cxiv
a. Improvement of students’ speaking ability
The  findings  of  the  study  showed  that  the  use  of  APS  in  speaking  class could  improve  students’  speaking  ability.  The  improvement  of  the  students’
speaking  ability  could  be  recognized  from  the  improvement  of  speaking achievement,  the  ability  to  answer  the  teacher’s  questions,  the  ability  to  express
ideas  using  appropriate  vocabulary  and  grammatical  form.  The  students  are  able to mix other functional skill to make the scripts more alive and natural.
Before the study, the researcher found that the students had low speaking achievement.  The  improvement  of  students’  speaking  ability  is  illustrated  on
graph  4.1.  The  graph  shows  that  the  speaking  achievement  is  increased dramatically from cycle to cycle. The mean score in pre-test is 62, the mean score
in cycle 1 is 62.8, and the mean score of cycle 2 is 71. The result of Graph 4.1 Speaking Scores
Another point in speaking ability improvement was the improvement of the number of students in class who reached the passing grade. It is clearly stated
SCORE
cxv
in graph below that during the preliminary study, 17.5 of students reached the passing grade, in cycle 1 the number became 30. In the second cycle it increased
to 75. Graph 4.2 Improvement of speaking level
b. Improvement of classroom situation
The  finding  of  teaching  and  learning  process  showed  that  there  was  a change of classroom situation before and after APS was implemented in speaking
class. The teaching and learning process using APS was more alive. Most of the activities  were  students  centered.  Teacher  applied  various  interesting  activities,
from  classical  activities  in  discussing  the  functional  skill  and  tenses,  composing the scripts and presenting the play in front of the class or in the school yard.
Teacher’s improvement was also one of the finding in this research. It was clearly observed that the researcher, as a teacher had made improvement in many
aspects.  Firstly,  the  researcher  improved  in  designing  and  developing  teaching material.  For  example:  the  researcher  prepared  lesson  plan  so  that  the  indicators
SCORE
cxvi
could  reach  the  objectives  well.  the  researcher  also  match  the  theme,  grammar, and  vocabularies  related  to  the  topic.  Secondly,  the  researcher  felt  closer  to  the
students, because during the discussion time, the researcher observed their work, the  researcher  moved  from  one  group  to  others  to  help  them  if  they  had  any
difficulties.  This  way,  the  researcher  knew  what  their  problems  were  and  what they  wanted  in  teaching  speaking.  The  last  but  not  the  least  the  researcher
appreciated my students better than before the implementation of APS.
c. Other findings: students’ responses toward the action
At the end of cycle 2, the researcher gave questionnaires to the students to find out the students’ responses toward the implementation of APS. The result of
the questionnaire can be seen in Table 4.14
Table 4.12 Students’ Responses toward the Action
Students’ Response No.
Questions Yes
No 1.
2. 3.
4. 5.
Do you agree with learning speaking through APS? Is there improvement in your speaking Ability?
Are you motivated to learn speaking usnig APS? Do you feel any burden in learning Speaking through APS?
Should we continue applying APS in the future? 100
100 100
100 100
Most students agreed to use APS as a technique in learning speaking. The reasons  were  because  APS  was  fun,  interesting,  exciting  and  challenging.  APS
made the lesson easier to understand, and APS could be a good facility in leaning speaking.  APS  gave  good  motivations  and  raised  the  spirit  of  the  students.  The
activity  encouraged  the  students  to  speak.  The  students  were  curious  about  the activities  so  they  wanted  to  learn  more  and  more.  APS  improved  not  only
cxvii
students’  vocabulary  and  grammar  but  also  pronunciation,  comprehension,  and fluency.
In line with the improvement of speaking ability, all students felt that the implementation  of  APS  really  improved  their  speaking  ability.  Before  the
implementation of APS, the students thought that they  could not speak, they felt afraid of making mistakes, and shy. That was why they just kept silent in speaking
sessions. But after APS was applied, they thought that they could speak English. They thought that speaking was  easy and fun. They used to be very afraid when
they got their turn to speak, but now, they are not reluctant to speak at all.
Every  student  felt  that  they  were  motivated  to  learn  speaking  with  APS. The reasons were because APS was very enjoyable and challenging. The students
found that speaking was not something difficult, therefore they were eager to do the activity. The students admitted that group work was really a perfect method to
share with their friends, solve their problems, take and give to each other.
Now, speaking is no longer becoming a big problem for them. Before the implementation of APS, speaking activity was a big burden for the students. They
even felt that the enjoyment of the activities made the students do the tasks in full of spirit.
One  hundred  percent  of  the  students  agreed  that  APS  would  be  applied continuously in the learning speaking process. They realized that speaking English
was not a frightening subject; moreover they had their friends to support them, to help them. One of the students said ‘smoga, besok kita masih diajar sama bu eny,
cxviii
biar  kita  bisa  bermain  drama  lagi.  Menyanyi  lagi.  Ternyata,  bahasa  inggris menyenangkan.  Sekarang  saya  bisa  berbicara,  walaupun  belum  lancar.
Terimakasih bu guru.
2. Discussion