 1980. A ground survey method for estimating loss caused by Phellinus weirii root rot. I. Development of survey design. Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forest Research Centre, Victoria., BC. 25 pp.

Bockheim, J.G., Ballard, T.M., and Willington, R.P. 1975. Soil disturbance associated with logging in southwest British Columbia. Can. J. For. Res., 5: 285-290.

Curran, M. and Thomson, S., 1991. Measuring soil disturbance following timber harvesting. BC Ministry of Forests Land Management Handbook Field Guide Insert 5. 25 pp.

Evanson, T., Riddle, A. and Fraser, D., 1994. A mechanised harvesting system in a clearfell radiata pine operation in Australia. New Zealand Logging Industry Research Organisation Report 19, 10 pp.

Frith, J., Van Dijk, W.A.J. and Murphy, G., 1984. A preliminary study of techniques for estimating harvesting-related soil disturbance from aerial photographs. New Zealand Forest Service, Forest Research Institute Bulletin No. 85, 14 pp.

Hazard, J.W. and Geist, J.M., 1984. Sampling forest soil conditions to assess impacts of management activities. In Stone, E.L. (ed.) Forest soils and treatment impacts, p. 421-430. Proc. 6th North Am. Forest Soils Conf., Knoxville, TN. 19-23 June, 1983. Dept. of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.

Howes, S.W., Hazard, J.W. and Geist, J.M., 1983. Guidelines for sampling some physical conditions of surface soils. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Range Watershed Management, Portland, Oregon, 34 pp.

Langford, K.J. and O'Shaughnessy, P.J. (Eds.), 1980. A study of the Coranderrk soils. MMBW, Victoria.

Lousier, J.D., 1990. Impacts of forest harvesting and regeneration on forest sites. BC Ministry of Forests Land Management Report No. 67, 92 pp.

McMahon, S.D., 1995. Accuracy of two ground survey methods for assessing site disturbance. J. For. Eng. 6: 27-34.

Miller, J.H. and Sirois, D.L., 1986. Soil disturbance by skyline vs. skidding in a loamy hill forest. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50:1579-1583.

Murphy, G. , 1982. Soil damage associated with production thinning. N.Z. J. For. Sci. 12:281-292. Petersen, R.G. and Calvin, L.D. 1987. Sampling. In: Klute, A (Ed) Methods of soil analysis: Part 1.

Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd edn, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp 33-51. Rab, M.A. 1994. Changes in physical properties of a soil associated with logging of Eucalyptus

regnans forest in southeastern Australia. For. Ecol. Manage., 70: 215-229. Rab, M.A. 1996. Soil physical and hydrological properties following logging and slash burning in

the Eucalyptus regnans forest of southeastern Australia. For. Ecol. Manage. 84:159-176. Rab, M.A. 1998. Measures and operating standards for evaluating Montreal process soil

sustainability indicators with reference to Victorian Central Highlands forest- a review. Intern. Rep. No. 27, Department of Natural Resources and environment, Victoria, Australia.

Rab, M.A., Baker, T.G., King, M. 1994. Quantification of the degree and extent of soil disturbance on clearfelled coupes of mountain ash in the Victorian Central Highlands. VSP Intern. Rep. No. 27, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Victoria, Australia, 22 pp.

Raison, J., Rab, M.A, Burger, J. 1998. Guidelines for the application of indicators to measure and interpret change in soil properties and processes in forests. Proceedings of the International Conf. on indicators for sustainable forest management. 24-28 August 1998, Melbourne.

Smith, R.B., and Wass, E.F., 1976. Soil disturbance, vegetative cover and regeneration on clearcuts in the Nelson Forest District, British Columbia. Can. For. Serv. Pac. For. Res. Cent. Inf. Rep. BC- X-151.

Still, G. and Thompson, S., 1987. Evaluation of soil disturbance in the Golden forest district. BC Min. For. Lands, Nelson, BC Unpubl. Working plan, EP 1022, 12 pp.

Utzig, G.F. and Herring, L., 1975. Forest harvesting impacts at high elevations: five case studies. Res. note No. 72. BC Min. For. Victoria, BC 85 pp.

Webster, R., and Oliver, M.A., 1990. Statistical methods in soil and land resource survey. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Lacey, S, T, Ryan, P.J. 1998. Poster paper in IUFRO conference, Melbourne