lxxiv
To  analyze  qualitative  data,  the  researcher  analyses  the  teaching  and learning  improvement  using  constant  comparative  method  recommended  by
Glaser and Strauss 1980: 105. There are four steps in this method as explained the following;
1. Comparing incidents applicable to each category. It is a process in which the researcher classifies  the nature and dimensions  of
the various concepts arising from the data. 2. Integrating categories and their properties
The  researcher  starts  to  write  down  the  relation  of  the  various  concepts.  It  is needed  for  the  researcher  to  play  attention  to  all  concepts  emerged  to  the
relationships. 3. Delimiting the theory
When the patterns of the concept relationship get clearer, the researcher ignores the concepts which are irrelevant to the inquiry. As the numbers of categories
are reduced, the theory will become simple. 4. Writing the theory
It  is  the  last  step  of  constant  comparative  method.  Here  the  researcher  notes theories resulted from the analysis in the previous three steps.
2. Quantitative Data
lxxv
This  study  will  be  successful  if  there  is  an  improvement  of  students’ ability in speaking. One of the indicators of the improvement is the increasing of
speaking scores. In this case, before applying the action, the researcher  will give a pre-test to her students. In the end of the action,  the researcher  will give post-test
in order to know the improvement of the speaking ability. Speaking score as the result of pre-test and post-test in this research will be analyzed by using inter rater
score  to  find  the  mean  score  between  the  researcher  and  her  Collaborator.The improvement from one action to another shows the success of this study.
The data obtained from speaking test are individual data. Mills 1997: 107 explains about how to find the mean of the data. The formula used is:
=   Mean Score =   Total Score
n      =   Total Students
lxxvi
CHAPTER IV
RESEARCH FINDING
As  stated  in  chapter  III,  there  are  four  steps  in  conducting  CAR  namely: planning,  acting,  observing,  and  reflecting.  Therefore,  the  researcher  elaborates
those four steps in this chapter. The elaboration of them has objective to present the research findings which provide evidences to answer the problem statements
stated in chapter I.
There are two sections in this chapter. Section A relates to the introduction and section B relates to the findings and discussion of the findings. The summary
of the findings is shown in Table 4.1.
I. Pre-research: Gaining base-line data ·
Observing teaching and learning process ·
Interviewing students ·
Conducting pre-test ·
Questionnaire II. Research Implementation
Cycle Task
Activity One: Expression of
Agreement Disagreement
Topic: Holiday 1. Explanation,  giving
examples 2. Writing the scripts
3. Presentation the play 1. The  teacher  explains    the  technique,  the
expression and gives examples 2.  The  students  compose  the  scripts  based
on the topic given 3.  The  students  act  the  play  in  front  of  the
class Two: Expression of
giving, asking and refusing
help Topic: recreation
1. Explanation,  giving examples
2. Writing the scripts 3. Presenting  the play
1. The  teacher  explains  the  technique,  the expression and giving examples
2.  The  students  compose  the  scripts  based on the topic given
3.  The  students  act  the  play  in  front  of  the class
lxxvii
A. The Process of the Research