The understanding of Classroom Action Research Design of Action Research

D. The Research Design

The Classroom Action Research procedure used in this research is Kurt Lewin’s design. It consists of two cycles in which each cycle contains four phases; planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. Figure 3.1 Kurt Lewin’s Action Research Design CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 Adapted from Wijaya Kusumah, 2009 Acting Planning Acting Observing Observing Reflecting Planning Reflecting Based on the Kurt Lewin’s action research design above, the writer would like to describe further concerning the implementation of Classroom Action research CAR in the cycle one and cycle two as following: Figure 3.2 The phases of Classroom Action Research modified by the writer CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 Planning After interviewing the writer, observing the class, and holding the pretest, then the teacher the writer collaborate to prepare the instruments such as: lesson plan, observational guidelines, and the posttest Acting The writer implements the lesson plan that has been made; that is teaching speaking in giving interpersonal response by using role play Observing The teacher observes the teaching learning process in the classroom. It includes the writer ’s performance, the class situation, and the students’ response. Meanwhile, at last of cycle 1 the students are given the posttest 1. Furthermore, the teacher computes the students’ speaking score result to find if there some students’ improvement scores from the pretest or not. Reflecting The teacher and the writer discuss about the result of the implementation role play in the action. Then, they prepare the new lesson plan for the next cycle and for post-test II in order to know the improvement of students’ score and to solve the problem unfinished yet. Planning The teacher and the writer collaborate to prepare some instruments such as: the new lesson plan with some modifications of role play strategy, observational guidelines, and the posttest Reflecting The teacher and the writer discuss about the result of the implementation of the modified action. If the Classroom Action Research target could not be achieved yet, the action would be continued moved to cycle 3, but if the students’ test result has completed the criterion of the action success, the cycle would be stopped. Acting The writer implements the new lesson plan; that is teaching speaking in giving interpersonal response by using role play. Observing The teacher observes the writer ’s performance, the class situation, and the students’ response. In the end of cycle two, the students are given the test posttest 2. Next, the teacher calculates the students’ speaking score result all at once the students’ improvement score from the previous test.

E. The Classroom Action Research Procedures

The Classroom Action Research using Kurt Lewin’s design consists of four phases within one cycle. Those are planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. After accomplishing the first cycle, it will be probably found a new problem or the previous unfinished problems yet. Therefore, it is necessary to continue to the second cycle in line with the same concept of the first cycle. To make clear what happens in every phase. Here are the explanations:

1. Planning

In this phase, the writer design a lesson plan see appendix 11 from the syllabus which is consulted with English teacher, creating the topics that are appropriate with the matter, Preparing materials that will be used at the cycle. The writer also makes the evaluation form to know about students’ achievements at the end of this cycle.

2. Action

In this phase, the writer and observer collaborates to carry out the planned action . The writer gives explanation how plays a role, and give an example from it. The writer also gives some related vocabulary items needed when students are do a role play activity. Then, the writer gives a role card that tells the students who he is, something of his background, what his opinions about a given subject are, and possibly suggests a course of action that he should try and carry out, and asks the students to practice in pairs or in a group. see page 36-43 for more detail.

3. Observation

In this phase, the observer the real teacher SMPN 251 observes the students ’ responses, participations, and achievements which are found during the teaching and learning process. Sometimes, the observer asks some students’ opinions about the process of teaching and learning using role play activity. The observer also takes the observation notes to write the real situation when the action is occurred see appendix 8.

4. Reflection

In this phase, the writer and the observer identifies the problems that are found by seeing the result of the observation which should be solved. Then, those are used to make plan for further cycle and correct its weaknesses.

F. The Technique of Collecting Data

In completing the data, the writer uses qualitative data and quantitative data, qualitative data consists of observation, interview and quesionnarie, quantitative data consists of pre-test and post test. 1

1. Observation

In this case, the writer uses the unstructured observation to get the information about the real condition in teaching learning activities. The writer make the observation notes about situation in the class while teaching learning process occurred, teacher’s performance in teaching speaking , and students’ speaking skills, such as; pronunciation, vocabulary,grammar and their braveries in speaking lesson. for more detail see appendix 8

2. Interview

Before implementing Classroom Action Research, the writer interview the teacher about

Dokumen yang terkait

Improving students' writing ability through clustering technique (A classroom action research in the second year of SMP al-hasra Bojongsari- Depok)

4 11 109

Improving student's pronunciation by using minimal pair drill ( a classroom action research at grade VII.3 SMPN 66 Jakarta)

1 6 104

Improving Students’ English Vocabulary Through Cluster Technique ( A Classroom Action Research At The Second Grade Of Smp Al-Kautsar Bkui Jakarta)

2 9 62

The Using Of Role Play To Improve Students’ Speaking Ability (A Classroom Action Research At Man 19 Jakarta)

0 3 135

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING NEAR-PEER ROLE MODELING (NPRM) ON STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the First Grade of SMPN 3 South Tangerang)

0 32 113

IMPLEMENTATION OF ROLE PLAY IN IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY AT THE FIRST GRADE OF SMAN 8 BANDAR LAMPUNG (A Classroom Action Research)

0 2 14

IMPROVING STUDENTS SPEAKING ABILITY BY USING ROLE-PLAY (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH AT THE SIXTH GRADE IMPROVING STUDENTS SPEAKING ABILITY BY USING ROLE-PLAY (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH AT THE SIXTH GRADE OF SDN 01 KARANGTURI-LASEM).

0 3 15

INTRODUCTION IMPROVING STUDENTS SPEAKING ABILITY BY USING ROLE-PLAY (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH AT THE SIXTH GRADE OF SDN 01 KARANGTURI-LASEM).

0 3 9

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL BY USING ROLE PLAY (AN ACTION RESEARCH AT THE IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL BY USING ROLE PLAY (AN ACTION RESEARCH AT THE TENTH YEAR OF SMA N 1 GEMOLONG IN 2010/2011 ACADEMIC YEAR).

0 2 15

IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY BY USING THREE COMMUNICATIVE ACTIVITIES (A Classroom Action Research for the Students of EC Kudus)

0 0 19