51 The data above shows an idea relation from a mental process thought. The
relation is hypotactic since the non-finite secondary clauses are projected by being reported and the clauses are irreversible.
Table.22. Distribution of Logical Semantic Relation Combined with Systems of Interdependence
Logical Relation Text A
Text B Paratactic Elaboration
4.44 -
Hypotactic Elaboration
13.33 26.47
Paratactic Extension
13.33 8.82
Hypotactic Extension
8.89 17.65
Paratactic Enhancement 2.22
2.94
Hypotactic Enhancement 17.78
14.70
Paratactic Locution 11.11
17.65
Hypotactic Locution 28.89
8.82
Paratactic Idea -
- Hypotactic Idea
- 2.94
The percentage of distribution of logical semantic relation combined with systems of interdependence shows very prominent differences and similarities.
Basically, the distinct distribution of each relation amongst in a discourse or between texts is significant. Both texts do not contain paratactic idea. However, there is a few
number of paratactic elaboration and hypotactic idea. A contrastive pattern happens between paratactic and hypotactic extension of
the two texts. Text A puts 13.33 paratactic extension while text B only serves 8.82. Otherwise, Text A is less strong at having hypotactic extension by only
52 8.89 than text B by 17.65. It shows that text A has paratactically more extended
clause complexes and text B has hypotactically more extended clause complexes. Hypotactic enhancement is identified as the second highest number of logical
semantic relation in text A but less appeared in text B. It is then known that clause complexes in text A are hypotactically more enhanced by using circumstantial
information compared to text B. The absence of paratactic idea in both texts weakens the position of
projection relation. It is known that both texts do not really project clause complexes by a mental process.
The number of hypotactic elaboration in text B is very significant. It is a dominant relation. It presents almost 2 times from the number in text A. It is enough
to say that text B presents hypotactically more elaborative clause complexes compared to text A.
Hypotactic locution occurs as the dominant relation in text A. This domination shows that there are more hypotactiaclly projected clause complexes
using a verbal process in text A compared to text B.
53 CHAPTER V
CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
An investigation of types of logical semantic relation combined with systems of interdependence has been made. The conclusions and suggestions are drawn as
follows:
5.1. Conclusions
